Well...let's see.
We can put each school next to a large path of ground. On that ground we can plant gardens, set up a chicken coup and have a pasture for some cattle.
The kids can take part of their day to work in the fields. They can learn farming, biology and some other useful things. Like how to kill chickens.
We'll pay cooks to turn this production into good fare for the children.
I kinda like it. That way we know the kids are getting exercise, are not home or in after school care playing video games or watching movies,
They can grow wheat for breads.
They can also learn how to can so they can put up the harvest for Winter.
The parents of these kids can help too.
Then we kill the line item budgets for bringing in food from overpaid contractors.
Perfect !!!!
I like it only you don't go far enough. We can set up factories next to schools, work houses, make them sew shoes and clothes
The money can go to the wealthy who will trickle it down with wealth and prosperity for all
.
As usual, you show up to dump (literally) one of your fallacies into the thread.
The factories could be set up for their parents who obviously can't afford to feed them.
But, then you are right. Why would we want to connect these kids to the fruits of their labors.
Let's let others feed them while they languish in school learning about how the Federal Government is such a great caretaker.
Wouldn't want them to miss recess now would we ?