Democrats make the most solid case yet for a border wall

[P@triot]

simply change the law, silly;

Again...if that's what you want....advocate for it. It has already begun in Colorado, Oregon, California, etc.

 

[danielpalos]

Don't "hate on the poor" for the Debt; that belongs to the One Percent.

I don't hate the poor - I hate the illegal aliens who cost us $100 billion per year.

less fortunate illegals; how typical of the "illegal" right wing.

 

[danielpalos]

Don't "hate on the poor" for the Debt; that belongs to the One Percent.

The 1% pays for most of the taxes in this nation. It's the criminals and the parasite class (i.e. the left) which is responsible for the $20 trillion debt.

dear, we are not a True national Socialist economy; we allege to subscribe to Capitalism where Taxes are based on ability to Pay in capital, not socialism on a national basis.

 

[P@triot]

We need a permanent solution to our illegal problem

We have one - it's called a border wall. Once in place, it will still stop illlegal aliens even when the Dumbocrats are in office again and refusing to enforce the law.

 

[danielpalos]

We need a permanent solution to our illegal problem not a wall.

We do? Then why have you spent the last 3 pages proclaiming they are not a problem?

To abolish that excuse for "whining" on the right wing?

 

[danielpalos]

simply change the law, silly;

Again...if that's what you want....advocate for it. It has already begun in Colorado, Oregon, California, etc.

Yes, it is the party of nothing but repeal and Increased Litigation, that is increasing or regulatory costs instead of eliminating them and, "getting the People a two for one deal".

 

[P@triot]

less fortunate illegals

If they are "less fortunate" it is only because selfish, greedy left-wingers such as yourself are not sharing your assets with them.

 

[danielpalos]

We need a permanent solution to our illegal problem

We have one - it's called a border wall. Once in place, it will still stop illlegal aliens even when the Dumbocrats are in office again and refusing to enforce the law.

10USC311 is federal law, let's enforce it, for the greater glory of our Republic, in Any Case of alleged times of War; even without real times of War tax rates, and even lowering taxes.

 

[P@triot]

We need a permanent solution to our illegal problem not a wall.

We do? Then why have you spent the last 3 pages proclaiming they are not a problem?

To abolish that excuse for "whining" on the right wing?

In other words - you just contradicted yourself...

 

[danielpalos]

less fortunate illegals

If they are "less fortunate" it is only because selfish, greedy left-wingers such as yourself are not sharing your assets with them.

lol. unlike the right wing, but at, "exploitation rates"?

 

[danielpalos]

We need a permanent solution to our illegal problem not a wall.

We do? Then why have you spent the last 3 pages proclaiming they are not a problem?

To abolish that excuse for "whining" on the right wing?

In other words - you just contradicted yourself...

I will stop when the right wing stops whining about it.

 

[P@triot]

I will stop when the right wing stops whining about it.

You don't have to stop whining. Doesn't bother me at all. This has been settled. The American people elected Donald Trump to end the illegal alien nightmare. And that's exactly what he's doing. There is nothing you can do about it.

 

[danielpalos]

I will stop when the right wing stops whining about it.

You don't have to stop whining. Doesn't bother me at all. This has been settled. The American people elected Donald Trump to end the illegal alien nightmare. And that's exactly what he's doing. There is nothing you can do about it.

The party of nothing but repeal and Increased Litigation, strikes again?

 

[P@triot]

The party of nothing but repeal strikes again?

We have to be the "party of repeal" - someone has to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution.

 

[danielpalos]

The party of nothing but repeal strikes again?

We have to be the "party of repeal" - someone has to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution.

It hasn't been the right wing.

 

[P@triot]

The party of nothing but repeal strikes again?

We have to be the "party of repeal" - someone has to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution.

It hasn't been the right wing.

You just admitted it was.

 

[danielpalos]

The party of nothing but repeal strikes again?

We have to be the "party of repeal" - someone has to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution.

It hasn't been the right wing.

You just admitted it was.

That was Your red herring, right wing fisherman; i am not investing in the Red Herring market, at the moment.

 

[P@triot]

The party of nothing but repeal strikes again?

We have to be the "party of repeal" - someone has to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution.

It hasn't been the right wing.

You just admitted it was.

That was Your red herring, right wing fisherman; i am not investing in the Red Herring market, at the moment.

Please stop using all of these terms when you have no idea what they mean. You sound like an idiot. A red herring is meant to get someone looking in the wrong direction, you dimwit.

As I previously stated, you admitted that we are the party of repeal because we're upholding the U.S. Constitution which you people attempt to destroy.

 

[danielpalos]

The party of nothing but repeal strikes again?

We have to be the "party of repeal" - someone has to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution.

It hasn't been the right wing.

You just admitted it was.

That was Your red herring, right wing fisherman; i am not investing in the Red Herring market, at the moment.

Please stop using all of these terms when you have no idea what they mean. You sound like an idiot. A red herring is meant to get someone looking in the wrong direction, you dimwit.

As I previously stated, you admitted that we are the party of repeal because we're upholding the U.S. Constitution which you people attempt to destroy.

The party of nothing but repeal only means something, when you understand the terms in our Social Contract.

 

[P@triot]

The party of nothing but repeal only means something, when you understand the terms in our Social Contract.

And that only means something when one understands that no such "social contract" exists and never has. That is purely left-wing propaganda.