Do climate "scientists" measure the Sun's intensity

[mamooth]

It's no secret that

Solar output has been decreasing since around 1970, yet the earth has been strongly warming during that period.

How does the kook "it's the sun!" conspiracy theory explain that?

Any denier cult fanatics, feel free to answer that. As none of you have ever answered it before, I'd be interested to hear what your cult orders you to say.

 

[SSDD]

It's no secret that

Solar output has been decreasing since around 1970, yet the earth has been strongly warming during that period.

How does the kook "it's the sun!" conspiracy theory explain that?

Any denier cult fanatics, feel free to answer that. As none of you have ever answered it before, I'd be interested to hear what your cult orders you to say.

Do tell hairball...what effect does each wavelength of the sun's output have on the earth and its climate? Interested people want to know...

 

[sparky]

It's no secret that hack climate scientists who depend on federal sponsored global warming grants fudge data to keep the keep the money flowing .

then you'd have them posted....

We all should be aware that the gigantic nuclear reactor in the sky dictates climate fluctuations and sometimes Ice Age climate change. Is it possible that there are hidden statistics that indicate the short term and long term fluctuations of the Sun that "scientist" hacks ignore?

they're not hidden at all

~S~

 

[Billy_Bob]

... Late last year they documented a massive loss in radiative power from the sun in the 0.2-0.6um bands ...

That wavelength range is the upper half of visible light ... without blue, green or yellow light, the sun would be profoundly red ...

... The dropout is massive from 0.2um to 1.8um ...

This includes the entire visible spectrum ... the sun would mostly stop shining ...

Interesting `facts` there Billy-Bob ... total horseshit but still interesting ...

-----

Climatologists rely on solar astronomers for their input flux numbers ... and these numbers are variable and unpredictable ... but on average runs 1,361 W/m^2 as measured in space ... and climatology is all about averages, so that's a valid number to use in our energy budget calculations ... solar output is also cyclic, about 22 years peak-to-peak, and this is one of the more important reasons to use 100 year climate averages, this lets us average out the variabilities over four solar cycles ... any time period shorter risks individual solar cycles being stronger/weaker than average and corrupting our climate data ...

The sun also vomits out matter, not just energy ... the Earth is bombarded with bare naked protons all the time ... plus a wide variety on even nastier species ... almost all this is dealt with above 1mb elevation and doesn't really effect day-to-day weather, or the 100 year climate averages ... but occasionally it does ... we just don't know for sure ...

Do you ever think before you post? The main area of shift is 0.2-0.6um and it shifts to 1.2-1.8um all of which is in the visible spectrum. Had you read the post you would have understood that the narrow band of 0.2-0.38 is the region of the down-welling spectrum that is capable of heating the oceans to 700 meters while the region of shift into is incapable of this due to interference of clouds and atmospheric make-up/conditions.

You failed to address this very basic tenet of my posts. So Tell me; what would a loss of 18-27% of this limited spectrum do to the energy budget of the earth?

 

[ReinyDays]

Do you ever fact check before you post? ... visible light is between 0.38 and 0.73 µm ... you post some whoppers sometimes ha ha ha ha ...

I did address the basic tenant of your post ... it's bullshit ... "narrow band of 0.2-0.38 is the region of the down-welling spectrum that is capable of heating the oceans to 700 meters" ... how could you post such a stupid thing, 0.2 - 0.38 µm doesn't even get 1% through the upper atmosphere, never mind that's damn near ionizing radiation and would disassociate the top meter of the ocean ... Lord have Mercy, there wouldn't be and ocean if UV penetrated the atmosphere ...