Did Trump Incite Insurrection?

So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It';s incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
...so do you agree with his assertion that the DNC is also guilty of incitement? When considering the fact that multiple Democrats have funded bail for various Antifa/BLM rioters that were apprehended over assault and destruction of property, that's worse than incitement.
Which Democrats funded bail?

~~~~~~
The following Democrats are contributors to the bail fund organizations for Antifa and BLM...
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez went on Twitter to announce she, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley were raising $50,000 for the groups.
Even Vice-Presidential candidate Kamala Harris has promoted the "Minneapolis Freedom Fund"(MFF), who redirected donations to the Black Visions Collective and has bailed out defendants from Twin Cities jails charged with murder, violent felonies, and sex crimes.
Needless to say that the bulk of the funds come from Soros organizations.



They fund bail programs because of a belief in racial inequity, which means black people have less means to post bail.

It doesn't get ANYONE off for any crime. It doesn't grant favor with the legal system. To say that supporting these bail programs is somehow equivalent of inciting an insurection against the Congress of the United States of America is to have you head way up your ass.

These massive denials and false equivalency excercises are but rationalizations to avoid admitting the obvious - Trump didn't win, he is too pathetic to admit it, so he lies lies lies about it. His rhetoric caused the attack on the Capitol and will continue to damage this great country at home and abroad.

Shame on all of you usefull idiots for pushing these lies along.

You use "useful idiot" a lot without realizing that the real enemy are the feds themselves. They work for K Street, not you or me.

The only problem with supporting Trump is believing that he could "drain the swamp." That clearly was a fantasy.

As much as you guys freak out over the weakest "insurrection" ever seen, you should be more concerned about the monster that is our federal government. They've been the enemy of the common citizen for decades now.


You clearly don't understand the fire that Trump is playing with as he spreads his self serving lies.

When people do not belive in electoral system to settle political diputes they start to take to violence to achieve their goals.

Jan 6th was not the end, it was but mild preview of where these lieas are going to take us. Just a preview of what will be once this country gives up the priciples of peaceful transfer of power.

And what do you think the Floyd protests were?

Floyd protests did not target government and had nothing to do with the principles of transfer of power in any shape or form.

What the fuck are you smoking?

The principle behind rioting during a protest is that you are using violence to fight the system. The Floyd protesters were targeting the local system. That might not be the same as targeting the feds, but it's the same principle of losing trust in the system.

So, clearly, your side still has faith in the federal system. I put more faith in my local system.


Floyd protesters did not target any system, they were prosteting and rioting to show disatisfaction with the policing, and in some cases out of plain criminal intent to steal shit out of some stores.

You trying to roll them up into the same category as an attack on the Capitol to halt the certification of an election is just plain stupid nonsense.

Yeah, we're never going to see eye to eye on this.

No worries, the Justice Department sees how it is. They're on it.
 
Telling supporters to march to the capitol does not mean break into it...not in any language...Even the nations of Germany Spain and France and Canada are warning the dems to not do another impeachment....

We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

By gosh, who could have ever thought that a call to fight would result in fighting!
I can’t seem to remember one politician who never used the work “fight”.
And which ones inspired a fight?
View attachment 497001
Who did what she said?
 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It';s incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
...so do you agree with his assertion that the DNC is also guilty of incitement? When considering the fact that multiple Democrats have funded bail for various Antifa/BLM rioters that were apprehended over assault and destruction of property, that's worse than incitement.
Which Democrats funded bail?

~~~~~~
The following Democrats are contributors to the bail fund organizations for Antifa and BLM...
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez went on Twitter to announce she, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley were raising $50,000 for the groups.
Even Vice-Presidential candidate Kamala Harris has promoted the "Minneapolis Freedom Fund"(MFF), who redirected donations to the Black Visions Collective and has bailed out defendants from Twin Cities jails charged with murder, violent felonies, and sex crimes.
Needless to say that the bulk of the funds come from Soros organizations.



They fund bail programs because of a belief in racial inequity, which means black people have less means to post bail.

It doesn't get ANYONE off for any crime. It doesn't grant favor with the legal system. To say that supporting these bail programs is somehow equivalent of inciting an insurection against the Congress of the United States of America is to have you head way up your ass.

These massive denials and false equivalency excercises are but rationalizations to avoid admitting the obvious - Trump didn't win, he is too pathetic to admit it, so he lies lies lies about it. His rhetoric caused the attack on the Capitol and will continue to damage this great country at home and abroad.

Shame on all of you usefull idiots for pushing these lies along.

You use "useful idiot" a lot without realizing that the real enemy are the feds themselves. They work for K Street, not you or me.

The only problem with supporting Trump is believing that he could "drain the swamp." That clearly was a fantasy.

As much as you guys freak out over the weakest "insurrection" ever seen, you should be more concerned about the monster that is our federal government. They've been the enemy of the common citizen for decades now.


You clearly don't understand the fire that Trump is playing with as he spreads his self serving lies.

When people do not belive in electoral system to settle political diputes they start to take to violence to achieve their goals.

Jan 6th was not the end, it was but mild preview of where these lieas are going to take us. Just a preview of what will be once this country gives up the priciples of peaceful transfer of power.

And what do you think the Floyd protests were?

Floyd protests did not target government and had nothing to do with the principles of transfer of power in any shape or form.

What the fuck are you smoking?

The principle behind rioting during a protest is that you are using violence to fight the system. The Floyd protesters were targeting the local system. That might not be the same as targeting the feds, but it's the same principle of losing trust in the system.

So, clearly, your side still has faith in the federal system. I put more faith in my local system.


Floyd protesters did not target any system, they were prosteting and rioting to show disatisfaction with the policing, and in some cases out of plain criminal intent to steal shit out of some stores.

You trying to roll them up into the same category as an attack on the Capitol to halt the certification of an election is just plain stupid nonsense.

Yeah, we're never going to see eye to eye on this.

No worries, the Justice Department sees how it is. They're on it.

That's little more than a politicized Gestapo, just like much of the feds in general.
 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It';s incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
...so do you agree with his assertion that the DNC is also guilty of incitement? When considering the fact that multiple Democrats have funded bail for various Antifa/BLM rioters that were apprehended over assault and destruction of property, that's worse than incitement.
Which Democrats funded bail?

~~~~~~
The following Democrats are contributors to the bail fund organizations for Antifa and BLM...
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez went on Twitter to announce she, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley were raising $50,000 for the groups.
Even Vice-Presidential candidate Kamala Harris has promoted the "Minneapolis Freedom Fund"(MFF), who redirected donations to the Black Visions Collective and has bailed out defendants from Twin Cities jails charged with murder, violent felonies, and sex crimes.
Needless to say that the bulk of the funds come from Soros organizations.



They fund bail programs because of a belief in racial inequity, which means black people have less means to post bail.

It doesn't get ANYONE off for any crime. It doesn't grant favor with the legal system. To say that supporting these bail programs is somehow equivalent of inciting an insurection against the Congress of the United States of America is to have you head way up your ass.

These massive denials and false equivalency excercises are but rationalizations to avoid admitting the obvious - Trump didn't win, he is too pathetic to admit it, so he lies lies lies about it. His rhetoric caused the attack on the Capitol and will continue to damage this great country at home and abroad.

Shame on all of you usefull idiots for pushing these lies along.

You use "useful idiot" a lot without realizing that the real enemy are the feds themselves. They work for K Street, not you or me.

The only problem with supporting Trump is believing that he could "drain the swamp." That clearly was a fantasy.

As much as you guys freak out over the weakest "insurrection" ever seen, you should be more concerned about the monster that is our federal government. They've been the enemy of the common citizen for decades now.


You clearly don't understand the fire that Trump is playing with as he spreads his self serving lies.

When people do not belive in electoral system to settle political diputes they start to take to violence to achieve their goals.

Jan 6th was not the end, it was but mild preview of where these lieas are going to take us. Just a preview of what will be once this country gives up the priciples of peaceful transfer of power.

And what do you think the Floyd protests were? What do you think the protests that have happened in Portland for almost a year now were?

That ship has sailed. All the pandemic did was show America's true colors. The left had their riots first, and then the right had one that apparently freaked a lot of people out, despite being pretty tame compared to Minneapolis, Portland, or Kenosha.

Violence is here and more will come. That's not Trump's fault. That's just where our society was headed with or without Trump, although years of the media pushing identity politics didn't help.

If the end result is breaking the country into multiple parts, I'm fine with that. It needs to happen anyway.

Unlike storming the Capitol on Insurrection Day, none of the BLM riots threatened our democracy.

We don't have a democracy. We have a plutocratic republic.

Nonsense, we have a representative democracy

a: government by the people
especially : rule of the majority
b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections

In theory, yes. In practice, corporate money makes the process a charade.

Most of the time, both parties serve the same masters, with a few social issues each side panders to in order to provide the illusion of choice.

Regardless, we're a representative democracy which also means we the people have the right to vote against any of them who represent us if we don't feel their acting in our best interest.

But semantics aside, Insurrection Day was an assault on our democracy. BLM riots, as abhorrent as they were, were not.

"Insurrection Day" was just a psyop used on gullible people -- both the protesters themselves and the people freaked out over it.

DC represents oligarchy, not democracy.

LOL

Oh? Who do you think carried it out?
 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It';s incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
...so do you agree with his assertion that the DNC is also guilty of incitement? When considering the fact that multiple Democrats have funded bail for various Antifa/BLM rioters that were apprehended over assault and destruction of property, that's worse than incitement.
Which Democrats funded bail?

~~~~~~
The following Democrats are contributors to the bail fund organizations for Antifa and BLM...
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez went on Twitter to announce she, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley were raising $50,000 for the groups.
Even Vice-Presidential candidate Kamala Harris has promoted the "Minneapolis Freedom Fund"(MFF), who redirected donations to the Black Visions Collective and has bailed out defendants from Twin Cities jails charged with murder, violent felonies, and sex crimes.
Needless to say that the bulk of the funds come from Soros organizations.



They fund bail programs because of a belief in racial inequity, which means black people have less means to post bail.

It doesn't get ANYONE off for any crime. It doesn't grant favor with the legal system. To say that supporting these bail programs is somehow equivalent of inciting an insurection against the Congress of the United States of America is to have you head way up your ass.

These massive denials and false equivalency excercises are but rationalizations to avoid admitting the obvious - Trump didn't win, he is too pathetic to admit it, so he lies lies lies about it. His rhetoric caused the attack on the Capitol and will continue to damage this great country at home and abroad.

Shame on all of you usefull idiots for pushing these lies along.

You use "useful idiot" a lot without realizing that the real enemy are the feds themselves. They work for K Street, not you or me.

The only problem with supporting Trump is believing that he could "drain the swamp." That clearly was a fantasy.

As much as you guys freak out over the weakest "insurrection" ever seen, you should be more concerned about the monster that is our federal government. They've been the enemy of the common citizen for decades now.


You clearly don't understand the fire that Trump is playing with as he spreads his self serving lies.

When people do not belive in electoral system to settle political diputes they start to take to violence to achieve their goals.

Jan 6th was not the end, it was but mild preview of where these lieas are going to take us. Just a preview of what will be once this country gives up the priciples of peaceful transfer of power.

And what do you think the Floyd protests were? What do you think the protests that have happened in Portland for almost a year now were?

That ship has sailed. All the pandemic did was show America's true colors. The left had their riots first, and then the right had one that apparently freaked a lot of people out, despite being pretty tame compared to Minneapolis, Portland, or Kenosha.

Violence is here and more will come. That's not Trump's fault. That's just where our society was headed with or without Trump, although years of the media pushing identity politics didn't help.

If the end result is breaking the country into multiple parts, I'm fine with that. It needs to happen anyway.

Unlike storming the Capitol on Insurrection Day, none of the BLM riots threatened our democracy.

We don't have a democracy. We have a plutocratic republic.

Nonsense, we have a representative democracy

a: government by the people
especially : rule of the majority
b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections

In theory, yes. In practice, corporate money makes the process a charade.

Most of the time, both parties serve the same masters, with a few social issues each side panders to in order to provide the illusion of choice.

Regardless, we're a representative democracy which also means we the people have the right to vote against any of them who represent us if we don't feel their acting in our best interest.

But semantics aside, Insurrection Day was an assault on our democracy. BLM riots, as abhorrent as they were, were not.

"Insurrection Day" was just a psyop used on gullible people -- both the protesters themselves and the people freaked out over it.

DC represents oligarchy, not democracy.

LOL

Oh? Who do you think carried it out?

Q was probably some spook employed by any one of the various organizations that our government uses to mindfuck the public. This is the same government that did MK Ultra and Operation Mockingbird. And thanks to Snowden, we know the vast surveillance resources they have.

An actual insurrection would look more like what the Puerto Rican Nationalists did to the Capitol in the 50s.
 
Telling supporters to march to the capitol does not mean break into it...not in any language...Even the nations of Germany Spain and France and Canada are warning the dems to not do another impeachment....

We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

By gosh, who could have ever thought that a call to fight would result in fighting!
I can’t seem to remember one politician who never used the work “fight”.
And which ones inspired a fight?
View attachment 497001
Who did what she said?
1622748369345.png
 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It';s incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
...so do you agree with his assertion that the DNC is also guilty of incitement? When considering the fact that multiple Democrats have funded bail for various Antifa/BLM rioters that were apprehended over assault and destruction of property, that's worse than incitement.
Which Democrats funded bail?

~~~~~~
The following Democrats are contributors to the bail fund organizations for Antifa and BLM...
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez went on Twitter to announce she, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley were raising $50,000 for the groups.
Even Vice-Presidential candidate Kamala Harris has promoted the "Minneapolis Freedom Fund"(MFF), who redirected donations to the Black Visions Collective and has bailed out defendants from Twin Cities jails charged with murder, violent felonies, and sex crimes.
Needless to say that the bulk of the funds come from Soros organizations.



They fund bail programs because of a belief in racial inequity, which means black people have less means to post bail.

It doesn't get ANYONE off for any crime. It doesn't grant favor with the legal system. To say that supporting these bail programs is somehow equivalent of inciting an insurection against the Congress of the United States of America is to have you head way up your ass.

These massive denials and false equivalency excercises are but rationalizations to avoid admitting the obvious - Trump didn't win, he is too pathetic to admit it, so he lies lies lies about it. His rhetoric caused the attack on the Capitol and will continue to damage this great country at home and abroad.

Shame on all of you usefull idiots for pushing these lies along.

You use "useful idiot" a lot without realizing that the real enemy are the feds themselves. They work for K Street, not you or me.

The only problem with supporting Trump is believing that he could "drain the swamp." That clearly was a fantasy.

As much as you guys freak out over the weakest "insurrection" ever seen, you should be more concerned about the monster that is our federal government. They've been the enemy of the common citizen for decades now.


You clearly don't understand the fire that Trump is playing with as he spreads his self serving lies.

When people do not belive in electoral system to settle political diputes they start to take to violence to achieve their goals.

Jan 6th was not the end, it was but mild preview of where these lieas are going to take us. Just a preview of what will be once this country gives up the priciples of peaceful transfer of power.

And what do you think the Floyd protests were? What do you think the protests that have happened in Portland for almost a year now were?

That ship has sailed. All the pandemic did was show America's true colors. The left had their riots first, and then the right had one that apparently freaked a lot of people out, despite being pretty tame compared to Minneapolis, Portland, or Kenosha.

Violence is here and more will come. That's not Trump's fault. That's just where our society was headed with or without Trump, although years of the media pushing identity politics didn't help.

If the end result is breaking the country into multiple parts, I'm fine with that. It needs to happen anyway.

Unlike storming the Capitol on Insurrection Day, none of the BLM riots threatened our democracy.

We don't have a democracy. We have a plutocratic republic.

Nonsense, we have a representative democracy

a: government by the people
especially : rule of the majority
b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections

In theory, yes. In practice, corporate money makes the process a charade.

Most of the time, both parties serve the same masters, with a few social issues each side panders to in order to provide the illusion of choice.

Regardless, we're a representative democracy which also means we the people have the right to vote against any of them who represent us if we don't feel their acting in our best interest.

But semantics aside, Insurrection Day was an assault on our democracy. BLM riots, as abhorrent as they were, were not.

"Insurrection Day" was just a psyop used on gullible people -- both the protesters themselves and the people freaked out over it.

DC represents oligarchy, not democracy.

LOL

Oh? Who do you think carried it out?

Q was probably some spook employed by any one of the various organizations that our government uses to mindfuck the public. This is the same government that did MK Ultra and Operation Mockingbird. And thanks to Snowden, we know the vast surveillance resources they have.

An actual insurrection would look more like what the Puerto Rican Nationalists did to the Capitol in the 50s.

:cuckoo:

Umm, the perps are confessing.
icon_rolleyes.gif
 
Telling supporters to march to the capitol does not mean break into it...not in any language...Even the nations of Germany Spain and France and Canada are warning the dems to not do another impeachment....

We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

By gosh, who could have ever thought that a call to fight would result in fighting!
I can’t seem to remember one politician who never used the work “fight”.
And which ones inspired a fight?
View attachment 497001
Who did what she said?
View attachment 497003
LOLOL

Moron, she said to "fight for justice" IF Chauvin isn't convicted. So no, she did not inspire the BLM riots.
 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It';s incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
...so do you agree with his assertion that the DNC is also guilty of incitement? When considering the fact that multiple Democrats have funded bail for various Antifa/BLM rioters that were apprehended over assault and destruction of property, that's worse than incitement.
Which Democrats funded bail?

~~~~~~
The following Democrats are contributors to the bail fund organizations for Antifa and BLM...
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez went on Twitter to announce she, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley were raising $50,000 for the groups.
Even Vice-Presidential candidate Kamala Harris has promoted the "Minneapolis Freedom Fund"(MFF), who redirected donations to the Black Visions Collective and has bailed out defendants from Twin Cities jails charged with murder, violent felonies, and sex crimes.
Needless to say that the bulk of the funds come from Soros organizations.



They fund bail programs because of a belief in racial inequity, which means black people have less means to post bail.

It doesn't get ANYONE off for any crime. It doesn't grant favor with the legal system. To say that supporting these bail programs is somehow equivalent of inciting an insurection against the Congress of the United States of America is to have you head way up your ass.

These massive denials and false equivalency excercises are but rationalizations to avoid admitting the obvious - Trump didn't win, he is too pathetic to admit it, so he lies lies lies about it. His rhetoric caused the attack on the Capitol and will continue to damage this great country at home and abroad.

Shame on all of you usefull idiots for pushing these lies along.

You use "useful idiot" a lot without realizing that the real enemy are the feds themselves. They work for K Street, not you or me.

The only problem with supporting Trump is believing that he could "drain the swamp." That clearly was a fantasy.

As much as you guys freak out over the weakest "insurrection" ever seen, you should be more concerned about the monster that is our federal government. They've been the enemy of the common citizen for decades now.


You clearly don't understand the fire that Trump is playing with as he spreads his self serving lies.

When people do not belive in electoral system to settle political diputes they start to take to violence to achieve their goals.

Jan 6th was not the end, it was but mild preview of where these lieas are going to take us. Just a preview of what will be once this country gives up the priciples of peaceful transfer of power.

And what do you think the Floyd protests were? What do you think the protests that have happened in Portland for almost a year now were?

That ship has sailed. All the pandemic did was show America's true colors. The left had their riots first, and then the right had one that apparently freaked a lot of people out, despite being pretty tame compared to Minneapolis, Portland, or Kenosha.

Violence is here and more will come. That's not Trump's fault. That's just where our society was headed with or without Trump, although years of the media pushing identity politics didn't help.

If the end result is breaking the country into multiple parts, I'm fine with that. It needs to happen anyway.

Unlike storming the Capitol on Insurrection Day, none of the BLM riots threatened our democracy.

We don't have a democracy. We have a plutocratic republic.

Nonsense, we have a representative democracy

a: government by the people
especially : rule of the majority
b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections

In theory, yes. In practice, corporate money makes the process a charade.

Most of the time, both parties serve the same masters, with a few social issues each side panders to in order to provide the illusion of choice.

Regardless, we're a representative democracy which also means we the people have the right to vote against any of them who represent us if we don't feel their acting in our best interest.

But semantics aside, Insurrection Day was an assault on our democracy. BLM riots, as abhorrent as they were, were not.

"Insurrection Day" was just a psyop used on gullible people -- both the protesters themselves and the people freaked out over it.

DC represents oligarchy, not democracy.

LOL

Oh? Who do you think carried it out?

Q was probably some spook employed by any one of the various organizations that our government uses to mindfuck the public. This is the same government that did MK Ultra and Operation Mockingbird. And thanks to Snowden, we know the vast surveillance resources they have.

An actual insurrection would look more like what the Puerto Rican Nationalists did to the Capitol in the 50s.

:cuckoo:

Umm, the perps are confessing.
icon_rolleyes.gif

The people at the protest that were apprehended, sure. I'm talking about who started the Q movement. The whole ideology behind it is very convenient to establishment interests.

The protest itself worked wonders on getting a lot of the public to unite in favor of the government, because they apparently don't realize the feds don't serve them. They still think the feds are on their side. They aren't. They don't care about us or our interests, but the sheep will clamor in support of them nonetheless.
 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It';s incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
...so do you agree with his assertion that the DNC is also guilty of incitement? When considering the fact that multiple Democrats have funded bail for various Antifa/BLM rioters that were apprehended over assault and destruction of property, that's worse than incitement.
Which Democrats funded bail?

~~~~~~
The following Democrats are contributors to the bail fund organizations for Antifa and BLM...
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez went on Twitter to announce she, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley were raising $50,000 for the groups.
Even Vice-Presidential candidate Kamala Harris has promoted the "Minneapolis Freedom Fund"(MFF), who redirected donations to the Black Visions Collective and has bailed out defendants from Twin Cities jails charged with murder, violent felonies, and sex crimes.
Needless to say that the bulk of the funds come from Soros organizations.



They fund bail programs because of a belief in racial inequity, which means black people have less means to post bail.

It doesn't get ANYONE off for any crime. It doesn't grant favor with the legal system. To say that supporting these bail programs is somehow equivalent of inciting an insurection against the Congress of the United States of America is to have you head way up your ass.

These massive denials and false equivalency excercises are but rationalizations to avoid admitting the obvious - Trump didn't win, he is too pathetic to admit it, so he lies lies lies about it. His rhetoric caused the attack on the Capitol and will continue to damage this great country at home and abroad.

Shame on all of you usefull idiots for pushing these lies along.

You use "useful idiot" a lot without realizing that the real enemy are the feds themselves. They work for K Street, not you or me.

The only problem with supporting Trump is believing that he could "drain the swamp." That clearly was a fantasy.

As much as you guys freak out over the weakest "insurrection" ever seen, you should be more concerned about the monster that is our federal government. They've been the enemy of the common citizen for decades now.


You clearly don't understand the fire that Trump is playing with as he spreads his self serving lies.

When people do not belive in electoral system to settle political diputes they start to take to violence to achieve their goals.

Jan 6th was not the end, it was but mild preview of where these lieas are going to take us. Just a preview of what will be once this country gives up the priciples of peaceful transfer of power.

And what do you think the Floyd protests were? What do you think the protests that have happened in Portland for almost a year now were?

That ship has sailed. All the pandemic did was show America's true colors. The left had their riots first, and then the right had one that apparently freaked a lot of people out, despite being pretty tame compared to Minneapolis, Portland, or Kenosha.

Violence is here and more will come. That's not Trump's fault. That's just where our society was headed with or without Trump, although years of the media pushing identity politics didn't help.

If the end result is breaking the country into multiple parts, I'm fine with that. It needs to happen anyway.

Unlike storming the Capitol on Insurrection Day, none of the BLM riots threatened our democracy.

We don't have a democracy. We have a plutocratic republic.

Nonsense, we have a representative democracy

a: government by the people
especially : rule of the majority
b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections

In theory, yes. In practice, corporate money makes the process a charade.

Most of the time, both parties serve the same masters, with a few social issues each side panders to in order to provide the illusion of choice.

Regardless, we're a representative democracy which also means we the people have the right to vote against any of them who represent us if we don't feel their acting in our best interest.

But semantics aside, Insurrection Day was an assault on our democracy. BLM riots, as abhorrent as they were, were not.

"Insurrection Day" was just a psyop used on gullible people -- both the protesters themselves and the people freaked out over it.

DC represents oligarchy, not democracy.

LOL

Oh? Who do you think carried it out?

Q was probably some spook employed by any one of the various organizations that our government uses to mindfuck the public. This is the same government that did MK Ultra and Operation Mockingbird. And thanks to Snowden, we know the vast surveillance resources they have.

An actual insurrection would look more like what the Puerto Rican Nationalists did to the Capitol in the 50s.

:cuckoo:

Umm, the perps are confessing.
icon_rolleyes.gif

The people at the protest that were apprehended, sure. I'm talking about who started the Q movement. The whole ideology behind it is very convenient to establishment interests.

The protest itself worked wonders on getting a lot of the public to unite in favor of the government, because they apparently don't realize the feds don't serve them. They still think the feds are on their side. They aren't. They don't care about us or our interests, but the sheep will clamor in support of them nonetheless.

We know who Q is. And neither he nor his dad were spooks.

 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It';s incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
...so do you agree with his assertion that the DNC is also guilty of incitement? When considering the fact that multiple Democrats have funded bail for various Antifa/BLM rioters that were apprehended over assault and destruction of property, that's worse than incitement.
Which Democrats funded bail?

~~~~~~
The following Democrats are contributors to the bail fund organizations for Antifa and BLM...
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez went on Twitter to announce she, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley were raising $50,000 for the groups.
Even Vice-Presidential candidate Kamala Harris has promoted the "Minneapolis Freedom Fund"(MFF), who redirected donations to the Black Visions Collective and has bailed out defendants from Twin Cities jails charged with murder, violent felonies, and sex crimes.
Needless to say that the bulk of the funds come from Soros organizations.



They fund bail programs because of a belief in racial inequity, which means black people have less means to post bail.

It doesn't get ANYONE off for any crime. It doesn't grant favor with the legal system. To say that supporting these bail programs is somehow equivalent of inciting an insurection against the Congress of the United States of America is to have you head way up your ass.

These massive denials and false equivalency excercises are but rationalizations to avoid admitting the obvious - Trump didn't win, he is too pathetic to admit it, so he lies lies lies about it. His rhetoric caused the attack on the Capitol and will continue to damage this great country at home and abroad.

Shame on all of you usefull idiots for pushing these lies along.

You use "useful idiot" a lot without realizing that the real enemy are the feds themselves. They work for K Street, not you or me.

The only problem with supporting Trump is believing that he could "drain the swamp." That clearly was a fantasy.

As much as you guys freak out over the weakest "insurrection" ever seen, you should be more concerned about the monster that is our federal government. They've been the enemy of the common citizen for decades now.


You clearly don't understand the fire that Trump is playing with as he spreads his self serving lies.

When people do not belive in electoral system to settle political diputes they start to take to violence to achieve their goals.

Jan 6th was not the end, it was but mild preview of where these lieas are going to take us. Just a preview of what will be once this country gives up the priciples of peaceful transfer of power.

And what do you think the Floyd protests were? What do you think the protests that have happened in Portland for almost a year now were?

That ship has sailed. All the pandemic did was show America's true colors. The left had their riots first, and then the right had one that apparently freaked a lot of people out, despite being pretty tame compared to Minneapolis, Portland, or Kenosha.

Violence is here and more will come. That's not Trump's fault. That's just where our society was headed with or without Trump, although years of the media pushing identity politics didn't help.

If the end result is breaking the country into multiple parts, I'm fine with that. It needs to happen anyway.

Unlike storming the Capitol on Insurrection Day, none of the BLM riots threatened our democracy.

We don't have a democracy. We have a plutocratic republic.

Nonsense, we have a representative democracy

a: government by the people
especially : rule of the majority
b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections

In theory, yes. In practice, corporate money makes the process a charade.

Most of the time, both parties serve the same masters, with a few social issues each side panders to in order to provide the illusion of choice.

Regardless, we're a representative democracy which also means we the people have the right to vote against any of them who represent us if we don't feel their acting in our best interest.

But semantics aside, Insurrection Day was an assault on our democracy. BLM riots, as abhorrent as they were, were not.

"Insurrection Day" was just a psyop used on gullible people -- both the protesters themselves and the people freaked out over it.

DC represents oligarchy, not democracy.

LOL

Oh? Who do you think carried it out?

Q was probably some spook employed by any one of the various organizations that our government uses to mindfuck the public. This is the same government that did MK Ultra and Operation Mockingbird. And thanks to Snowden, we know the vast surveillance resources they have.

An actual insurrection would look more like what the Puerto Rican Nationalists did to the Capitol in the 50s.

:cuckoo:

Umm, the perps are confessing.
icon_rolleyes.gif

The people at the protest that were apprehended, sure. I'm talking about who started the Q movement. The whole ideology behind it is very convenient to establishment interests.

The protest itself worked wonders on getting a lot of the public to unite in favor of the government, because they apparently don't realize the feds don't serve them. They still think the feds are on their side. They aren't. They don't care about us or our interests, but the sheep will clamor in support of them nonetheless.

We know who Q is. And neither he nor his dad were spooks.


And Epstein killed himself too.
 
Telling supporters to march to the capitol does not mean break into it...not in any language...Even the nations of Germany Spain and France and Canada are warning the dems to not do another impeachment....

We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

By gosh, who could have ever thought that a call to fight would result in fighting!
I can’t seem to remember one politician who never used the work “fight”.

You probably also can't remember a policitician that kept claiming that he won election in a landlside after losing and then sat back and watched his supporters conduct a violent break into the Capitol.
 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It';s incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
...so do you agree with his assertion that the DNC is also guilty of incitement? When considering the fact that multiple Democrats have funded bail for various Antifa/BLM rioters that were apprehended over assault and destruction of property, that's worse than incitement.
Which Democrats funded bail?

~~~~~~
The following Democrats are contributors to the bail fund organizations for Antifa and BLM...
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez went on Twitter to announce she, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley were raising $50,000 for the groups.
Even Vice-Presidential candidate Kamala Harris has promoted the "Minneapolis Freedom Fund"(MFF), who redirected donations to the Black Visions Collective and has bailed out defendants from Twin Cities jails charged with murder, violent felonies, and sex crimes.
Needless to say that the bulk of the funds come from Soros organizations.



They fund bail programs because of a belief in racial inequity, which means black people have less means to post bail.

It doesn't get ANYONE off for any crime. It doesn't grant favor with the legal system. To say that supporting these bail programs is somehow equivalent of inciting an insurection against the Congress of the United States of America is to have you head way up your ass.

These massive denials and false equivalency excercises are but rationalizations to avoid admitting the obvious - Trump didn't win, he is too pathetic to admit it, so he lies lies lies about it. His rhetoric caused the attack on the Capitol and will continue to damage this great country at home and abroad.

Shame on all of you usefull idiots for pushing these lies along.

You use "useful idiot" a lot without realizing that the real enemy are the feds themselves. They work for K Street, not you or me.

The only problem with supporting Trump is believing that he could "drain the swamp." That clearly was a fantasy.

As much as you guys freak out over the weakest "insurrection" ever seen, you should be more concerned about the monster that is our federal government. They've been the enemy of the common citizen for decades now.


You clearly don't understand the fire that Trump is playing with as he spreads his self serving lies.

When people do not belive in electoral system to settle political diputes they start to take to violence to achieve their goals.

Jan 6th was not the end, it was but mild preview of where these lieas are going to take us. Just a preview of what will be once this country gives up the priciples of peaceful transfer of power.

And what do you think the Floyd protests were? What do you think the protests that have happened in Portland for almost a year now were?

That ship has sailed. All the pandemic did was show America's true colors. The left had their riots first, and then the right had one that apparently freaked a lot of people out, despite being pretty tame compared to Minneapolis, Portland, or Kenosha.

Violence is here and more will come. That's not Trump's fault. That's just where our society was headed with or without Trump, although years of the media pushing identity politics didn't help.

If the end result is breaking the country into multiple parts, I'm fine with that. It needs to happen anyway.

Unlike storming the Capitol on Insurrection Day, none of the BLM riots threatened our democracy.

We don't have a democracy. We have a plutocratic republic.

Nonsense, we have a representative democracy

a: government by the people
especially : rule of the majority
b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections

In theory, yes. In practice, corporate money makes the process a charade.

Most of the time, both parties serve the same masters, with a few social issues each side panders to in order to provide the illusion of choice.

Regardless, we're a representative democracy which also means we the people have the right to vote against any of them who represent us if we don't feel their acting in our best interest.

But semantics aside, Insurrection Day was an assault on our democracy. BLM riots, as abhorrent as they were, were not.

"Insurrection Day" was just a psyop used on gullible people -- both the protesters themselves and the people freaked out over it.

DC represents oligarchy, not democracy.

LOL

Oh? Who do you think carried it out?

Q was probably some spook employed by any one of the various organizations that our government uses to mindfuck the public. This is the same government that did MK Ultra and Operation Mockingbird. And thanks to Snowden, we know the vast surveillance resources they have.

An actual insurrection would look more like what the Puerto Rican Nationalists did to the Capitol in the 50s.

:cuckoo:

Umm, the perps are confessing.
icon_rolleyes.gif

The people at the protest that were apprehended, sure. I'm talking about who started the Q movement. The whole ideology behind it is very convenient to establishment interests.

The protest itself worked wonders on getting a lot of the public to unite in favor of the government, because they apparently don't realize the feds don't serve them. They still think the feds are on their side. They aren't. They don't care about us or our interests, but the sheep will clamor in support of them nonetheless.

We know who Q is. And neither he nor his dad were spooks.


And Epstein killed himself too.

Diverting again?
 
Q was probably some spook employed by any one of the various organizations that our government uses to mindfuck the public. This is the same government that did MK Ultra and Operation Mockingbird. And thanks to Snowden, we know the vast surveillance resources they have.

An actual insurrection would look more like what the Puerto Rican Nationalists did to the Capitol in the 50s.
Classic. When caught, claim the other side launched a false flag, or undercover operation. Except at the Capitol insurrection, where the entire complex was ringed with surveillance cameras, the police with body cameras, and the insurgents posted or live streamed what they did. So using all those resources, it became easy to determine who did what, and with over 500 indictments there is no evidence of other groups involvement.
 
Q was probably some spook employed by any one of the various organizations that our government uses to mindfuck the public. This is the same government that did MK Ultra and Operation Mockingbird. And thanks to Snowden, we know the vast surveillance resources they have.

An actual insurrection would look more like what the Puerto Rican Nationalists did to the Capitol in the 50s.
Classic. When caught, claim the other side launched a false flag, or undercover operation. Except at the Capitol insurrection, where the entire complex was ringed with surveillance cameras, the police with body cameras, and the insurgents posted or live streamed what they did. So using all those resources, it became easy to determine who did what, and with over 500 indictments there is no evidence of other groups involvement.
Desperate straw grasping is telling. ANYTHING not to admit the most obvious.
 
Q was probably some spook employed by any one of the various organizations that our government uses to mindfuck the public. This is the same government that did MK Ultra and Operation Mockingbird. And thanks to Snowden, we know the vast surveillance resources they have.

An actual insurrection would look more like what the Puerto Rican Nationalists did to the Capitol in the 50s.
Classic. When caught, claim the other side launched a false flag, or undercover operation. Except at the Capitol insurrection, where the entire complex was ringed with surveillance cameras, the police with body cameras, and the insurgents posted or live streamed what they did. So using all those resources, it became easy to determine who did what, and with over 500 indictments there is no evidence of other groups involvement.
I'm referring to who started the Q movement itself, not the people at the protest.
 
Telling supporters to march to the capitol does not mean break into it...not in any language...Even the nations of Germany Spain and France and Canada are warning the dems to not do another impeachment....

We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

By gosh, who could have ever thought that a call to fight would result in fighting!
I can’t seem to remember one politician who never used the work “fight”.

You probably also can't remember a policitician that kept claiming that he won election in a landlside after losing and then sat back and watched his supporters conduct a violent break into the Capitol.
Vote audits of the 2020 election are still in process. Rumors are some definitely serious malfeasance has been found.

Trump often says stuff that gets ridiculed initially but later proves true. The latest example is that the coronavirus virus came from a lab in Wuhan, China.
 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It';s incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
...so do you agree with his assertion that the DNC is also guilty of incitement? When considering the fact that multiple Democrats have funded bail for various Antifa/BLM rioters that were apprehended over assault and destruction of property, that's worse than incitement.
Which Democrats funded bail?

~~~~~~
The following Democrats are contributors to the bail fund organizations for Antifa and BLM...
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez went on Twitter to announce she, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley were raising $50,000 for the groups.
Even Vice-Presidential candidate Kamala Harris has promoted the "Minneapolis Freedom Fund"(MFF), who redirected donations to the Black Visions Collective and has bailed out defendants from Twin Cities jails charged with murder, violent felonies, and sex crimes.
Needless to say that the bulk of the funds come from Soros organizations.



They fund bail programs because of a belief in racial inequity, which means black people have less means to post bail.

It doesn't get ANYONE off for any crime. It doesn't grant favor with the legal system. To say that supporting these bail programs is somehow equivalent of inciting an insurection against the Congress of the United States of America is to have you head way up your ass.

These massive denials and false equivalency excercises are but rationalizations to avoid admitting the obvious - Trump didn't win, he is too pathetic to admit it, so he lies lies lies about it. His rhetoric caused the attack on the Capitol and will continue to damage this great country at home and abroad.

Shame on all of you usefull idiots for pushing these lies along.

You use "useful idiot" a lot without realizing that the real enemy are the feds themselves. They work for K Street, not you or me.

The only problem with supporting Trump is believing that he could "drain the swamp." That clearly was a fantasy.

As much as you guys freak out over the weakest "insurrection" ever seen, you should be more concerned about the monster that is our federal government. They've been the enemy of the common citizen for decades now.


You clearly don't understand the fire that Trump is playing with as he spreads his self serving lies.

When people do not belive in electoral system to settle political diputes they start to take to violence to achieve their goals.

Jan 6th was not the end, it was but mild preview of where these lieas are going to take us. Just a preview of what will be once this country gives up the priciples of peaceful transfer of power.

And what do you think the Floyd protests were? What do you think the protests that have happened in Portland for almost a year now were?

That ship has sailed. All the pandemic did was show America's true colors. The left had their riots first, and then the right had one that apparently freaked a lot of people out, despite being pretty tame compared to Minneapolis, Portland, or Kenosha.

Violence is here and more will come. That's not Trump's fault. That's just where our society was headed with or without Trump, although years of the media pushing identity politics didn't help.

If the end result is breaking the country into multiple parts, I'm fine with that. It needs to happen anyway.

Unlike storming the Capitol on Insurrection Day, none of the BLM riots threatened our democracy.

We don't have a democracy. We have a plutocratic republic.

Nonsense, we have a representative democracy

a: government by the people
especially : rule of the majority
b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections

In theory, yes. In practice, corporate money makes the process a charade.

Most of the time, both parties serve the same masters, with a few social issues each side panders to in order to provide the illusion of choice.

Regardless, we're a representative democracy which also means we the people have the right to vote against any of them who represent us if we don't feel their acting in our best interest.

But semantics aside, Insurrection Day was an assault on our democracy. BLM riots, as abhorrent as they were, were not.

"Insurrection Day" was just a psyop used on gullible people -- both the protesters themselves and the people freaked out over it.

DC represents oligarchy, not democracy.

LOL

Oh? Who do you think carried it out?

Q was probably some spook employed by any one of the various organizations that our government uses to mindfuck the public. This is the same government that did MK Ultra and Operation Mockingbird. And thanks to Snowden, we know the vast surveillance resources they have.

An actual insurrection would look more like what the Puerto Rican Nationalists did to the Capitol in the 50s.

:cuckoo:

Umm, the perps are confessing.
icon_rolleyes.gif

The people at the protest that were apprehended, sure. I'm talking about who started the Q movement. The whole ideology behind it is very convenient to establishment interests.

The protest itself worked wonders on getting a lot of the public to unite in favor of the government, because they apparently don't realize the feds don't serve them. They still think the feds are on their side. They aren't. They don't care about us or our interests, but the sheep will clamor in support of them nonetheless.

We know who Q is. And neither he nor his dad were spooks.


And Epstein killed himself too.

Diverting again?

I don't even know why I waste my time with you.
 
Q was probably some spook employed by any one of the various organizations that our government uses to mindfuck the public. This is the same government that did MK Ultra and Operation Mockingbird. And thanks to Snowden, we know the vast surveillance resources they have.

An actual insurrection would look more like what the Puerto Rican Nationalists did to the Capitol in the 50s.
Classic. When caught, claim the other side launched a false flag, or undercover operation. Except at the Capitol insurrection, where the entire complex was ringed with surveillance cameras, the police with body cameras, and the insurgents posted or live streamed what they did. So using all those resources, it became easy to determine who did what, and with over 500 indictments there is no evidence of other groups involvement.
Desperate straw grasping is telling. ANYTHING not to admit the most obvious.
Well fuck you too.
 

Forum List

Back
Top