Demolishing The White Houses East Wing

WTF?

What a ******* DUMB ASS.
You know less about construction than Trump.
The DUMB ASS can't even read a blueprint.



D.C. Permitting Guide for Builders, Developers, Contractors

View attachment 1177901
PermitFlow
https://www.permitflow.com › blog › dc-permitting
Sep 11, 2025 — Constructing, renovating, or demolishing a building in the DC area requires a permit. And obtaining a permit requires submitting a thorough ...

What you're citing is for DC buildings that aren't federal buildings. Let me point to the dc.gov website for the laws and regulations for federal buildings. LINK
 
What you're citing is for DC buildings that aren't federal buildings. Let me point to the dc.gov website for the laws and regulations for federal buildings. LINK
Bullshit.

Why does the Trump cult keep bringing the historical planning council up?
They have NOTHING to do with building codes.
That tells me, they know as much about construction as Trump does..........Not a damned thing.
 
The White House is at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW. It exists on federal land, not municipal property. That means: It’s not under D.C. jurisdiction, so city zoning laws and building codes don’t apply. No building permits are issued by the D.C. Department of Buildings or city council.

No, the White House does not need traditional building permits because it is exempt from local zoning and permitting, but federal construction is overseen by the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC). The White House must submit plans for new construction to the NCPC for review and approval, even though the Commission's authority over demolitions has been debated and contested. Other federal laws, such as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), also apply, and the White House must comply with various executive orders and statutes governing historic preservation and federal projects.
 
No, the White House does not need traditional building permits because it is exempt from local zoning and permitting, but federal construction is overseen by the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC). The White House must submit plans for new construction to the NCPC for review and approval, even though the Commission's authority over demolitions has been debated and contested. Other federal laws, such as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), also apply, and the White House must comply with various executive orders and statutes governing historic preservation and federal projects.
Here's from the NCPC website: LINK

NCPC typically participates in the NHPA-mandated “Section 106 Consultation Process” (so named because it was established by Section 106 of the NHPA) as a consulting party. This means NCPC actively participates in the process but is not the lead agency. Under some circumstances, NCPC must conduct the Section 106 Consultation Process as the lead agency. This occurs for non-federal agency projects requiring Commission approval (NHPA only applies to federal agencies) or for NCPC derived plans focused on a specific geographic area with detailed recommendations that render evaluation of historic impacts possible.

The Section 106 consultation process generally consists of four steps: (1) initiation of the process and establishment of the undertaking; (2) identification of historic properties; (3) assessment of adverse effects; and (4) the resolution of adverse effects.

Well guess what, the White House falls under section 107 of the NHPA. So, they don't have to submit anything to them for approval.
 
What you're citing is for DC buildings that aren't federal buildings. Let me point to the dc.gov website for the laws and regulations for federal buildings. LINK
Several others, myself included have tried to point out the laws and regulations. As you can see, with no effect. The lie will keep trundling along.
 
Back
Top Bottom