Democrats, This Is Worse Than Trump's Landslide Victory!!!

[Mac1958]

49.5%-47.5% is NOT a landslide, bot. Not by any stretch of the imagination.

And you could do just a bit better on the algorithm by not posting the same list every post you make.

They're not even trying to be honest.

But remember the Trumpster definition of "landslide": Winning both the popular vote and Electoral College percentages by below average margins.

 

[Invisibleflash]

1. I just read a few articles I need to share, but the point is that you need to start over as a political party, and decide who you are.......and Trump has already co-opted "patriots," and "capitalists," and "individual freedom and free speech."
What's left for you?????


2. "Of all the slurs ascribed to me in my years as a journalist—libtard, commie, ******, just to name a few—Democrat is by far the most humiliating, because it implies that I am not only a libtard, a commie, and a ******, but also an unprincipled one, who, like the Democratic Party, believes in nothing at all."
"How the Democrats Lost Men Like Me," River Page



3."E ver since they were walloped in November, Democrats have been asking not just what they’re supposed to do next—but who they’re supposed to be.
As of right now, there are 15 Democratic House members being primaried, and we’re still nine months out from the first votes. “I absolutely expect the House Dem primary challenge number to rise,” Amanda Litman, the president of Run for Something, a group that recruits young progressive candidates, told me in an email. “It’s still very early.”
These new Democrats say they are done with just railing against Donald Trump, which has been the Democrats’ MO for the past decade, and are more focused on addressing the problems that propelled Trump to power in the first place—the problems that the people they’re challenging have had years to do something about but, to their mind, have not."
"They’re Young. They’re Mad at Biden. And They’re Running," by Peter Savodnik



4. They want young, gay, Muslim candidates. And I'm betting that socialist will be up there. Will you still simply look at the "D" when you vote, or will you actually think about the policies?
We are in interesting times.



5. How many of these will still be the Democrat playbook???
Race and gender preferences

Language police

No punishment for criminals

Open borders

Attacks on the Supreme Court

Transgender sports competitions

Antisemitism

Wealth tax

Cancel culture

Welfare State

Government run healthcare mandates

Sanctuary Cities

Two-Tiered Justice system



Looking forward to the baby-shower for the new-born Democrat Party.

 

[PoliticalChic]

#2 Seems to be working to a large extent. But it's not mindless. Trump is largely doing it to himself. Because he's a moron.

And anything that is done....can be undone by the next administration.
This too, shall pass.

Legend has it that when critics of Gen. Ulysses S. Grant complained to President Abraham Lincoln about Grant's drinking, Lincoln replied, "I wish some of you would tell me the brand of whiskey that Grant drinks. I would like to send a barrel of it to my other generals."


If the sucessful Trump is a moron, we should hope all presidents are morons........you less-than-a-moron.

 

[Contumacious]

#2 Seems to be working to a large extent. But it's not mindless. Trump is largely doing it to himself. Because he's a moron.

And anything that is done....can be undone by the next administration.
This too, shall pass.

AND "WE THE PEOPLE" BENEFIT HOW?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

See, this is the sort of lamebrain the party has to contend with. They can't change, and just want to keep going over the cliff.
View attachment 1118766


A Democrat far smarter than you wrote this......would you like to debate him?




STEPHEN A. SMITH: It is a mandate, and I'm going to explain why.

Now I don't mind the question, but let me be very clear. I'm no supporter of Trump. I'm a supporter of truth and facts. And here's the facts. The man won every swing state. He increased in terms of his vote, his voter turnout, in his favor, from the standpoint of blacks, Latinos and young voters. He increased his numbers in that regard from 2020. 89 percent of the counties shifted to the right. That's a mandate.

We can sit up here and play around all we want to. In 2020, Trump didn't win the popular vote. He didn't win the electoral college vote. As a matter of fact the Republicans have won the popular vote, if I remember correctly, since 2004. But they did this year. So 20 years after they last won a popular vote, they won the popular vote. They won the electoral college vote. The man won every swing state. And on top of it all, 89 percent of the counties shifted (inaudible.)

I don't understand how people can look at that and say "There's no mandate." There's a mandate.




Which total would you choose, Trump's or the Fascists?

This is not a response, bot. You need to adjust your algorithm. And Trump?....is about as popular as cancer now.
A lot of those people who voted for him..are now having extreme buyer's remorse.

• Donald Trump: 49.9% / 49.8% of the popular vote.
• Kamala Harris: 48.4% / 48.33% of the popular vote

Stop flooding the zone. Come up with something more original.

 

[PoliticalChic]

They're not even trying to be honest.

But remember the Trumpster definition of "landslide": Winning both the popular vote and Electoral College percentages by below average margins.

Why would any intelligent, freedom-loving American vote for this?



1.Elon Musk: "The fundamental moral flaw of the left is empathy for criminals and not empathy for the victims."

2.The Right supports free speech, the Left, censorship and cancel culture.

3.The Right is guided by religion and the Left hates family, father,mother, and Western Civilization.

4.For the Right, human life has value, for the Left “"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky

5. Racial preferences and racism in general, the way Democrats have won elections are the very opposite of the Constitution treating Americans as individuals rather than ethnic, gender, demographic groups.

 

[PoliticalChic]

AND "WE THE PEOPLE" BENEFIT HOW?

You hit the nail on his head.


They cannot see beyound the letter "D"

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

View attachment 1118767

Yep, that's about the size of him...according to Stormy anyway.

 

[Contumacious]

See, this is the sort of lamebrain the party has to contend with. They can't change, and just want to keep going over the cliff.
View attachment 1118766


A Democrat far smarter than you wrote this......would you like to debate him?




STEPHEN A. SMITH: It is a mandate, and I'm going to explain why.

Now I don't mind the question, but let me be very clear. I'm no supporter of Trump. I'm a supporter of truth and facts. And here's the facts. The man won every swing state. He increased in terms of his vote, his voter turnout, in his favor, from the standpoint of blacks, Latinos and young voters. He increased his numbers in that regard from 2020. 89 percent of the counties shifted to the right. That's a mandate.

We can sit up here and play around all we want to. In 2020, Trump didn't win the popular vote. He didn't win the electoral college vote. As a matter of fact the Republicans have won the popular vote, if I remember correctly, since 2004. But they did this year. So 20 years after they last won a popular vote, they won the popular vote. They won the electoral college vote. The man won every swing state. And on top of it all, 89 percent of the counties shifted (inaudible.)

I don't understand how people can look at that and say "There's no mandate." There's a mandate.




Which total would you choose, Trump's or the Fascists?

Part of the MANDATE was to end the CIA Proxy war in Ukraine which the CIA-Lindsey Graham - Marco Rubio clan is circumventing - but you are --somehow- happy .

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is not a response, bot. You need to adjust your algorithm. And Trump?....is about as popular as cancer now.
A lot of those people who voted for him..are now having extreme buyer's remorse.

• Donald Trump: 49.9% / 49.8% of the popular vote.
• Kamala Harris: 48.4% / 48.33% of the popular vote

Stop flooding the zone. Come up with something more original.

Stephen A Smith ripped you a new one. You're the only one who can't see that.

 

[WelfareQueen]

#2 Seems to be working to a large extent. But it's not mindless. Trump is largely doing it to himself. Because he's a moron.

And anything that is done....can be undone by the next administration.
This too, shall pass.

Ah....you guys have taken option #2 for the last nine years and have lost two elections to the orange Hitler. Only in Dim World would anyone think it is working. Sorry dude, your statement is completely retarded, much like the Dim Party. The only reasonable option for you is #1. Work with Trump where you can and come up with your own ideas to help the American People.

But we all know you'll continue the full resistance and go all in on the cultural Marxism, because well. Dims are dim.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Why would any intelligent, freedom-loving American vote for this?



1.Elon Musk: "The fundamental moral flaw of the left is empathy for criminals and not empathy for the victims."

Sure...DOGE Master gets spanked and sent away and now he's an oracle.

2.The Right supports free speech, the Left, censorship and cancel culture.

No, this is a lie. The right supports the right to lie and misinform.

3.The Right is guided by religion and the Left hates family, father,mother, and Western Civilization.

On this, we can agree. Which is one of the reason conservatism fails so miserably when it tries to translate to economic or social policy. It is rooted in the belief in God. Not reality.

4.For the Right, human life has value, for the Left “"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky

Sure. Tell that to all the dead children in Gaza.

5. Racial preferences and racism in general, the way Democrats have won elections are the very opposite of the Constitution treating Americans as individuals rather than ethnic, gender, demographic groups.

Same ole, same ole.....flood that zone!

 

[leftwinger]

@Contumacious

They're not even trying to be honest.

But remember the Trumpster definition of "landslide": Winning both the popular vote and Electoral College percentages by below average margins.

Take off 10-30 million bogus votes like stolen 2020 and yes it's 70-30.

Haairyarse was so lame they couldn't pay mules enough to haul backpacks full of phony ballots at 3AM. Or WISC to run USB sticks alone in count rooms after shutdown you filthy maggot.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Ah....you guys have taken option #2 for the last nine years and have lost two elections to the orange Hitler. Only in Dim World would anyone think it is working. Sorry dude, your statement is completely retarded, much like the Dim Party. The only reasonable option for you is #1. Work with Trump where you can and come up with your own ideas to help the American People.

But we all know you'll continue the full resistance and go all in on the cultural Marxism, because well. Dims are dim.

I would love to see more intelligent, pro-America types take over, but I am an eternal pessimist, and recognize the strength of the Bolshevik element in the party.

 

[Contumacious]

@Contumacious


Take off 10-30 million bogus votes like stolen 2020 and yes it's 70-30.

Haairyarse was so lame they couldn't pay mules enough to haul backpacks full of phony ballots at 3AM. Or WISC to run USB sticks alone in count rooms after shutdown you filthy maggot.

Yup

The too big to to rig strategy

 

[PoliticalChic]

Sure...DOGE Master gets spanked and sent away and now he's an oracle.

No, this is a lie. The right supports the right to lie and misinform.

On this, we can agree. Which is one of the reason conservatism fails so miserably when it tries to translate to economic or social policy. It is rooted in the belief in God. Not reality.

Sure. Tell that to all the dead children in Gaza.

Same ole, same ole.....flood that zone!

2.The Right supports free speech, the Left, censorship and cancel culture.

"No, this is a lie. The right supports the right to lie and misinform"

PBS
PBS: Public Broadcasting Service › newshour › politics › zuckerberg...
Aug 27, 2024 — Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg says senior Biden administration officials pressured Facebook to “censor” some COVID-19 content during the pandemic.



1 There are those of us who have been brought up correctly, with the right principles and knowledge of right and wrong



2. Some of us may not have had that start, and been misled by sophistry, but finally saw through it and moved in the right direction.



3. I see that you belong to neither of those categories. But you are not alone: Around 22% of Americans identify as strong Democrats, meaning they are highly likely to consistently vote for Democratic candidates, no matter how many lies and hoaxes are revealed.


This poster clearly has neither the ability to tell the truth, or to learn from his defeat.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

"No, this is a lie. The right supports the right to lie and misinform"

PBS
PBS: Public Broadcasting Service › newshour › politics › zuckerberg...
Aug 27, 2024 — Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg says senior Biden administration officials pressured Facebook to “censor” some COVID-19 content during the pandemic.



1 There are those of us who have been brought up correctly, with the right principles and knowledge of right and wrong

That's not possible for a machine.

2. Some of us may not have had that start, and been misled by sophistry, but finally saw through it and moved in the right direction.

No, you've moved in the direction of totalitarianism.

3. I see that you belong to neither of those categories. But you are not alone: Around 22% of Americans identify as strong Democrats, meaning they are highly likely to consistently vote for Democratic candidates, no matter how many lies and hoaxes are revealed.

Well, politicians lie. Been that way since time began. But Republicans have taken it to an art form in the last 20 years or so.
Servitude will do that to you.

This poster clearly has neither the ability to tell the truth, or to learn from his defeat.

I only post the truth, bot. You are a machine. And I'm smiling because I can see I'm screwing up your algorithmic responses.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That's not possible for a machine.

No, you've moved in the direction of totalitarianism.

Well, politicians lie. Been that way since time began. But Republicans have taken it to an art form in the last 20 years or so.
Servitude will do that to you.

I only post the truth, bot. You are a machine. And I'm smiling because I can see I'm screwing up your algorithmic responses.

This one will still vote Democrat when the party changes logos from the donkey to the hammer and sickle.

 

[Billiejeens]

It was clear when they stole the nomination from Bernie and gave it to Hillary.


They're gonna have to come to terms with their Bolshevik base.

Well
2 points;

Bernie was not a Democrat
Bernie had no chance nationally

The party has a responsibility to nominate a viable Democrat candidate.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Well
2 points;

Bernie was not a Democrat
Bernie had no chance nationally

The party has a responsibility to nominate a viable Democrat candidate.

Not true.

Democrats are not Democrats....and socialists have always made up a large part of that party.



"Liberal" = socialist= communist= Democrat

The term Liberal today, in the colloquial, is the Democrat/Progressive/socialist grouping.

It is due to the communist John Dewey persuading the Socialist Party to change its name to Liberal.....so that is the way it is accepted today.


How Socialist John Dewey Switched Labels
by Jim Peron

1. Pity the poor liberal. And I mean the real liberal. Not the modern watered-down socialist who calls himself a liberal but a real, honest, classical liberal. There is so much confusion over the term and real liberals have allowed fake liberals to get away with this subtle destruction of the language.
2. The classical liberals proposed laissez faire and this led to prosperity. The economics of 19th century liberalism brought about a major increase in the standard of living of all people. Thus real liberalism produced the effects which socialists dreamed their system would provide.
   1. Many socialists wanted prosperity and thought socialism would lead to such results faster than classical liberalism. But at the same time many socialists saw their ideology as a means of grabbing power for themselves and it was the power, not the promised prosperity, which attracted them.
3. [Socialists] knew that liberalism had a good reputation with the working classes — the very audience which they were targeting. The idea was to adopt the name liberal to describe socialism. Socialism, as socialism, was harder to sell. But by taking a name they did not deserve they felt they could make political gains on the backs of classical liberalism. And they did.
4. In the United States, where liberalism most clearly reversed its meaning, in common parlance, it was the socialist John Dewey who openly promoted the idea of stealing the liberal label. Dewey, in his book Individualism Old and Newargued that liberal individualism had in fact disappeared and been replaced by state capitalism and that collectivism already existed in America.
   1. But he noted the collectivism of that day was a “collectivism of profit” and not a “collectivism of planning”. He said the only way liberalism could return to its true meaning was to adopt socialism as the means by which liberal goals would be achieved. As he put it central economic planning was “the sole method of social action by which liberalism can realize its professed aims.”
5. Peter Witonski, in his essay The Historical Roots of American Planningsaid: “Dewey was the first to argue that the word ‘liberal’—which once stood for liberal, free-market capitalism—could better serve the needs of social democracy in America than the world ‘socialism’.
   1. The liberalism of Adam Smith was out-of-date Dewey argued.” In his book Liberalism and Social Action, Dewey suggested that the goals of a free society could best be obtained “only by a reversal of the means to which early liberalism was committed.” But the means of liberalism were fundamentally connected to the basic premises of liberalism. A reversal of means, while keeping similar goals in mind, also changed the premises of liberalism. The “new wisdom” of Keynes with the “reversal of means” of Dewey really meant stealing the name of liberalism and applying it to another very different species. The famed economist Joseph Schumpeter noted that “the enemies of private enterprise have thought it wise to appropriate its label.”
6. Today a great deal of confusion reigns because socialists decided to deceptively call their own ideology liberal. And, to a very large degree, the academics who wrote the recent texts on liberalism were socialists. Hence they were quite willing to pretend that socialism was a modern form of classical liberalism.
7. [Classical] liberal describes individuals supporting free markets, private property, profit management and limited governments. So-called “liberals” support socialism, state ownership, bureaucratic management and statism.

http://orlingrabbe.com/lfetimes/liberal_confusion.htm

www.freerepublic.com





Bernie Sanders won the Democrat nomination for President, and the party stole it and gave it to Hillary.


BBC
https://www.bbc.com › world-us-canada-41850798
Nov 3, 2017 — CNN asked Senator Elizabeth Warren if Mrs Clinton's contest against Democratic rival Bernie Sanders was rigged, and she said: "Yes."

http://forum.rottentomatoes.com/topic/show/1369713?page=2