task0778
Diamond Member
The green and blue lines with the dots near the bottom show the actual observations. The black line wih the dots show the climate model average.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Modelling!
I live in Sydney, Australia. Every morning I look at the weather forecast on the Sydney Morning Herald website. They predict the coming week and do long-range forecasts up to a month. They predict not only the temperature, but if it will rain or not. They are on the money every time with a degree or two. And it rains every day they say it is, even four weeks out from the event. How? Modelling the weather patterns.
/threadWhat's a "climate denier"?
Tipping Point!!!I'm just wondering if climate change deniers know the population of the world. That is all I am asking at the moment. There is a point, but I'm just trying to get an idea of what they know. BTW, this is not a trick question or anything like that.
When "Population Bomb" was published
I'm just wondering if climate change deniers know the population of the world. That is all I am asking at the moment. There is a point, but I'm just trying to get an idea of what they know. BTW, this is not a trick question or anything like that.
When "The Population Bomb" was published in 1968 by Paul Ehrlich, it predicted hundreds of millions starving to death before 1980, nuclear war and global famine before 2000.
He wrote, in 1968, ""The battle to feed all of humanity is over."
Does this kind of doomsday nonsense sound familiar?
Yes, its accurate. And no one has been able to change my mind.Says the guy who has a pic stating "lincoln was a tyrant" in his nic..What a gay thread.
Have a good one guys
When "Population Bomb" was published
When "The Population Bomb" was published in 1968 by Paul Ehrlich, it predicted hundreds of millions starving to death before 1980, nuclear war and global famine before 2000.
He wrote, in 1968, ""The battle to feed all of humanity is over."
Does this kind of doomsday nonsense sound familiar?
Yes, its accurate. And no one has been able to change my mind.
Not much. I know he ran for President and he was an explorer.Yes, its accurate. And no one has been able to change my mind.
How familiar are you with John Charles Fremont? ...
How familiar are you with John Charles Fremont? ...
Not much. I know he ran for President and he was an explorer.
Not to mention that the CURRENT ALTERNATIVES to fossil fuel (excepting nuclear) are fraudulent "hope and dreams"..
Totally untrue. We have plenty of solar and wind power being utilised in Australia and it's doing fine.
EVERY WATT of solar or wind needs a complete secondary backup... Because solar is good for 8 hours a day and the grid load at 10PM is about 80% of the daytime peak in urban areas.. And WIND is so totally unschedulably flaky that it takes DAYS OFF at a time.. So behind all that "investment" is MATCHING investments for nat gas or other RELIABLE generators...
Have you ever SEEN a daily production chart for wind farm?? They produce 50% of their yearly output on just about 70 days a year... Like I said -- hope and dreams. Not engineering.. And how much HAVE is nothing like how much it actually generates or uses...
If that's part of the COST -- it's a complete waste of money.. The GODFATHER of GW, James Hansen signed a statement with 20 other leading GW enviro advocates and stated (to the effect of )
"If you believe that wind and solar are sufficient to tackle GW -- you probably believe in the Tooth Fairy and the Easter bunny"... Hope and dreams man....
We have a tonne of sun and wind in Australia and batteries to store the power. I don't believe they are the only solution BTW.
One thing I do find annoying, is that coal - especially in western countries - burns a lot cleaner these days, but I'm surprised they haven't got a top-notch filter system so the shit doesn't go into the air.
Not to mention that the CURRENT ALTERNATIVES to fossil fuel (excepting nuclear) are fraudulent "hope and dreams"..
Totally untrue. We have plenty of solar and wind power being utilised in Australia and it's doing fine.
EVERY WATT of solar or wind needs a complete secondary backup... Because solar is good for 8 hours a day and the grid load at 10PM is about 80% of the daytime peak in urban areas.. And WIND is so totally unschedulably flaky that it takes DAYS OFF at a time.. So behind all that "investment" is MATCHING investments for nat gas or other RELIABLE generators...
Have you ever SEEN a daily production chart for wind farm?? They produce 50% of their yearly output on just about 70 days a year... Like I said -- hope and dreams. Not engineering.. And how much HAVE is nothing like how much it actually generates or uses...
If that's part of the COST -- it's a complete waste of money.. The GODFATHER of GW, James Hansen signed a statement with 20 other leading GW enviro advocates and stated (to the effect of )
"If you believe that wind and solar are sufficient to tackle GW -- you probably believe in the Tooth Fairy and the Easter bunny"... Hope and dreams man....
We have a tonne of sun and wind in Australia and batteries to store the power. I don't believe they are the only solution BTW.
One thing I do find annoying, is that coal - especially in western countries - burns a lot cleaner these days, but I'm surprised they haven't got a top-notch filter system so the shit doesn't go into the air.
There is no justification for his abuse of power. He shit on the entire bill of rightsHow familiar are you with John Charles Fremont? ...Not much. I know he ran for President and he was an explorer.
Read his biography ... I assume you're well studied in the political history of Lincoln's time ... perhaps after you study John Charles Fremont's life and politics, you just might change your mind about Lincoln ...
know the population of the world?