Democrats fine churches

[meaner gene]

any place of worship that defies the mandate is violating the law & they should never call themselves 'pro life ' again.

Perfect example of a DemonRat.

The lake of fire is gonna be crowded

America has long defiled religions he doesn't agree with. From the Rastafarians to the Native southwest indians.

History and Major Milestones

Discover articles and resources about the major alternative religions and their belief systems. Learn how different alternative religions developed and changed with time and the important events that shaped individual faiths.

www.learnreligions.com

Possessing marijuana is illegal in the United States regardless of religion. In fact, while a number of states have taken steps to decriminalize marijuana use, particularly for medical reasons, federal agencies can still arrest marijuana users within those states.


Many compare the Rasta use of ganja to the Native American use of peyote, which is legal in certain religious circumstances despite the fact that both ganja and peyote are Schedule I drugs, which are the most highly controlled substances.

 

[Gracie]

 

[Bob Blaylock]

abortion clinics are also practicing strict adherence to what's keeping the covid cooties at bay.

And yet they are responsible for far more human deaths than the other top several causes of death combined.

In defending this butchery, you completely and totally forfeit any credibility in claiming to care about any human life.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

It never ceases to amaze me that as the right obsesses over the lives lost to abortion, it does nothing about the 45,000 lives lost each year because of lack of access to health care, either due to lack of insurance, or lack of money for copays.

Right. Because a million or two lives lost is nothing compared to 45,000.

 

[jackflash]

Democratic New Mexico governor fines churches $10,000 apiece after Christmas Eve service videos go viral | Blaze Media

Her office then called the pastors responsible 'pro-virus'

www.theblaze.com

Saying they had too many attending services.

New Mexico's Democratic Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham fined two churches $10,000 apiece for violating the state's social distancing requirements, and her communications director released a statement accompanying the fine implying that the pastors involved were "pro-virus," according to a report from Daily Wire.

In a statement provided to KOAT, Legacy Church was defiant about Grisham's order: "It's tragic that what we do for thousands of shut-ins, those in despair, and kids who go without meals gets no state notice, but fixation on one service can net us large fines. The state should fold its losing hand against Churches as Colorado has, focus on the truly vulnerable, and recognize what the US Supreme Court has recently said about Churches because we must continue to do what we are called to."

Ahh, the hive mentality of the Gestapo is alive & well in New Mexico!

 

[Bob Blaylock]

nobody is forcing any female to HAVE an abortion.

The ones most affected by abortion, the innocent victims who are murdered thereby, certainly are being forced to that fate.

And approximately half (in some places, more than that) of those innocent victims are female, so yes, females are being forced to be murdered via abortion.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

& you don't wanna be forced to pay for tax increases as the result of all them black babies being born....

Leave it to a subhuman left wrong-wing piece of shit to expose his own blatant racism, while trying to falsely accuse his opponents of racism.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

as for cali? that's up to cali ... you know, state's rights.

Under the doctrine of incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment, states have no more authority than the federal government to violate the Constitutional rights of Americans.

California's attacks against the First Amendment rights to freedom of religion and freedom of assembly are every bit as illegal and illegitimate as if it was the federal government carrying out these attacks.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

I am of the firm belief that the ONLY reason these churches are demanding live, in person services, is that the pastors need the cash from the collection plates, to live on.

No one cares what a Godless piece of filth such as yourself thinks about our right to worship God as we see fit.

 

[meaner gene]

Leave it to a subhuman left wrong-wing piece of shit to expose his own blatant racism, while trying to falsely accuse his opponents of racism.

It seems hypocritical for republicans to oppose both abortion, and the social programs needed to protect the children that avoided abortion.

 

[meaner gene]

Under the doctrine of incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment, states have no more authority than the federal government to violate the Constitutional rights of Americans.

California's attacks against the First Amendment rights to freedom of religion and freedom of assembly are every bit as illegal and illegitimate as if it was the federal government carrying out these attacks.

Funny. You would think those amendment would protect people like Osama BinLaden using their religion to plot terrorism against the US.

Their right to assemble, their right to speak their intentions to each other, especially in a religious setting.

You've probably talked about hos Islam is an evil religion, but isn't that evil protected by the constitution?

 

[meaner gene]

No one cares what a Godless piece of filth such as yourself thinks about our right to worship God as we see fit.

Interesting thing about religion. People like Osama BinLaden believe that God aka Allah, calls them to plot death to America. Thus those meetings, and their plotting terrorism is protected by the 1st amendment.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

It seems hypocritical for republicans to oppose both abortion, and the social programs needed to protect the children that avoided abortion.

It only seems that way to a sociopath who has no moral qualms about murdering thousands of innocents a day in cold blood, under the fraudulent guise of “protecting” them from lesser adverse life outcomes than simply being murdered.

 

[meaner gene]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

 

[meaner gene]

It seems hypocritical for republicans to oppose both abortion, and the social programs needed to protect the children that avoided abortion.

It only seems that way to a sociopath who has no moral qualms about murdering thousands of innocents a day in cold blood, under the fraudulent guise of “protecting” them from lesser adverse life outcomes than simply being murdered.

Why are republicans against providing those pregnant mothers quality pre-natal and natal care, especially to those who cant' afford it.

You might have an argument if republicanas supported universal healthcare, you would have a pillar on which to stand, but you fight every social welfare program.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Funny. You would think those amendment would protect people like Osama BinLaden using their religion to plot terrorism against the US.

Their right to assemble, their right to speak their intentions to each other, especially in a religious setting.

You've probably talked about hos Islam is an evil religion, but isn't that evil protected by the constitution?

Interesting thing about religion. People like Osama BinLaden believe that God aka Allah, calls them to plot death to America. Thus those meetings, and their plotting terrorism is protected by the 1st amendment.

No rational person sees religious freedom as protecting the commission of crimes of violence and destruction, nor conspiring to commit such crimes.

To even try to make such a point is prima facie proof that you are full of shit; that you are either being willfully deceitful, or else just plain batshit crazy.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Why are republicans against providing those pregnant mothers quality pre-natal and natal care, especially to those who cant' afford it.

You might have an argument if republicanas [sic] supported universal healthcare, you would have a pillar on which to stand, but you fight every social welfare program.

As long as you defend the “right” to murder these children in cold blood, you are in no moral position to even bring up the question.

It's a whole other matter to try to argue which means of having government steal from those who work to earn their livings, for the benefit of those who will not, is most beneficial or most harmful to the children whose lives you falsely claim to care about; but we aren't even there as long as you support murdering these children.

 

[meaner gene]

Interesting thing about religion. People like Osama BinLaden believe that God aka Allah, calls them to plot death to America. Thus those meetings, and their plotting terrorism is protected by the 1st amendment.

No rational person sees religious freedom as protecting the commission of crimes of violence and destruction, nor conspiring to commit such crimes.

Exactly my point. If a religion in the middle of a deadly pandemic schemes to bring their people together into a super spreader setting, the result of which had been previously shown to result in people spreading the virus, in a chain of infections with people hospitalized and dying. And their crowded gathering could easily again lead to people dying. So as you said, no rational person sees religious freedom as protecting actions leading to peoples deaths..

 

[Grumblenuts]

As long as you defend the “right” to murder these children in cold blood, you are in no moral position to even bring up the question.

Meet Bob. Performs precise virtual uterus inspections from afar by the million daily. Sees "children" each and every time. Bob is not crazy. No, he's not. Bob is passionate. Moral. Religious. Opinionated. Irrational. Be nice to Bob.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

No rational person sees religious freedom as protecting the commission of crimes of violence and destruction, nor conspiring to commit such crimes.

Exactly my point. If a religion in the middle of a deadly pandemic schemes to bring their people together into a super spreader setting, the result of which had been previously shown to result in people spreading the virus, in a chain of infections with people hospitalized and dying. And their crowded gathering could easily again lead to people dying. So as you said, no rational person sees religious freedom as protecting actions leading to peoples deaths..

It is only ignorant, gullible sheep, and the lying tyrants who they support, who keep speaking of “super spreader events”, and other ways to disparage those of us who refuse to be deceived and intimidated into sacrificing our most essential freedoms over a fake “pandemic”.

Any sane person has to know that when someone like you tries, in such a manner, to equate attending legitimate church services, working to earn a living, shopping, and otherwise going about necessary life activities, to Islamism terrorism; that the one who is making such a comparison is seriously fucked-up in the head, and in the soul.

You're rather see people starve to death, or lose their homes and wind up living in the streets, than to see the power of the tyrants that you worship be diminished.