DNC Chairman makes it official --- Pro-lifers BANNED from party

WTF does religion have to do with anything?

It seems that as the elites gain success in a decaying Europe religious attendance drops. You may be surprised at that but I am not. A culture cannot survive without its religious base...which is of course one of the reasons religion is so vociferously attacked by liberals. There are other reasons as well of course. But every Marxist starts by attacking Christianity.

You are absolutely stuck in phoney dogma.

There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. Start actually caring about children that are already born and I'll change that.

Hey dumbfuck....

How Is a child that is just about to be delivered from the womb NOT the same child they are when the delivery is over?

Do explain.

There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. After a child is born you fakes could not care less if the child died the same day because of no healthcare coverage.

.

Health care coverage for kids? That's what parents should provide. THINK

Thank you for demonstrating my point in perfect clarity. There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. Once a child is born the pro-birthers could not care less about it.
 
WTF does religion have to do with anything?

It seems that as the elites gain success in a decaying Europe religious attendance drops. You may be surprised at that but I am not. A culture cannot survive without its religious base...which is of course one of the reasons religion is so vociferously attacked by liberals. There are other reasons as well of course. But every Marxist starts by attacking Christianity.

You are absolutely stuck in phoney dogma.

There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. Start actually caring about children that are already born and I'll change that.

Hey dumbfuck....

How Is a child that is just about to be delivered from the womb NOT the same child they are when the delivery is over?

Do explain.

There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. After a child is born you fakes could not care less if the child died the same day because of no healthcare coverage.

.

Health care coverage for kids? That's what parents should provide. THINK

Thank you for demonstrating my point in perfect clarity. There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. Once a child is born the pro-birthers could not care less about it.

So, according to you, pro-lifers don't support laws against the abuse, neglect or molestation of children after they are born. . .

You are completely full of shit of course. . .

But, just for fuck's sake.... let's see the evidence that you THINK you have to support your asinine claim.
 
WTF does religion have to do with anything?

It seems that as the elites gain success in a decaying Europe religious attendance drops. You may be surprised at that but I am not. A culture cannot survive without its religious base...which is of course one of the reasons religion is so vociferously attacked by liberals. There are other reasons as well of course. But every Marxist starts by attacking Christianity.

You are absolutely stuck in phoney dogma.

There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. Start actually caring about children that are already born and I'll change that.

Hey dumbfuck....

How Is a child that is just about to be delivered from the womb NOT the same child they are when the delivery is over?

Do explain.

There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. After a child is born you fakes could not care less if the child died the same day because of no healthcare coverage.

.

Health care coverage for kids? That's what parents should provide. THINK

Thank you for demonstrating my point in perfect clarity. There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. Once a child is born the pro-birthers could not care less about it.

How many kids are you providing health care for?
 
WTF does religion have to do with anything?

It seems that as the elites gain success in a decaying Europe religious attendance drops. You may be surprised at that but I am not. A culture cannot survive without its religious base...which is of course one of the reasons religion is so vociferously attacked by liberals. There are other reasons as well of course. But every Marxist starts by attacking Christianity.

You are absolutely stuck in phoney dogma.

There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. Start actually caring about children that are already born and I'll change that.

Hey dumbfuck....

How Is a child that is just about to be delivered from the womb NOT the same child they are when the delivery is over?

Do explain.

There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. After a child is born you fakes could not care less if the child died the same day because of no healthcare coverage.

.

Health care coverage for kids? That's what parents should provide. THINK

Thank you for demonstrating my point in perfect clarity. There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. Once a child is born the pro-birthers could not care less about it.

How many kids are you providing health care for?

Ad hominem.

One on the list of go to fallacies that fake Christians flock to like moths. What they are saying is "If someone else doesn't have to act like a Christian then neither do I".

Just as Jesus said.
 
I myself am not pro-life. I am anti-abortion.


Ditto for me.... though I am not "anti-life" either. So, I am more "pro-life" than not.

It's so insane, the way some of these leftardz think. Their measure for how much their opponents care for children is NOT measured by the laws we all (the VAST majority of us) support against abuse, neglect, molestation, exploitation, etc.

Their measure for how much their opponents care for children is based on how much MORE FREE shit we are willing to give them through INEFFICIENT socialized government programs.

Their conclusion is that ANY expectation that the parents (and not the government) be responsible for the caring and provisions for the children they create is tantamount to not "caring" about the children or their needs at all.

To the leftist tardz.... the ONLY measure for how much you care about children is based upon how much you are willing to absolve the actual PARENTS of their parental responsibilities.
 
Last edited:
The self-proclaimed "Party of Diversity" says diverse opinions on the issues are not allowed.

Democrats Reel from DNC Chair’s Announcement That Party Will Exclude Pro-Life Candidates

april 29 2017 Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairman Tom Perez’s announcement that pro-lifers are not welcome in his party has planted the seeds of rebellion among some Democrats and sharpened the view that the party is now primarily defined by its embrace of abortion on demand.

“Every Democrat, like every American, should support a woman’s right to make her own choices about her body and her health,” Perez said, as the HuffPost reported. “That is not negotiable and should not change city by city or state by state.”

Perez is an ass. That is what's wrong with both sides, no one can have a different opinion other than theirs.


There can never ever be a different opinion than the sovereignty of one's body. We can never ever give up control of that. Whether its reproduction or any other issue, one's body is one's own, no matter what.


Now, here is a post the substance of which you'll be forced to ignore....because you pro-murder types cannot answer.

How can it be her body if what we are discussing
a. has different DNA
b. has different finger prints
c. has different blood type
or
d. is a different sex?


See what I mean....you have no answer, do you.


Oh....and a little biology for you:

When the embryo implants in the lining of the uterus, it emits chemical substances which weaken the woman's immune system within the uterus so that this tiny "foreign" body is not rejected by the woman's body. Were this tiny embryo simply "part of the woman's body" there would be no need to locally disable the woman's immunities.
 
I myself am not pro-life. I am anti-abortion.


Ditto for me.... though I am not "anti-life" either. So, I am more "pro-life" than not.

It's so insane, the way some of these leftardz think. Their measure for how much their opponents care for children is NOT measured by the laws we all (the VAST majority of us) support against abuse, neglect, molestation, exploitation, etc.

Their measure for how much their opponents care for children is based on how much MORE FREE shit we are willing to give them through INEFFICIENT socialized government programs.

Their conclusion is that ANY expectation that the parents (and not the government) be responsible for the caring and provisions for the children they create is tantamount to not "caring" about the children or their needs at all.

To the leftist tardz.... the ONLY measure for how much you care about children is based upon how much you are willing to absolve the actual PARENTS of their parental responsibilities.

Note the twisted perverted thinking of isaacnewton. This is the brain damage Marxism has leads us to.. First the liberals whined "keep your moral values to yourself its my body you bigot stop slut shaming!". They wanted birth control and divorce and promiscuity and shacking up and pornography and feminism. And wanted no part of Christian moralizing.
Then, when the inevitable happens, they cry "waaah look at all my poor bastard children and you wont take care of them because you are cruel and a non christian meanie and if you keep refusing I'll abort the next one gimmee gimmee gimmee you OWE me for having children I cant provide for..."

Lots of terms and words come to mind to describe the liberal...but I really think the best word is simply "Shameless". Like an animal.
 
It seems that as the elites gain success in a decaying Europe religious attendance drops. You may be surprised at that but I am not. A culture cannot survive without its religious base...which is of course one of the reasons religion is so vociferously attacked by liberals. There are other reasons as well of course. But every Marxist starts by attacking Christianity.

You are absolutely stuck in phoney dogma.

There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. Start actually caring about children that are already born and I'll change that.

Hey dumbfuck....

How Is a child that is just about to be delivered from the womb NOT the same child they are when the delivery is over?

Do explain.

There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. After a child is born you fakes could not care less if the child died the same day because of no healthcare coverage.

.

Health care coverage for kids? That's what parents should provide. THINK

Thank you for demonstrating my point in perfect clarity. There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. Once a child is born the pro-birthers could not care less about it.

How many kids are you providing health care for?

Ad hominem.

One on the list of go to fallacies that fake Christians flock to like moths. What they are saying is "If someone else doesn't have to act like a Christian then neither do I".

Just as Jesus said.

What would you know about Jesus?
 
You are absolutely stuck in phoney dogma.

There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. Start actually caring about children that are already born and I'll change that.

Hey dumbfuck....

How Is a child that is just about to be delivered from the womb NOT the same child they are when the delivery is over?

Do explain.

There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. After a child is born you fakes could not care less if the child died the same day because of no healthcare coverage.

.

Health care coverage for kids? That's what parents should provide. THINK

Thank you for demonstrating my point in perfect clarity. There are no pro-lifers, only pro-birthers. Once a child is born the pro-birthers could not care less about it.

How many kids are you providing health care for?

Ad hominem.

One on the list of go to fallacies that fake Christians flock to like moths. What they are saying is "If someone else doesn't have to act like a Christian then neither do I".

Just as Jesus said.

What would you know about Jesus?

Try reading.
 
The self-proclaimed "Party of Diversity" says diverse opinions on the issues are not allowed.

Democrats Reel from DNC Chair’s Announcement That Party Will Exclude Pro-Life Candidates

april 29 2017 Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairman Tom Perez’s announcement that pro-lifers are not welcome in his party has planted the seeds of rebellion among some Democrats and sharpened the view that the party is now primarily defined by its embrace of abortion on demand.

“Every Democrat, like every American, should support a woman’s right to make her own choices about her body and her health,” Perez said, as the HuffPost reported. “That is not negotiable and should not change city by city or state by state.”

Perez is an ass. That is what's wrong with both sides, no one can have a different opinion other than theirs.


There can never ever be a different opinion than the sovereignty of one's body. We can never ever give up control of that. Whether its reproduction or any other issue, one's body is one's own, no matter what.

Since when does your body have another man's DNA? Since when does your body have 46 pairs of genes? Humans only have 23 pairs.
Now if you want sovereignty over your own body close your legs. Or take birth control. Wasn't birth control and sex education supposed to be the be all and end all from liberals? Strange that decades after cheap birth control became widely available the problem seems to have only gotten worse.
 
Try reading.

Ill take that as a "I know next to nothing about Jesus but like to throw His name around to try and control believers"

Now its your turn to moan "pro birther pro birther"...yet again.
 
Last edited:
The self-proclaimed "Party of Diversity" says diverse opinions on the issues are not allowed.

Democrats Reel from DNC Chair’s Announcement That Party Will Exclude Pro-Life Candidates

april 29 2017 Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairman Tom Perez’s announcement that pro-lifers are not welcome in his party has planted the seeds of rebellion among some Democrats and sharpened the view that the party is now primarily defined by its embrace of abortion on demand.

“Every Democrat, like every American, should support a woman’s right to make her own choices about her body and her health,” Perez said, as the HuffPost reported. “That is not negotiable and should not change city by city or state by state.”

Perez is an ass. That is what's wrong with both sides, no one can have a different opinion other than theirs.


There can never ever be a different opinion than the sovereignty of one's body. We can never ever give up control of that. Whether its reproduction or any other issue, one's body is one's own, no matter what.

Since when does your body have another man's DNA? Since when does your body have 46 pairs of genes? Humans only have 23 pairs.
Now if you want sovereignty over your own body close your legs. Or take birth control. Wasn't birth control and sex education supposed to be the be all and end all from liberals? Strange that decades after cheap birth control became widely available the problem seems to have only gotten worse.

Funny too how they ignore the way our fetal homicide laws prove against their claim that the child is just part of the "woman's body."

If the 'fetus' is just "part of" the woman's body... why are criminals charged with TWO counts of murder, when they kill a pregnant woman in a criminal act?

Just another glimpse into how little thought these leftardz actually put into even their most professed opinions.
 
Just as Jesus said.

What would you know about Jesus?

Try reading.[/QUOTE]

Ill take that as a "I know next to nothing about Jesus but like to throw His name around to try and control believers"

Now its your turn to moan "pro birther pro birther"...yet again.[/QUOTE]

You don't have to tell anyone, we all know 'you take that' only in a way that fits your meme rolodex. That way no thinking is required.

The Democrats 'banning pro-lifers' is a non-sequitur as there are no pro-lifers.
 
We're nearly the same kind of economy outside of the fact that we don't offer any healthcare, free college and are much harder when it comes to welfare..The funny thing is Americans work hard as slaves pretty much (far harder then most european countries or canada)and most of the wealth goes to the top 1%....We're stagnating in science, tech and in every way but hell lets point fingers at much freer and fairer societies.

HAHAHA. You think europe has more freedom than america. ???? America has far more in the way of gun rights and free speech and those are what matter. THINK

Well, yes they actually do. Excluding Britian, Europe is more socialist, less religious, dying culturally and biologically, and full of such freedom expanding laws as restrictions on hate speech and gun ownership. Europe's marriage rates and birth rates are plummeting as their families die in conjunction with the rise of statism. Europe doesn't have a hard core vein of rebelling against statism and tyranny as the US does. And Europe has faster trains...somehow fast trains are conflated with superiority.
And, especially appealing to them, Europe is full of bred and born elites who think they were born to rule. Here in the US the liberals have to make do by sucking the asses of Hollywood celebrities, reality show stars and tech billionaires. But they miss the chance to doff their hats to real and decadent nobility.
So yes the liberal is enamored of Europe. And they can't win here until we are reduced to the level of Europe.
 
The Democrats 'banning pro-lifers' is a non-sequitur as there are no pro-lifers.

Man you do live in a world of denial and make believe...necessary for remaining a liberal of course but still...this takes some effort on your part to remain this delusional and alone.
So go ahead and pretend there are "no pro lifers"...because as all good liberals know reality can be bent, twisted and even ignored or pretended away.

Oxford Concise Dictionary of Politics
Pro-life...‐life An ideological position which opposes abortion on the grounds of the inviolable rights of the foetus as a moral subject. These rights are seen as ‘trumping’ all countervailing considerations claimed by pro‐choicers , though there are some differences of opinion on appropriate action in ‘tough cases’ (e.g. where the mother's life is threatened by continuation of the pregnancy). Stewart Wood ...

Oxford Living Dictionary
pro-life prōˈlīf/
adjective: pro-life;opposing abortion and euthanasia.
  1. "she is a pro-life activist"
Merriam Webster
pro-life: opposed to abortion
adjective \(ˌ)prō-ˈlīf\

Dictionary.com
pro-life [proh-lahyf]
adjective
1.opposed to legalized abortion; right-to-life.


Cambridge English Language Dictionary
pro-life adjective
US /ˈproʊˈlɑɪf/supporting the belief that it is immoral for a pregnant woman to have the freedom to choose to have an abortion (= an operation to end a pregnancy) if she does not want to have a baby


Collins English Dictionary

Pro-life: adjective
opposing the legal right to obtain an abortion


MacMillian Dictionary
Pro-life, adj. believing that pregnant women should not be allowed to have an abortion


American Heritage Dictionary
pro-life
(prō-līf) adj. Advocating the legal protection of human embryos and fetuses, especially by favoring the outlawing of abortion on the ground that it is the taking of a human life.


Wikipedia: "Anti-abortion movements, also referred to as pro-life movements, are involved in the abortion debate advocating against the practice of abortion and its legality." LINK

Wikipedia United States Pro-Life Movement
"The United States anti-abortion movement or the right-to-life movement or pro-life movement contains elements opposing elective abortion on both moral and sectarian grounds and supports its legal prohibition or restriction." LINK

Wiktionary
Etymology[edit]
pro- +‎ life
Adjective[edit]
pro-life (comparative more pro-life, superlative most pro-life)
  1. Of, pertaining to, or supportive of the right to life; believing that life should be protected from its beginning to natural death in all or most circumstances.
    1. (chiefly US) Opposed to the advocacy, practice, or legalization of abortion.
      They were pro-life except in cases of rape, incest, maternal life risk, mental health risk, socioeconomic factors, or fetal defects.
 
How can it be her body if what we are discussing
a. has different DNA
b. has different finger prints
c. has different blood type
or
d. is a different sex?
.

Those are good points. I support abortion but NOT because "a woman has the right to do whatever she wants with her body".


I support abortion because it's the only form of birth control the non-white hordes will practice. Their breeding is bankrupting us.
 
How can it be her body if what we are discussing
a. has different DNA
b. has different finger prints
c. has different blood type
or
d. is a different sex?
.

Those are good points. I support abortion but NOT because "a woman has the right to do whatever she wants with her body".


I support abortion because it's the only form of birth control the non-white hordes will practice. Their breeding is bankrupting us.

Wasn't that the original point of the abortion and eugenics movements?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 

Forum List

Back
Top