Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Haha nobody said they were going to defund they irs
You ignore that and make things up because you are too childish to admit you’ve been duped by your cult propaganda
Where in your link does it say they want to defund the irs? It doesn’t cuts aren’t defunding, it’s making some cuts to the fundingProposed Cuts to IRS Enforcement Would Add $24 Billion to Deficit, CBO Finds | U.S. Senate Committee On The Budget
The Official U.S. Senate Committee On The Budgetwww.budget.senate.gov
No it’s not. That’s the title of a propaganda piece nobody in congress has suggested defunding that irsThats the entire topic of the thread. Defunding the IRS to send the money to Israel.
Yes, it is. Even you were talking about how the legislation cuts IRS funding.No it’s not. That’s the title of a propaganda piece nobody in congress has suggested defunding that irs
Cutting funding doesn’t mean defunding it, in fact it means there will still be funds….some, cut…in this case funds not even being used.Yes, it is. Even you were talking about how the legislation cuts IRS funding.
Link to “not even being used “Cutting funding doesn’t mean defunding it, in fact it means there will still be funds….some, cut…in this case funds not even being used.
Nobody is saying they want to prevent the irs from continuing to get funding
Just stop lying
Cutting funding is defunding when conservatives talk about cities defunding the police.Cutting funding doesn’t mean defunding it, in fact it means there will still be funds….some, cut…in this case funds not even being used.
Nobody is saying they want to prevent the irs from continuing to get funding
Just stop lying
Let's make this simple. You obtain a loan but you don't spend it. Are you still indebted to the loan company? Of course you are. Use your head.The other poster said the IRS didn’t need it and wasn’t going to spend it. Meaning it wasn’t going to add to the debt.
We haven’t obtained the loan.Let's make this simple. You obtain a loan but you don't spend it. Are you still indebted to the loan company? Of course you are. Use your head.
Think you'll ever gain a modicum of intelligence?Think you'll ever get over your anal obsession with spelling, MAGA brown noser?
Do you ever think before you post. Come back when you have something that is not nonsense.Johnson is a puppet of Trump which is why you're drooling over him. Does Johnson still think that the Sky Fairy put him in as SOTH?
Wallow in your ignorance.We haven’t obtained the loan.
Your analogy doesn’t work.
You really have no idea how government worksWallow in your ignorance.
Congress has appropriated the money. When have you ever heard of a government department that has ever returned appropriated money unless the congress takes it back? SMFH.We haven’t obtained the loan.
Your analogy doesn’t work.
No defunding the police is when dems try to prevent funding police, not cut funding.Cutting funding is defunding when conservatives talk about cities defunding the police.
I guess this is just another instance of you having different standards when your side is doing it.
Whatever you want to call, cutting IRS funding or defunding the IRS, doesn’t save money. It costs money.
The less funding the IRS has, the more people get away with cheating on taxes, the less the government is funded and the bigger the deficit.
Geez man, read the link in the OP, all of itLink to “not even being used “
I just can’t keep up with conservatives changing the definitions of words when it suits them. Conservatives railed on Dems for defunding the police when apparently (using your new definition) it never even happened.No defunding the police is when dems try to prevent funding police, not cut funding.
If we want to fund the war started by Hamas, we need to come up with money, why not use the unused money slotted to the irs?
As to your last point, by your logic we should send more money to law enforcement so that more crimes aren’t committed…silly.
The simple way to increase revenue is to cut taxes, works all the time.
You are the only one changing definitions here.I just can’t keep up with conservatives changing the definitions of words when it suits them. Conservatives railed on Dems for defunding the police when apparently (using your new definition) it never even happened.
Yes. Funding law enforcement more reduces crime, but it doesn’t generally increase revenue. Funding the IRS is actually the simplest way to increase revenue.
The republicans want to cut the IRS to save money and claim it’s about reducing the deficit, but it’ll have the opposite effect. It tells me this is more about politics and less about the deficit.
Nah. I’m not.You are the only one changing definitions here.
You got sucked into dembot propaganda headlines again and are only digging yourself deeper and looking more foolish.
www.foxnews.com
I did. It ain’t there.Geez man, read the link in the OP, all of it
Then maybe read it again…Though I can’t say I’m surprised you don’t think taxes have an impact on the cost of homesI did. It ain’t there.
What IS there is the fact that defunding the IRS will ADD 26 billion to the deficit
