Democrats rig Tulsi Gabbard right out of their next debate

[skookerasbil]

Im laughing.......talk about rigged.

This Gabbard woman would be a formidable candidate against Trump imo........easily the most impressive in the initial debates. She is witty, articulate, likeable, attractive, military background, blow the field away on foreign policy!! And she's getting hosed by the DUMS.

Bring on the socialists!!!

 

[Flash]

Damn, she is the only fuckable one of the lot.

 

[pknopp]

So she's going to campaign for Medicare for All as a Republican in 2024?

She may with the private option on the table.

She won't. She is one of the few with principles.

She was always for a UH with a private option I believe.

The principled part was addressing her becoming a Republican.

The Democrat party basically threw her to the curb. I supposed she could run as an Independent but that never works out.

She very well could get my vote. Sanders would be the only possible exception.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

She may with the private option on the table.

She won't. She is one of the few with principles.

She was always for a UH with a private option I believe.

The principled part was addressing her becoming a Republican.

The Democrat party basically threw her to the curb. I supposed she could run as an Independent but that never works out.

She very well could get my vote. Sanders would be the only possible exception.

You would vote for a Socialist? Yuck!

 

[pknopp]

She won't. She is one of the few with principles.

She was always for a UH with a private option I believe.

The principled part was addressing her becoming a Republican.

The Democrat party basically threw her to the curb. I supposed she could run as an Independent but that never works out.

She very well could get my vote. Sanders would be the only possible exception.

You would vote for a Socialist? Yuck!

As do you.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

She was always for a UH with a private option I believe.

The principled part was addressing her becoming a Republican.

The Democrat party basically threw her to the curb. I supposed she could run as an Independent but that never works out.

She very well could get my vote. Sanders would be the only possible exception.

You would vote for a Socialist? Yuck!

As do you.

I would never vote for Bernie.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Im laughing..........it goes to show how rigged these primaries are. As a conservative, Id be shitting in my pants if she were the nominee.......the woman is impressive as hell. Tough, articulate, attractive, witty........blows all the others away on knowledge of foreign policy. The woman could easily stand toe to toe with Trump on a debate stage........but she'll be long gone because she cant court the k00ks in the base.

She's a good-looking (in some opinions) political hack that advocates for almost every looney idea except a few. She could not debate her way out of a wet paper bag because her ideas are all wrong.

BTW, we should not promote National Guard Majors to CINC.

 

[pknopp]

Im laughing..........it goes to show how rigged these primaries are. As a conservative, Id be shitting in my pants if she were the nominee.......the woman is impressive as hell. Tough, articulate, attractive, witty........blows all the others away on knowledge of foreign policy. The woman could easily stand toe to toe with Trump on a debate stage........but she'll be long gone because she cant court the k00ks in the base.

She's a good-looking (in some opinions) political hack that advocates for almost every looney idea except a few. She could not debate her way out of a paper bag.

BTW, we should not promote National Guard Majors to CINC.

We reserve that for those with bone spurs.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Tulsi Gabbard Hits 8% In New Poll

 

[mikegriffith1]

By excluding Tulsi Gabbard from the next round of debates, the Democratic Party has now made it clear that there is no room for presidential candidates who support genuine border security, who respect U.S. sovereignty, and who oppose giving free health care to illegal immigrants. Of course, Gabbard also committed the major sin of pointing out a serious black mark in Kamala Harris's record as California's attorney general.

Gabbard Victimized by DNC's Dubious Debate Criteria | RealClearPolitics
EXCERPT:

Take, for instance, her poll standing in New Hampshire, which currently places Gabbard at 3.3% support, according to the RealClearPolitics average as of Aug. 20. One might suspect that such a figure would merit inclusion in the upcoming debates -- especially considering she’s ahead of several candidates who have already been granted entry, including Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar, Beto O’Rourke, and Andrew Yang. But the Democratic National Committee has decreed that the polls constituting this average are not sufficiently “qualifying.”

Months ago, party chieftains issued a list of “approved sponsoring organizations/institutions” for polls that satisfy their criteria for debate admittance. Not appearing on that list is the Boston Globe, which sponsored a Suffolk University poll published Aug. 6 that placed Gabbard at 3%. The DNC had proclaimed that for admittance to the September and October debates, candidates must secure polling results of 2% or more in four separate “approved” polls -- but a poll sponsored by the newspaper with the largest circulation in New Hampshire (the Globe recently surpassed the New Hampshire Union Leader there) does not count, per this cockamamie criteria. There has not been an officially qualifying poll in New Hampshire, Gabbard’s best state, in over a month.

The absurdity mounts. A South Carolina poll published Aug. 14 by the Post and Courier placed Gabbard at 2%. One might have again vainly assumed that the newspaper with the largest circulation in a critical early primary state would be an “approved” sponsor per the dictates of the DNC, but it is not. Curious.​

 

[Brain357]

Let’s hope she gets in the next one.

 

[mikegriffith1]

A lot of people don't realize that Gabbard has said that she supports building a wall along areas of the border where that is the only viable option. She believes many areas of the border can be secured via a virtual wall or with regular fencing coupled with technology. She has said these things in several interviews, including an interview that she did with Van Jones on CNN.

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

The Dems ain't playin that Trump shit...she is cut straight out...lol!