Dems release more Epstein stuff

[OODA_Loop]

WOW, when you no logical, cogent, well thought argument left to make YOU drag out WJC, Why do you do that, because that is all you've got

WJC is guilty of goddamn something because he WJC is guilty of goddamn something be is WJC goddmnit!

Did WJC incite Insurrection? NO, that was 47.

Did WJC pardon Insurrectionists, NO that was 47

Did WJC attack Gold Star Families. NO that was 47.

Did WJC call the Men and Women who died defending our Democracy, "Suckers and Losers", NO that was 47.

Did WJC use the hollowed of Arlington Cemetery where those honored dead remain in honored sleep for a cheap political stunt, NO that was 47.

Is WJC a Convicted Felon. NO that is 47.

Did WJC offer to give the Communist Leader of the democratic People's Republic of (North) Korea, NO that was 47.

Did WJC illegally remove Classified Documents tohis private residence at them of his term in office, NO that was 47.

Did WJC pardon a drug smuggler, NO that was 47.

This is an Epstein Thread......Is WJC photographed getting a massage from one of the Epstein Victims ? Yes.

 

[sartre play]

Why do certain posters ignore Andrew’s involvement?

Because he is not an American. His country can deal with their own sex offenders.
We are stuck with dealing with our own.

 

[buckeye]

No one was closer to Jeffrey Epstein in his final days than Steve Bannon.

Bannon was a regular houseguest and close friend of Epstein. He was even working on a vanity video for Epstein intended to rehabilitate his image even as they both knew the authorities were moving in.

Bannon would creep into Epstein's back door because he knew Epstein was under law enforcement surveillance.

I just love how leftists think their opinions are facts.

You're full of shit. There were very many, many people that were closer to Epstein. Bannon was certainly among his friends but you embellish richly.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

You should read your own link.

Donald Trump signed a bill on 19 November ordering the justice department to release all its files on the Epstein case, giving them a 30-day deadline to make them available in a "searchable and downloadable format".

That deadline would give the department until Friday, 19 December to do so.

But there are obstacles to the files being shared with the US public on that date.

For one, the bill said that the justice department can hold back any documents that "jeapordise an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution, provided that such withholding is narrowly tailored and temporary".

That could potentially lead to delays, given that Trump has called for investigations into Epstein's links with prominent Democrats, such as Bill Clinton and Larry Summers "to determine what was going on with them, and him [Epstein]".

The latest bill also says Attorney General Pam Bondi can "withhold or redact" records that include victims' names, medical files and other personal information that "would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy".

No matter what files were released democrats will say that they weren't released, they weren't the right ones. They don't want files released. They want files manufactured.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Because he is not an American. His country can deal with their own sex offenders.
We are stuck with dealing with our own.

Right, he is a Brit and can go to jail if he is critical of Andrew in this forum.

 

[JGalt]

But these arent the actual files are they ? When is that happening ?
They have had plenty of time to erase Trumps name from them by now.
Ehen will that happen or will the conflict in Venezuela delay them ?

More images of Epstein's private island home released by House Democrats

Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released the new trove of pictures and videos from disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein's private island.

www.bbc.co.uk

Another big, fat Nothingburger is all you have.

No meat, no lettuce, no tomatoes, no onions, no mustard, and no mayonnaise. Just two stale buns with nothing on them. Hope you don't choke on it.

Well actually, I hope you do.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

But these arent the actual files are they ? When is that happening ?
They have had plenty of time to erase Trumps name from them by now.
Ehen will that happen or will the conflict in Venezuela delay them ?

More images of Epstein's private island home released by House Democrats

Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released the new trove of pictures and videos from disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein's private island.

www.bbc.co.uk

They needed something to distract from the drug boat story failure...lol

 

[MagicMike]

But these arent the actual files are they ? When is that happening ?
They have had plenty of time to erase Trumps name from them by now.
Ehen will that happen or will the conflict in Venezuela delay them ?

More images of Epstein's private island home released by House Democrats

Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released the new trove of pictures and videos from disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein's private island.

www.bbc.co.uk

Even after they've exhausted the 30 day deadline and believe they have successfully scrubbed Trump's pedophillic activities with Epstein there are now 1,000 F.B.I. agents out there who were paid overtime to help facilitate the coverup. The odds are pretty high that at least a few of those agents will wind up being whistle blowers on what they were requested to redact about Trump, especially with morale at the DOJ being so low under Trump.
And also the Epstein estate has it's own trove of files it will probably be trickling out little by little.
If those records don't match what Bondi's circus freaks choose to release that's not going to look too good.

 

[22lcidw]

Even after they've exhausted the 30 day deadline and believe they have successfully scrubbed Trump's pedophillic activities with Epstein there are now 1,000 F.B.I. agents out there who were paid overtime to help facilitate the coverup. The odds are pretty high that at least a few of those agents will wind up bwing whistle blowers on what they were requested to redact about Trump, especially with morale at the DOJ being so low under Trump.
And also the Epstein estate has it's own trove of files it will probably be trickling out little by little.
If those records don't match what Bondi's circus freaks choose to release that's not going to look too good.

The real tragedy is that this existed, and it was not such a secret. I certainly do not know why those cracker jack journalists never investigated these things. These commentators need to be taken to task. Our freedom will start with this. For this is not the first amendment.

 

[Nostra]

No one was closer to Jeffrey Epstein in his final days than Steve Bannon.

Bannon was a regular houseguest and close friend of Epstein. He was even working on a vanity video for Epstein intended to rehabilitate his image even as they both knew the authorities were moving in.

Bannon would creep into Epstein's back door because he knew Epstein was under law enforcement surveillance.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Even after they've exhausted the 30 day deadline and believe they have successfully scrubbed Trump's pedophillic activities with Epstein there are now 1,000 F.B.I. agents out there who were paid overtime to help facilitate the coverup. The odds are pretty high that at least a few of those agents will wind up being whistle blowers on what they were requested to redact about Trump, especially with morale at the DOJ being so low under Trump.
And also the Epstein estate has it's own trove of files it will probably be trickling out little by little.
If those records don't match what Bondi's circus freaks choose to release that's not going to look too good.

That is more than likely.
I reckon the problem they have at the moent is we know that trump is in the files many times. Kash told us that. They have to weed out enough of that to not incriminate the orange one but leave enough in to allay suspicion.
Its a delicate job and cant be left to an algorithm.
I guess being king is hard work in the digital age.

 

[Blisterfinger]

That is more than likely.
I reckon the problem they have at the moent is we know that trump is in the files many times. Kash told us that. They have to weed out enough of that to not incriminate the orange one but leave enough in to allay suspicion.
Its a delicate job and cant be left to an algorithm.
I guess being king is hard work in the digital age.

If the files were so damning to Trump why didn't Biden let them out?

 

[22lcidw]

That is more than likely.
I reckon the problem they have at the moent is we know that trump is in the files many times. Kash told us that. They have to weed out enough of that to not incriminate the orange one but leave enough in to allay suspicion.
Its a delicate job and cant be left to an algorithm.
I guess being king is hard work in the digital age.

The Dems had a choice to release this during the last administration. So, all of this is a lie. You lie! Once you can give us a reason that Progressive Socialists did not do it, then we can move on from there. You guys' lambasted Trump everyday even when he was not in power. The Republican voters are deplorables and dregs. Your politicians and those around them mocked Christians and even promoted putting Republican voters and Christians into camps. So, I do not get it. You would have released those files. We all know that Hillary should be in prison.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

We moved on from Epstein. do keep up.

No, Trump's cult moved on from Epstein. The rest of us want justice for the victims.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

If the files were so damning to Trump why didn't Biden let them out?

My guess is that it was damaging for them as well. I dont care who is in the files. I dont like the idea of rich men acting like its aincient Rome. None of which hides trumps giult.

 

[Blisterfinger]

My guess is that it was damaging for them as well. I dont care who is in the files. I dont like the idea of rich men acting like its aincient Rome. None of which hides trumps giult.

My guess is the files don't damage Trump or Biden would have been on them like a fly on shit. They have been a big nothing burger for you and you should be embarrassed.

 

[cnm]

We moved on from Epstein. do keep up.

Epstein didn't move on from you.

 

[cnm]

The Dems had a choice to release this during the last administration. So, all of this is a lie. You lie! Once you can give us a reason that Progressive Socialists did not do it, then we can move on from there. You guys' lambasted Trump everyday even when he was not in power. The Republican voters are deplorables and dregs. Your politicians and those around them mocked Christians and even promoted putting Republican voters and Christians into camps. So, I do not get it. You would have released those files. We all know that Hillary should be in prison.

Is is possible to be more of a victim?

 

[drudge X]

Trump will slow walk the “investigation” until the midterms, if he can.

I agree. He is planning a TKO against Democrats prior to mid term.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Why do certain posters ignore Andrew’s involvement?

Andrew's involvement was of exceedingly low interest. He had sex with a 17 year old prostitute. He had sex with the same prostitute twice more after she turned 18. If Virginia Giuffre is to be believed, he wasn't good in bed and got a thrill out of sacking her toes.

For this, he paid her millions of dollars. This on top of the $2,000 per trick Epstein paid.

Andrew is ordinary enough to be ignored.