Zone1 did Jesus ever mention homosexuality?

did Jesus mention homosexuality?

  • no

  • yes

  • dont know


Results are only viewable after voting.
These are words of Jesus that were directly given to Moses from Him.


Leviticus 20:1,13
1 And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying,
13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Jesus is the God of the Old Testament. For my post on this see post #37.
Levitikus is often just absurd
 
Jesus supported that law? Is that so? He said only that it would remain in effect - every jot and tittle of it - until later in that generation, when he would come to destroy the temple.

And even if I were alive two thousand years ago or earlier, I would not have been subject to that law. I would not have been an Israelite. That law's jurisdiction extended only to the temple people.

The Mosaic Law is dead. Or do you know any Levites who perform priestly ministrations? Any Jews who treat their Israelite slaves better than they treat their foreign slaves? Who sacrifice animals in a temple? Who stone women for adultery?

Yea, you try living up to that law and see how long you can avoid prison.

Of course Jesus supported the Law. Concerning a leper whom He had healed, He said, (Luke 5:14) "And he charged him to tell no man: but go, and shew thyself to the priest, and offer for thy cleansing, according as Moses commanded, for a testimony unto them."

See (Matt. 5:17) "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets..."

When Jesus was on this earth, He was under the Mosaic Law. And the Israelites He spoke to were under the Mosaic Law. Jesus never found fault with the Law. The Law was fulfilled before 70 A.D

The Law was in effect till Jesus died on the Cross. He fulfilled all the requirements of the Law.

Sorry. But if you are a Gentile, that didn't make you immune to the Law of God. (Rom. 2:14-15) "For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves.

"Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another"

My point here is that the 4 Gospels cover a time period when the Mosaic Law was to be obeyed. It was not done away with at that time.

Quantrill
 
He never talked Homosexuality at all. Just like he NEVER talked about abortion. He did not believe in divorce though.
Doh.gif
 
Levitikus is often just absurd

No, Leviticus is the Word Of God. Which no doubt is absurd to you. Because God is absurd to you. But He is not absurd to me. He is my Father, and Saviour.

Quantrill
 
Leviticus 20:1,13
1 And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying,
13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Jesus is the God of the Old Testament. For my post on this see post #37.
Paul said.... we must not follow leviticus
 
Here is what Jesus thought:

“Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?“ Matt 7:3
 
Romans had sex with boys in the baths under murals of men having sex with women. Jesus never mentioned that.
 
Paul said.... we must not follow leviticus
Show me the verse. Paul may have been referring to certain practices of the lesser law of Moses that were fulfilled by Jesus' higher law. If homosexuality was thought to be an abomination by Jesus when he gave the law to Moses, why would it not still be a sin as Paul continued to teach in the New Testament. Isn't God the same yesterday, today and forever when it comes to sin? Paul, being an Apostle of Jesus Christ looked first and foremost to the teachings of Jesus and taught in Romans 1 that homosexuality was a perversion of God's ways. Why are you so pro-homosexual?
 
If persecuting gays and militant anti-abortion was important to Jesus he would have clear messages like:

“Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; life does not consist in an abundance of possessions" (Luke 12:15)

I mean he felt strongly about greed. Not abortion or anti-gay.
 
Show me the verse. Paul may have been referring to certain practices of the lesser law of Moses that were fulfilled by Jesus' higher law. If homosexuality was thought to be an abomination by Jesus when he gave the law to Moses, why would it not still be a sin as Paul continued to teach in the New Testament. Isn't God the same yesterday, today and forever when it comes to sin? Paul, being an Apostle of Jesus Christ looked first and foremost to the teachings of Jesus and taught in Romans 1 that homosexuality was a perversion of God's ways. Why are you so pro-homosexual?
Jesus said to Moses .....

Joke over
 
Jesus said to Moses .....

Joke over
Where's the verse??? Were you lying about your Paul quote? See post #37 for proof that Jesus was the God of the Old Testament who spoke and appeared before the ancient prophets and gave them the law regarding homosexuality. Sorry, NO JOKE!!!
 
Where's the verse??? Were you lying about your Paul quote? See post #37 for proof that Jesus was the God of the Old Testament who spoke and appeared before the ancient prophets and gave them the law regarding homosexuality. Sorry, NO JOKE!!!
Where is Jesus’ quote? He spoke a lot about hypocrisy and caring for the poor and not worshipping money, and a whole lot of stuff but nothing about being gay or abortion. The dude hung out with hookers. Hmm.
 
15th post
Where is Jesus’ quote? He spoke a lot about hypocrisy and caring for the poor and not worshipping money, and a whole lot of stuff but nothing about being gay or abortion. The dude hung out with hookers. Hmm.
See post #37
 
Yea. No quote. Try again. Just a wall of text hoping I’ll lose focus by the end.

Here is how you show a quote. Jesus thought it was important to honor your parents:

“Honor your father and your mother," Matthew 15:4 and Matthew 19:17

See? It’s easy.
 
If he was God/Son of God then everything that was important was preserved.
If man was doing the preserving then it would be certain to be flawed, wouldn’t you agree
 
Back
Top Bottom