Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
A LOT of people care that conservative voices are being suppressed - and hidden from voters. This is America; not China.No one cares..
Then tell them to do better.A LOT of people care that conservative voices are being suppressed - and hidden from voters. This is America; not China.
I am joining a growing number of those "cutting the cable" I have been subjected to the same crap by DISH and I've had enough. I can stream, many times for free, everything that DISH is offering. Where I have to pay for the service it adds up to less than half of what DISH is charging per month. These companies are in the process of getting their come uppance.
I didn't know about this but it hardly surprises anyone.
It was supposedly for "cost cutting reasons" but Trump says it was political. Gee... Why would he think that? Hmmmm... Go figure...
Site:
Newsmax was seeking a small license fee, as the nation's 4th highest-rated cable news channel.
Well, remind me not to ever do business w/ DirectTV
A LOT of people care that conservative voices are being suppressed - and hidden from voters. This is America; not China.
Well yea, consistency aint a thing with the Trumpsters.It's good that a baker can refuse to bake a cake but it's bad that a cable service can decide to not carry a channel?
They’re doing fine revealing the horrors of the Democrats. That’s why the kids shut them down.Then tell them to do better.
False equivalency. The cable service removed, unilaterally, a channel that was part of the line up that customers had previously contracted for. The baker shared no contract, real or implied. The customer was clearly able to go to another baker. The cable customer, in many instances were locked into potentially years long contracts and forced to pay for a service they were no longer receiving. I know its a tough concept for those who have been indoctrinated by the left.It's good that a baker can refuse to bake a cake but it's bad that a cable service can decide to not carry a channel?
False equivalency. The cable service removed, unilaterally, a channel that was part of the line up that customers had previously contracted for. The baker shared no contract, real or implied. The customer was clearly able to go to another baker. The cable customer, in many instances were locked into potentially years long contracts and forced to pay for a service they were no longer receiving. I know its a tough concept for those who have been indoctrinated by the left.
If they were making money, they would not go anywhere. Nothing more disgusting than RWer victimhood.Channels have always came and went. Especially ones no one watches.
Fourth most watched cable news channel--please keep upChannels have always came and went. Especially ones no one watches.
A baker is an individual deciding whom to serve.It's good that a baker can refuse to bake a cake but it's bad that a cable service can decide to not carry a channel?
Come and GONE.Channels have always came and went. Especially ones no one watches.
Great point. Thx.Fourth most watched cable news channel--please keep up
Among a host of other topics, you also aren't very knowledgeable about, is how contracts work between cable providers and the companies who own the channels that they offer.If they were making money, they would not go anywhere. Nothing more disgusting than RWer victimhood.
Did it make money? Who is the first three?Fourth most watched cable news channel--please keep up
