Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No it wasn't. They are buying every week, often more than one fundIt is because it goes in weekly. You are buying stocks or mutualsWhy don't they just limit it to hsts if that's the purpose ......how will this affect the person who weekly have money taken out for their 401?
If you are speaking about income, that's not a trade.
Most do not trade much. But the question was about money being taken out.
It is because it goes in weekly. You are buying stocks or mutualsWhy don't they just limit it to hsts if that's the purpose ......how will this affect the person who weekly have money taken out for their 401?
If you are speaking about income, that's not a trade.
Most do not trade much. But the question was about money being taken out.
Actually when you are forced to take the RMD out of a 401K or IRA you do so by selling off the stocks and/.or mutual fund shares in your portfolio.
So you want to add a tax to buy stocks and\ or mutual funds and a tax to sell those same funds what about the sales of or purchases of funds the people who manage the mutual funds in your retirement make make?
You are basically arguing for death by 1000 cuts
I support the proposed transaction tax. It will hit the high-speed traders more than me or other "buy and hold" investors.
No it wasn't. They are buying every week, often more than one fundIt is because it goes in weekly. You are buying stocks or mutualsWhy don't they just limit it to hsts if that's the purpose ......how will this affect the person who weekly have money taken out for their 401?
If you are speaking about income, that's not a trade.
Most do not trade much. But the question was about money being taken out.
Very little in trades for most but all the same, we have built a 28 trillion debt, why shouldn't we be willing to pay for that? You want to leave it to your kids so you can afford the desert after dinner?
No, we propose the politicians stop pissing away money.OMG
These fuckin loons will tax orgasms if they could.
Goddamn authoritarians!
You prefer just giving money away and adding to the debt?
Trump's Road to Socialism | Tho Bishop
No it wasn't. They are buying every week, often more than one fundIt is because it goes in weekly. You are buying stocks or mutualsWhy don't they just limit it to hsts if that's the purpose ......how will this affect the person who weekly have money taken out for their 401?
If you are speaking about income, that's not a trade.
Most do not trade much. But the question was about money being taken out.
Very little in trades for most but all the same, we have built a 28 trillion debt, why shouldn't we be willing to pay for that? You want to leave it to your kids so you can afford the desert after dinner?
We need to spend less not take more money from the people.
The fucking government has proven that no matter how much money we allow them to take from us that it will never be enough
It is because it goes in weekly. You are buying stocks or mutualsWhy don't they just limit it to hsts if that's the purpose ......how will this affect the person who weekly have money taken out for their 401?
If you are speaking about income, that's not a trade.
Most do not trade much. But the question was about money being taken out.
Actually when you are forced to take the RMD out of a 401K or IRA you do so by selling off the stocks and/.or mutual fund shares in your portfolio.
So you want to add a tax to buy stocks and\ or mutual funds and a tax to sell those same funds what about the sales of or purchases of funds the people who manage the mutual funds in your retirement make make?
You are basically arguing for death by 1000 cuts
For the majority it would be a very small percent. I'll ask you the same. You want to add to the debt and leave it for your kids so you can get the dessert after dinner?
No, we propose the politicians stop pissing away money.OMG
These fuckin loons will tax orgasms if they could.
Goddamn authoritarians!
You prefer just giving money away and adding to the debt?
Trump's Road to Socialism | Tho Bishop
Politicians are not going to pay down the debt. No votes in it.
No it wasn't. They are buying every week, often more than one fundIt is because it goes in weekly. You are buying stocks or mutualsWhy don't they just limit it to hsts if that's the purpose ......how will this affect the person who weekly have money taken out for their 401?
If you are speaking about income, that's not a trade.
Most do not trade much. But the question was about money being taken out.
Very little in trades for most but all the same, we have built a 28 trillion debt, why shouldn't we be willing to pay for that? You want to leave it to your kids so you can afford the desert after dinner?
We need to spend less not take more money from the people.
The fucking government has proven that no matter how much money we allow them to take from us that it will never be enough
We don't need to address the trillions we have spent and not paid for?
It is because it goes in weekly. You are buying stocks or mutualsWhy don't they just limit it to hsts if that's the purpose ......how will this affect the person who weekly have money taken out for their 401?
If you are speaking about income, that's not a trade.
Most do not trade much. But the question was about money being taken out.
Actually when you are forced to take the RMD out of a 401K or IRA you do so by selling off the stocks and/.or mutual fund shares in your portfolio.
So you want to add a tax to buy stocks and\ or mutual funds and a tax to sell those same funds what about the sales of or purchases of funds the people who manage the mutual funds in your retirement make make?
You are basically arguing for death by 1000 cuts
For the majority it would be a very small percent. I'll ask you the same. You want to add to the debt and leave it for your kids so you can get the dessert after dinner?
I disagree.
And letting people keep their own retirement money isn't adding to the debt.
And i don't have kids. I didn't vote for any of the politicians that have run up the debt.
The corrupt politicians have proven by their actions that no matter how much we allow them to take from us that it will never be enough. We need to force them to spend less b y starving them into submission.
You mean SPENDINGAll these taxes start to add up
Our debt isn't?
You mean SPENDINGAll these taxes start to add up
Our debt isn't?
OMG
These fuckin loons will tax orgasms if they could.
Goddamn authoritarians!
Cut spending. We haven't paid for our spending to begin with. If we had we wouldn't be in debt.You mean SPENDINGAll these taxes start to add up
Our debt isn't?
Spending that has led to massive debt. Why shouldn't we pay for that?
It is because it goes in weekly. You are buying stocks or mutualsWhy don't they just limit it to hsts if that's the purpose ......how will this affect the person who weekly have money taken out for their 401?
If you are speaking about income, that's not a trade.
Most do not trade much. But the question was about money being taken out.
Actually when you are forced to take the RMD out of a 401K or IRA you do so by selling off the stocks and/.or mutual fund shares in your portfolio.
So you want to add a tax to buy stocks and\ or mutual funds and a tax to sell those same funds what about the sales of or purchases of funds the people who manage the mutual funds in your retirement make make?
You are basically arguing for death by 1000 cuts
For the majority it would be a very small percent. I'll ask you the same. You want to add to the debt and leave it for your kids so you can get the dessert after dinner?
I disagree.
And letting people keep their own retirement money isn't adding to the debt.
I didn't say that but you know I did not say that.
And i don't have kids. I didn't vote for any of the politicians that have run up the debt.
The corrupt politicians have proven by their actions that no matter how much we allow them to take from us that it will never be enough. We need to force them to spend less b y starving them into submission.
You support being a dead beat country I suppose. Your 401k isn't worth a fraction of where it is at now without the massive debt by the government. It's time to pay for that.
How is not taking money from an American "giving" it away?OMG
These fuckin loons will tax orgasms if they could.
Goddamn authoritarians!
You prefer just giving money away and adding to the debt?
Trump's Road to Socialism | Tho Bishop
These people are taxed on that money as capital gains, Stupid.I agree
Right now the super wealthy are only taxed on their income. They are clever enough not to claim income. We cannot touch their wealth.
A small fee on transactions (like a sales tax) will open up their wealth to taxation
Cut spending. We haven't paid for our spending to begin with. If we had we wouldn't be in debt.You mean SPENDINGAll these taxes start to add up
Our debt isn't?
Spending that has led to massive debt. Why shouldn't we pay for that?
CUT SPENDING
