Yeah, I know you were being facetious (the smilie) but the argument is a relevant one, that being: Why does the next President have to be someone with experience as a political candidate?
It's been since Eisenhower since we've had a President who hadn't before becoming President been elected to any political office, I believe. And before him Grant maybe? I don't feel like doing the research right now but I think the only people who weren't previously elected office holders who eventually became President were all military leaders. Military leaders fresh off a historical victory (Revolution, Civil War, WW2) no less. There could be exceptions but the trend is obvious I think.
But back to Dr. Rice. What are even her qualifications? She specialized in the Soviet Union in school, she's been on the board of directors of companies, she was the NSA, she's the SecState, she's brilliant. That's all great, but does it scream, 'President'? Not really.
Don't misunderstand, I'd guarantee she'd be at least a fair President, certainly far better than Mrs. Clinton, but can she win?
Dick Morris seems to think so, but I think he overestimates the amount of black people who would vote for her, and that's his main argument (according to the talk shows I've heard him on at least).
There's also the fact that I don't think she has any desire to run.
But getting past her unwillingness to run, she would have to be a strong politician, I think, to pull blacks away from the DNC. She'd have to be more than just brilliant and black, she would have to be pleasent and political. Does anyone know if she can be that?