Hey Ed, do you see a big freeze now? No. So the universe has not existed forever which means it did have a beginning.And again there is no temperature at which no work can be done except absolute zero which as you know cannot be reached, so no matter what temperature thermal equilibrium settles on as long as it is not absolute zero there will be kinetic energy, the energy of motion, to do work.Your link that you relied upon literally said the cosmological fate of an ever accelerating expansion of the universe is a big freeze. That’s what thermal equilibrium is dummy.Nowhere in the link did it say there will be no kinetic energy to do work, it only said the universe will become too cold to support life as we know it. Work and life are two different things to everyone but a liar like you.How about the link you provided that agrees with me, dipshit?No, I am arguing against your perversion of the link I provided where you substituted "life" for "work."Are you arguing against the link you provided?
Got any links that support your belief that the cosmological fate of the universe does not end in thermal equilibrium?
But you knew that already.
You are just repeating the same debunked lies over and over again.
Find some new lies or concede defeat.