Democrats Pass Sweeping Gun Control

[airplanemechanic]

Sounds AWESOME. Every state should have these laws.

The Second Amendment is about Militias that don't exist anymore.

Fuck you. That's fucking bullshit and you know it. That's not what SCOTUS says. SCOTUS before Trump made it even MORE conservative:

"In the 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court held that the "Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.""

Second Amendment

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[Monk-Eye]

" On Vapid Stupidity Of Eliminating Individual Ability To Neutralize Despots Whether Private Or Public "

* Left Wing Mind Set Of Abdicating To Only Government Protection Is Stupidity *

And also why conservatives are dying out.

Both parties of the us include a band of retarded stupid fucks , the rino(s) have the abortion anti-choice issue and the left wing have gun control ,

The term conservative versus liberal is dying out because the paradigm is intellectual buffoonery and political science idiocy .

Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments

" Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments " * Express Agreement Or Disagreement With These Premises * Does any agree or disagree that " equal wrights " advocates must make a distinction between negative and positive wrights ? Does...

www.usmessageboard.com

Applying THe Term Rights As A Descriptor For Articles Of Constitution Is Slang And A Profound Error In Diction

* Applying The Term Rights As A Descriptor For Articles Of A Constitution Is Slang And A Profound Error In Diction * * Opening Post Subjective Objective Sew Gnomon * The term right is a faux pas of diction , as to equivocate the term right with a mathematical norm leads to a contradiction ...

www.usmessageboard.com

Left Wing Are Not Liberals They Are Extreme Authoritarians

" Left Wing Are Not Liberals They Are Extreme Authoritarians " * Lying Under Cover Of Pretending To Liberate Through Domination * The right wing outlets must ttop referring to the left as liberals and call them either authoritarians , or conservatives . The term liberal is synonymous with...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[airplanemechanic]

" On Vapid Stupidity Of Eliminating Individual Ability To Neutralize Despots Whether Private Or Public "

* Left Wing Mind Set Of Abdicating To Only Government Protection Is Stupidity *

Both parties of the us include a band of retarded stupid fucks , the rino(s) have the abortion anti-choice issue and the left wing have gun control ,

The term conservative versus liberal is dying out because the paradigm is intellectual buffoonery and political science idiocy .

Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments

" Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments " * Express Agreement Or Disagreement With These Premises * Does any agree or disagree that " equal wrights " advocates must make a distinction between negative and positive wrights ? Does...

www.usmessageboard.com

Applying THe Term Rights As A Descriptor For Articles Of Constitution Is Slang And A Profound Error In Diction

* Applying The Term Rights As A Descriptor For Articles Of A Constitution Is Slang And A Profound Error In Diction * * Opening Post Subjective Objective Sew Gnomon * The term right is a faux pas of diction , as to equivocate the term right with a mathematical norm leads to a contradiction ...

www.usmessageboard.com

Left Wing Are Not Liberals They Are Extreme Authoritarians

" Left Wing Are Not Liberals They Are Extreme Authoritarians " * Lying Under Cover Of Pretending To Liberate Through Domination * The right wing outlets must ttop referring to the left as liberals and call them either authoritarians , or conservatives . The term liberal is synonymous with...

www.usmessageboard.com

Totally seperate issues.

The right says that nowhere in the constitution does it state a woman has a right to kill her baby in the womb. That is absolute truth.

The left says the constitution doesn't grant someone the right to own a firearm, which is absolutely false. Until there is a constitutional amendment for the right to an abortion, women don't have that right. We already have the 2nd, so we have gun rights.

 

[the watcher]

It should be obvious who the state views as misfits, and who is worthy of salvation. The rush towards the new squirrel order is speeding up, and if they have trouble eliminating your right to self defense, they will eliminate your ability to self defend. Ex-LA Gangster Who Shot, Paralyzed 16-Year-Old Girl Works in Newsom's Department of Public Safety

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Sounds AWESOME. Every state should have these laws.

The Second Amendment is about Militias that don't exist anymore.

Read the rest of the 2nd Amendment moron.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Read the rest of the 2nd Amendment moron.

Joey does not care. Joey is a propagandist Goebbels would be proud of.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Abortion Choice Republicans Understand Dobbs Is Dumbfounded Sedition Against Us 14th , 9th , 1st And 10th Amendments And Supported By Traitors To Principles Of Us Republic "

* Anti Federalists Are Statists Vying For Populism Of Democracy And Tyranny By Collective Majority To Undermine Individual Liberty *

Totally seperate issues.
The right says that nowhere in the constitution does it state a woman has a right to kill her baby in the womb. That is absolute truth.
The left says the constitution doesn't grant someone the right to own a firearm, which is absolutely false. Until there is a constitutional amendment for the right to an abortion, women don't have that right. We already have the 2nd, so we have gun rights.

A state is comprised of citizens in whom interests of a state lay .

A citizen and their constitutional protections are instantiated with a live birth requirement .

By equitable doctrine , a liver birth is required for equal protection with a citizen .

By us 14th amendment , states are prohibited from protecting a wright to life of any thing which has not met a live birth requirement to receive it .

Therefore by us 14th amendment and title 1 section 8 of us code , states are prohibited from proscribing abortion !

Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade

" Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade " * On Behalf Of Pro Choice Republican Constitutionalism * The next nominee for us supreme court should be asked to explain the following statement from justice blackmun whom...

www.usmessageboard.com

Equal Protection Of Citizenship Is In A State Of Sedition Because Of Supreme Court Ruling On Abortion

" Equal Protection Of Citizenship Is Under Sedition By States As A Result Of US Supreme Court Ruling On Abortion " * Constitutional Originalism Versus Judicial Activism * Blackmun wrote this - ' Logically, of course, a legitimate state interest in this area need not stand or fall on...

www.usmessageboard.com

Desantis Is A Knights Of Columbus Tool

" Desantis Is A Knights Of Columbus Tool " * Government Moochers Promoting Inundation Of US With Illegal Immigrants And State Funded Sectarianism In Violation of Establishment Claus * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_of_Columbus Membership is limited to practicing Catholic men.[3] It...

www.usmessageboard.com

Applying THe Term Rights As A Descriptor For Articles Of Constitution Is Slang And A Profound Error In Diction

* Applying The Term Rights As A Descriptor For Articles Of A Constitution Is Slang And A Profound Error In Diction * * Opening Post Subjective Objective Sew Gnomon * The term right is a faux pas of diction , as to equivocate the term right with a mathematical norm leads to a contradiction ...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[M14 Shooter]

Therefore by us 14th amendment and title 1 section 8 of us code , states are prohibited from proscribing abortion !

Sorry, no.

State criminal abortion laws,, that except from criminality only a life-saving procedure on the mother's behalf without regard to the stage of her pregnancy and other interests involved violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which protects against state action the right to privacy, including a woman's qualified right to terminate her pregnancy. Though the State cannot override that right, it has legitimate interests in protecting both the pregnant woman's health and the potentiality of human life, each of which interests grows and reaches a "compelling" point at various stages of the woman's approach to term.

For the stage subsequent to viability the State, in promoting its interest in the potentiality of human life, may, if it chooses, regulate, and even proscribe, abortion except where necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Pervasive Ignorance And Dismissive Arrogance Of Those Embracing A Rite To Privacy For Justifying Abortion Choice Public Policy "

* Clueless Leadership And Pathetically Informed Consent Of The Public *

Sorry, no.
State criminal abortion laws,, that except from criminality only a life-saving procedure on the mother's behalf without regard to the stage of her pregnancy and other interests involved violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which protects against state action the right to privacy, including a woman's qualified right to terminate her pregnancy. Though the State cannot override that right, it has legitimate interests in protecting both the pregnant woman's health and the potentiality of human life, each of which interests grows and reaches a "compelling" point at various stages of the woman's approach to term.

For the stage subsequent to viability the State, in promoting its interest in the potentiality of human life, may, if it chooses, regulate, and even proscribe, abortion except where necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.

A RITE TO PRIVACY is INCIDENTAL , SECONDARY and NOT PRINCIPLE to the actual constitutional basis for abortion , where the actual basis is that a LIVE BIRTH IS REQUIRED for EQUAL PROTECTION with a CITIZEN .

The abortion choice leadership , jurisprudence at large , political pundits and the fee press are INTELLECTUAL and CONSTITUTIONAL EMBARRASSMENTS !

* Scrotus Dumbfounded Sedition *

The alito opinion stating that " potential life " was not sufficiently explained by #Roe_v_Wade court is a dumbfounded , seditious , lie , and none should need to explain the blackmun statement , " LOGICALLY , OF COURSE , A LEGITIMATE STATE INTEREST .. NOT .. PRIOR TO LIVE BIRTH " , or its a'priori basis from political science basis to a supreme court justice !

https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf

"Although the Court acknowledged that States had a legitimate interest in protecting “potential life,” it found that this interest could not justify any restriction on pre-viability abortions., The Court did not explain the basis forthis line, and even abortion supporters have found it hardto defend Roe’s reasoning. "

That is , in #roevwade , natural viability was substituted IN LIEU of a LIVE BIRTH REQUIREMENT for equal protection with a citizen , given an ability for a fetus to survive an IMMINENT LIVE BIRTH , and even title 1 section 8 of us code clarifies the definition of a person in us 14th amendment as those born alive !


* State Serve Interests Of Citizens *

A legitimate state interest is founded upon its citizens and individuals within its jurisdiction .

A legitimate state interest is NOT founded upon non citizens and non individuals outside of its jurisdiction .

There is not a sanctimonious dictum included in us constitution to defend every and all lives !


" Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement "

Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade

" Wishful Thinking Bloviate " * Simple Tons * Big multi-syllabic words are often a smoke screen to conceal the little thoughts behind them.The argument is direct , there is nothing complicated about it . A state is comprised of citizens and citizens receive constitutionally protected wrights...

usmessageboard.com

 

[M14 Shooter]

A RITE TO PRIVACY is INCIDENTAL , SECONDARY and NOT PRINCIPLE to the actual constitutional basis for abortion , where the actual basis is that a LIVE BIRTH IS REQUIRED for EQUAL PROTECTION with a CITIZEN .

Roe v Wade says otherwise.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" How Long Will Ignorance From Dismissive Arrogance Continue "

* Abortion Choice Leadership Responsibility For A Lost Cause *

Roe v Wade says otherwise.

The black mun wrote the majority opinion of #roevwade and his " LOGICALLY , OF COURSE " quotation is provided and has been ignored by abortion choice leadership , the fee press , jurisprudence at large and political communities , which has resulted in the dumbfounded conclusions of sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments by scotus in dobbs .

" Roe v Wade says otherwise." is not a sufficient rebuttal and a " rite to privacy " and due process exist from us 4th amendment , and it is not sufficient because searches and seizures of abortion clinics are not unreasonable when those services are publicly provided and abortion is outlawed .

Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,[a] against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.[2]

 

[M14 Shooter]

" Roe v Wade says otherwise." is not a sufficient rebuttal...

Why do you disagree with Roe v Wade?
You do know the entire right to privacy argument stems from it, right?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Champion A Us Republic Not Beholden To Non Citizens And Non Individuals "

* Maintain Principles Of Equal Protection Of Negative Liberties Among Individuals For Rites Of Privacy *

Why do you disagree with Roe v Wade?
You do know the entire right to privacy argument stems from it, right?

The disagreement is not with roe v wade , rather disagreement is with an insufficient argument that the constitutional basis for abortion and for roe v wade are founded upon a rite to privacy , as clearly a rite to privacy argument as a basis for public policy on abortion is insufficient and has failed .

Invoking non enumerated rites from us 9th amendment , such as a rite to privacy , does not necessarily exclude a us 10th amendment state interest in a rite of behavior that would violate principles of non violence and individualism , or safety or security .

A rite to privacy does not restrict legitimate state interests to protection of the citizen whom must have been born , and by equitable doctrine to equal protection of other individuals whom must also have been born .

The prohibitions on a state ability to proscribe abortion and restriction of legitimate state interests are related succinctly by black mun in his " logically , of course , a legitimate state interest ... not ... prior to live birth . " ,

A legitimate state interest is founded upon its citizens and individuals within its jurisdiction , a legitimate state interest is NOT founded upon non citizens and non individuals outside of its jurisdiction , and where by natural law there is not a sanctimonious dictum to protect every and all lives .

A rite to privacy is bantered as a secular humanism movement mantra and it was hoped or presumed that the hubris would be maintained , ahem - as precedence / dogma within the courts , and thus the movement remained complacent , arrogant , ignorant and financially dismissive to a rigorous political science proof for a constitutional rite to abortion ,

* E Pluribus Unum Individualism Semantics From Nature Of Natural Law *

A law exists because there is an entity capable of and issuing a retort for violations of its precepts , and if there were a natural law with a penalty of death for murder , then a perpetrator would die immediately upon committing a murder ; hence , by observation there is not a natural law against killing , hence abortion is not murder except unless there is an entity capable of and issuing a retort for violations of its precepts .

As natural law does not itself include a penalty of death for killing , individuals exchange natural freedoms for rites of protection by a collective state of individuals as a greater individual ( individual , corporation , state , federate ) .

A us republic founded upon a collective state of individuals espousing a motto for a credo of e pluribus unum , which expects rites promoting independence of the individual , with equal protection of negative liberties among individuals and with safety and security .


* Public Service Announcement From Department Of Public Education *

An orthogonal , or a perpendicular , or a norm are synonymous with a 90 degree angle , whereas a 90 degree angles as a right angle , or right as antonym for wrong , or right as synonymous with valid or correct , is DEBASE AND IDIOTIC !

STOP SLANG !

Applying THe Term Rights As A Descriptor For Articles Of Constitution Is Slang And A Profound Error In Diction

* Applying The Term Rights As A Descriptor For Articles Of A Constitution Is Slang And A Profound Error In Diction * * Opening Post Subjective Objective Sew Gnomon * The term right is a faux pas of diction , as to equivocate the term right with a mathematical norm leads to a contradiction ...

usmessageboard.com

.

 

[Resnic]

Only control we need is criminal, druggie and crazy people control. Get those under control and we could actually lessen gun control.

The only people who follow the rules are sane, decent, average people who wouldn't want to shoot anyone even if we had no gun control.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Invoking non enumerated rites from us 9th amendment , such as a rite to privacy , does not necessarily exclude a us 10th amendment state interest in a rite of behavior that would violate principles of non violence and individualism , or safety or security .

Good luck with that.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" A Rite To Privacy Where Reasonable Suspicion Exists "

* Reality Of Deflection Foolishness *

Good luck with that.

Do you mean good luck with protection against unreasonable search and seizure for violating a statute , which has been created and defines a violation of law , as opposed to presenting a constitutional argument for abortion that prohibits state interests and prevents the statue from being created in the first place ?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Do you mean good luck with

With whatever it is you think you want to accomplish.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Political Action Committees Legal Charities Control Fee Press Hem While Casual Interests Hear Here "

* Contrast Populism For Autocracy Versus Principles Of Non Violence And Individualism *

With whatever it is you think you want to accomplish.

The us populace is clueless in large part because it ignores that a natural law of gawd does not exact a penalty of death on the perpetrator for a killing .

A law exists because there is an entity capable of and issuing a retort for violation of its legal precepts .

Prior to entering into a social civil agreement according to a constitution , individuals are subject to the moral relativism of law that is evident in nature .

To improve odds of survival and quality of life , individuals exchange natural freedoms for protected rites , according to a constitution .

As a greater state of an individual , a collective of individuals is therefore an entity capable of and issuing a retort for violations of its legal precepts .

Should a greater state of an individual cease to exists , then laws of retribution again become sole responsibility of the individual .

The idiocy of bureaucrats , those seeking to usurp and rescind us 2nd , nonsensically ignore natural law when a collective state no longer exists .

Those individuals slain by other individuals of society refuse should be collectively memorialized among other patriots who also regrettably suffered and died to ensure that other individual citizens are able to mitigate the greater potential of more magnanimous atrocities through mutually assured destruction .


* Continuing To Promote Self Ownership Of The Individual *

The literal meaning for the metaphors of an after life , a life to come , reincarnation , being born again , transmutation of soles , etc . is to pass on ones genetic identity so that another , both figuratively and literally as oneself , by a sophisticated state , may experience the sentience , sapience and introspection that is afforded as life , where failure to do so in perpetuity is ascribed the metaphors of final judgement or eternal damnation .

From principles of individualism , violence against an individual is illegitimate aggression against self ownership or self determination of the individual , where self ownership includes free roam , free association and progeny , while self determination includes entitlement to retain private property and by willful intent enter into social civil contracts which are made valid through informed consent .

Thus , from principles of non violence and individualism , the individual and not the collective state of individuals is responsible offspring , that includes options for abortion .

A subjective altruism would be that the introspection of hue mammon should exist in perpetuity throughout eternity , however nature of gawd does not expect that every instance of hue mammon introspection must exist in perpetuity to satisfy a subjective altruism .


* Maintaining Informed Consent Outreach *

The liberal versus conservative paradigm is intellectual buffoonery and political science idiocy -

Negative liberties represent protections , independence and individualism .

Positive liberties represent endowments , dependence and collectivism .

Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments

" Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments " * Express Agreement Or Disagreement With These Premises * Does any agree or disagree that " equal wrights " advocates must make a distinction between negative and positive wrights ? Does...

usmessageboard.com

 

[M14 Shooter]

The us populace is clueless in large part because it ignores that a natural law of gawd...

Good luck with that.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Satirical Encouragement Nature Of Gawd Abstraction "

* Monism Myopia Egoism Perpetuity Projection Remains Alienable *

Good luck with that.

What of a reference to a nature of gawd ?

A reference to a nature of gawd is an allusion to donning of garments , which alludes to physical characteristics of the natural environment and of the natural beings .

A reference to the nature of gawd is apatheistic and does not convey disparagement towards principalities of existential belief systems , and a reference to the nature of gawd relates only with characteristics of nature and natural phenomenon .

Include a note not to confuse a success criteria for survival from the nature of gawd with a means by which to satisfy its subjective altruism .

A subjective altruism is an expectation by a subject that its introspection should exist in perpetuity ; and , note that nature of gawd does not expect that every instance of a subject altruism exist in perpetuity to satisfy a subjective altruism .


* One More Across The Bow From Individualism To Leave Guns And Family Planning Alone *

A law exists because there is an entity capable of and issuing a retort for violation of its legal precepts .

If there were a natural law that abortion was murder where the perpetrator would instantly die , a natural law against abortion would exist but does not .

A state is comprised of citizens on whose behalf interests of a state lay .

A citizen and its constitutional protections are instantiated concurrently through live birth .

A legitimate state interest is founded upon its citizens and individuals within its jurisdiction .

A legitimate state interest is NOT founded upon non citizens and non individuals outside of its jurisdiction .

There is not a sanctimonious dictum to defend every and all lives !

Us constitution stipulates , " When does a state interest begin ? " and not " When does life begin ? " .

The us populace is clueless in large part because it ignores that a natural law of gawd does not exact a penalty of death on the perpetrator for a killing .