Do Federal/State/Local Governments Create Jobs?

[Iceweasel]

How would it be unfettered since you'd need a set of laws to operate?

Who makes and enforces those laws?

You're talking in circles. How could it be unfettered in order to operate?

And you're not answering my question. What would happen to the economy if the government took it all over?

Unfettered by government controls - since there would be none. Holy shit...

They wouldn't be unfettered since there would need to be an agreement on money, payments, collections, property, etc. So there can't be any such thing as unfettered capitalism. Or pure, whatever that was supposed to mean.

What entity would provide and oversee an agreement on money, payments, collections, property, etc.?

Whatever entity was hired to do so.

 

[Lakhota]

I suspect that most righties on this thread recognize the important role of government - they just want it controlled and dominated by conservative forces. In other words, it all boils down to where we are - POLITICS.

 

[Lakhota]

Who makes and enforces those laws?

You're talking in circles. How could it be unfettered in order to operate?

And you're not answering my question. What would happen to the economy if the government took it all over?

Unfettered by government controls - since there would be none. Holy shit...

They wouldn't be unfettered since there would need to be an agreement on money, payments, collections, property, etc. So there can't be any such thing as unfettered capitalism. Or pure, whatever that was supposed to mean.

What entity would provide and oversee an agreement on money, payments, collections, property, etc.?

Whatever entity was hired to do so.

How would this "entity" be chosen? Who would choose this "entity"? Who would govern this "entity"?

 

[Iceweasel]

I suspect that most righties on this thread recognize the important role of government - they just want it controlled and dominated by conservative forces. In other words, it all boils down to where we are - POLITICS.

Well duh right back atcha. Conservatives want the government to do what government should do, create and enforce a secure country with borders, sensible regulations that benefit all and not try to micro-manage the complex and dynamic economy.

 

[Lakhota]

I suspect that most righties on this thread recognize the important role of government - they just want it controlled and dominated by conservative forces. In other words, it all boils down to where we are - POLITICS.

Well duh right back atcha. Conservatives want the government to do what government should do, create and enforce a secure country with borders, sensible regulations that benefit all and not try to micro-manage the complex and dynamic economy.

Who should determine what government "should do"?

 

[Iceweasel]

You're talking in circles. How could it be unfettered in order to operate?

And you're not answering my question. What would happen to the economy if the government took it all over?

Unfettered by government controls - since there would be none. Holy shit...

They wouldn't be unfettered since there would need to be an agreement on money, payments, collections, property, etc. So there can't be any such thing as unfettered capitalism. Or pure, whatever that was supposed to mean.

What entity would provide and oversee an agreement on money, payments, collections, property, etc.?

Whatever entity was hired to do so.

How would this "entity" be chosen? Who would choose this "entity"? Who would govern this "entity"?

Whoever was paid. Anything but answer the question 'what would happen to the economy if the government took it all over' huh?

 

[Iceweasel]

I suspect that most righties on this thread recognize the important role of government - they just want it controlled and dominated by conservative forces. In other words, it all boils down to where we are - POLITICS.

Well duh right back atcha. Conservatives want the government to do what government should do, create and enforce a secure country with borders, sensible regulations that benefit all and not try to micro-manage the complex and dynamic economy.

Who should determine what government "should do"?

The taxpayers. If it can be done by the private sector it should be done by the private sector. This is like talking to a 5 year old.

 

[Lakhota]

Unfettered by government controls - since there would be none. Holy shit...

They wouldn't be unfettered since there would need to be an agreement on money, payments, collections, property, etc. So there can't be any such thing as unfettered capitalism. Or pure, whatever that was supposed to mean.

What entity would provide and oversee an agreement on money, payments, collections, property, etc.?

Whatever entity was hired to do so.

How would this "entity" be chosen? Who would choose this "entity"? Who would govern this "entity"?

Whoever was paid. Anything but answer the question 'what would happen to the economy if the government took it all over' huh?

Like I said before, retard - totalitarianism. Who is advocating for that?

 

[Lakhota]

I suspect that most righties on this thread recognize the important role of government - they just want it controlled and dominated by conservative forces. In other words, it all boils down to where we are - POLITICS.

Well duh right back atcha. Conservatives want the government to do what government should do, create and enforce a secure country with borders, sensible regulations that benefit all and not try to micro-manage the complex and dynamic economy.

Who should determine what government "should do"?

The taxpayers. If it can be done by the private sector it should be done by the private sector. This is like talking to a 5 year old.

Taxpayers? Don't you mean the VOTERS? After all, we do live in a democracy. Why do you hate the Constitution?

 

[Iceweasel]

I suspect that most righties on this thread recognize the important role of government - they just want it controlled and dominated by conservative forces. In other words, it all boils down to where we are - POLITICS.

Well duh right back atcha. Conservatives want the government to do what government should do, create and enforce a secure country with borders, sensible regulations that benefit all and not try to micro-manage the complex and dynamic economy.

Who should determine what government "should do"?

The taxpayers. If it can be done by the private sector it should be done by the private sector. This is like talking to a 5 year old.

Taxpayers? Don't you mean the VOTERS? After all, we do live in a democracy. Why do you hate the Constitution?

I hate deadbeats. And we live in a republic.

 

[Lakhota]

I suspect that most righties on this thread recognize the important role of government - they just want it controlled and dominated by conservative forces. In other words, it all boils down to where we are - POLITICS.

Well duh right back atcha. Conservatives want the government to do what government should do, create and enforce a secure country with borders, sensible regulations that benefit all and not try to micro-manage the complex and dynamic economy.

Who should determine what government "should do"?

The taxpayers. If it can be done by the private sector it should be done by the private sector. This is like talking to a 5 year old.

Taxpayers? Don't you mean the VOTERS? After all, we do live in a democracy. Why do you hate the Constitution?

I hate deadbeats. And we live in a republic.

Who are the so-called "deadbeats"?

 

[bripat9643]

What would happen to the U.S. economy if the private sector took over all public sector functions?

The economy would boom Of course, there would be no private equivalent of welfare. You can't get people to voluntarily cough up money for parasites. They will only give to the truly needy.

 

[bripat9643]

What would happen to the U.S. economy if the private sector took over all public sector functions?

It would improve due to competition and accountability. What would happen to the economy if the public sector took over all of the private sector?

Prove it with "credible" sources. No governments - just pure, unfettered capitalism.

What kind of "sources" are there for hypothetical scenarios?

the records shows that the closer we came to laizzes faire capitalism, the faster the economy grew.

 

[bripat9643]

Well duh right back atcha. Conservatives want the government to do what government should do, create and enforce a secure country with borders, sensible regulations that benefit all and not try to micro-manage the complex and dynamic economy.

Who should determine what government "should do"?

The taxpayers. If it can be done by the private sector it should be done by the private sector. This is like talking to a 5 year old.

Taxpayers? Don't you mean the VOTERS? After all, we do live in a democracy. Why do you hate the Constitution?

I hate deadbeats. And we live in a republic.

Who are the so-called "deadbeats"?

People like you who live off the taxpayers and produce nothing of value.

 

[Iceweasel]

What would happen to the U.S. economy if the private sector took over all public sector functions?

It would improve due to competition and accountability. What would happen to the economy if the public sector took over all of the private sector?

Prove it with "credible" sources. No governments - just pure, unfettered capitalism.

What kind of "sources" are there for hypothetical scenarios?

the records shows that the closer we came to laizzes faire capitalism, the faster the economy grew.

Yeah, I'm supposed to provide a link for when the US had no government. LOL.
He still doesn't want to answer what happens when government takes it all over.

 

[Lakhota]

Who should determine what government "should do"?

The taxpayers. If it can be done by the private sector it should be done by the private sector. This is like talking to a 5 year old.

Taxpayers? Don't you mean the VOTERS? After all, we do live in a democracy. Why do you hate the Constitution?

I hate deadbeats. And we live in a republic.

Who are the so-called "deadbeats"?

People like you who live off the taxpayers and produce nothing of value.

I receive three retirement checks each month - not counting my dividend checks. Therefore, I'm living off myself.

 

[bripat9643]

The taxpayers. If it can be done by the private sector it should be done by the private sector. This is like talking to a 5 year old.

Taxpayers? Don't you mean the VOTERS? After all, we do live in a democracy. Why do you hate the Constitution?

I hate deadbeats. And we live in a republic.

Who are the so-called "deadbeats"?

People like you who live off the taxpayers and produce nothing of value.

I receive three retirement checks each month - not counting my dividend checks. Therefore, I'm living off myself.

Who issues the checks?

 

[Lakhota]

Taxpayers? Don't you mean the VOTERS? After all, we do live in a democracy. Why do you hate the Constitution?

I hate deadbeats. And we live in a republic.

Who are the so-called "deadbeats"?

People like you who live off the taxpayers and produce nothing of value.

I receive three retirement checks each month - not counting my dividend checks. Therefore, I'm living off myself.

Who issues the checks?

Duh, that would be considered "personal" information.

 

[bripat9643]

I hate deadbeats. And we live in a republic.

Who are the so-called "deadbeats"?

People like you who live off the taxpayers and produce nothing of value.

I receive three retirement checks each month - not counting my dividend checks. Therefore, I'm living off myself.

Who issues the checks?

Duh, that would be considered "personal" information.

ROFL! Yeah. we know you don't want to answer because the government issues all the checks. You're a tick on the ass of society.

 

[Lakhota]

Who are the so-called "deadbeats"?

People like you who live off the taxpayers and produce nothing of value.

I receive three retirement checks each month - not counting my dividend checks. Therefore, I'm living off myself.

Who issues the checks?

Duh, that would be considered "personal" information.

ROFL! Yeah. we know you don't want to answer because the government issues all the checks. You're a tick on the ass of society.

Like they say - "the best revenge is living well"...