Did you notice the nearly imperceptible 9/11 Google Tribute?

[beagle9]

Google is managed by extremely smart, extremely Liberal people who have a reason for everything they do and don't do. They have the ability to control information on a global scale. And they are not shy about tweaking search algorithms or using their home page to convey their stance, in this case "9/11 was no big deal". Don't think for one minute their miniscule 9/11 ribbon Did ian oversight.

Check out the masterpiece they created for this Muslim dude for comparison:
Google Pays Tribute To Al Andalus Muslim Polymath Ibn Rushd

Did it ever occur to you that the people that create these banners are not white?

. Not white meaning what ?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Did you notice the OP doesn't have a signature image of the twin towers to commemortate the 9/11 attacks?

Clearly he's a radical moose lamb.

Why did you ignore the context he gave for his comment?

Oh, that's right, you are a libtard.

 

[Asclepias]

Just because they dont cater to whites all the time doesnt = anti american.

Says the guy with the AFRICAN avatar

Do you think having an African avatar = anti american? If so explain your logic.

 

[Asclepias]

Google is managed by extremely smart, extremely Liberal people who have a reason for everything they do and don't do. They have the ability to control information on a global scale. And they are not shy about tweaking search algorithms or using their home page to convey their stance, in this case "9/11 was no big deal". Don't think for one minute their miniscule 9/11 ribbon Did ian oversight.

Check out the masterpiece they created for this Muslim dude for comparison:
Google Pays Tribute To Al Andalus Muslim Polymath Ibn Rushd

Did it ever occur to you that the people that create these banners are not white?

. Not white meaning what ?

Meaning not a recessive person descended from mutated populations in europe.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Did you notice the OP doesn't have a signature image of the twin towers to commemortate the 9/11 attacks?

Clearly he's a radical moose lamb.

Why did you ignore the context he gave for his comment?

Oh, that's right, you are a libtard.

Just a guess, but probably because the "context" for comment is asinine.

Google is not under any obligation to care about what you think they should care about, and whining about it just makes you look like a "snowflake".

If Google's failure to fetishize the tragedy of 16 years ago upsets you, you are free to use Bing, or another search engine.

 

[Mr Natural]

How long been this malls start having big 9/11 day sales?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Just a guess, but probably because the "context" for comment is asinine.
Google is not under any obligation to care about what you think they should care about, and whining about it just makes you look like a "snowflake".
If Google's failure to fetishize the tragedy of 16 years ago upsets you, you are free to use Bing, or another search engine.

Whether the context is asinine in your opinion is immaterial to my point. Doofus asserted that there was no point to it but there was in fact.

And google is under a general obligation to support its users and to provide the public with a consistent and objective service or else go the **** out of business, which they would if they had any competition.

What Google needs to have done is to have its virtual monopoly broken up by government action, but that wont happen since they kiss the libtard Establishments ass, as your comment proves.

 

[bodecea]

They routinely put up elaborate tributes to unknown minority figures from history but all they can muster for the 9/11 attack is a little ribbon at the bottom of the page? Google's priority is clearly to not offend Muslims.

What did YOUR tribute look like?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Just a guess, but probably because the "context" for comment is asinine.
Google is not under any obligation to care about what you think they should care about, and whining about it just makes you look like a "snowflake".
If Google's failure to fetishize the tragedy of 16 years ago upsets you, you are free to use Bing, or another search engine.

Whether the context is asinine in your opinion is immaterial to my point. Doofus asserted that there was no point to it but there was in fact.

And google is under a general obligation to support its users and to provide the public with a consistent and objective service or else go the **** out of business, which they would if they had any competition.

What Google needs to have done is to have its virtual monopoly broken up by government action, but that wont happen since they kiss the libtard Establishments ass, as your comment proves.

Google doesn't have any sort of "monopoly".

There's nothing stopping you from creating your own search engine, or using the hundreds of others that already exist. Google has absolutely no obligation to you or me. They are not obligated to be "objective", any more than Rush Limbaugh or Matt Drudge is.

You are whining because a free service they provide, and that you choose to use is not "fair" according to your deluded political views.

As my father used to say, man the **** up. Life isn't fair. Deal with it.

 

[beagle9]

Did you notice the OP doesn't have a signature image of the twin towers to commemortate the 9/11 attacks?

Clearly he's a radical moose lamb.

Why did you ignore the context he gave for his comment?

Oh, that's right, you are a libtard.

Just a guess, but probably because the "context" for comment is asinine.

Google is not under any obligation to care about what you think they should care about, and whining about it just makes you look like a "snowflake".

If Google's failure to fetishize the tragedy of 16 years ago upsets you, you are free to use Bing, or another search engine.

. Google should be broken up if they are found to be abusing their power, and pushing political agenda's with that power.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Did you notice the OP doesn't have a signature image of the twin towers to commemortate the 9/11 attacks?

Clearly he's a radical moose lamb.

Why did you ignore the context he gave for his comment?

Oh, that's right, you are a libtard.

Just a guess, but probably because the "context" for comment is asinine.

Google is not under any obligation to care about what you think they should care about, and whining about it just makes you look like a "snowflake".

If Google's failure to fetishize the tragedy of 16 years ago upsets you, you are free to use Bing, or another search engine.

. Google should be broken up if they are found to be abusing their power, and pushing political agenda's with that power.

Why?

Just because you're butthurt about their choice of Google doodle?

 

[Pogo]

What Google needs to have done is to have its virtual monopoly broken up by government action, but that wont happen since they kiss the libtard Establishments ass, as your comment proves.

Aren't you the same asscrack running a thread whining about how Stephen Colbert should be "fired" because you're butthurt about a comedy routine that you allegedly don't watch anyway?

Fascist control freak much?

 

[beagle9]

Did you notice the OP doesn't have a signature image of the twin towers to commemortate the 9/11 attacks?

Clearly he's a radical moose lamb.

Why did you ignore the context he gave for his comment?

Oh, that's right, you are a libtard.

Just a guess, but probably because the "context" for comment is asinine.

Google is not under any obligation to care about what you think they should care about, and whining about it just makes you look like a "snowflake".

If Google's failure to fetishize the tragedy of 16 years ago upsets you, you are free to use Bing, or another search engine.

. Google should be broken up if they are found to be abusing their power, and pushing political agenda's with that power.

Why?

Just because you're butthurt about their choice of Google doodle?

. If found to be pushing heavily a political agenda that leans over into an unbalanced way, then they should be stopped. They should provide a service for all, and stay neutral in the market place always. To become a political arm of the Demon-crats or the repugnacrats should just turn their customer base stomachs.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Did you notice the OP doesn't have a signature image of the twin towers to commemortate the 9/11 attacks?

Clearly he's a radical moose lamb.

Why did you ignore the context he gave for his comment?

Oh, that's right, you are a libtard.

Just a guess, but probably because the "context" for comment is asinine.

Google is not under any obligation to care about what you think they should care about, and whining about it just makes you look like a "snowflake".

If Google's failure to fetishize the tragedy of 16 years ago upsets you, you are free to use Bing, or another search engine.

. Google should be broken up if they are found to be abusing their power, and pushing political agenda's with that power.

Why?

Just because you're butthurt about their choice of Google doodle?

. If found to be pushing heavily a political agenda that leans over into an unbalanced way, then they should be stopped. They should provide a service for all, and stay neutral in the market place always. To become a political arm of the Demon-crats or the repugnacrats should just turn their customer base stomachs.

So you're proposing some sort of "fairness doctrine" for the internet?

Does this apply to all websites, or just the ones that upset you? What branch of the government should be in charge of making sure websites are "fair" enough for you? What should the penalties be for violating it?

 

[Asclepias]

Did you notice the OP doesn't have a signature image of the twin towers to commemortate the 9/11 attacks?

Clearly he's a radical moose lamb.

Why did you ignore the context he gave for his comment?

Oh, that's right, you are a libtard.

Just a guess, but probably because the "context" for comment is asinine.

Google is not under any obligation to care about what you think they should care about, and whining about it just makes you look like a "snowflake".

If Google's failure to fetishize the tragedy of 16 years ago upsets you, you are free to use Bing, or another search engine.

. Google should be broken up if they are found to be abusing their power, and pushing political agenda's with that power.

Why?

Just because you're butthurt about their choice of Google doodle?

. If found to be pushing heavily a political agenda that leans over into an unbalanced way, then they should be stopped. They should provide a service for all, and stay neutral in the market place always. To become a political arm of the Demon-crats or the repugnacrats should just turn their customer base stomachs.

Why should they be stopped? Are you a snowflake? No one is forcing you to use Google. You can use Bing or any of the other search engines. I thought you clowns were for less government intervention not more?

 

[Spare_change]

Google is managed by extremely smart, extremely Liberal people who have a reason for everything they do and don't do. They have the ability to control information on a global scale. And they are not shy about tweaking search algorithms or using their home page to convey their stance, in this case "9/11 was no big deal". Don't think for one minute their miniscule 9/11 ribbon Did ian oversight.

Check out the masterpiece they created for this Muslim dude for comparison:
Google Pays Tribute To Al Andalus Muslim Polymath Ibn Rushd

Did it ever occur to you that the people that create these banners are not white?

Google says only 2% of its staff is black, and only 18% are women. What conclusions would you draw from that?

Google says only 2% of its staff are black and 18% are women | Daily Mail Online

 

[Asclepias]

Google is managed by extremely smart, extremely Liberal people who have a reason for everything they do and don't do. They have the ability to control information on a global scale. And they are not shy about tweaking search algorithms or using their home page to convey their stance, in this case "9/11 was no big deal". Don't think for one minute their miniscule 9/11 ribbon Did ian oversight.

Check out the masterpiece they created for this Muslim dude for comparison:
Google Pays Tribute To Al Andalus Muslim Polymath Ibn Rushd

Did it ever occur to you that the people that create these banners are not white?

Google says only 2% of its staff is black, and only 18% are women. What conclusions would you draw from that?

Google says only 2% of its staff are black and 18% are women | Daily Mail Online

That most are east indian men. Why do you ask?

 

[impuretrash]

Why should they be stopped? Are you a snowflake? No one is forcing you to use Google. You can use Bing or any of the other search engines. I thought you clowns were for less government intervention not more?

Pft. Old fogie republicans following the party line about 'muh free market capitalism' helped get us into this situation where ultra mega multinational corporations are growing more powerful than the federal government. Just because you *think* they're on your political side today doesn't mean it will always stay that way.

 

[Asclepias]

Why should they be stopped? Are you a snowflake? No one is forcing you to use Google. You can use Bing or any of the other search engines. I thought you clowns were for less government intervention not more?

Pft. Old fogie republicans following the party line about 'muh free market capitalism' helped get us into this situation where ultra mega multinational corporations are growing more powerful than the federal government. Just because you *think* they're on your political side today doesn't mean it will always stay that way.

Why would I think repubs were on my side? Most of them are racists.

 

[impuretrash]

Why should they be stopped? Are you a snowflake? No one is forcing you to use Google. You can use Bing or any of the other search engines. I thought you clowns were for less government intervention not more?

Pft. Old fogie republicans following the party line about 'muh free market capitalism' helped get us into this situation where ultra mega multinational corporations are growing more powerful than the federal government. Just because you *think* they're on your political side today doesn't mean it will always stay that way.

Why would I think repubs were on my side? Most of them are racists.

I'm talking about the corporations, dummy