DNC/Crowdstrike Claim DNC Server Was Hacked By Russia Crumbling - Crowdstrike Distances From Claim

[easyt65]

CLAIM:
'Robert Johnston dealt directly with the FBI as an investigator of the DNC hack for CrowdStrike, a leading cyber security company hired by the Democrats. He told us the FBI didn’t physically examine the DNC servers because CrowdStrike gave the bureau copies of the data from the servers.

“If there is a server or a computer system of any kind that’s involved in the incident you can take an exact bit for bit digital copy of what’s on that system. Now that digital copy is just as good as having the real thing,”


"A former senior government official, familiar with the investigation, told us the FBI would have preferred to work alongside CrowdStrike’s investigators, but the Democratic National Committee decided to give the bureau digital copies of its servers instead. The official told us this was “acceptable,” in fact even typical in FBI investigations."

SINCE WHEN DOES THE DNC GIVE THE FBI ORDERS / DENYTHE FBI THE RESPONSIBILITY OF INVESTIGATING MATTERS OF NATIONALSECURITY & OUTSOURCES THAT JOB TO A COMPANY TIED TO THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN (HUGE DONATIONS)?

-- The fact tha the DNC paid Crowdstrike over $600k & Obama gave the CEO/founder of the company a position in his administration after 'services rendered' is not fishy at all.



1. Internal sources say the server was never hacked.

2. CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” of their 'investigation' on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took their word for it. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the un-redacted copies of Crowdstrike’s reports

3. Former NSA whistleblower Bill Binney previously reported he has evidence the DNC emails were not hacked but copied most likely on to a flashdrive or something similar.
- (Can you say 'AYWAN'?)

4. Cyber expert Yaacov Apelbaum says the 60 Minutes and Crowdstrike claims are completely false:

"If Crowdstrike gave the FBI any data it was drive images (we don’t even know which ones). This did not include memory dumps, network pocket captures, firewall activity, etc. This additional data is crucial and should have been examined in real-time by the FBI. If indeed any drive images were given to the FBI, these would have been contaminated because they continued to use these drives for weeks after the alleged hack."



BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Crowdstrike and Their PR Firm Now Distance Themselves from Russia's Link to Wikileaks -- HUGE DEVELOPMENT

 

[Augustine_]

CLAIM:
'Robert Johnston dealt directly with the FBI as an investigator of the DNC hack for CrowdStrike, a leading cyber security company hired by the Democrats. He told us the FBI didn’t physically examine the DNC servers because CrowdStrike gave the bureau copies of the data from the servers.

“If there is a server or a computer system of any kind that’s involved in the incident you can take an exact bit for bit digital copy of what’s on that system. Now that digital copy is just as good as having the real thing,”


"A former senior government official, familiar with the investigation, told us the FBI would have preferred to work alongside CrowdStrike’s investigators, but the Democratic National Committee decided to give the bureau digital copies of its servers instead. The official told us this was “acceptable,” in fact even typical in FBI investigations."

SINCE WHEN DOES THE DNC GIVE THE FBI ORDERS / DENYTHE FBI THE RESPONSIBILITY OF INVESTIGATING MATTERS OF NATIONALSECURITY & OUTSOURCES THAT JOB TO A COMPANY TIED TO THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN (HUGE DONATIONS)?

-- The fact tha the DNC paid Crowdstrike over $600k & Obama gave the CEO/founder of the company a position in his administration after 'services rendered' is not fishy at all.



1. Internal sources say the server was never hacked.

2. CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” of their 'investigation' on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took their word for it. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the un-redacted copies of Crowdstrike’s reports

3. Former NSA whistleblower Bill Binney previously reported he has evidence the DNC emails were not hacked but copied most likely on to a flashdrive or something similar.
- (Can you say 'AYWAN'?)

4. Cyber expert Yaacov Apelbaum says the 60 Minutes and Crowdstrike claims are completely false:

"If Crowdstrike gave the FBI any data it was drive images (we don’t even know which ones). This did not include memory dumps, network pocket captures, firewall activity, etc. This additional data is crucial and should have been examined in real-time by the FBI. If indeed any drive images were given to the FBI, these would have been contaminated because they continued to use these drives for weeks after the alleged hack."



BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Crowdstrike and Their PR Firm Now Distance Themselves from Russia's Link to Wikileaks -- HUGE DEVELOPMENT

^

 

[easyt65]

According to the WaPo (using CrowdStrike, DOJ, and their other usual hush-hush government sources in the know), the attack was perpetrated by a Russian unit lead by Lieutenant Captain Nikolay Kozachek who allegedly crafted a malware called X-Agent and used it to get into the network and install keystroke loggers on several PCs. This allowed them to see what the employees were typing and take screenshots of the employees’ computer.

This is pretty detailed information, but if this was the case, then how did the DOJ learn all of these ‘details’ and use them in the indictments without the FBI ever forensically evaluating the DNC/HRC computers?

And since when does the DOJ, an organization that only speaks the language of indictments use hearsay and 3rd parties like the British national Matt Tait (a former GCHQ collector and a connoisseur of all things related to Russian collusion), CrowdStrike, or any other evidence lacking chain of custody certification as a primary source for prosecution?"

Ummmm....the House Democrats Impeached the President with hearsay and 3rd party accusations....

 

[easyt65]

"One of the editor’s notes concerned the MSM trope that “Russian intelligence operatives stole and released thousands of internal emails and other documents in an effort to boost Trump’s chances, according to U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies.”

The Editor’s note was as follows:

This is fake news. While it’s oft-repeated by the propagandists in the MSM legacy corporate media, there is no evidence that the emails were stolen and released by “Russian intelligence operatives.” The emails were released by WikiLeaks and an entity called Guccifer 2.0. WikiLeaks denies it got them from any Russians, and Julian Assange has hinted that they were stolen by murdered DNC operative Seth Rich. The FBI was denied access to the emails and the conclusion that they were stolen and released by “Russian intelligence operatives” was made by the DNC-hired cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which has ties to Ukrainian oligarchs and the Council on Foreign Relations. –BL

A few days later, this past Tuesday, Personal Liberty reportedly received an email from John Eddy, Executive Vice President of the PR firm Goldin:

"My firm works with CrowdStrike and we read your article titled “Trump seeks to boost Sanders and foment discord among Democrats” (https://personalliberty.com/trump-seeks-to-boost-sanders-and-foment-discord-among-democrats/ [personalliberty.com]). We need to request important updates to the article.

CrowdStrike was hired by the DNC to respond to the suspected breach of its servers, and did not do any investigations around the release of the information."


CROWDSTRIKE WAS HIRED TO RESPOND TO THE SUSPECTED BREACH OF ITS SERVER -- IT WAS NOT HIRED TO INVESTIGATE IF RUSSIANS HAD HACKED THE DNC SERVER,ACCORDING TO CROWDSTRIKE NOW.....WHICH MEANS:

THE FBI NOR ANY OTHER GOVT AGENCY INVESTIGATED THE DNC'S CLAIM THAT RUSSIANS HACKED THEIR SERVER
-- CROWDSTRIKE WAS HIRED TO CONDUCT WHAT AMOUNTS TO PR DAMAGE CONTROL

THE 'REPORT' CROWDSTRIKE GAVE TO THE FBI WAS NOT THE RESULT OF AN INVESTIGATION, ACCORDING TO CROWDSTRIKE, BUT ITS A REDACTED ASSESSMENT' OF WHAT HAPPENED:

"Note the phrase from Crowdstrike’s PR firm, stating that Crowdstrike “did not do any investigations around the release of the information.”


Now after three and a half years of the fraudulent Russia collusion scam being repeated so often that half of America believes that Russia hacked the DNC and gave their emails to WikiLeaks, Crowdstrike announces that it had nothing to do with assessing that Russians gave the emails to WikiLeaks??!!

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Everybody knows it was not the Russians.

It was Seth Rich.

.

 

[easyt65]

The Mueller report clearly states that Russians hacked the DNC and gave the hacked emails to WikiLeaks:

WEISMANN-MUELLER'S SOURCE FOR THEIR CLAIM UPON WHICH THEY HEAVILY BASED A LARGE PORTION OF THEIR DEBUNKED 'RUSSIA COLLUSION' CASE WAS CROWDSTRIKE.

THE CLAIM HAS BEEN THAT CROWDSTRIKE CONDUCTED AN INVESTIGATION INSTEAD OF THE FBI OR ANY OTHER GOVT AGENCY, BUT THE PR FIRM REPRESENTING CROWDSTRIKE JUST MADE IT CLEAR THEY DID NOT CONDUCT ANY INVESTIGATION TO CONFIRM THE DNC'S CLAIM THAT THEY WERE HACKED BY RUSSIANS.

THIS FURTHER EXPOSES THE ENTIRE OBAMA-INITIATED FAILED COUP SUPPORTED BY THE BOGUS WEISMANN-MUELLER 'INVESTIGATION'.

 

[westwall]

CLAIM:
'Robert Johnston dealt directly with the FBI as an investigator of the DNC hack for CrowdStrike, a leading cyber security company hired by the Democrats. He told us the FBI didn’t physically examine the DNC servers because CrowdStrike gave the bureau copies of the data from the servers.

“If there is a server or a computer system of any kind that’s involved in the incident you can take an exact bit for bit digital copy of what’s on that system. Now that digital copy is just as good as having the real thing,”


"A former senior government official, familiar with the investigation, told us the FBI would have preferred to work alongside CrowdStrike’s investigators, but the Democratic National Committee decided to give the bureau digital copies of its servers instead. The official told us this was “acceptable,” in fact even typical in FBI investigations."

SINCE WHEN DOES THE DNC GIVE THE FBI ORDERS / DENYTHE FBI THE RESPONSIBILITY OF INVESTIGATING MATTERS OF NATIONALSECURITY & OUTSOURCES THAT JOB TO A COMPANY TIED TO THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN (HUGE DONATIONS)?

-- The fact tha the DNC paid Crowdstrike over $600k & Obama gave the CEO/founder of the company a position in his administration after 'services rendered' is not fishy at all.



1. Internal sources say the server was never hacked.

2. CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” of their 'investigation' on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took their word for it. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the un-redacted copies of Crowdstrike’s reports

3. Former NSA whistleblower Bill Binney previously reported he has evidence the DNC emails were not hacked but copied most likely on to a flashdrive or something similar.
- (Can you say 'AYWAN'?)

4. Cyber expert Yaacov Apelbaum says the 60 Minutes and Crowdstrike claims are completely false:

"If Crowdstrike gave the FBI any data it was drive images (we don’t even know which ones). This did not include memory dumps, network pocket captures, firewall activity, etc. This additional data is crucial and should have been examined in real-time by the FBI. If indeed any drive images were given to the FBI, these would have been contaminated because they continued to use these drives for weeks after the alleged hack."



BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Crowdstrike and Their PR Firm Now Distance Themselves from Russia's Link to Wikileaks -- HUGE DEVELOPMENT

^

Yeah, we know you are stupid, and crazy.

No need to affirm it more.

 

[Augustine_]

CLAIM:
'Robert Johnston dealt directly with the FBI as an investigator of the DNC hack for CrowdStrike, a leading cyber security company hired by the Democrats. He told us the FBI didn’t physically examine the DNC servers because CrowdStrike gave the bureau copies of the data from the servers.

“If there is a server or a computer system of any kind that’s involved in the incident you can take an exact bit for bit digital copy of what’s on that system. Now that digital copy is just as good as having the real thing,”


"A former senior government official, familiar with the investigation, told us the FBI would have preferred to work alongside CrowdStrike’s investigators, but the Democratic National Committee decided to give the bureau digital copies of its servers instead. The official told us this was “acceptable,” in fact even typical in FBI investigations."

SINCE WHEN DOES THE DNC GIVE THE FBI ORDERS / DENYTHE FBI THE RESPONSIBILITY OF INVESTIGATING MATTERS OF NATIONALSECURITY & OUTSOURCES THAT JOB TO A COMPANY TIED TO THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN (HUGE DONATIONS)?

-- The fact tha the DNC paid Crowdstrike over $600k & Obama gave the CEO/founder of the company a position in his administration after 'services rendered' is not fishy at all.



1. Internal sources say the server was never hacked.

2. CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” of their 'investigation' on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took their word for it. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the un-redacted copies of Crowdstrike’s reports

3. Former NSA whistleblower Bill Binney previously reported he has evidence the DNC emails were not hacked but copied most likely on to a flashdrive or something similar.
- (Can you say 'AYWAN'?)

4. Cyber expert Yaacov Apelbaum says the 60 Minutes and Crowdstrike claims are completely false:

"If Crowdstrike gave the FBI any data it was drive images (we don’t even know which ones). This did not include memory dumps, network pocket captures, firewall activity, etc. This additional data is crucial and should have been examined in real-time by the FBI. If indeed any drive images were given to the FBI, these would have been contaminated because they continued to use these drives for weeks after the alleged hack."



BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Crowdstrike and Their PR Firm Now Distance Themselves from Russia's Link to Wikileaks -- HUGE DEVELOPMENT

^

Yeah, we know you are stupid, and crazy.

No need to affirm it more.

Go fuck yourself