Did SCOTUS look at the expenditures by USAID?

[MarcATL]

That is not what you were saying at the time she was appointed.

Sure wasn't.

I believe he was among those who poopooed people like me when I suggested she was a DEI hire.

Principles. MAGATS, and other assorted Republican flavors, do not have any.

 

[skye]

 

[Calypso Jones]

You wasn't blabbing that bullshit when Trump appointed her.

What do you know about what i said about Barrett. I want to know who recommended her to him. She consistently sides with the left. THAT Is not what i wanted. I want a SC justice who knows the law and applies it according to the constitution.

 

[OKTexas]

View attachment 1087192

SCOTUS is supposed to remain neutral during those speeches.


.

 

[Vastator]

Some of yall have lost your minds. She didn't betray anything. She upheld the Constitutional Law. Or are we supposed to run rough-shod over the Constitution we love just to spite the Dems? News flash... They lost! We're in power now. But what's done is done. The spending was approved by Congress, whose job it is to determine whether or not to open the purse strings. It happened under a different congress, and President; but that hardly matters. What matters is how we handle spending approvals going forward. We don't crush our enemies by becoming just like them...

 

[skye]

SCOTUS is supposed to remain neutral during those speeches.


.

Would you call her face "neutral"?

She looks disgusted..............whatever.

 

[jc456]

She is not loyal to the constitution. She is a ringer...always was. She should be taken out of SC for Fraud.

here you go

 

[jc456]

Would you call her face "neutral"?

She looks disgusted..............whatever.

Well technically, the judge does not have any standing. There's that.

 

[OKTexas]

Would you call her face "neutral"?

She looks disgusted..............whatever.

The fact is you don't now at what point in time that photo was taken, or what her expression was two minutes before. That meme crap is meant for the maximum propaganda purposes, I don't pay any attention to them.

.

 

[skye]

She is not loyal to the constitution. She is a ringer...always was. She should be taken out of SC for Fraud.

I agree

 

[jc456]

I agree

well, the judge had no standing. That isn't per constitutional judgement.

 

[Dragonlady]

Supreme Court denies Trump request to block $2 billion foreign-aid payment​

Barrett and Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. joined the court’s three liberals in backing a federal judge’s order that requires the administration to begin repaying global health groups nearly $2 billion for completed work.

Supreme Court denies Trump request to block $2 billion foreign-aid payment

A divided Supreme Court on Wednesday turned down a request by the Trump administration to lift an order by a federal judge in Washington, D.C., that had directed the State […]

www.scotusblog.com

Trump cut lifesaving foreign aid as State Department planned to buy expensive art for embassies

Now part of the $2 billion that SCOTUS said could not be halted from being paid included...

"But at least initially, the budget for expensive artwork to hang in U.S. embassies and consulates worldwide remained robust.
The State Department planned, for instance, to purchase a $650,000 “triple-height suspended sculpture” for its embassy in Brasília. It had designs on a $55,000 “wall installation” in Malawi. A “textile work” that costs $105,000 and a $94,000 “suspended sculpture that would span two levels” were on the books for Mauritius. And $550,000 was set aside for “three ceiling suspended sculptures” that would hang in the “main atrium space” of the American embassy in Riyadh.

The intended purchases, which total nearly $2 million, were described to me by a U.S. government official with information about the State Department’s spending plans. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity, for fear of retribution. I verified the planned acquisitions by reviewing a government document—dated earlier this month, weeks after Donald Trump took office—with itemized descriptions of the artwork."

Trump cut lifesaving foreign aid as State Department planned to buy expensive art for embassies

The intended purchases, which total nearly $2 million, were described by a U.S. government official with information about the State Department’s spending plans.

www.pbs.org

QUESTiON: Did SCOTUS know that part of the above $2 billion was to be used to buy sculptures and not to fee the hungry?

It doesn't matter what the money was being used for, Trump has no legal right not to pay the funds. The President has no power of the purse.

He has no authority to impose tariffs on any nation either.

 

[Seymour Flops]

We can live with this ruling. Pay people for the asinine work the asinine Dems and RINO's promised to pay them for. Trump can still cut off funding for further insanity and nothing in that ruling stops him.

I believe the USSC is trying not to look like a rubber stamp as justoffal said. They will rule with common sense when Trump cuts off future transgender dogs and HIV experiments on monkeys (who cannot get HIV).

The Democrats seem to be trying to be as wrong as possible on each issue. We are ripe for a third party that the Bill Mahers of the Democratic base could be welcome in, and not be embarassed for supporting.

 

[IM2]

Trump Republicans lash out at Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett as a DEI hire​

Some of President Donald Trump’s loudest supporters have a new diversity, equity and inclusion target: Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

The reason?

Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts this week sided with the court’s three liberal justices in backing an order that the Trump administration has to pay foreign aid organizations for work they already did for the government.

Although Roberts wasn’t targeted, Barrett faced some scathing criticism from the right.

Jack Posobiec, a senior editor at Human Events, a conservative political news and analysis site, called Barrett “a warning against the dangers of Republican DEI.”

Trump Republicans lash out at Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett as a DEI hire

Some conservatives attacked Justice Barrett as a DEI hire after she backed a district judge's order requiring the administration pay foreign aid bills.

www.usatoday.com

 

[Vastator]

Bummer bout the Thread kill... But, to be honest... The OP was a dishonest C,U,N,T...
Incoming ban. Check one for the commies...

 

[skye]

Interesting watching!!

DEEP STATE Just OVERTHREW Trump! Judge Barrett Sides With LIBERALS, America is OUTRAGED!​

 

[Vastator]

Some of yall are fuckin' retarded. Ain't sayin' no names. But you know, who you are...

 

[Calypso Jones]

It's not gonna survive with black and white progressive women in charge.

 

[jwoodie]

SCOTUS has 4 Conservatives, 3 Liberals and 2 Rino justices.

Roberts is a player, and Barrett may be one too. They may be waiting for the right case to bring down the hammer.

 

[skye]

Roberts is a player, and Barrett may be one too. They may be waiting for the right case to bring down the hammer.

POS both of them.....................and her ? freaking turncoat.