Did Durham Read "Last Of The Mohicans"????

[Not a Monkeys Uncle]

Thats so true, thats exactly how they think

 

[PoliticalChic]

Thats so true, thats exactly how they think

Did you use "think" in connection with them??????

 

[berg80]

You are an inveterate liar.

The conservative media also skewed what the filing said. For example, Mr. Durham’s filing never used the word “infiltrate.” And it never claimed that Mr. Joffe’s company was being paid by the Clinton campaign.

Most important, contrary to the reporting, the filing never said the White House data that came under scrutiny was from the Trump era. According to lawyers for David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the Yota analysis, the data — so-called DNS logs, which are records of when computers or smartphones have prepared to communicate with servers over the internet — came from Barack Obama’s presidency.

“What Trump and some news outlets are saying is wrong,” said Jody Westby and Mark Rasch, both lawyers for Mr. Dagon. “The cybersecurity researchers were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign, and to our knowledge all of the data they used was nonprivate DNS data from before Trump took office.”

In a statement, a spokesperson for Mr. Joffe said that “contrary to the allegations in this recent filing,” he was apolitical, did not work for any political party, and had lawful access under a contract to work with others to analyze DNS data — including from the White House — for the purpose of hunting for security breaches or threats.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You are an inveterate liar.

The conservative media also skewed what the filing said. For example, Mr. Durham’s filing never used the word “infiltrate.” And it never claimed that Mr. Joffe’s company was being paid by the Clinton campaign.

Most important, contrary to the reporting, the filing never said the White House data that came under scrutiny was from the Trump era. According to lawyers for David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the Yota analysis, the data — so-called DNS logs, which are records of when computers or smartphones have prepared to communicate with servers over the internet — came from Barack Obama’s presidency.

“What Trump and some news outlets are saying is wrong,” said Jody Westby and Mark Rasch, both lawyers for Mr. Dagon. “The cybersecurity researchers were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign, and to our knowledge all of the data they used was nonprivate DNS data from before Trump took office.”

In a statement, a spokesperson for Mr. Joffe said that “contrary to the allegations in this recent filing,” he was apolitical, did not work for any political party, and had lawful access under a contract to work with others to analyze DNS data — inclDuuding from the White House — for the purpose of hunting for security breaches or threats.

Let's add to the palpable fear you Democrat supporters evince per the Durham filing:

"The Durham filing then went on:

The defendant’s billing records reflect that the defendant repeatedly billed the Clinton Campaign for his work on the [Alfa Bank] allegations. In compiling and disseminating these allegations, the defendant and Tech Executive-1 also had met and communicated with another law partner at Law Firm-1 who was then serving as General Counsel to the Clinton Campaign (“Campaign Lawyer-1”).

The Words 'Infiltrate' and 'Spy' Appear Exactly Zero Times in John Durham's Recent Court Filing. Here's What It Actually Says — and What It Doesn't.

The first missive, filed Friday by special counsel John H. Durham, led to claims by conservatives (such as Kash Patel on FOX News) and even by Donald Trump himself that liberal and Democratic figures were "infiltrating" or "spying" on his campaign. The Durham filing, however, does not directly...

lawandcrime.com

Again, from the Durham filing:

The Government’s evidence at trial will also establish that among the Internet data Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited was domain name system (“DNS”) Internet traffic pertaining to (i) a particular healthcare provider, (ii) Trump Tower, (iii) Donald Trump’s Central Park West apartment building, and (iv) the Executive Office of the President of the United States (“EOP”). (Tech Executive-1’s employer, Internet Company-1, had come to access and maintain dedicated servers for the EOP as part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided DNS resolution services to the EOP. Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump.)"

Ibid

 

[PoliticalChic]

"‘People need to go to JAIL’: Ted Cruz says DURHAM allegations ‘A LOT bigger than WATERGATE’​

What Durham alleges as a federal prosecutor, as a special prosecutor, is that a lawyer for the Hillary Clinton campaign conspired with a Big Tech executive to monitor and spy on Donald Trump. To spy on him at his home, to spy on him at his office. And indeed, they were spying on the White House itself. They were spying on a sitting president,” he reminds us.

And to the extent Hillary Clinton is complicit with this, her campaign is complicit with it, her lawyers are complicit with it. Big Tech is complicit with it. If this is true, it’s a lot bigger than Watergate,” said Cruz. “That was a bungled, third-rate burglary. It was wrong. People went to jail for Watergate”

‘People need to go to JAIL’: Ted Cruz says DURHAM allegations ‘A LOT bigger than WATERGATE’ – The Right Scoop

therightscoop.com

Did you see the media response?

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[PoliticalChic]

"‘Mainstream’ Media Hides Hillary’s Hackers​

Imagine that a well-respected federal prosecutor’s courtroom filing revealed the following:

Sen. John McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign paid a pro-GOP law firm to hire technical experts to hack Democratic opponent Barack Obama’s computer servers at his home, office, and campaign headquarters. They sought evidence that Obama was born in Kenya and thus, disqualified for the presidency.

Once Obama took the oath of office as president, McCain’s hacking operation accelerated. All the Arizona senator’s men drilled into Obama’s computers, this time inside the White House.

When they discovered no proof of Obama’s alleged Kenyan birth, they nonetheless launched Kenyagate. McCain and other Republicans explained that the candidate who beat them bowed to Nairobi rather than Washington.


Rather than challenge Obamacare, the Paris Agreement on global warming, and the Iran nuclear deal on their merits, the GOP weaponized its Kenyagate fabrication and hounded Obama nonstop, for three long years. If Obama proved to be a native of East Africa, then hallelujah, Republicans reckoned. If not, these bogus charges would sandbag Obama, swamp his agenda, and sink him in the polls.

If a prosecutor’s court filing exposed this vast right-wing conspiracy, the ensuing news coverage would have been wall to wall. Breathless anchors and hand-wringing political analysts would have pondered every microscopic detail. Their barely contained rage would have choked every smartphone, laptop, and 60-inch HDTV between Pacific Heights and Atlantic City.

But this hypothetical scenario did not occur.

The “mainstream” media’s cover-up of Hillary’s hackers has been virtually seamless. It would make George Orwell, father of the memory hole, weep."

'Mainstream' Media Hides Hillary’s Hackers

If the GOP had spied on Democrats the way Hillary Clinton allegedly spied on Trump, legacy media would be outraged. Instead, they're silent.

www.dailysignal.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

When does Leslie Stahl apologize????

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[PoliticalChic]

.......some politicized language that right wing media grabbed and ran with. Duping every knuckle dragging rube who tuned in to the latest iteration of Faux' 24/7 barrage of lies.

Let's review. The overt lies spun by various right wing media sources making erroneous assertions based on Durham's filing last Friday have been thoroughly debunked. Even Durham himself, in a half-assed way, has backed away from the ridiculous RWM claims.

Court Filing Started a Furor in Right-Wing Outlets, but Their Narrative Is Off Track
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/...rump-russia.html?referringSource=articleShare

New details on 2016 Russia probe prompt flawed allegations of espionage
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/n...-probe-prompt-flawed-allegations-of-espionage

Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing
The special counsel implicitly acknowledged that White House internet data he discussed, which conservative outlets have portrayed as proof of spying on the Trump White House, came from the Obama era.

But over the weekend, the conservative news media treated those sentences in Mr. Durham’s filing as a new revelation while significantly embellishing what it had said. Mr. Durham, some outlets inaccurately reported, had said he had discovered that the Clinton campaign had paid Mr. Joffe’s company to spy on Mr. Trump. But the campaign had not paid his company, and the filing did not say so. Some outlets also quoted Mr. Durham’s filing as using the word “infiltrate,” a word it did not contain.

Most important, the coverage about purported spying on the Trump White House was premised on the idea that the White House network data involved came from when Mr. Trump was president. But Mr. Durham’s filing did not say when it was from.

Lawyers for a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped analyze the Yota data said on Monday that the data came from the Obama presidency. Mr. Sussmann’s lawyers said the same in a filing on Monday night complaining about Mr. Durham’s conduct.

Mr. Durham did not directly address that basic factual dispute. But his explanation for why he included the information about the matter in the earlier filing implicitly confirmed that Mr. Sussmann had conveyed concerns about White House data that came from before Mr. Trump was president.
Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing

This reporting puts Faux's lies in context and on full display. Which, I might add, happens every day.

https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-new...that-her-campaign-spied-on-trump-133433925577

Will the truth put an end to this story? Of course not. The Following still thinks Trump won the election. Once a lie circulates among them they hold on to it like a life raft.

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[PoliticalChic]

View attachment 637071

Obama judge to the rescue!!!!!!!!!!!

"Judge won’t let Clinton collusion tweet be admitted in Sussmann trial​

Hillary Clinton's tweet touting Trump-Russia collusion claims will not be allowed as evidence in the trial against Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann despite efforts by special counsel John Durham.

On Halloween 2016, Clinton tweeted, “Donald Trump has a secret server ... It was set up to communicate privately with a Putin-tied Russian bank.”

Clinton later tweeted, “Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank.”

She also shared a lengthy statement by then-Clinton campaign adviser, and President Joe Biden's current national security adviser, Jake Sullivan.

“This could be the most direct link yet between Donald Trump and Moscow,” Sullivan claimed. "This secret hotline may be the key to unlocking the mystery of Trump’s ties to Russia.”

Sullivan added, “We can only assume that federal authorities will now explore this direct connection between Trump and Russia.”


....Judge Christopher Cooper, an Obama appointee, denied Durham’s efforts...."

Judge won’t let Clinton collusion tweet be admitted in Sussmann trial

Hillary Clinton's tweet touting Trump-Russia collusion claims will not be allowed as evidence in the trial against Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann despite efforts by special counsel John Durham.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

"BREAKING TESTIMONY: Hillary Clinton APPROVED sharing phony Russia collusion allegations in 2016​

Hillary Clinton’s former campaign manager Robby Mook told a court on Friday that she signed off on sharing debunked allegations linking Donald Trump and the Kremlin-backed Alfa Bank with the media in the run-up to the 2016 election.
‘I discussed it with Hillary as well,’ Mook told the court.

He also admitted the campaign wasn’t ‘totally confident in the legitimacy of the data’, but was hoping a reporter would follow it up and determine if it was ‘accurate’ or ‘substantive.’


‘I don’t remember the substance of the conversation, but notionally, the discussion was, hey, we have this and we want to share it with a reporter,’ Mook said."

BREAKING TESTIMONY: Hillary Clinton APPROVED sharing phony Russia collusion allegations in 2016 – The Right Scoop

therightscoop.com

If this was by Trump rather than the Democrat godmother, the trial'd be on every TV channel.

 

[struth]

"BREAKING TESTIMONY: Hillary Clinton APPROVED sharing phony Russia collusion allegations in 2016​

Hillary Clinton’s former campaign manager Robby Mook told a court on Friday that she signed off on sharing debunked allegations linking Donald Trump and the Kremlin-backed Alfa Bank with the media in the run-up to the 2016 election.
‘I discussed it with Hillary as well,’ Mook told the court.

He also admitted the campaign wasn’t ‘totally confident in the legitimacy of the data’, but was hoping a reporter would follow it up and determine if it was ‘accurate’ or ‘substantive.’


‘I don’t remember the substance of the conversation, but notionally, the discussion was, hey, we have this and we want to share it with a reporter,’ Mook said."

BREAKING TESTIMONY: Hillary Clinton APPROVED sharing phony Russia collusion allegations in 2016 – The Right Scoop

therightscoop.com

If this was by Trump rather than the Democrat godmother, the trial'd be on every TV channel.

wow, as we all suspected…Clinton was directly in charge of helping spread Russian misinformation in order to under the election

once again we see the dems we’re putin’s puppets

 

[PoliticalChic]

wow, as we all suspected…Clinton was directly in charge of helping spread Russian misinformation in order to under the election

once again we see the dems we’re putin’s puppets

We knew it from the get-go.....

....but I'm bettin' they did too, but the requirement for being a Democrat in good standing is to parrot the propaganda.

 

[easyt65]

Sussmann moronically billed Clinton for the hour he was meeting with Baker yet told Baker he was not there representing anyone.

Now today Hillary's former campaign manager testified Hillary approved the release of the false Trump-Russian Bank Connection information by Sussmann to Baker.

Betwern Baker's amd Mook's testimonies, BOTH Sussmann and Hillary are exposed as being guilty as hell....

...but of course the trial was rigged from the start toensure Sussmann walks by planting 3 Hillary supporters / donors in the jury pool.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Sussmann moronically billed Clinton for the hour he was meeting with Baker yet told Baker he was not there representing anyone.

Now today Hillary's former campaign manager testified Hillary approved the release of the false Trump-Russian Bank Connection information by Sussmann to Baker.

Betwern Baker's amd Mook's testimonies, BOTH Sussmann and Hillary are exposed as being guilty as hell....

...but of course the trial was rigged from the start toensure Sussmann walks by planting 3 Hillary supporters / donors in the jury pool

But wait!

There's more!


Over 90% of D.C. residents voted Democrat.

Judge Cooper is African-American.[18] Cooper is married to Amy Jeffress, a former Justice Department official and national security counselor to former United States Attorney General Eric Holder, and an Obama appointee.

 

[easyt65]

But wait!

There's more!


Over 90% of D.C. residents voted Demorat.

Judge Cooper is African-American.[18] Cooper is married to Amy Jeffress, a former Justice Department official and national security counselor to former United States Attorney General Eric Holder, and an Obama appointee.

Damn....

 

[PoliticalChic]

Damn....

You only find justice in the dictionary and the cemetery.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Michael Sussmann found not guilty of lying to FBI in Durham ...edition.cnn.com› 2022 › 05 › 31 › politics › sussmann-verdict › index.html
3 hours ago - Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann was acquitted Tuesday of lying to the FBI, in the first trial of special counsel John Durham's investigation.