Demons in your clothes, yes really.

Crazy woman says she talks with Michael Jackson and Princess Di in the "afterlife". What a f*ckin' loon!:

Psychic Sylvia Browne on How Michael Jackson and Princess Di Are Doing in Afterlife | PopEater.com
Big difference between a "psychic" and a "Christian". Or is there?

Have you really had a "Demon", with an uppercase D, tell you "straight to your face "Hey watch out, I'm a Demon"."
I have actually met a Demon. But in order to disguise her true intentions she introduced herself as Janet Reno.

(Yes I actually met Janet Reno in D.C.)
 
These people are nuts AND THEY VOTE!:eusa_shifty:

That's exactly what we say about you guys that are whining here.

The man is senile. He shouldn't be on tv or radio anymore. Rather than so compassion, you guys would prefer to mock.

Meanwhile, you made Joe Biden Vice President.
 
And would again.

But, you can't blame senility for Robertson's vile hatred of human beings. Just like others who have "found" god as a way to make an easy buck off the gullible, he's been spouting that same shit for way too many years. He's just a vile excuse for a man.
 
These people are nuts AND THEY VOTE!:eusa_shifty:

That's exactly what we say about you guys that are whining here.

The man is senile. He shouldn't be on tv or radio anymore. Rather than so compassion, you guys would prefer to mock.

Meanwhile, you made Joe Biden Vice President.

You know what, Avatar - you really need to stop pretending to be a Christian. You are so filled with really nasty hate and you spread it freely, here, every fucking day.
 
You know what, Avatar - you really need to stop pretending to be a Christian. You are so filled with really nasty hate and you spread it freely, here, every fucking day.
You know what Luddite - your really need to stop pretending to know about Christianity.

You admitted in another thread that you don't read the Bible so just stop with yer' trollin'.
 
These people are nuts AND THEY VOTE!:eusa_shifty:

That's exactly what we say about you guys that are whining here.

The man is senile. He shouldn't be on tv or radio anymore. Rather than so compassion, you guys would prefer to mock.

Meanwhile, you made Joe Biden Vice President.

You know what, Avatar - you really need to stop pretending to be a Christian. You are so filled with really nasty hate and you spread it freely, here, every fucking day.

yes. I spread hate by suggesting you have charity for a senile man.
 
That's exactly what we say about you guys that are whining here.

The man is senile. He shouldn't be on tv or radio anymore. Rather than so compassion, you guys would prefer to mock.

Meanwhile, you made Joe Biden Vice President.

You know what, Avatar - you really need to stop pretending to be a Christian. You are so filled with really nasty hate and you spread it freely, here, every fucking day.

yes. I spread hate by suggesting you have charity for a senile man.

The thing is, what he said is not all that nuts by christian standards. Oh sure, demons in cloths isn't biblical. But christians believe in demons. They believe demons can reside in humans and pigs.

So it's really only a slight deviation from scripture.
 
So it's really only a slight deviation from scripture.

You've nailed why I was asking about demons in the bible.

yes. I spread hate by suggesting you have charity for a senile man.

Actually, yes, you were. Its pretty silly to defend this vile pos by saying he's senile. He's been saying crap like this for his whole life.
 
Lefties, they just can't stop hating.

Reacting against those who hate is not necessarily hating, and even if it is... so what. We wouldn't be the hypocrites, since we don't claim to cling to a doctrine that preaches love, or worship a god of supposed similar ontology.
 
Last edited:
So it's really only a slight deviation from scripture.

You've nailed why I was asking about demons in the bible.

yes. I spread hate by suggesting you have charity for a senile man.

Actually, yes, you were. Its pretty silly to defend this vile pos by saying he's senile. He's been saying crap like this for his whole life.

Yeah being compassionate to people is hate. Go with that argument.
 
Lefties, they just can't stop hating.

Reacting against those who hate is not necessarily hating, and even if it is... so what. We wouldn't be the hypocrites, since we don't claim to cling to a doctrine that preaches love, or worship a god of supposed similar ontology.

Yes. responding to hate coming from you guys is not hating. There is nothing hateful about what Pat said. Odd, yes. But not hateful.

You attack him somehow you're responding? Doesn't work that way.
 
funny3.gif
 
Lefties, they just can't stop hating.

Reacting against those who hate is not necessarily hating, and even if it is... so what. We wouldn't be the hypocrites, since we don't claim to cling to a doctrine that preaches love, or worship a god of supposed similar ontology.

Yes. responding to hate coming from you guys is not hating. There is nothing hateful about what Pat said. Odd, yes. But not hateful.

You attack him somehow you're responding? Doesn't work that way.

If you are unable to see the hate in some of Robertson's words, then you are likely blinded by your own bias. Robertson was no less than a bigot, inspired by the bible. The bible itself is full of bigotry and hate, such as with the promotion of slavery, genocide, and homophobia. One following the word of the bible will naturally become a bigot. It is only through reformed thought can one avoid such pitfalls. The idea that the bible is divinely inspired when it inspires such hate is a paradox that is hard to ignore, considering that this divine being is supposedly omni-benevolent.

Your last question didn't make sense.
 
Reacting against those who hate is not necessarily hating, and even if it is... so what. We wouldn't be the hypocrites, since we don't claim to cling to a doctrine that preaches love, or worship a god of supposed similar ontology.

Yes. responding to hate coming from you guys is not hating. There is nothing hateful about what Pat said. Odd, yes. But not hateful.

You attack him somehow you're responding? Doesn't work that way.

If you are unable to see the hate in some of Robertson's words, then you are likely blinded by your own bias. Robertson was no less than a bigot, inspired by the bible. The bible itself is full of bigotry and hate, such as with the promotion of slavery, genocide, and homophobia. One following the word of the bible will naturally become a bigot. It is only through reformed thought can one avoid such pitfalls. The idea that the bible is divinely inspired when it inspires such hate is a paradox that is hard to ignore, considering that this divine being is supposedly omni-benevolent.

Your last question didn't make sense.

What exactly is hateful about Robertson saying:

”Can demonic spirits attach themselves to inanimate objects? The answer is yes. But I don’t think every sweater you get from Goodwill has demons in it. In a sense your mother is just being super cautious, so hey — it isn’t gonna hurt you any to rebuke any spirits that might attach themselves to those clothes.”

Odd yes. Hateful no.

You're attacking him on that statement is somehow you responding to hate? How do you figure?

You think you're somehow justified in all this?
 
Funny how tolerant libs are when the issues concern dykes on bikes or international terrorism but let Soros dig up one statement by Pat Robertson and tolerance goes out the window. A woman will be stoned to death in a moslem country for failing to wear a hat. Which scenario is more frightening, Pat Robertson's demons or execution by stoning?
 
Funny how tolerant libs are when the issues concern dykes on bikes or international terrorism but let Soros dig up one statement by Pat Robertson and tolerance goes out the window. A woman will be stoned to death in a moslem country for failing to wear a hat. Which scenario is more frightening, Pat Robertson's demons or execution by stoning?

Please, they aren't tolerant.
 

Forum List

Back
Top