Dems want a Civil War

[Coyote]

Allowing the libs to destroy this country because of all their social experimentation's they have running here, should be sending chills down the back sides of every single American that calls themselves Americans. It's what has gone on here folks, where as you can easily see that the communist socialist lib crazies with all their crazy radical bull crap is what's at stake with them, and now the push back has come home to roost. This nation in order to figure it's way out of this delema, has got to finally put it's foot down, and it has got to do what is right for the children and grandchildren again. Enough is enough already. The devil's grip on the minds of people is unreal these days, and somehow that grip has to be broken.

Ya, radical bullcrap like allowing gays to marry...or maybe the radical bullcrap that prevents industries from dumping their wastes in our rivers...or is it the radical bullcrap that insists every citizen of age has a right to vote? Or that we have a right to know what is in the products we use and who is behind the political ads we view? So radical. What commies.

 

[theHawk]

No Civil War necessary....just waiting for Trump to implode

You guys kept claiming Trump's run was "over" every time the MSM released some new fake news story about him for the last year.

Y'all never learn.

 

[Coyote]

No Civil War necessary....just waiting for Trump to implode

You guys kept claiming Trump's run was "over" every time the MSM released some new fake news story about him for the last year.

Y'all never learn.

Haven't been many fake Trump news stories.

 

[Weatherman2020]

You people will get one if you prevent Trump from being President.

Let them. We've got most of the weapons and ammo.

 

[beagle9]

The Democrats lost seats in part due to a very good strategy on the part of the Republicans. Remember when the Republicans lost a shitload of seats in a wave election? Was that a rejection of conservative ideology? I don't think it was as much as other factors.

The Democrats have, to their loss, focused on White House runs, while the Republicans have focused state legislatures and governerships. Different strategies, and in doing this the Democrats have lost touch with the people they claim to represent.

Democrats lost seats because they supercharged liberalism, particularly with Commie Care.

I don't agree. If it was Commie Care, we would have a one payer system. We have a system based 100% on capitalism. In fact, many of the components were supported by the Republicans and rejected only because it was Obama's bill. Even now, less than 30% support repealing it over fixing it.

Liberal polices are just not liked in a free country. People loved Obama, and that's the only reason for his success. I think the real nail in the coffin for Democrats was this cross-dresser bathroom thing, especially when Obama threatened public schools that didn't adopt his policies on it.

Really? Like which liberal policies?

Laws forcing mine companies to control the dust levels in the mines in hopes of reducing black lung?
How about laws forcing companies to pay the medical expenses for black lung?
What about the following liberal policies?
Civil Rights Act (and don't start in on the Repubs/Dems - parties aren't the ideologies behind movements).
The 40-hour work week
Women’s Voting Rights
The right of people of all colors to use schools and facilities.
Child-labor laws.
Health care benefits
GI Bill
Labor Laws/Worker’s Rights
Product Labeling/Truth in Advertising Laws
Rural Electrification/Tennessee Valley Authority
Consumer Product Safety Commission
Americans With Disabilities Act
Clean Air Act
Clean Water Act
Civilian Conservation Corps
Banning of torture
Endangered Species Act
Voting Rights Act
Etc.

Ever wonder what it was like before the FDA and the food/drug safety and truth laws?
I grew up when pollution was finally being recognized as a major problem, along with the extinction of many once-common species in our nation, everything was being dumped into our air and water, the slogan I remember from school was "don't be a litter bug" and Tom Lehrer's song "Pollution" was very relevant. It was LIBERAL policies that addressed all that and many of those policies remain publically popular (as per the polls I quoted).

Free Americans don't want to be told what to do. We don't want the federal government telling us who is going to be in the bathrooms and showers with our daughters in school. We don't want to be told we have to buy healthcare or else. We don't need the federal government taking over car dealerships and student loans. We don't need the federal government telling bakers who they have to take as customers even if it's offensive to their religion. We don't want the federal government controlling our lives.

Yes you DO want federal government controling your lives. You want the government to tell who can get married and who can't. You want the government to restrict the rights of certain religions. You want the government to "bring back jobs" by bullying private companies. You want the government to insist that only biological girls can use the girls room and biological boys can use the boys room. You want the government to interfere in a woman's reproductive rights. Don't tell me you don't want the government telling us what to do.

. Who is us ???? The few amongst the libs who believe that their way should now control the majority in this nation ? That US ??? It's over with your dam controlling the masses, but you will be spared your freedoms, but you won't be able to rob others of theirs so get used to it.

 

[Coyote]

The Democrats lost seats in part due to a very good strategy on the part of the Republicans. Remember when the Republicans lost a shitload of seats in a wave election? Was that a rejection of conservative ideology? I don't think it was as much as other factors.

The Democrats have, to their loss, focused on White House runs, while the Republicans have focused state legislatures and governerships. Different strategies, and in doing this the Democrats have lost touch with the people they claim to represent.

Democrats lost seats because they supercharged liberalism, particularly with Commie Care.

I don't agree. If it was Commie Care, we would have a one payer system. We have a system based 100% on capitalism. In fact, many of the components were supported by the Republicans and rejected only because it was Obama's bill. Even now, less than 30% support repealing it over fixing it.

Liberal polices are just not liked in a free country. People loved Obama, and that's the only reason for his success. I think the real nail in the coffin for Democrats was this cross-dresser bathroom thing, especially when Obama threatened public schools that didn't adopt his policies on it.

Really? Like which liberal policies?

Laws forcing mine companies to control the dust levels in the mines in hopes of reducing black lung?
How about laws forcing companies to pay the medical expenses for black lung?
What about the following liberal policies?
Civil Rights Act (and don't start in on the Repubs/Dems - parties aren't the ideologies behind movements).
The 40-hour work week
Women’s Voting Rights
The right of people of all colors to use schools and facilities.
Child-labor laws.
Health care benefits
GI Bill
Labor Laws/Worker’s Rights
Product Labeling/Truth in Advertising Laws
Rural Electrification/Tennessee Valley Authority
Consumer Product Safety Commission
Americans With Disabilities Act
Clean Air Act
Clean Water Act
Civilian Conservation Corps
Banning of torture
Endangered Species Act
Voting Rights Act
Etc.

Ever wonder what it was like before the FDA and the food/drug safety and truth laws?
I grew up when pollution was finally being recognized as a major problem, along with the extinction of many once-common species in our nation, everything was being dumped into our air and water, the slogan I remember from school was "don't be a litter bug" and Tom Lehrer's song "Pollution" was very relevant. It was LIBERAL policies that addressed all that and many of those policies remain publically popular (as per the polls I quoted).

Free Americans don't want to be told what to do. We don't want the federal government telling us who is going to be in the bathrooms and showers with our daughters in school. We don't want to be told we have to buy healthcare or else. We don't need the federal government taking over car dealerships and student loans. We don't need the federal government telling bakers who they have to take as customers even if it's offensive to their religion. We don't want the federal government controlling our lives.

Yes you DO want federal government controling your lives. You want the government to tell who can get married and who can't. You want the government to restrict the rights of certain religions. You want the government to "bring back jobs" by bullying private companies. You want the government to insist that only biological girls can use the girls room and biological boys can use the boys room. You want the government to interfere in a woman's reproductive rights. Don't tell me you don't want the government telling us what to do.

. Who is us ???? The few amongst the libs who believe that their way should now control the majority in this nation ? That US ??? It's over with your dam controlling the masses, but you will be spared your freedoms, but you won't be able to rob others of theirs so get used to it.

Well...you do have ONE point, you will be busy robbing others of their rights and freedoms. In the name of freedom of course.







'Cause one man's chains become another's freedom
So I'll be no forgotten man.
'Cause one man's chains becomes another's freedom
So you'll be no forgotten man.
Solas - No Forgotten Man

 

[beagle9]

The Democrats lost seats in part due to a very good strategy on the part of the Republicans. Remember when the Republicans lost a shitload of seats in a wave election? Was that a rejection of conservative ideology? I don't think it was as much as other factors.

The Democrats have, to their loss, focused on White House runs, while the Republicans have focused state legislatures and governerships. Different strategies, and in doing this the Democrats have lost touch with the people they claim to represent.

Democrats lost seats because they supercharged liberalism, particularly with Commie Care.

I don't agree. If it was Commie Care, we would have a one payer system. We have a system based 100% on capitalism. In fact, many of the components were supported by the Republicans and rejected only because it was Obama's bill. Even now, less than 30% support repealing it over fixing it.

Liberal polices are just not liked in a free country. People loved Obama, and that's the only reason for his success. I think the real nail in the coffin for Democrats was this cross-dresser bathroom thing, especially when Obama threatened public schools that didn't adopt his policies on it.

Really? Like which liberal policies?

Laws forcing mine companies to control the dust levels in the mines in hopes of reducing black lung?
How about laws forcing companies to pay the medical expenses for black lung?
What about the following liberal policies?
Civil Rights Act (and don't start in on the Repubs/Dems - parties aren't the ideologies behind movements).
The 40-hour work week
Women’s Voting Rights
The right of people of all colors to use schools and facilities.
Child-labor laws.
Health care benefits
GI Bill
Labor Laws/Worker’s Rights
Product Labeling/Truth in Advertising Laws
Rural Electrification/Tennessee Valley Authority
Consumer Product Safety Commission
Americans With Disabilities Act
Clean Air Act
Clean Water Act
Civilian Conservation Corps
Banning of torture
Endangered Species Act
Voting Rights Act
Etc.

Ever wonder what it was like before the FDA and the food/drug safety and truth laws?
I grew up when pollution was finally being recognized as a major problem, along with the extinction of many once-common species in our nation, everything was being dumped into our air and water, the slogan I remember from school was "don't be a litter bug" and Tom Lehrer's song "Pollution" was very relevant. It was LIBERAL policies that addressed all that and many of those policies remain publically popular (as per the polls I quoted).

Free Americans don't want to be told what to do. We don't want the federal government telling us who is going to be in the bathrooms and showers with our daughters in school. We don't want to be told we have to buy healthcare or else. We don't need the federal government taking over car dealerships and student loans. We don't need the federal government telling bakers who they have to take as customers even if it's offensive to their religion. We don't want the federal government controlling our lives.

Yes you DO want federal government controling your lives. You want the government to tell who can get married and who can't. You want the government to restrict the rights of certain religions. You want the government to "bring back jobs" by bullying private companies. You want the government to insist that only biological girls can use the girls room and biological boys can use the boys room. You want the government to interfere in a woman's reproductive rights. Don't tell me you don't want the government telling us what to do.

. Who is us ???? The few amongst the libs who believe that their way should now control the majority in this nation ? That US ??? It's over with your dam controlling the masses, but you will be spared your freedoms, but you won't be able to rob others of theirs so get used to it.

Well...you do have ONE point, you will be busy robbing others of their rights and freedoms. In the name of freedom of course.







'Cause one man's chains become another's freedom
So I'll be no forgotten man.
'Cause one man's chains becomes another's freedom
So you'll be no forgotten man.
Solas - No Forgotten Man

. Your comprehension is off, but of course it is.

 

[Faun]

Obama wanted what was best for the country....so has every other President

You are just too partisan to recognize it

So, creating racial unrest and tension was good for the country? Doubling the debt was good for the country? Denigrating cops and military was good for the country? Obozocare was good for the country? Cancelling the national day of prayer and holding a muslim prayer day was good for the country? Lying about Benghazi was good for the country?

YOU, are the one who is too partisan to see the truth.

Bush doubled the debt and the right didn't care. Reagan tripled the debt and the right didn't care.

Yeah, and they didn't cry like you libs are crying now. They (the electorate) just waited for the election cycles to correct things like it should always, but unfortunately Obama threw a monkey wrench into all that thinking. 8 years of bull crap that had taken this nation to the brink. Americans being killed on this soil since 9-11 by terrorist should have been the biggest eye opener to have people saying wait one dag minute here, just like Trump saying no more of these Muslim refugees will be coming in here from war zones unvetted until we find out what the hell is going on here. Then the libs tried to construe that as Trump being a racist ???? Good grief.

You're a nut. Way more people were killed in the U.S. by terrorists while Bush was president.

. Boooooosh did it, booooooosh did it. Good grief... What will the libs do without boooosh ?

More people were killed by terrorists during his 2 terms. Sorry if reality hurts you so much that you feel compelled to whine like a baby when confronted with it.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I don't agree. If it was Commie Care, we would have a one payer system. We have a system based 100% on capitalism. In fact, many of the components were supported by the Republicans and rejected only because it was Obama's bill. Even now, less than 30% support repealing it over fixing it.

Wrong. Forcing people to buy anything is not capitalism, that's dictatorship or Communism. Every single Republican in Congress voted Commie Care down, so you can't pin that failure on us. It was all your hero's idea.

Furthermore if Republicans wanted any kind of government healthcare, they would have introduced it during the Bush administration when he had a Republican Congress and Senate. No such bill was introduced--not even suggested. It wasn't even an idea. As for Republicans wanting it, that's an old liberal wives tale because the Heritage Foundation did suggest a similar program to Obama's, but that's all it was, an opinion piece.

Ever wonder what it was like before the FDA and the food/drug safety and truth laws?
I grew up when pollution was finally being recognized as a major problem, along with the extinction of many once-common species in our nation, everything was being dumped into our air and water, the slogan I remember from school was "don't be a litter bug" and Tom Lehrer's song "Pollution" was very relevant. It was LIBERAL policies that addressed all that and many of those policies remain publically popular (as per the polls I quoted).

Please, the EPA was created by Richard Nixon. Do you know why you can't buy regular lightbulbs today? They were outlawed by the Bush administration. During his administration, he placed all kinds of unnecessary environmental regulations on the transportation industry. Today, over 80% of our problems in trucks have to do with some kind of pollution gadget going haywire, and they break down all the time. We also have to use this stuff called Diesel Emission Fluid, or DEF for short. All trucks manufactured after 2010 have to use DEF which is a separate container that squirts this magic fluid into the exhaust pipe. Of course if I didn't tell you about it, you'd have never known by going outside and smelling the air. Like most modern regulations, nobody would even know if they were there.

Yes you DO want federal government controling your lives. You want the government to tell who can get married and who can't. You want the government to restrict the rights of certain religions. You want the government to "bring back jobs" by bullying private companies. You want the government to insist that only biological girls can use the girls room and biological boys can use the boys room. You want the government to interfere in a woman's reproductive rights. Don't tell me you don't want the government telling us what to do.

Government telling me who I can or can't get married to? Haven't we always done that? Why can't you marry your son? Why not your grandson? Why not three guys?

Now if you're explicitly talking about SSM, government never stopped any two people from getting married. They just wouldn't recognize it. If two people of the same sex wanted to get married, all they had to do is find a religion to marry them and not one Republican stopped it. However states no longer have the right to make that decision thanks to the Supreme Court being contaminated. Now states are FORCED to accept SSM whether the people want to or not.

What religious rights do I want government to stop?

I want government to bring back jobs by lowering taxes, not taxing multinational companies that bring money back to the USA, closing down our borders, and getting rid of a few thousand regulations that prevent job creation including Commie Care.

I want government to get out of telling us what restrooms to use like DumBama just did with public schools. I want private industry to choose what restrooms women and men are allowed to use so we can boycott them like the Target stores which will end up closing down in the near future.

 

[beagle9]

So, creating racial unrest and tension was good for the country? Doubling the debt was good for the country? Denigrating cops and military was good for the country? Obozocare was good for the country? Cancelling the national day of prayer and holding a muslim prayer day was good for the country? Lying about Benghazi was good for the country?

YOU, are the one who is too partisan to see the truth.

Bush doubled the debt and the right didn't care. Reagan tripled the debt and the right didn't care.

Yeah, and they didn't cry like you libs are crying now. They (the electorate) just waited for the election cycles to correct things like it should always, but unfortunately Obama threw a monkey wrench into all that thinking. 8 years of bull crap that had taken this nation to the brink. Americans being killed on this soil since 9-11 by terrorist should have been the biggest eye opener to have people saying wait one dag minute here, just like Trump saying no more of these Muslim refugees will be coming in here from war zones unvetted until we find out what the hell is going on here. Then the libs tried to construe that as Trump being a racist ???? Good grief.

You're a nut. Way more people were killed in the U.S. by terrorists while Bush was president.

. Boooooosh did it, booooooosh did it. Good grief... What will the libs do without boooosh ?

More people were killed by terrorists during his 2 terms. Sorry if reality hurts you so much that you feel compelled to whine like a baby when confronted with it.

. Matters not how many, but why it all went down, and how did it increase under Obama ?? Sort of like gun control huh, where as the libs can't even thwart another attack on this nation after 9-11, so what dam good are they ??

 

[Montrovant]

Here you are talking about who other people should be voting for again.

1) The two major party candidates are the only viable candidates so long as people believe that to be true. If people start to believe otherwise, a third party candidate can become viable. That has to begin somewhere.
2) You are assuming that a person must vote against a candidate. Perhaps some people actually voted FOR a candidate, instead.
3) Your chosen candidate winning the election is not the only reason people cast a presidential vote.
4) Some people didn't want Trump or Clinton in office.

This is still all about your approval. If you approve of the way someone voted, you approve of them complaining. Otherwise, you don't think they have any business bitching. I think that is ridiculous.

It's reasonable to talk about who people should vote for when they are bitching about who won. If someone didn't want Trump to win, they should have voted for the only other candidate who had a viable chance at beating them. When you throw away your vote, you throw away your standing to ***** about it with your vote.

Again, if a person didn't want Clinton or Trump as president, why would they have voted for Clinton to keep Trump from office? Why do you insist that someone most vote against a candidate rather than for a candidate? The idea that a vote for someone other than one of the two major party candidates is a 'wasted vote' is one of the more annoying in our political system. How is it throwing away a vote to vote your conscience?

Your entire point is based on the idea that only a vote for a D or R matters. Not only is that something I vehemently disagree with, not to mention insulting to anyone who votes third party/independent, it is playing into the lesser-of-two-evils paradigm that keeps the two major parties in power, as well as assures us we will continue to elect an evil.

I didn't want Trump to win. I didn't want Clinton to win. By your reasoning, not wanting either of those candidates pretty much excludes me from bitching about having one of them in office.

How's this? Did you vote for Clinton? If the answer is yes, you voted to support the Democratic party in pushing a candidate so thoroughly flawed she could not defeat a thin-skinned, juvenile celebrity candidate like Trump. Supporting Clinton gives the Dems impetus to continue pushing crappy candidates forward, so in a way Trump is your fault. Therefore, you shouldn't ***** about him being the new president.

It matters not that you wanted neither to win as one of them was going to regardless of what you wanted. Many folks would have preferred better candidates to choose from; but our choices were still limited to Trump or Hillary. For those who liked neither, which applied to many, the only rational choice was to pick the lesser of two evils. For those who were stupid enough to throw their vote away by not voting or voting 3rd party, **** 'em. They had their chance to speak up and blew it. No one cares now to hear from those who didn't care enough to speak (vote) then.

And now you feel you can speak for everyone.

Anyone who voted for a candidate other than Trump or Clinton did "speak up." That you don't like what they had to say doesn't change that fact.

As long as people continue to accept the lesser-of-two-evils, they will continue to be accepting evil.

You seem to also be ignoring people who may not have seen either Trump or Clinton as a lesser evil.

If you don't want to read people ***** about Trump as president if they didn't vote for Clinton, you can put them on ignore. Seems pretty childish and thin-skinned, though.....like Trump.

No, they did not speak up. They threw their vote away. And if they throw their vote away, they are in no position to ***** now when they had the chance to speak up.

They spoke. Your problem seems to be you did not care for what they had to say.

 

[owebo]

You people will get one if you prevent Trump from being President.

Let them. We've got most of the weapons and ammo.

Over 17,500 tons of ammunition were sold in 2016 to citizens......

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Whites face the death penalty more ONLY because they represent a much larger portion of the population. If you look at it proportionate to population blacks are much more likely to get the death penalty (as well as hispanics) for the same crime than a white person: The Death Penalty in Black and White: Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Decides | Death Penalty Information Center

From initial charging decisions to plea bargaining to jury sentencing, African-Americans are treated more harshly when they are defendants, and their lives are accorded less value when they are victims. All-white or virtually all-white juries are still commonplace in many localities.

Death Penalty and Race

• A report sponsored by the American Bar Association in 2007 concluded that one-third of African-American death row inmates in Philadelphia would have received sentences of life imprisonment if they had not been African-American.
• A January 2003 study released by the University of Maryland concluded that race and geography are major factors in death penalty decisions. Specifically, prosecutors are more likely to seek a death sentence when the race of the victim is white and are less likely to seek a death sentence when the victim is African-American.
• A 2007 study of death sentences in Connecticut conducted by Yale University School of Law revealed that African-American defendants receive the death penalty at three times the rate of white defendants in cases where the victims are white. In addition, killers of white victims are treated more severely than people who kill minorities, when it comes to deciding what charges to bring.

Poverty is also much more likely to guarantee a death sentence:

Poverty is a similar -- and often additional -- handicap. Because the lawyers provided to indigent defendants charged with capital crimes are so uniformly undertrained and undercompensated, the 90 percent of capitally charged defendants who lack the resources to retain a private attorney are virtually guaranteed a death sentence. Together, therefore, race and class function as an elephant on death's side of the sentencing scale.​

When you have such gross inequities in the system, how can it be justice? It's not.

Percentage of the population is irrelevant unless the entire population faces the death penalty. What I'm talking about are those who commit the crime of murder.

In an equal society, if blacks commit 53% of the murders, we should have 53% of the death penalties handed to blacks. But we don't. More whites are sentenced to death than blacks based on the murders committed. Because blacks commit three times their population percentage of this country has nothing to do with race. There are just more black murderers than whites.

Again, let's look at the execution chart and remember that 45% of whites commit murders compared to 53% of blacks:


View attachment 102546

If there is inequity within the races of murderers, then certainly this chart shows the inequity of whites--not blacks. More whites who committed murder were executed than blacks that committed murder even though they commit over 7% more murders than whites.

Most murders committed by blacks are on black victims. The death penalty is RARELY given when the victim is black or hispanic or doesn't rate high (poor, no college degree, etc).


The Death Penalty For Black & White Murderers Reveals How Capital Punishment Is Part Of The Racial Problem

In all cases resulting in execution in the last 40 years, 75 percent of the victims were white, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. Black people represent 15 percent of victims in death penalty cases, even though they are eight times more likely to be a homicide victim than white individuals, according to FiveThirtyEight's estimates.​

Racism and the Execution Chamber

Unchecked by the judiciary, the death penalty's racial discrepancy survived and thrived. Eleven years after McCleskey, Baldus studied 667 homicides in Philadelphia between 1983 and 1993 and found that black defendants there were nearly four times likelier than white defendants to receive a death sentence for the same crimes. Racial disparities in crime rates aren't a factor in this because homicide, the predominant capital offense, is an overwhelmingly intra-racial crime. Federal statistics show that 84 percent of white victims and 93 percent of black victims between 1980 and 2008 were murdered by someone of the same race. But death-row statistics don't reflect those rates: Although roughly half of all U.S. homicide victims are black, more than three-quarters of victims of death-row defendants executed since 1976 were white.​

That may make sense given the fact that there are way more whites being murdered by blacks than the other way around. If you have more cases of blacks killing whites, then it's likely you'll have more capital punishment of blacks killing whites:

View attachment 102565

Blacks are much more likely to be the VICTIMS of all homicides, and when they are the victims - the perpetrator is LESS likely to incur the death penalty. It does make sense that rate of black on white homicides is higher than white on black based solely on the fact that whites represent 66% of the population.

Either way though - we digressing hugely I was originally trying to show that liberal ideology in and of itself isn't being rejected in the main - that public polls show a large amount of agreement on key points regarding environment, abortion, immigration and the death penalty. So why such a polarization

You can believe that if you want, but there is no evidence to support your case. Under DumBama, your party lost hundreds and hundreds of seats across the country. I don't call that liberal support in any way. Polls? We can all find polls to say what we want, but polls are only as reliable as the questions asked. Polls showed that Hilary was going to beat Trump without even trying. Exit polls showed the same. Polls are not science as we recently (and in the past) seen.

I had a similar discussion to ours with somebody who brought up prison sentences for blacks vs whites. Blacks get more time for doing the same type of crime than whites. That's all the study showed. But I've been to court. There are many other factors that go along with sentencing. The police talk to the judge before the case is heard to give them their take on the compliance of the suspect. Yes, judges hold disrespect of officers against the suspect. The judge is also aware of past criminal history--another thing the judge takes into consideration. Then there is the attitude of the suspect in court. If you act like a child in court and disrespect the judge by murmuring, shaking your head back and forth, rolling your eyes, guess what, that judge is not going go be favorable to your situation. He or she will get a harsher sentence than a person that shows remorse, respect to the court, and concern about their fate.

So I talked to a friend of mine who works at the clerk of courts in downtown. He admitted that in his opinion, blacks do get harsher sentences. But guess what? Those harsh sentences were handed down by black judges.

It makes sense too. If a white judge doesn't care for blacks, the worst thing he can do for blacks is release criminals back into their community. Black judges on the other hand live in those communities. If they don't, they likely have family and friends that do. So they do what they can in their power to clean up those communities.

Exit polls did not report about 10 percent of the vote which broke for Trump, Hillary go the amounts the polls said she would Trump just got that extra 10 percent the dumb asses did not factor in.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

equivalent is your word not mine. Putin is a KGB thug. Trump is a successful American businessman. There is no equivalency there. The equivalency is in that they both want what is best for their country. If we automatically make Russia an enemy rather than trying to find common ground with them, everyone loses.

We do not have to agree with a leader in order to work with him. The idea that we have to force our beliefs and culture on the rest of the world is one of the reasons we are so screwed up right now, and the reason for many of our stupid wasteful wars.

Obama wanted what was best for the country....so has every other President

You are just too partisan to recognize it

So, creating racial unrest and tension was good for the country? Doubling the debt was good for the country? Denigrating cops and military was good for the country? Obozocare was good for the country? Cancelling the national day of prayer and holding a muslim prayer day was good for the country? Lying about Benghazi was good for the country?

YOU, are the one who is too partisan to see the truth.

Bush doubled the debt and the right didn't care. Reagan tripled the debt and the right didn't care.

Yeah, and they didn't cry like you libs are crying now. They (the electorate) just waited for the election cycles to correct things like it should always, but unfortunately Obama threw a monkey wrench into all that thinking. 8 years of bull crap that had taken this nation to the brink. Americans being killed on this soil since 9-11 by terrorist should have been the biggest eye opener to have people saying wait one dag minute here, just like Trump saying no more of these Muslim refugees will be coming in here from war zones unvetted until we find out what the hell is going on here. Then the libs tried to construe that as Trump being a racist ???? Good grief.

You're a nut. Way more people were killed in the U.S. by terrorists while Bush was president.

Really provide a link that proves that claim.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Allowing the libs to destroy this country because of all their social experimentation's they have running here, should be sending chills down the back sides of every single American that calls themselves Americans. It's what has gone on here folks, where as you can easily see that the communist socialist lib crazies with all their crazy radical bull crap is what's at stake with them, and now the push back has come home to roost. This nation in order to figure it's way out of this delema, has got to finally put it's foot down, and it has got to do what is right for the children and grandchildren again. Enough is enough already. The devil's grip on the minds of people is unreal these days, and somehow that grip has to be broken.

Ya, radical bullcrap like allowing gays to marry...or maybe the radical bullcrap that prevents industries from dumping their wastes in our rivers...or is it the radical bullcrap that insists every citizen of age has a right to vote? Or that we have a right to know what is in the products we use and who is behind the political ads we view? So radical. What commies.

Telling us we have to let men in our women's bathrooms and our daughters locker rooms was really stupid.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

So, creating racial unrest and tension was good for the country? Doubling the debt was good for the country? Denigrating cops and military was good for the country? Obozocare was good for the country? Cancelling the national day of prayer and holding a muslim prayer day was good for the country? Lying about Benghazi was good for the country?

YOU, are the one who is too partisan to see the truth.

Bush doubled the debt and the right didn't care. Reagan tripled the debt and the right didn't care.

Yeah, and they didn't cry like you libs are crying now. They (the electorate) just waited for the election cycles to correct things like it should always, but unfortunately Obama threw a monkey wrench into all that thinking. 8 years of bull crap that had taken this nation to the brink. Americans being killed on this soil since 9-11 by terrorist should have been the biggest eye opener to have people saying wait one dag minute here, just like Trump saying no more of these Muslim refugees will be coming in here from war zones unvetted until we find out what the hell is going on here. Then the libs tried to construe that as Trump being a racist ???? Good grief.

You're a nut. Way more people were killed in the U.S. by terrorists while Bush was president.

. Boooooosh did it, booooooosh did it. Good grief... What will the libs do without boooosh ?

More people were killed by terrorists during his 2 terms. Sorry if reality hurts you so much that you feel compelled to whine like a baby when confronted with it.

Provide a link that proves that more Americans were killed on American soil by terrorists during the Bush years then during the Obama years.

 

[sealybobo]

You people will get one if you prevent Trump from being President.

Let them. We've got most of the weapons and ammo.

Over 17,500 tons of ammunition were sold in 2016 to citizens......

And 1 in 3 of those Americans have zero savings. Sad. Let's see if trump improves this sad fact. This is why the poorly educated voted for trump. Hopefully be frees them from social security.

 

[sealybobo]

Allowing the libs to destroy this country because of all their social experimentation's they have running here, should be sending chills down the back sides of every single American that calls themselves Americans. It's what has gone on here folks, where as you can easily see that the communist socialist lib crazies with all their crazy radical bull crap is what's at stake with them, and now the push back has come home to roost. This nation in order to figure it's way out of this delema, has got to finally put it's foot down, and it has got to do what is right for the children and grandchildren again. Enough is enough already. The devil's grip on the minds of people is unreal these days, and somehow that grip has to be broken.

Ya, radical bullcrap like allowing gays to marry...or maybe the radical bullcrap that prevents industries from dumping their wastes in our rivers...or is it the radical bullcrap that insists every citizen of age has a right to vote? Or that we have a right to know what is in the products we use and who is behind the political ads we view? So radical. What commies.

Telling us we have to let men in our women's bathrooms and our daughters locker rooms was really stupid.

Not true. The truth is telling a tranny she has to use the men's bathroom is a joke. Only right wing wackos don't get that

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Allowing the libs to destroy this country because of all their social experimentation's they have running here, should be sending chills down the back sides of every single American that calls themselves Americans. It's what has gone on here folks, where as you can easily see that the communist socialist lib crazies with all their crazy radical bull crap is what's at stake with them, and now the push back has come home to roost. This nation in order to figure it's way out of this delema, has got to finally put it's foot down, and it has got to do what is right for the children and grandchildren again. Enough is enough already. The devil's grip on the minds of people is unreal these days, and somehow that grip has to be broken.

Ya, radical bullcrap like allowing gays to marry...or maybe the radical bullcrap that prevents industries from dumping their wastes in our rivers...or is it the radical bullcrap that insists every citizen of age has a right to vote? Or that we have a right to know what is in the products we use and who is behind the political ads we view? So radical. What commies.

Telling us we have to let men in our women's bathrooms and our daughters locker rooms was really stupid.

Not true. The truth is telling a tranny she has to use the men's bathroom is a joke. Only right wing wackos don't get that

The law states that ANY man can claim he is a woman and use the women's facilities.

 

[Pop23]

Allowing the libs to destroy this country because of all their social experimentation's they have running here, should be sending chills down the back sides of every single American that calls themselves Americans. It's what has gone on here folks, where as you can easily see that the communist socialist lib crazies with all their crazy radical bull crap is what's at stake with them, and now the push back has come home to roost. This nation in order to figure it's way out of this delema, has got to finally put it's foot down, and it has got to do what is right for the children and grandchildren again. Enough is enough already. The devil's grip on the minds of people is unreal these days, and somehow that grip has to be broken.

Ya, radical bullcrap like allowing gays to marry...or maybe the radical bullcrap that prevents industries from dumping their wastes in our rivers...or is it the radical bullcrap that insists every citizen of age has a right to vote? Or that we have a right to know what is in the products we use and who is behind the political ads we view? So radical. What commies.

Ahhhh, the people who believe that if we were a democracy gay marriage would exist. Hell, in a democracy they would probably never come out of the closet.