Democrats started and supported DOGE

There's nothing " intelligent" about leftists and their tranny comic books.
Which doesn't even exist. You believe the lies, because you lack intelligence.
 
People who care about reality laugh at leftists who are in rage mode over their fraud, theft and waste being under the harsh light of scrutiny.
Then why do Musk and Trump have to lie so often?
 
Cool, except for the fact the Democrat leadership and their lemmings are out protesting the actual cuts that President Trump is implementing, so again if it's all theater what are they talking about? What's with the lawsuits trying to stop the Presidents Executive Actions?

Are they just imagining things?
The cuts are meaningless in terms of overall budgetary management and have the propensity to cause serious harm to a lot of people.

You aren't going to solve the fiscal issues of this country by cutting USAID.
 
Wanna know a secret? Most Americans don't pay enough in taxes to be upset by how it gets spent. Joe Sixpack paying a 6% effective income tax rate is almost certainly going to be getting more than he pays in.
Which just means the congresscritters cynically set up tax policy to deliberately make net recipients out of a majority of the citizens to make it impossible to cut anything. And TRUMP! has put the TDS afflicted in the position of defending said policy.

BTW, the median American income is over $80,000. Joe Sixpack is likely to be making 60-70 K, which puts his tax rate between 12%-24%.
Regardless, government spending is approved by Congress. That's how it works in a Republic.
And we are pulling back the covers so everyone can see what that spending is. Then taxpayers can decide if they want to support those who continue and increase the spending or those who want the taxpayer to have a voice in it. Let's ask the taxpayers if they want to continue spending money on teaching clowns to tie balloon animals.
 
The cuts are meaningless in terms of overall budgetary management and have the propensity to cause serious harm to a lot of people.
What "serious harm" is being caused and what "lot of people" is it harming?
You aren't going to solve the fiscal issues of this country by cutting USAID.
So, what's your solution?
 
The cuts are meaningless in terms of overall budgetary management and have the propensity to cause serious harm to a lot of people.

You aren't going to solve the fiscal issues of this country by cutting USAID.
You can if you merge its programs into the State Department and allow the taxpayers to see what the spending is. Start cutting the smaller things and the bigger ones will start paying attention and tightening up the ship, because they don't want to be next on the block.
 
The cuts are meaningless in terms of overall budgetary management and have the propensity to cause serious harm to a lot of people.

You aren't going to solve the fiscal issues of this country by cutting USAID.
You aren't going to be doing anything but being an accomplice to fraud, theft and waste by allowing leftists to continue their abuse of taxpayers.
 
You aren't going to be doing anything but being an accomplice to fraud, theft and waste by allowing leftists to continue their abuse of taxpayers.
Meaningless gibberish. Let me know when you take the issue seriously instead of mouthing partisan talking points.
 
The cuts are meaningless in terms of overall budgetary management and have the propensity to cause serious harm to a lot of people.

You aren't going to solve the fiscal issues of this country by cutting USAID.
again, it seems you are conceding the point that demofks don't care about waste and money laundering.
 
Meaningless gibberish. Let me know when you take the issue seriously instead of mouthing partisan talking points.
I fully expected you to retreat with pointless babbling.
 
so you concede demofks don't care about waste and money laundering.
Spending millions so Trump can watch the first half of the Super Bowl is wasteful.
 
Spending millions so Trump can watch the first half of the Super Bowl is wasteful.
"But... but.... but... but what about Trump."

Pretty typical sidestep and skedaddle.
 
15th post
"But... but.... but... but what about Trump."

Pretty typical sidestep and skedaddle.
It just proves you’re talking points are hollow.

Define government waste and tell me how that definition doesn’t apply to Trump’s Super Bowl trip.
 
Dems want to do this intelligently.

DOGE is anything but intelligent.
Great. Please enlighten US HOW Democrats want to do this. What will they do differently? What will be the outcomes?

You state opinions like this from a self-assumed position of intellectual authority yet provide no context to back it up.
 
It just proves you’re talking points are hollow.

Define government waste and tell me how that definition doesn’t apply to Trump’s Super Bowl trip.
It just proves your only babbling response is "I blame Trump".

If your tender sensibilities are offended by Trump attending the superbowl, go to your cry corner.

Cry for us about government waste when you leftists were printing tranny comic books.
 
Back
Top Bottom