Do Dems Risk Alienating Women by Rejecting a Female Supreme Court Nominee?

[JakeStarkey]

2016 witnessed the two lousiest candidates for the Presidency in like forever.

Now after four years of one of those as President, Biden the Glorious looks like a God on Olympus compared to the Orange Dwarf.

 

[Cellblock2429]

President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.

Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.

I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.

Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?

Discuss.

/----/ democRATs have the FemiNazi Seal of Approval to totally trash any woman that doesn't tow the liberal agenda, especially on abortion. So, no, nothing will happen if the democRATs go after a conservative female nominee. Case in point : Gov Palin was savaged by the democRATs and LSM.

 

[wamose]

It's not going to be easy to expose the Democrats as hypocrites. They already did that themselves many times over. Viva Trumpy, MAGA

Both parties do it regularly the Repubs certainly played vindictive hypocrites during the pandemic and the large amounts of socialism they spread through Trump signed checks.The last GOP president that did it was called a Neocon a Rino. The lambasting of the GOP when Oblama was driving up the debt and now the GOP has done it not only since Trump was elected but faster than the Dems and Oblama did...

Everything you said is true. I just think this crisis was far greater in magnitude than any other one I've ever seen. In my opinion, Trump handled COVID pretty well, actually above my expectations considering all the resistance he got at every turn. Time will tell but I'd be willing to bet on a great comeback next year as long as Trump gets reelected. All bets are off with Biden.

I never live my life according to who is running for or who is in office.

Then you get what you get and all of your numerous opinions fall on deaf ears.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

She literally said that. “Equal Treatment”. And you wonder why abuses of women are up? Men need to be chivalrous because women are physically the weaker gender. Most of the time. You’re an exception, prancing Nancy boy.

You are misquoting her meaning, Azog. You could not her your own against her. Now do not alienate the liberal women, my friend: they vote.

Now you’re a mind reader? So a liberal woman if she is being attacked by a man and I walk by she doesn’t want my help? Is that what you’re saying? Yes or no?

 

[wamose]

It's not going to be easy to expose the Democrats as hypocrites. They already did that themselves many times over. Viva Trumpy, MAGA

Both parties do it regularly the Repubs certainly played vindictive hypocrites during the pandemic and the large amounts of socialism they spread through Trump signed checks.The last GOP president that did it was called a Neocon a Rino. The lambasting of the GOP when Oblama was driving up the debt and now the GOP has done it not only since Trump was elected but faster than the Dems and Oblama did...

Everything you said is true. I just think this crisis was far greater in magnitude than any other one I've ever seen. In my opinion, Trump handled COVID pretty well, actually above my expectations considering all the resistance he got at every turn. Time will tell but I'd be willing to bet on a great comeback next year as long as Trump gets reelected. All bets are off with Biden.

No one believes that. Trump has bungled and continues to bungle the response. He tries to play doctor when he is unqualified to do so.

I believe it and that makes you wrong.

 

[Nostra]

President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.

Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.

I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.

Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?

Discuss.

There is no risk of that. Suburban women tend to be more highly educated. Schumer got it right when he said Democrats should focus on what her sitting in the court would mean to the country. They should highlight her extremist ruling and what they would mean to the country. The end of Roe vs Wade. The end of healthcare reform. Dirty air and dirty water.

Female voters especially suburban women are more moderate. In Arizona, McSally will likely lose to a male candidate by winning the female vote. The reason is that she has taken extremist Trump positions. Marsha Blackburn would not win a Senate seat in a swing state or a red state. The reason is because she is too extreme.

Also worth noting that Kamala Harris sits on the Judiciary Committee. She is likely to provide more free advertising for the Democrat ticket as it will likely be carried live.

They should highlight her extremist ruling and what they would mean to the country

Link us up to these "extremist rulings", Sport.

"Highlight" them for us.

Why do I think you won't be able to come up with any busybee01

 

[Nostra]

Dems have painted themselves into a corner with women. It's going to be very difficult for Dems to attack and oppose a female SCOTUS nominee. Bank on this though, their #1 argument is likely to be abortion.

Why shouldn't it be? Roe vs Wade is supported by 70% of voters. In many states, overturning Roe vs Wade would affect women the most. A woman should have a say since it is their body.

Hey Stupid, overturning Roe V Wade wouldn't change any state law.

 

[Nostra]

Nah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.

Another case in point why the world would be better if you were never born

View attachment 390971

My pleasure. Truth hurts, eh Jake.

Why is it that the mods allow their fellow cons to troll? If I wrote something like this I'd have a mod on my ass in 30 minutes.

All Azog had to do was comment on the OP with his trolling, but that is difficult for him. He does not get that con females bully each other, so the OP is silly.

Give me an example. I ll patiently wait. You are one of the reasons I am pro choice

There are several examples above that educate you. Study them on how discuss dems will not alienate females in these hearings.

If you deny the above, then you can't read/understand or you are lying.

Hmmmm...nice deflection. World would be better off if you were never born. True story.

So you don't like being a fail. Understandable. That won't change until you understand how to post and critically think. Critically thinking we know both parties bully women on the other side. Not going to change.

Provide one example please. Thanks.

They don't do examples. They make asinine claims, then run away when challenged.

 

[Nostra]

Dems have painted themselves into a corner with women. It's going to be very difficult for Dems to attack and oppose a female SCOTUS nominee. Bank on this though, their #1 argument is likely to be abortion.

Schumer should bring in aborted fetuses and shriek that 'Justice Barrett would seek to put an end this!"

The question is whether woman should have a say in what goes on in their body. Should a woman be forced to have a baby created by a rapist? Democrats should definitely focus on Roe vs Wade. It is sad to say that people who oppose abortion are creating political suicide. Women in some states could be jailed for having a abortion.

Sooooooo, so, so, so, so many abortions were because of rape, right?

The point is that a woman would be forced to carry the child according to right wing extremist abortion laws. There are plenty more situations where a woman would be forced to carry the child. A woman has a right to choose.

No woman is forced to carry a child. It was HER CHOICE to procreate.

 

[Nostra]

If SCOTUS were ever to overturn RvW, and SoccerMomConservativeInTheValley has her daughter Susie lose a soccer scholarship at Valley State because she can't terminate a pregnancy, the GOP would have less than 20% of its Senate and House member re-elected in the next polls.

Overturning Roe v Wade doesn't outlaw abortion, you raving lunatic.

Get an education, Dummy.

It does for many women.

You need to get a education but I doubt you could pass the first grade entrance exam.

Nope. Overturning Roe v Wade changes no state law.

 

[Nostra]

President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.

Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.

I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.

Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?

Discuss.

The idea that women shouldn't attempt to discredit a female nominee tells me that you're a man and a pretty clueless man at that. The whole idea of gender equality is equal treatment. Why should an unqualified or otherwise unsuitable candidate be given a pass just because she's a woman, or a woman of colour? Was Sarah Palin given a pass because she's a woman?

Why do you think she is unqualified Dragonlady

Be specific.

 

[Nostra]

Nope. Not even a little bit. Conservative women are not taken seriously by anyone, especially not conservatives.

Hillary lost the white female vote even though media idiots predicted because she was a white woman other white women would automatically vote for her.
If Dems are highly uncivil to Ms. Barrett I believe that has the potential to turn off a lot of swing or independent female voters.

In 2018, the white female vote split 49-49. In Pennsylvania, white women voted for the Democrat Senator over a Trump disciple by 12 points.

Clinton lost in 2016 because white women did not like Dim policies or her. If your Dim asshole pals beat up on Amy Barrett too hard you can kiss the white female vote goodbye yet again. Trump won the white female vote 53-47.

White Women Helped Elect Donald Trump (Published 2016)

While black and Hispanic or Latino women voted overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton, 53 percent of white women who voted picked Mr. Trump, exit data show.

www.nytimes.com

Clinton lost in 2016 because voters of both sexes stayed home. Trump won with fewer votes than Mitt Romney received in his losing effort in 2012. 2016 was the lowest voter turn out in years. That won't happen this year.

Clinton lost in 2016 because voters of both sexes stayed home.

Then how did she get 3 million more votes you raving lunatic?

 

[WelfareQueen]

If RvW was overturned, the GOP would dissolve in the next national election,

Nah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.

Another case in point why the world would be better if you were never born

View attachment 390971

My pleasure. Truth hurts, eh Jake.

Why is it that the mods allow their fellow cons to troll? If I wrote something like this I'd have a mod on my ass in 30 minutes.

All Azog had to do was comment on the OP with his trolling, but that is difficult for him. He does not get that con females bully each other, so the OP is silly.

Give me an example. I ll patiently wait. You are one of the reasons I am pro choice

There are several examples above that educate you. Study them on how discuss dems will not alienate females in these hearings.

If you deny the above, then you can't read/understand or you are lying.

Hmmmm...nice deflection. World would be better off if you were never born. True story.

So you don't like being a fail. Understandable. That won't change until you understand how to post and critically think. Critically thinking we know both parties bully women on the other side. Not going to change.

Provide one example please. Thanks.

: i
This entire thread. Go back to the beginning and come forward carefully. Once you realize assertions are not facts and require verifiable, accurate support, you will be on your way.

You could begin with giving support for the OP: evidence why Dems attacking a female nominated for SCOTUS would hurt Dem chances in the election, Be careful with RvW, though ~ just a hint. Here is some help on that: " A total of 77% say the Supreme Court should uphold Roe, but within that there's a lot of nuance — 26% say they would like to see it remain in place, but with more restrictions added; 21% want to see Roe expanded to establish the right to abortion under any circumstance; 16% want to keep it the way it is; and 14% want to see some of the restrictions allowed under Roe reduced. Just 13% overall say it should be overturned. " Poll: Majority Want To Keep Abortion Legal, But They Also Want Restrictions

The thing that unites them is they support Roe vs Wade. The Republican nominee will not be dealing in nuances. They will be looking to axe Roe vs Wade. That will create a political explosion not seen since slavery was a part of this country's fabric.

Dim strawman argument # 975. Show anywhere in writing where any potential nominees said they will destroy Roe V Wade. Dims and their lies. All they have I guess.....

 

[WelfareQueen]

Nope. Not even a little bit. Conservative women are not taken seriously by anyone, especially not conservatives.

Hillary lost the white female vote even though media idiots predicted because she was a white woman other white women would automatically vote for her.
If Dems are highly uncivil to Ms. Barrett I believe that has the potential to turn off a lot of swing or independent female voters.

In 2018, the white female vote split 49-49. In Pennsylvania, white women voted for the Democrat Senator over a Trump disciple by 12 points.

Clinton lost in 2016 because white women did not like Dim policies or her. If your Dim asshole pals beat up on Amy Barrett too hard you can kiss the white female vote goodbye yet again. Trump won the white female vote 53-47.

White Women Helped Elect Donald Trump (Published 2016)

While black and Hispanic or Latino women voted overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton, 53 percent of white women who voted picked Mr. Trump, exit data show.

www.nytimes.com

I don’t think Trump can count on that same level of support this time, Amy Barret or no. His opponent is not Clinton and he has a record.

We'll see. Suburban moms do not like lawlessness and violence. The polls show that overwhelmingly. And the Dims have been tacitly or actively supporting the riots from the beginning.

Suburban women are not housewives either. This is not the 1950s. The polls show women overwhelmingly support Biden. Democrats have not supported riots. Educated women do not buy your garbage..

None of the above and all lies yet again.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Nah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.

Another case in point why the world would be better if you were never born

View attachment 390971

My pleasure. Truth hurts, eh Jake.

Why is it that the mods allow their fellow cons to troll? If I wrote something like this I'd have a mod on my ass in 30 minutes.

All Azog had to do was comment on the OP with his trolling, but that is difficult for him. He does not get that con females bully each other, so the OP is silly.

Give me an example. I ll patiently wait. You are one of the reasons I am pro choice

There are several examples above that educate you. Study them on how discuss dems will not alienate females in these hearings.

If you deny the above, then you can't read/understand or you are lying.

Hmmmm...nice deflection. World would be better off if you were never born. True story.

So you don't like being a fail. Understandable. That won't change until you understand how to post and critically think. Critically thinking we know both parties bully women on the other side. Not going to change.

Provide one example please. Thanks.

They don't do examples. They make asinine claims, then run away when challenged.

Exactly. Shows weakness and lack of logic.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Nope. Not even a little bit. Conservative women are not taken seriously by anyone, especially not conservatives.

Hillary lost the white female vote even though media idiots predicted because she was a white woman other white women would automatically vote for her.
If Dems are highly uncivil to Ms. Barrett I believe that has the potential to turn off a lot of swing or independent female voters.

In 2018, the white female vote split 49-49. In Pennsylvania, white women voted for the Democrat Senator over a Trump disciple by 12 points.

Clinton lost in 2016 because white women did not like Dim policies or her. If your Dim asshole pals beat up on Amy Barrett too hard you can kiss the white female vote goodbye yet again. Trump won the white female vote 53-47.

White Women Helped Elect Donald Trump (Published 2016)

While black and Hispanic or Latino women voted overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton, 53 percent of white women who voted picked Mr. Trump, exit data show.

www.nytimes.com

Clinton lost in 2016 because voters of both sexes stayed home. Trump won with fewer votes than Mitt Romney received in his losing effort in 2012. 2016 was the lowest voter turn out in years. That won't happen this year.

Your third set of lies. You're on a roll. The New York Times (The Dim Paper of record} said Hillary lost becuase white women went for Trump 53-47. I posted the link and you still make shit up. But you are a Dim.

 

[skews13]

President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.

Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.

I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.

Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?

Discuss.

No. Women support Roe v Wade by overwhelming majority. As does 70% of America.

Which is why Trump is going to lose big, and Republicans in state and national races are going to pay a severe price in every election going forward.

 

[WelfareQueen]

President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.

Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.

I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.

Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?

Discuss.

No. Women support Roe v Wade by overwhelming majority. As does 70% of America.

Which is why Trump is going to lose big, and Republicans in state and national races are going to pay a severe price in every election going forward.

I am pro choice. You Dims claiming this nominee will destroy Roe V Wade is a lie. You tell the same lie every time a GOP President puts up a new nominee. No one believes you, No one.

Provide a link where any potential Supreme Court nominee says they will kill Roe V Wade, Didn't think so. STFU.

 

[Coyote]

Nope. Not even a little bit. Conservative women are not taken seriously by anyone, especially not conservatives.

Hillary lost the white female vote even though media idiots predicted because she was a white woman other white women would automatically vote for her.
If Dems are highly uncivil to Ms. Barrett I believe that has the potential to turn off a lot of swing or independent female voters.

In 2018, the white female vote split 49-49. In Pennsylvania, white women voted for the Democrat Senator over a Trump disciple by 12 points.

Clinton lost in 2016 because white women did not like Dim policies or her. If your Dim asshole pals beat up on Amy Barrett too hard you can kiss the white female vote goodbye yet again. Trump won the white female vote 53-47.

White Women Helped Elect Donald Trump (Published 2016)

While black and Hispanic or Latino women voted overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton, 53 percent of white women who voted picked Mr. Trump, exit data show.

www.nytimes.com

I don’t think Trump can count on that same level of support this time, Amy Barret or no. His opponent is not Clinton and he has a record.

We'll see. Suburban moms do not like lawlessness and violence. The polls show that overwhelmingly. And the Dims have been tacitly or actively supporting the riots from the beginning.

I disagree on the level of support you imply. Most folks I know support cause but not riots. My mother in law, lives near Portland, very liberal, wrote a letter to tbe editor, stop the violence, go home, start working on political so,unions. It is a mistake to think that because people refuse to demonize the movement or because they that most of the protests are not violent, that they support those that are,

 

[Coyote]

President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.

Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.

I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.

Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?

Discuss.

No. Women support Roe v Wade by overwhelming majority. As does 70% of America.

Which is why Trump is going to lose big, and Republicans in state and national races are going to pay a severe price in every election going forward.

I am pro choice. You Dims claiming this nominee will destroy Roe V Wade is a lie. You tell the same lie every time a GOP President puts up a new nominee. No one believes you, No one.

Provide a link where any potential Supreme Court nominee says they will kill Roe V Wade, Didn't think so. STFU.

Think a moment. Most of Trump’s supporters want him to nominate judges who will overturn RvW. Trump has stated he will pick judges who will do so. Given that why do you insist it won’t happen?