Votto
Diamond Member
- Oct 31, 2012
- 58,083
- 59,826
- 3,605
They are.OMG
These fuckin loons will tax orgasms if they could.
Goddamn authoritarians!
Didn't you hear?
You will find out when you get audited.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are.OMG
These fuckin loons will tax orgasms if they could.
Goddamn authoritarians!
From the OP:They make too much. They do about half of the stock trades, and do nothing but steal our 401k investments.I support the proposed transaction tax. It will hit the high-speed traders more than me or other "buy and hold" investors.
How much money do these high-speed traders currently make every year?
Too much.
Your precise grasp of this issue is very convincing.
They do about half of the stock trades
And what do they do when they trade? Can you explain it?
and do nothing but steal our 401k investments.
I'm not buying and selling the stocks in my 401k every day, how do they steal from me?
From the OP:They make too much. They do about half of the stock trades, and do nothing but steal our 401k investments.I support the proposed transaction tax. It will hit the high-speed traders more than me or other "buy and hold" investors.
How much money do these high-speed traders currently make every year?
Too much.
Your precise grasp of this issue is very convincing.
They do about half of the stock trades
And what do they do when they trade? Can you explain it?
and do nothing but steal our 401k investments.
I'm not buying and selling the stocks in my 401k every day, how do they steal from me?
"This (transaction tax) makes financial markets fairer and possibly less volatile. As described by Michael Lewis in Flash Boys, high frequency traders (HFTs) can earn profits by front-running other trades by micro-seconds, an activity that raises costs for legitimate traders and provides no value to society. HFTs account for roughly half all stock trades and much of their business model would be threatened by the proposed transactions tax.
If you're still not convinced, read the OP links. The transaction tax is a very good thing.
OMG, $100 per year is meaningful to you? You living under a bridge somewhere?Yes, for every $1,000 you pay $1 in tax.1. I'm not a "phony conservative", you know the coxuckers who vote for tax cuts and then borrow trillions, aka "bubble makers".You can’t ever call yourself a conservative if you support government socially or financially engineering society. There’s enough taxation in this country. ENOUGH.I never thought that I'd ever be on the same side as Ilhan Omar, but here we are.
I support the proposed transaction tax. It will hit the high-speed traders more than me or other "buy and hold" investors.
The argument against it is that high-speed traders will just move off-shore to do their trades, fine.
They are nothing but leeches stealing our 401k investments.
Senate Democrats reintroduce bill to create financial transaction tax
A group of Democratic senators on Thursday reintroduced legislation to create a financial transaction tax, arguing that such a tax would help to reduce economic inequality.The bill would establish …thehill.com
"This (transaction tax) makes financial markets fairer and possibly less volatile. As described by Michael Lewis in Flash Boys, high frequency traders (HFTs) can earn profits by front-running other trades by micro-seconds, an activity that raises costs for legitimate traders and provides no value to society. HFTs account for roughly half all stock trades and much of their business model would be threatened by the proposed transactions tax.Congress wants to tax stock trades. Investors shouldn't fret. | Brookings
Aaron Klein makes the case for a financial transaction tax.www.brookings.edu
Under current law, someone selling or buying $1,000 of stock pays just over two cents in transaction taxes. This existing fee raises over $1.5 billion per year. The proposal would add a tax of $1 to that transaction."
2. I support the transaction tax. The $1 per $1000 BOT/SLD will hit the high-frequency traders, not "buy and hold" investors.
3. $30T DEBT is ENOUGH.
I support the transaction tax. The $1 per $1000 BOT/SLD will hit the high-frequency traders, not "buy and hold" investors.
If I buy $1000 of stock, I won't get hit with a $1 tax?
So how much a year would you probably pay?
I'd pay less than $100 a year.
I don't do a lot of trades.
Yes, for every $1,000 you pay $1 in tax.
So this claim, was a lie.
The $1 per $1000 BOT/SLD will hit the high-frequency traders, not "buy and hold" investors.
Don't just look at the tax, look at your 401K bump w/o high-frequency traders. Its a net benefit, not a tax.From the OP:They make too much. They do about half of the stock trades, and do nothing but steal our 401k investments.I support the proposed transaction tax. It will hit the high-speed traders more than me or other "buy and hold" investors.
How much money do these high-speed traders currently make every year?
Too much.
Your precise grasp of this issue is very convincing.
They do about half of the stock trades
And what do they do when they trade? Can you explain it?
and do nothing but steal our 401k investments.
I'm not buying and selling the stocks in my 401k every day, how do they steal from me?
"This (transaction tax) makes financial markets fairer and possibly less volatile. As described by Michael Lewis in Flash Boys, high frequency traders (HFTs) can earn profits by front-running other trades by micro-seconds, an activity that raises costs for legitimate traders and provides no value to society. HFTs account for roughly half all stock trades and much of their business model would be threatened by the proposed transactions tax.
If you're still not convinced, read the OP links. The transaction tax is a very good thing.
No tax is a good thing. Once government starts taxing something it never stops
From the OP:They make too much. They do about half of the stock trades, and do nothing but steal our 401k investments.I support the proposed transaction tax. It will hit the high-speed traders more than me or other "buy and hold" investors.
How much money do these high-speed traders currently make every year?
Too much.
Your precise grasp of this issue is very convincing.
They do about half of the stock trades
And what do they do when they trade? Can you explain it?
and do nothing but steal our 401k investments.
I'm not buying and selling the stocks in my 401k every day, how do they steal from me?
"This (transaction tax) makes financial markets fairer and possibly less volatile. As described by Michael Lewis in Flash Boys, high frequency traders (HFTs) can earn profits by front-running other trades by micro-seconds, an activity that raises costs for legitimate traders and provides no value to society. HFTs account for roughly half all stock trades and much of their business model would be threatened by the proposed transactions tax.
If you're still not convinced, read the OP links. The transaction tax is a very good thing.
Don't just look at the tax, look at your 401K bump w/o high-frequency traders. Its a benefit, not a tax.From the OP:They make too much. They do about half of the stock trades, and do nothing but steal our 401k investments.I support the proposed transaction tax. It will hit the high-speed traders more than me or other "buy and hold" investors.
How much money do these high-speed traders currently make every year?
Too much.
Your precise grasp of this issue is very convincing.
They do about half of the stock trades
And what do they do when they trade? Can you explain it?
and do nothing but steal our 401k investments.
I'm not buying and selling the stocks in my 401k every day, how do they steal from me?
"This (transaction tax) makes financial markets fairer and possibly less volatile. As described by Michael Lewis in Flash Boys, high frequency traders (HFTs) can earn profits by front-running other trades by micro-seconds, an activity that raises costs for legitimate traders and provides no value to society. HFTs account for roughly half all stock trades and much of their business model would be threatened by the proposed transactions tax.
If you're still not convinced, read the OP links. The transaction tax is a very good thing.
No tax is a good thing. Once government starts taxing something it never stops
OMG, $100 per year is meaningful to you? You living under a bridge somewhere?Yes, for every $1,000 you pay $1 in tax.1. I'm not a "phony conservative", you know the coxuckers who vote for tax cuts and then borrow trillions, aka "bubble makers".You can’t ever call yourself a conservative if you support government socially or financially engineering society. There’s enough taxation in this country. ENOUGH.I never thought that I'd ever be on the same side as Ilhan Omar, but here we are.
I support the proposed transaction tax. It will hit the high-speed traders more than me or other "buy and hold" investors.
The argument against it is that high-speed traders will just move off-shore to do their trades, fine.
They are nothing but leeches stealing our 401k investments.
Senate Democrats reintroduce bill to create financial transaction tax
A group of Democratic senators on Thursday reintroduced legislation to create a financial transaction tax, arguing that such a tax would help to reduce economic inequality.The bill would establish …thehill.com
"This (transaction tax) makes financial markets fairer and possibly less volatile. As described by Michael Lewis in Flash Boys, high frequency traders (HFTs) can earn profits by front-running other trades by micro-seconds, an activity that raises costs for legitimate traders and provides no value to society. HFTs account for roughly half all stock trades and much of their business model would be threatened by the proposed transactions tax.Congress wants to tax stock trades. Investors shouldn't fret. | Brookings
Aaron Klein makes the case for a financial transaction tax.www.brookings.edu
Under current law, someone selling or buying $1,000 of stock pays just over two cents in transaction taxes. This existing fee raises over $1.5 billion per year. The proposal would add a tax of $1 to that transaction."
2. I support the transaction tax. The $1 per $1000 BOT/SLD will hit the high-frequency traders, not "buy and hold" investors.
3. $30T DEBT is ENOUGH.
I support the transaction tax. The $1 per $1000 BOT/SLD will hit the high-frequency traders, not "buy and hold" investors.
If I buy $1000 of stock, I won't get hit with a $1 tax?
So how much a year would you probably pay?
I'd pay less than $100 a year.
I don't do a lot of trades.
Yes, for every $1,000 you pay $1 in tax.
So this claim, was a lie.
The $1 per $1000 BOT/SLD will hit the high-frequency traders, not "buy and hold" investors.
How does that $100/yr compare to your broker fees + income taxes?
I will gladly pay $100/yr for $80b in new tax revenue.
IMHO its a net gain w/o high-frequency traders stealing our 401K investments.
Don't just look at the tax, look at your 401K bump w/o high-frequency traders. Its a benefit, not a tax.
I agree
Right now the super wealthy are only taxed on their income. They are clever enough not to claim income. We cannot touch their wealth.
A small fee on transactions (like a sales tax) will open up their wealth to taxation
So you want to add an additional tax on the 401Ks and IRAs?I agree
Right now the super wealthy are only taxed on their income. They are clever enough not to claim income. We cannot touch their wealth.
A small fee on transactions (like a sales tax) will open up their wealth to taxation
Yeah that's great for the working folks
Works for meI agree
Right now the super wealthy are only taxed on their income. They are clever enough not to claim income. We cannot touch their wealth.
A small fee on transactions (like a sales tax) will open up their wealth to taxation
most of the liberal wealthy elite make their money off transaction investments and don’t get hit with income tax. Better get sign off from them.
So you want to add an additional tax on the 401Ks and IRAs?I agree
Right now the super wealthy are only taxed on their income. They are clever enough not to claim income. We cannot touch their wealth.
A small fee on transactions (like a sales tax) will open up their wealth to taxation
Yeah that's great for the working folks
A small fee wouldn’t hurt.
Neither would exempting retirement funds
Call all you want, Einstein. You cheered Trump when he signed a massive spending increase.And we once again have Trumpsters pretending to be fiscally responsible and attacking others.
Too funny
Seems to me the "Trumpsters"are calling for less spending you fckn clown
Call all you want, Einstein. You cheered Trump when he signed a massive spending increase.And we once again have Trumpsters pretending to be fiscally responsible and attacking others.
Too funny
Seems to me the "Trumpsters"are calling for less spending you fckn clown
You are arrogant and ignorant. A perfect mindless Trumpster.
Yeah, thats what it will go to. The thing nobody in washington gives a shit aboutStart paying for what? Shit the federal govt has no business doing?NoOMG
These fuckin loons will tax orgasms if they could.
Goddamn authoritarians!
You prefer just giving money away and adding to the debt?
Trump's Road to Socialism | Tho Bishop
So what we have here is a proposal to start paying for things and you are still against that?
You federal supremacists make me fucking sick to my stomach. This countries founders died in vain because of shit stains like you.
One of the options is to state where you would spend it. Why not suggest the debt?
Tell me, how is it the governments business to bail out private businesses?
Of course you did, and you cheered the economy that was stimulated by all that spending.Call all you want, Einstein. You cheered Trump when he signed a massive spending increase.And we once again have Trumpsters pretending to be fiscally responsible and attacking others.
Too funny
Seems to me the "Trumpsters"are calling for less spending you fckn clown
You are arrogant and ignorant. A perfect mindless Trumpster.
I never cheered Trump signing a tax increase you lying sack of shit.
Now sit the fuck down you partisan hack
When big investors buy any stocks that you have, the high-frequency traders steal some of the investment.From the OP:They make too much. They do about half of the stock trades, and do nothing but steal our 401k investments.I support the proposed transaction tax. It will hit the high-speed traders more than me or other "buy and hold" investors.
How much money do these high-speed traders currently make every year?
Too much.
Your precise grasp of this issue is very convincing.
They do about half of the stock trades
And what do they do when they trade? Can you explain it?
and do nothing but steal our 401k investments.
I'm not buying and selling the stocks in my 401k every day, how do they steal from me?
"This (transaction tax) makes financial markets fairer and possibly less volatile. As described by Michael Lewis in Flash Boys, high frequency traders (HFTs) can earn profits by front-running other trades by micro-seconds, an activity that raises costs for legitimate traders and provides no value to society. HFTs account for roughly half all stock trades and much of their business model would be threatened by the proposed transactions tax.
If you're still not convinced, read the OP links. The transaction tax is a very good thing.
As described by Michael Lewis in Flash Boys, high frequency traders (HFTs) can earn profits by front-running other trades by micro-seconds, an activity that raises costs for legitimate traders and provides no value to society.
That drama queen? He's funny!
Ok, TSLA is trading at $711.15-Bid $711.19-Offer.
I try to buy 100 shares at $711.19.....how does an HFT swoop in and steal my money? Any idea?