Democrats make the most solid case yet for a border wall

[danielpalos]

The party of nothing but repeal only means something, when you understand the terms in our Social Contract.

And that only means something when one understands that no such "social contract" exists and never has. That is purely left-wing propaganda.

See what I mean. A constitution is a "social Contract", enforcible at law.

 

[P@triot]

The party of nothing but repeal only means something, when you understand the terms in our Social Contract.

And that only means something when one understands that no such "social contract" exists and never has. That is purely left-wing propaganda.

See what I mean. A constitution is a "social Contract", enforcible at law.

It is not a "social contract", snowflake. It outlines the structure of our government and how it will function. Keep digging...

 

[danielpalos]

The party of nothing but repeal only means something, when you understand the terms in our Social Contract.

And that only means something when one understands that no such "social contract" exists and never has. That is purely left-wing propaganda.

See what I mean. A constitution is a "social Contract", enforcible at law.

It is not a "social contract", snowflake. It outlines the structure of our government and how it will function. Keep digging...

that is a social Contract and why i don't take the right wing seriously about the law (or economics).

 

[P@triot]

that is a social Contract and why i don't take the right wing seriously about the law (or economics).

No snowflake, it's not. This is why nobody takes you seriously about anything.

Social contract arguments typically posit that individuals have consented, either explicitly or tacitly, to surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority of the ruler or magistrate

We've done no such thing in the United States despite your deepest desires otherwise. Quite the contrary, the U.S. Constitution dictates that the government submits to the people. Run along now junior. Nobody can take you seriously on anything.

Social contract - Wikipedia

 

[danielpalos]

that is a social Contract and why i don't take the right wing seriously about the law (or economics).

No snowflake, it's not. This is why nobody takes you seriously about anything.

Social contract arguments typically posit that individuals have consented, either explicitly or tacitly, to surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority of the ruler or magistrate

We've done no such thing in the United States despite your deepest desires otherwise. Quite the contrary, the U.S. Constitution dictates that the government submits to the people. Run along now junior. Nobody can take you seriously on anything.

Social contract - Wikipedia

A Constitution is a social Contract, enforcible at law.

 

[P@triot]

that is a social Contract and why i don't take the right wing seriously about the law (or economics).

No snowflake, it's not. This is why nobody takes you seriously about anything.

Social contract arguments typically posit that individuals have consented, either explicitly or tacitly, to surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority of the ruler or magistrate

We've done no such thing in the United States despite your deepest desires otherwise. Quite the contrary, the U.S. Constitution dictates that the government submits to the people. Run along now junior. Nobody can take you seriously on anything.

Social contract - Wikipedia

A Constitution is a social Contract, enforcible at law.

Snowflake...repeating a lie doesn't magically make that lie "true". You just got owned. This is why nobody on this board takes you seriously about anything. You've bought into the left-wing propaganda and you refuse to accept facts when presented to you.

Social contract arguments typically posit that individuals have consented, either explicitly or tacitly, to surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority of the ruler or magistrate

We've done no such thing in the United States despite your deepest desires otherwise. Quite the contrary, the U.S. Constitution dictates that the government submits to the people. Run along now junior.

Social contract - Wikipedia

 

[danielpalos]

that is a social Contract and why i don't take the right wing seriously about the law (or economics).

No snowflake, it's not. This is why nobody takes you seriously about anything.

Social contract arguments typically posit that individuals have consented, either explicitly or tacitly, to surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority of the ruler or magistrate

We've done no such thing in the United States despite your deepest desires otherwise. Quite the contrary, the U.S. Constitution dictates that the government submits to the people. Run along now junior. Nobody can take you seriously on anything.

Social contract - Wikipedia

A Constitution is a social Contract, enforcible at law.

Snowflake...repeating a lie doesn't magically make that lie "true". You just got owned. This is why nobody on this board takes you seriously about anything. You've bought into the left-wing propaganda and you refuse to accept facts when presented to you.

Social contract arguments typically posit that individuals have consented, either explicitly or tacitly, to surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority of the ruler or magistrate

We've done no such thing in the United States despite your deepest desires otherwise. Quite the contrary, the U.S. Constitution dictates that the government submits to the people. Run along now junior.

Social contract - Wikipedia

Dude; you merely have lousy reading comprehension.

Congress is Delegated their social Powers, by the People.

 

[P@triot]

Dude; you merely have lousy reading comprehension.

Dude...you are seriously illiterate and a serious pathological liar.

Congress is Delegated their social Powers, by the People.

Congress has no "social powers". They don't exist. The states/people explicitly delegated 18 enumerated powers to the federal government and that is all. The states/people then "ratified" it - signing it into law. You don't get to violate the law simply because you are selfish and greedy.

 

[danielpalos]

Dude; you merely have lousy reading comprehension.

Dude...you are seriously illiterate and a serious pathological liar.

Congress is Delegated their social Powers, by the People.

Congress has no "social powers". They don't exist. The states/people explicitly delegated 18 enumerated powers to the federal government and that is all. The states/people then "ratified" it - signing it into law. You don't get to violate the law simply because you are selfish and greedy.

The coercive use of force of the State is social, not capital.

 

[P@triot]

The coercive use of force of the State is social, not capital.

That's not even a coherent sentence. Stop trying to sound "smart" when you're getting defeated by facts. It makes you look stupid. More so than normal.

Bottom line - we have never had a social contract. That's a left-wing lie in an attempt to justify their socialism which violates the U.S. Constitution.

 

[danielpalos]

The coercive use of force of the State is social, not capital.

That's not even a coherent sentence. Stop trying to sound "smart" when you're getting defeated by facts. It makes you look stupid. More so than normal.

Bottom line - we have never had a social contract. That's a left-wing lie in an attempt to justify their socialism which violates the U.S. Constitution.

A constitution is a social Contract, enforcible at law; it is why nobody should ever take the right wing seriously about the law, or economics and politics.

 

[P@triot]

A constitution is a social Contract, enforcible at law; it is why nobody should ever take the right wing seriously about the law, or economics and politics.

No it's not snowflake - and I've already proven that half a dozen times already. The U.S. Constitution outlines our system of government, how it will operate, and the rights of our citizens. It doesn't even remotely resemble a "social contract". Please have an adult click the link below, read it to you, and then explain it to you as well...

Social contract - Wikipedia

This is why nobody takes the left seriously about the law, politics, economics, the constitution, or current events.

 

[P@triot]

These animals - who are so violent and dangerous that El Salvador is in a panic and holding emergency meetings over - are the people who the left not only invited into our nation, they insisted that these animals should be allowed to stay in the U.S. permanently.

The Trump administration is sending violent gang members back to their home countries in droves -- so many that one country is dreading what's to come.

El Salvador authorities are holding emergency meetings and trying to come up with new laws to keep track of all the criminals being deported from the U.S., The Washington Post reports.

Thank God for President Trump. Just compare that with what Dumbocrat Barack Insane Obama did..

This is the opposite of what former president Barack Obama did. "The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency released nearly 600 illegal immigrants convicted of sex crimes, many because their home countries refused to take them back, according to newly obtained documents," the Washington Examiner wrote.

So Obama actually gave other nations a choice and these thugs were so bad, their own nations refused to take them back. So what did Obama do? Just turned them loose on the streets of America (while his wife and daughters were in bullet proof compounds and limos, surrounded by the finest Personal Security Details in the world, armed with fully automatic weapons). Typical lefty.

Trump Sending So Many Gang Members Back to El Salvador That Officials There Now in a Panic