Did Hillary cheat to get the nomination back in 2016?

Did Hillary have to cheat to steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders for 2016?

  • No

    Votes: 1 8.3%
  • Yes

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • Yes, OBVIOUSLY!

    Votes: 7 58.3%
  • Maybe, Hillary has been known to do a lot worse things than steal votes?!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other answer, please be specific in a reply.

    Votes: 2 16.7%

  • Total voters
    12

DennisPTate

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2025
Messages
2,922
Reaction score
1,127
Points
163
I was watching the whole thing from up here in Canada and the news that I was getting made it seem pretty clear that Hillary had to cheat, and cheat and cheat to steal the nomination away from Bernie?

The impression that I got was that Hillary did not have to cheat merely a little bit, but she had to cheat A LOT, to take the nomination away from Bernie?

The whole process that crowned Kamala Harris for 2024 was arguably even more corrupt than what happened when Hillary emerged as the rival to President Trump back in 2016.

If the Dems do not do a better job of NOT OBVIOUSLY CHEATING during their nomination process, they will have alienated a significant percentage of Democrat voters for 2028.
 
I do not believe that Hillary cheated but rather she was never intended to become President

however, the plan was that her administration was to be elevated and all federal and World Bank Club associations within her administration - this is why they flooded the country with strangers because even her administration and all associations within her administration were exposed .

by emptying all of the mental institutions, prisons and broken and problematic communities to enter the USA unidentified and undocumented in any way possible this was an act of collateral and insurance that the World Bank Club would keep the investments and assets of its American Federal and Contracted member finances stable and current
 
I was watching the whole thing from up here in Canada and the news that I was getting made it seem pretty clear that Hillary had to cheat, and cheat and cheat to steal the nomination away from Bernie?

The impression that I got was that Hillary did not have to cheat merely a little bit, but she had to cheat A LOT, to take the nomination away from Bernie?

The whole process that crowned Kamala Harris for 2024 was arguably even more corrupt than what happened when Hillary emerged as the rival to President Trump back in 2016.

If the Dems do not do a better job of NOT OBVIOUSLY CHEATING during their nomination process, they will have alienated a significant percentage of Democrat voters for 2028.

Shouldn't question read as, "Did Donald Trump Cheat In 2016?" The answer is yes.
 
Does it really matter now? She was a lousy candidate that lost the an equally lousy candidate.

The country got cheated and it's been downhill ever since.
 
Dunno if she cheated, but dem party cheated comrade Sanders out of his chance.

Things happen clintons.webp
 
I do not believe that Hillary cheated but rather she was never intended to become President

however, the plan was that her administration was to be elevated and all federal and World Bank Club associations within her administration - this is why they flooded the country with strangers because even her administration and all associations within her administration were exposed .

by emptying all of the mental institutions, prisons and broken and problematic communities to enter the USA unidentified and undocumented in any way possible this was an act of collateral and insurance that the World Bank Club would keep the investments and assets of its American Federal and Contracted member finances stable and current


Here is why I believe that it is important for the Dems to become significantly more honest for the up coming critical months and years.

Millions of lives could be saved in the Middle East alone if the Dems were to ask Al Gore to come up with an alternative theory on stabilization of the climate that would tend to increase economic cooperation between ten million Israelis and a billion or more of their Islamic neighbours.

......


"Would you like to see Mr. Al Gore come out with a new documentary on an alternative theory on stabilization of the climate that could be useful to the Trump administration as a possible Phase two, three or four, to The Abraham Accords?

Based partly on the less divisive way of approaching Climate Change would you like to see Mr. Al Gore lead the Dems into the 2026 mid-terms?
....

"I have a sincere suggestion for the Dems.....
get Mr. Al Gore to do so some variation on an apology for missing some critical information related to his documentary "An Inconvenient Truth."

His new campaign for the 2026 mid terms could be to deliberately turn deserts green in such a way as to insulate the USA and world economy from a Bear Market, AND to attempt to increase economic cooperation between ten million Israelis with their two billion Islamic neighbours, based on an ancient Islamic prediction that fits perfectly with Isaiah chapter thirty five."

"Will world peace begin with immigrants from many nations who go to Canada and find out ways to address the root causes of the conflicts that were going on in the nations that they left?

I am hopeful that this will be the case, for example, immigrants to Canada from the Middle East may be able to turn the world away from the Al Gore Carbon Tax Theory and the Bill Gates, "Innovation to zero" emissions theory, and instead adopt the more down to earth approach to Climate Change advocated in the Jewish, Islamic and Christian scriptures as well as by a New Mexico biologist and coach.

Here is an ancient Islamic prediction that sounds like a brilliant response to both the threat of rising ocean levels... as well as to the Economic Crisis that it appears some influential people seem to want to occur."
Book 005, Number 2208:
"Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (way peace be upon him) as saying: The Last Hour will not come before wealth becomes abundant and overflowing, so much so that a man takes Zakat out of his property and cannot find anyone to accept it from him and till the land of Arabia becomes meadows and rivers."
SAHIH MUSLIM, BOOK 25: The Book on General Behaviour (Kitab Al-Adab)
... "The wilderness and the solitary place shall be glad for them; and the desert shall rejoice, and blossom as the rose.
It shall blossom abundantly, and rejoice even with joyand singing: the glory of Lebanon shall be given unto it, the
excellency of Carmel and Sharon, they shall see the glory of the LORD, and the excellency of our God.

....
Then shall the lame man leap as an hart, and the tongueof the dumb sing: for in the wilderness shall waters break out,
and streams in the desert.
And the parched ground shall become a pool, and the thirsty land springs of water:
in the habitation of dragons,where
each lay, shall be grass with reeds and rushes." (Isaiah 35 : 1, 2, 6, 7 ).

A New Mexico biologist and coach wrote up an alternative theory on stabilization of the climate that fits well with these ancient Islamic and Jewish predictions for the last decades and centuries of human history before our Creator gives us a utopian world where the Holy Spirit is poured out on all flesh.

New Mexico biologist and coach Carl Cantrell.....

"So how is our problem of continental drying causing global warming? It all has to do with vegetation and sunlight. When sun light hits a plant, it causes a process which we call photosynthesis where the energy from the sun light creates oxygen for us to breath, water for us to drink, and is stored as sugar for plants and animals to use. When the same sun light hits the soil, all of its energy turns into heat and is radiated back into the atmosphere, carried away by running surface water such as rain fall, is carried away to other areas by our winds, and diffuses down into the soil towards the earth's crust. All of this warms our planet increasing its average temperature.

Therefore, the less vegetation you have on the planet, the more sunlight is being turned into heat and the warmer the planet becomes. This is very critical because warmer and dryer winds dry out other land areas faster decreasing the vegetation on those land areas. Less humidity in the air also reflects less sun light back out into space so that more sun light strikes the earth and more heat is generated.

The truth is that you can do more to decrease global warming by just reducing the average temperature for the Sahara Desert by one or two degrees than if we humans completely quit using fossil fuels and returned to the cave.

So, how would you start working to resolve this problem? Easy, cool the deserts and get some vegetation growing on them as soon as possible. But the method is much more complex than that. You have to use the prevailing trade winds in relation to the deserts to get the best results as quickly as possible and it will be extremely expensive.

Then we build desalination plants along the coast near these water sheds and pipe water to the tops or ridges of the water sheds

This will do a number of things. First, it will increase the moisture in the desert soil so that it will develop water tables and water will begin to run in the streams. This water will increase the amount of vegetation in the area and decrease the amount of heat being generated by sun light cooling the watered area and all areas down wind of the watered area. As more available water evaporates, it will cool the air and reflect more sun light back out into space cooling the area even more. Cooler and more humid air will have less of a heating effect on areas down wind and will reflect more sun light back into space in those areas cooling areas we won't be watering yet. Cooler and more humid air will also have less of a warming effect on our seas and oceans.

Rain water running off of cooler soil will decrease the heating effect on our oceans and our planet crusts which will decrease catastrophic storm activities for other areas and seismic activity for the entire planet. Also, returning more ocean water to the surface and aquifers of our continents will lower the sea levels providing more usable land for us to farm and build on.

With cooler desert areas and increasing vegetation, less water will evaporate from our deserts increasing the amount of surface water even more and increasing the amount of vegetation and animal life by huge amounts because deserts currently take up more than 20% of our land surface. Populations will be able to spread out and there will be less competition for existing land areas.

This strategy has to be done in steps with the first step being to begin slowing the rate at which our global warming is increasing. We need to focus on that until we have brought it to a point to where the temperature is not increasing any more and is reasonably stable. While we are doing this, we need to come to a global consensus of just how cool we want to cool our planet down to. If we cool it down too much, we will begin to have devastatingly harsh winters in large populated areas and even cause an ice age to set in.

Then we begin cooling the planet down to a point which will be most beneficial for all countries or the planet as a whole. We need to gradually bring the temperature down because there may be a lag effect in which the planet will continue cooling after we stop increasing our efforts to cool it off more. We may even want to stop cooling the planet once or twice before we reach our targeted temperatures to see if there is a lag effect


We need to start working on this as soon as possible because, if the planet reaches a point to where it is warming faster than our technology can possibly stop or reverse this warming trend, then our planet is lost and all life will cease to exist on this planet within a relatively short period of time. We will need to start with the largest and hottest deserts because cooling them will have the greatest benefit in the least time. (Global Warming II by biologist Carl Cantrell).


 
How do you think she cheated OP?
 
I was watching the whole thing from up here in Canada and the news that I was getting made it seem pretty clear that Hillary had to cheat, and cheat and cheat to steal the nomination away from Bernie?

The impression that I got was that Hillary did not have to cheat merely a little bit, but she had to cheat A LOT, to take the nomination away from Bernie?

The whole process that crowned Kamala Harris for 2024 was arguably even more corrupt than what happened when Hillary emerged as the rival to President Trump back in 2016.

If the Dems do not do a better job of NOT OBVIOUSLY CHEATING during their nomination process, they will have alienated a significant percentage of Democrat voters for 2028.

The Democratic Party uses what are called "super delegates" at their convention who have extra voting power to essentially ensure the establishment gets the nominee they want.
 
Dunno if she cheated, but dem party cheated comrade Sanders out of his chance.

View attachment 1204541


Exactly!

Hillary and her team hit Bernie from every angle.

Hillary Clinton did not "cheat" to win the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination in the sense of engaging in election fraud, as she won based on the popular vote and pledged delegates. However, significant controversy arose from the discovery that her campaign had an unusual agreement with the Democratic National Committee (DNC) that gave her campaign control over party operations well before she secured the nomination.

Key Details of the Controversy
  • DNC Agreement: In August 2015, the cash-strapped DNC signed a joint fundraising agreement with the Clinton campaign. This agreement effectively gave the Clinton campaign control over the party's staffing, strategy, and finances in exchange for the campaign helping to relieve the DNC's debt.
  • Allegations of Bias: Critics, including supporters of rival Bernie Sanders, viewed this arrangement as evidence of the DNC having its "thumb on the scales" and favoring Clinton from an early stage, creating an unfair advantage.
  • Leaked Emails: Leaked emails from the DNC, released by WikiLeaks in July 2016, revealed instances of DNC officials scoffing at the Sanders campaign and questioning his religion, reinforcing the perception of bias among some party insiders.
  • Donna Brazile's Statements: Donna Brazile, who took over as interim DNC chair after Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigned amid the email scandal, initially wrote in a 2017 book that she found proof the nomination process was rigged and that the agreement "broke her heart".
  • Walk-back and Denials: Brazile later walked back her initial claim, stating that while the agreement was "unethical" and unusual, she found no evidence that the primary was explicitly rigged, and Clinton won fairly based on the votes cast.
Ultimately, the consensus among many political analysts and officials is that while there was significant bias within the DNC and an ethically questionable financial agreement, Hillary Clinton legitimately won more votes and delegates than Bernie Sanders in the primary process
 
The Democrat Party apparatus rigged the 2016 nomination process so that Bernie Sanders couldn't get because they knew he'd get smoked in the general election.
Don't cry for Hillary though.
Despite losing to Donald Trump in the general, she nonetheless has found gainful employment 29 hours a week.

i-2bShQHz-M.jpg
 
I was watching the whole thing from up here in Canada and the news that I was getting made it seem pretty clear that Hillary had to cheat, and cheat and cheat to steal the nomination away from Bernie?

The impression that I got was that Hillary did not have to cheat merely a little bit, but she had to cheat A LOT, to take the nomination away from Bernie?

The whole process that crowned Kamala Harris for 2024 was arguably even more corrupt than what happened when Hillary emerged as the rival to President Trump back in 2016.

If the Dems do not do a better job of NOT OBVIOUSLY CHEATING during their nomination process, they will have alienated a significant percentage of Democrat voters for 2028.
The DNC “cheated” though they are under no obligation to do anything other than run whoever they want. So they really can’t “cheat”.
 
The DNC “cheated” though they are under no obligation to do anything other than run whoever they want. So they really can’t “cheat”.
They cheated all the voters in the primaries.
 
15th post
I was watching the whole thing from up here in Canada and the news that I was getting made it seem pretty clear that Hillary had to cheat, and cheat and cheat to steal the nomination away from Bernie?

The impression that I got was that Hillary did not have to cheat merely a little bit, but she had to cheat A LOT, to take the nomination away from Bernie?

The whole process that crowned Kamala Harris for 2024 was arguably even more corrupt than what happened when Hillary emerged as the rival to President Trump back in 2016.

If the Dems do not do a better job of NOT OBVIOUSLY CHEATING during their nomination process, they will have alienated a significant percentage of Democrat voters for 2028.
No, but tRump cheated to win both times.
 
Back
Top Bottom