Did MAGA Rig the election?

[BackAgain]

The later is exactly what happened as attempted to by the Republican sos.

Untrue. It is not “exactly” what happened nor even at all what happened.

As we heard on that phone call. As we’ve seen though case after case of bogus stolen election claims. It’s comical how bad yall are at being convincing

You misinterpreted the phone call.

 

[Slade3200]

No chance Trump hating media would suppress something counter the agenda?

Oh of course Trump hating media would suppress.. but right wing Trump loving media wouldn’t… it would be all over the place. I’m pretty sure the thing you heard was was trumps mischaracterization of a statement made about somebody else.

 

[Delldude]

Oh of course Trump hating media would suppress.. but right wing Trump loving media wouldn’t… it would be all over the place. I’m pretty sure the thing you heard was was trumps mischaracterization of a statement made about somebody else.

I'm pretty sure you're wrong.

Raffensperger testimony under oath..........find the transcript.

 

[Slade3200]

I'm pretty sure you're wrong.

Raffensperger testimony under oath..........find the transcript.

Again, it is all linked in the fact check article I sent you... click the link on "testimony" to see the transcript from the Meadows case. Trump was taking Brads testimony out of context and spreading fake news like he always does.



------
Facts First: Trump’s claim is false. Raffensperger did not say that Trump didn’t do anything wrong on the January 2021 call.

Trump’s claim about Raffensperger, a Republican, was one of more than a dozen false claims he made in the “Meet the Press” interview. Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign did not respond to a request to explain what supposed Raffensperger remark Trump was purporting to refer to.

Raffensperger’s office declined to comment. But a review of Raffensperger’s recent public statements shows that he did not say anything similar to what Trump said he did.

Raffensperger’s recent statements about the call and Trump​

It is possible that Trump was mischaracterizing Raffensperger’s testimony from a late-August court hearing on the attempt by former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows to get his own Georgia criminal case moved from state court to federal court. Nowhere in Raffensperger’s testimony did he say Trump didn’t do anything wrong or did he defend Trump’s words.

RELATED ARTICLEFact check: 14 of Trump's false claims on 'Meet the Press'
Rather, Raffensperger testified that “I didn’t take it as inappropriate” when Meadows told him on the January 2021 call that he hoped they could reach an agreement to allow the Trump side to look more fully at the election data. (Meadows had asked on the call if, “in the spirit of cooperation and compromise,” they could “at least have a discussion” to seek a “less litigious” path forward.) That Raffensperger remark was in response to a question that was solely about Meadows’ words, not Trump’s.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/18/politics/fact-check-trump-raffensperger-phone-call-didnt-do-wrong/index.html

 

[Delldude]

Again, it is all linked in the fact check article I sent you..

Again, not what I was talking about. I mentioned it might not have been Meadows too.

Under direct, was asked, something to the effect, did he think Trump was trying to get him to break the law or something like that and
Raffenspergers answer was no.

That's it.

Shoulda bookmarked it.

 

[Slade3200]

Again, not what I was talking about. I mentioned it might not have been Meadows too.

Under direct, was asked, something to the effect, did he think Trump was trying to get him to break the law or something like that and
Raffenspergers answer was no.

That's it.

Shoulda bookmarked it.

If I provided a quote where he said the opposite would it make any difference to you: is it even worth the goose chase?

 

[Delldude]

If I provided a quote where he said the opposite would it make any difference to you: is it even worth the goose chase?

Telling you what I read and that's all I can say about it.

You're the one twisting it to suit your view.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

For “again” you need to be thinking of the Dims.

MAGA gets caught at it, as you well know.

... a notable phone call between Trump and Raffensperger happened on January 2, 2021, where Trump pressured Raffensperger to "find 11,780 votes" to overturn the election results in Georgia. This call has been widely discussed and scrutinized,

 

[BackAgain]

MAGA gets caught at it, as you well know.

... a notable phone call between Trump and Raffensperger happened on January 2, 2021, where Trump pressured Raffensperger to "find 11,780 votes" to overturn the election results in Georgia. This call has been widely discussed and scrutinized

You either didn’t comprehend the conversation or you choose to lie about it.

 

[Delldude]

.. a notable phone call between Trump and Raffensperger happened on January 2, 2021, where Trump pressured Raffensperger to "find 11,780 votes" to overturn the election results in Georgia. This call has been widely discussed and scrutinized,

And nothing will ever come of it now, will it?

 

[Slade3200]

You either didn’t comprehend the conversation or you choose to lie about it.

Pretty easy to comprehend and to fact check… Trump pushed lie after lie. Ignored the SOS when he tried to correct the facts and then steamrolled his agenda which was to get him to find votes so they could flip the state. It was an embarrassment and attempt to abuse the power of his presidency. Par for the course when it comes to Trump

 

[BackAgain]

Pretty easy to comprehend

And yet, you failed miserably.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Pretty easy to comprehend and to fact check… Trump pushed lie after lie. Ignored the SOS when he tried to correct the facts and then steamrolled his agenda which was to get him to find votes so they could flip the state. It was an embarrassment and attempt to abuse the power of his presidency. Par for the course when it comes to Trump

Much Ado About Nothing. You are easily trolled

 

[Slade3200]

And yet, you failed miserably.

I’d say the same about you… and my claims would be backed by dozens of fail court attempts and many admissions of spreading lies from the Trump squad

 

[Slade3200]

Much Ado About Nothing. You are easily trolled

I’m easily trolled? That’s the best you can come up with?

 

[Delldude]

I’d say the same about you… and my claims would be backed by dozens of fail court attempts and many admissions of spreading lies from the Trump squad

I’m easily trolled? That’s the best you can come up with?

Why is it so important you opine on things that no longer matter?

Your life is focused on issues that are now moot.............litigation that is now moot.

Trump living inside your head, again or still?

 

[Blisterfinger]

I’m easily trolled? That’s the best you can come up with?

Very easy to get you to expend enormous energy defending inane misplaced outrage. Much Ado over nothing.

 

[BackAgain]

I’d say the same about you… and my claims would be backed by dozens of fail court attempts and many admissions of spreading lies from the Trump squad

Nope. It’s one thing to say he lies. So did Potato and Obumbler. So does everyone.

But you’re full of shit in declaring that Trump is a main offender.

 

[Hollie]

Notice how we aren't hearing any claims of cheating or challenging the legitimacy of the election? It's noteworthy to look at some of the differences between the last few elections.

When Trump lost he called the Dems cheaters, claimed he won and the election was rigged. He refused to concede and respect the democratic process. It led to a riot at the capital that tried to stop the certification of the election.

Look at how the Dems are reacting to this election. They are reflecting on what they got wrong, trying to understand what happened and how they can adjust. There is plenty of crumbs to go after the "Cheating" narrative if they want. One of Trumps key "rigged" claims in 2020 had to do with Social Media companies working with the gov to give favor to the Dems. Well Trump had Elon the owner of X "Twitter" giving out a million dollars a day for people to register to vote and then he followed up by flooding his platform with MAGA talking points. This is something the Dems could focus on to claim an unfair advantage but it is nowhere near the top of the headlines.

Last points, I think the Dems do need to chill out now and give Trump a chance. He won by a substantial amount of votes and our democracy has handed him mandate to pursue his agenda. Not to say Dems need to agree with everything, debate and negotiation is necessary, but do so in good faith and not overpoliticized obstruction which has become the norm in Washington.

For the Republicans, a little humility would be helpful. Imagine for a second that Trump was a Dem pushing a leftist agenda. Using his same dishonest, bully tactics. You all would be losing your minds and the words dictator and commies would be in every talking point. Y'all need to mellow out as well and guide Trump in a better direction instead of enabling every ugly impulse to crush political enemies. We are one country in this together. Let's start acting like it.

#RantOver

Dems/ Socialists are not "reflecting" on what they did wrong. They're literally doubling down on what they did wrong.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Dems/ Socialists are not "reflecting" on what they did wrong. They're literally doubling down on what they did wrong.

Your head is hurting again.