Did being president ruin George W. Bush's life and harm his family?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rdean
  • Start date Start date



Why don't you try something from this year, Dingbat?


Gallup Daily: Obama Job Approval


Approval rating 52% for March 2016.

Why don't you just use one screen name,sock? You're not fooling me, **** waffle



Anytime you're caught being an idiot, all you can do is pull a sock out of your ass.
her same old tired routine as usual
 



Why don't you try something from this year, Dingbat?


Gallup Daily: Obama Job Approval


Approval rating 52% for March 2016.
Your point FatIrishAss? W's was cratering when he left at what? 18%



Did you just call me FatIrishAss? lol
No. I accidentally included your quote. Will edit ;)
 



Why don't you try something from this year, Dingbat?


Gallup Daily: Obama Job Approval


Approval rating 52% for March 2016.
Your point FatIrishAss? W's was cratering when he left at what? 18%



Did you just call me FatIrishAss? lol
No. I accidentally included your quote. Will edit ;)



I knew who you were talking to. :D
 
Good grief

Denial

Denial (psychological)

Denial consists of the refusal to accept a past or present reality and is most commonly employed to protect the host from their own negative traits; to protect them from the repeated memories of the negative actions of another or to avoid recognizing their own guilt for past actions, thoughts or feelings.

Urban Dictionary: Denial

:coffee:



.

I repeat....good grief. Now go snow a left loon, they'll buy into anything

You know as well as I do that the Cheney gang used up President Bush, and threw him under the bus to take the fall.
He left office with the tail between his legs.

Even Bush admits his mistakes, why can't you?

George Bush, in a moment of reflection ahead of his departure from the White House, last night admitted that the decision to go to war against Saddam Hussein on the basis of flawed intelligence was the biggest regret of his presidency. The acknowledgment marks the first time that Bush has publicly expressed doubts about his rationale for going to war on Iraq.

Interview: Iraq war my biggest regret, Bush admits


.


You're an Obamapologist...I was never a huge GWBush fan.....hence.....good grief
 
Poor 'W'. What a pity that making such a mess of things interrupted his safe, silver-spoon existence. That he should be in prison (or executed) for war crimes and is not may be some consolation.

That is a bit . . . crazy, IMO. I thought you were anti execution?
It was only stated that, in light of the Nuremberg precedents, 'W' dodged a bullet. No approval or encouragement of capital punishment should be applied. The man is simply guilty.
 
I actually like GWB and Bill Clinton. I don't agree with either of them politically 100%, but both seem like cool and laid back kind of guys. Obama, OTOH, comes across as quite arrogant, although sometimes he can be kind of funny.
 
Poor 'W'. What a pity that making such a mess of things interrupted his safe, silver-spoon existence. That he should be in prison (or executed) for war crimes and is not may be some consolation.

That is a bit . . . crazy, IMO. I thought you were anti execution?
It was only stated that, in light of the Nuremberg precedents, 'W' dodged a bullet. No approval or encouragement of capital punishment should be applied. The man is simply guilty.

I would not want to see George W be executed or thrown in jail. Presidents are not perfect and they sometimes make mistakes. They got bad intel, and at the time, they were probably thinking "better safe than sorry" when it came to Iraq, especially after 9/11. Unfortunately, we lost a lot of people and a lot of money for absolutely nothing in return.
 
Poor 'W'. What a pity that making such a mess of things interrupted his safe, silver-spoon existence. That he should be in prison (or executed) for war crimes and is not may be some consolation.

That is a bit . . . crazy, IMO. I thought you were anti execution?
It was only stated that, in light of the Nuremberg precedents, 'W' dodged a bullet. No approval or encouragement of capital punishment should be applied. The man is simply guilty.

Guilty of making a bad decision. That is not really a "war crime" in my mind. He's a human being and human beings err ALL the time.
 
The American intervention in Vietnam was not illegal. The invasions of Laos and Cambodia were, and as such Nixon and Kissinger are war criminals. This is not opinion, it is accepted international law.
The Iraq invasion was illegal and a war crime. Such criminals should not be above the law, especially those from nations that propose to stand for human rights and dignity.
 
The American intervention in Vietnam was not illegal. The invasions of Laos and Cambodia were, and as such Nixon and Kissinger are war criminals. This is not opinion, it is accepted international law.
The Iraq invasion was illegal and a war crime. Such criminals should not be above the law, especially those from nations that propose to stand for human rights and dignity.

The Iraq war was not illegal.
 
It was stupid and wasteful but not "illegal." Saddam Hussein had broken "treaty" agreements.

The most important text of Resolution 1441 was to require that Iraq "shall provide UNMOVIC and the IAEA immediate, unimpeded, unconditional, and unrestricted access to any and all, including underground, areas, facilities, buildings, equipment, records, and means of transport which they wish to inspect".[22] However, on January 27, 2003, Hans Blix, the lead member of the UNMOVIC, said that, "Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptance, not even today, of the disarmament that was demanded of it". Blix noted that Iraq had failed cooperation in a number of areas, including the failure to provide safety to U-2spy planes that inspectors hoped to used for aerial surveillance, refusal to let UN inspectors into several chemical, biological, and missile sites on the belief that they were engaging in espionage rather than disarmament, submitting 12,000-page arms declaration that it handed over in December 2002 which contained little more than old material previously submitted to inspectors, and failure to produce convincing evidence to the UN inspectors that it had unilaterally destroyed its anthrax stockpiles as required by resolution 687 a decade before 1441 was passed in 2002.[23] On March 7, 2003, Blix said that Iraq had made significant progress toward resolving open issues of disarmament but the cooperation was still not "immediate" and "unconditional" as called for by UN Security Council Resolution 1441. He concluded that it would take “but months” to resolve the key remaining disarmament tasks.[24] The US government observed this as a breach of resolution 1441 because Iraq did not meet the requirement of an "immediate" and "unconditional" compliance.[25]
 
It was not a declared war. Congress was, as usual, too cowardly to do such a thing.
It was a unilateral, unprovoked military invasion of a sovereign nation by a signatory of international treaties prohibiting such. It was even referred to as 'per-emptive' by its proponents. Treaties, approved by Congress, come under the Constitution, so in addition to being illegal by international law, the invasion was also technically unconstitutional.
Sorry to see you take it this way, ChrisL. We agreed very well in the religious thread. What is stated in these posts is a matter of objective application of law. Subjective nationalism, as always and especially involving 'super powers', overrules reason.
By the way, even Kofi Annan, UN Secretary General, finally admitted, in an intense interview with journalists, that the action was illegal.
 
It was not a declared war. Congress was, as usual, too cowardly to do such a thing.
It was a unilateral, unprovoked military invasion of a sovereign nation by a signatory of international treaties prohibiting such. It was even referred to as 'per-emptive' by its proponents. Treaties, approved by Congress, come under the Constitution, so in addition to being illegal by international law, the invasion was also technically unconstitutional.
Sorry to see you take it this way, ChrisL. We agreed very well in the religious thread. What is stated in these posts is a matter of objective application of law. Subjective nationalism, as always and especially involving 'super powers', overrules reason.

It was never determined to be an "illegal" war. The resolution was passed by Congress. They might like to whine and complain about it after the fact.
 
I agree; Congress, including Clinton, is also guilty.
 
15th post
Before he became president, George Bush loved to go out and do things. He owned a sports team. He was in the news. He was governor of Texas. He loved to travel.

But since he's been president, his public life has completely vanished. He can't leave the country. At the very least, he could be arrested for war crimes and torture. At the most, he might be attacked and killed.

It has to bother him that the GOP don't want him anywhere near their convention. He was president for 8 years and followed GOP policies perfectly. It's not his fault they failed and damaged the country. They were lousy policies.

His foreign policies were disasters. Even his "no help if you pass out or talk about condoms" probably caused more cases of AIDS than helped. We know about the Middle East.

I suspect the countries that supported his Iraq coalition are ashamed and feel duped.

He knows all this. It's not a surprise to him.

We found out about his lie that he had never been arrested or convicted of a crime. How embarrassing.

We found out his wife had killed her ex years before.

The lasting image of his daughters as criminals and drug users.

And now he will spend the rest of his life as a recluse afraid to even step outside of his compound. And maybe even family members are in danger for what he's done. They probably go by different names when out in public.

And worse, once Obama leaves office, he will be one of the most respected men in the world. That's gotta hurt, probably most of all.


You must live in a bubble.

Bush has been active supporting our veterans.

And his daughters are busy leading happy, productive lives. One recently had a baby.
 
The American intervention in Vietnam was not illegal. The invasions of Laos and Cambodia were, and as such Nixon and Kissinger are war criminals. This is not opinion, it is accepted international law.
The Iraq invasion was illegal and a war crime. Such criminals should not be above the law, especially those from nations that propose to stand for human rights and dignity.


Lmfao


So nam was legal and Iraq not?

Mmmmk please tell us what was the difference?




.
 
cvfspjk4hesmzts2bc0brg.gif
 
It was not a declared war. Congress was, as usual, too cowardly to do such a thing.
It was a unilateral, unprovoked military invasion of a sovereign nation by a signatory of international treaties prohibiting such. It was even referred to as 'per-emptive' by its proponents. Treaties, approved by Congress, come under the Constitution, so in addition to being illegal by international law, the invasion was also technically unconstitutional.
Sorry to see you take it this way, ChrisL. We agreed very well in the religious thread. What is stated in these posts is a matter of objective application of law. Subjective nationalism, as always and especially involving 'super powers', overrules reason.
By the way, even Kofi Annan, UN Secretary General, finally admitted, in an intense interview with journalists, that the action was illegal.


We have not declared war on anyone since WWII and never will again.
Chrisl is correct UN resolution 1441 said it was Iraq's last change and their would be serious consequence

Also a raise of hands here who gives a damn what the UN says?

The only law an American government official has to abide by is U.S. law ....why?

Because we have these


upload_2016-4-9_14-9-3.webp
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom