Democrats Dont You Dare...

[HereWeGoAgain]

Trump has been the only candidate to have never won an election or even have run one ever before in his life, walk into the PResidential election stone cold and win it against all the expert opinions, all the polls and all the odds. That is like some amateur walking into a professional chess tournament and winning first prize in his first ever tournament.

And yet you still call Trump a "clown"?

Dude, you are not making Trump look like the clown here.

He has stunned the world, and deserves credit for that, but you can't look at all the things he said along the campaign trail and believe he didn't act like a clown.....mocking people with disabilities, talking about how ugly women are....seriously? He was in tune with the mood of the electorate, and had the good fortune of running against the worst canidate in history, but had he been able to hold his tongue just a bit, the race would have been over in August. You deserve great acknowledgement for your bold and steadfast insistence that he would win.

He didnt mock people with disabilities.
100% 'proof' Donald Trump did NOT mock a reporter with a disability

The only proof you provided was what a poor excuse for a human being you are. What, Trump was not mocking a handicapped person because he got the hand motions wrong?

So why would he use the same exact gesture on people who are not handicapped?
It's pretty obvious he uses it as a universal gesture to show the idiocy of the left.
And I'm quite sure he would use it in your case as well.
Ya fucken retard.

I think it's rather humorous when these rotten individuals act all "offended" by Trump, when they seem like much angrier people. Lol. As if this guy CARES that Trump mocked some reporter or not?

The faux outrage is hilarious.
Nothing a dem does would even get em to raise an eyebrow, yet Trump would be labeled the anti Christ if he spit on the sidewalk.

 

[depotoo]

But many, many more executive actions and presidential directives

Dont you dare give Trump any crap about whatever Executive orders he may issue.

You have been defending the most egregious usurpation of power in American history in peace time.

You have not one leg to stand on in criticizing any EOs that Trump puts out and he is going to bring a hailstorm of changes to EOs and the executive branch.

Now it is time for you to understand WHY allowing the President so much power is a very foolish thing to do even if you think he is your President.

Obama issued LESS EOs than Bush. So, what's your point?

 

[depotoo]

No, the residents of the state voted for it. It was on the ballot, dear.

Yes, when they themselves voted for it.

And the federal government has NO business trying to mandate health care. That is totally out of their jurisdiction! This is what is so upsetting to people, democrats! LISTEN.

but it's ok for the states to make it mandatory, like Romneycare was mandatory in Mass?

when the citizens voted for it or the representatives voted for it?

cuz our representatives voted for it at the federal level

same as reps at the state level

it wasn't we the people voting in the state or federal levels

 

[RealDave]

And the federal government has NO business trying to mandate health care. That is totally out of their jurisdiction! This is what is so upsetting to people, democrats! LISTEN.

but it's ok for the states to make it mandatory, like Romneycare was mandatory in Mass?

Yes, the states have jurisdiction.

So, you disagree with Trump's plan to buy insurance across State Lines where States no longer can regulate who sells insurance in their State.

States have the right to do it. The feds do not have the right to make health insurance mandatory.

USSC said it did

 

[RealDave]

He has stunned the world, and deserves credit for that, but you can't look at all the things he said along the campaign trail and believe he didn't act like a clown.....mocking people with disabilities, talking about how ugly women are....seriously? He was in tune with the mood of the electorate, and had the good fortune of running against the worst canidate in history, but had he been able to hold his tongue just a bit, the race would have been over in August. You deserve great acknowledgement for your bold and steadfast insistence that he would win.

He didnt mock people with disabilities.
100% 'proof' Donald Trump did NOT mock a reporter with a disability

The only proof you provided was what a poor excuse for a human being you are. What, Trump was not mocking a handicapped person because he got the hand motions wrong?

So why would he use the same exact gesture on people who are not handicapped?
It's pretty obvious he uses it as a universal gesture to show the idiocy of the left.
And I'm quite sure he would use it in your case as well.
Ya fucken retard.

I think it's rather humorous when these rotten individuals act all "offended" by Trump, when they seem like much angrier people. Lol. As if this guy CARES that Trump mocked some reporter or not?

The faux outrage is hilarious.
Nothing a dem does would even get em to raise an eyebrow, yet Trump would be labeled the anti Christ if he spit on the sidewalk.

Of course. Of Course. What was I thinking. You people think it is OK to mock the handicapped. You even defend it.

 

[Rustic]

Maybe so, but it will no longer be mandatory. dip shit

How to Cancel an ObamaCare Plan? - Obamacare Facts

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

He didnt mock people with disabilities.
100% 'proof' Donald Trump did NOT mock a reporter with a disability

The only proof you provided was what a poor excuse for a human being you are. What, Trump was not mocking a handicapped person because he got the hand motions wrong?

So why would he use the same exact gesture on people who are not handicapped?
It's pretty obvious he uses it as a universal gesture to show the idiocy of the left.
And I'm quite sure he would use it in your case as well.
Ya fucken retard.

I think it's rather humorous when these rotten individuals act all "offended" by Trump, when they seem like much angrier people. Lol. As if this guy CARES that Trump mocked some reporter or not?

The faux outrage is hilarious.
Nothing a dem does would even get em to raise an eyebrow, yet Trump would be labeled the anti Christ if he spit on the sidewalk.

Of course. Of Course. What was I thinking. You people think it is OK to mock the handicapped. You even defend it.

I'm mocking you not the handicapped.
But then with your obvious problems when it comes to mental acuity I guess it's possible that I am mocking the disabled... mentally disabled that is.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Leftists lower the bar then get pissy when righties take advantage of the bar that leftists lowered.

smh

 

[Zoom-boing]

Secondly, the real test is this.

You have the Presidency, House and Senate. You have the Supreme Court. You have more power to change things than any president since FDR.

Trump Promised:

• Destroy ISIS very Quickly.
• Build wall, make Mexico pay.
• Bring Manufacturing jobs home
• Get higher wages for struggling Americans
• Replace ObamaCare with something affordable for all the hard-working, low-income families in the rust belt who voted for him.

Rather than creating enemies lists and hunting the now powerless Democratic opposition, you have to be accountable to your promises. You have to lead and save this country. This can't be merely a grievance movement that allows White Supremacists to rise, and people like Jim Bowie to spit on Liberals. At some point, this has to be a movement that improves the economic conditions of average Americans.

For instance, I would love ObamaCare to be replaced by something more affordable with lower premiums.

Trump promised it. Said it would be easy.

Now do it.

You have control of every branch of Government.

Stop gloating and spewing hate and just fucking deliver on your economic and foreign policy promises.

Geez, can you give the guy a chance to be sworn in first?

smh

 

[ChrisL]

And the federal government has NO business trying to mandate health care. That is totally out of their jurisdiction! This is what is so upsetting to people, democrats! LISTEN.

but it's ok for the states to make it mandatory, like Romneycare was mandatory in Mass?

Yes, the states have jurisdiction.

So, you disagree with Trump's plan to buy insurance across State Lines where States no longer can regulate who sells insurance in their State.

States have the right to do it. The feds do not have the right to make health insurance mandatory.

USSC said it did

That's because they underhandedly used the commerce clause. They are sneaky SOBs and try to find loopholes in which to do their dirty deeds and violate the states rights and the people's rights.

 

[ChrisL]

The Commerce Clause describes an enumerated power listed in the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). The clause states that the United States Congress shall have power "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes." Courts and commentators have tended to discuss each of these three areas of commerce as a separate power granted to Congress.[1] It is common to see the individual components of the Commerce Clause referred to under specific terms: The Foreign Commerce Clause, the Interstate Commerce Clause,[2] and the Indian Commerce Clause.

Dispute exists within the courts as to the range of powers granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause. As noted below, the clause is often paired with the Necessary and Proper Clause, the combination used to take a broad, expansive perspective of these powers. However, the effect of the Commerce Clause has varied significantly depending on the Supreme Court's interpretation. During the Marshall Court era, Commerce Clause interpretation empowered Congress to gain jurisdiction over numerous aspects of intrastate and interstate commerce as well as non-commerce. During the post-1937 era, the use of the Commerce Clause by Congress to authorize federal control of economic matters became effectively unlimited. Since the latter half of the RehnquistCourt era, Congressional use of the Commerce Clause has become slightly restricted again, being limited only to matters of trade or any other form of restricted area (whether interstate or not) and production (whether commercial or not).

The Commerce Clause is the source of federal drug prohibition laws under the Controlled Substances Act. In the recent medical marijuana case, Gonzales v. Raich, the Supreme Court rejected the argument that the ban on growing medical marijuana for personal use exceeded Congress' powers under the Commerce Clause. Even if no goods were sold or transported across state lines, the Court found that there could be an "indirect" effect on interstate commerce. In reaching this conclusion, the Court relied heavily on the New Deal era case, Wickard v. Filburn, which held that the government may regulate personal cultivation and consumption of crops because the aggregate effect of individual consumption could have an "indirect" effect on interstate commerce.