Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,440
- 2,290
Of course I do. Just how rightarded arecyoubto think I want more justices under a Republican president?You must have a reading disorder. I said Democrats can do it next time they control the Executive branch and the Congress. Where exactly do you see trump fitting into that picture?So? Both are methods of stacking the court. It matters not that one changes the number of justices while the other doesn't. The end game is still the same. And there's certainly nothing etched in stone that we have to have 9 justices. We've had other numbers over the years.Because the Republicans are not changing anything about the court. They simply waited until they had the opportunity. Democrats want to change the court by changing the amount of people on it.
View attachment 284988
What's good for Republicans is good for Democrats.
Fine, then write to your commie friends and tell them to pass that in the House. Then Trump will nominate several conservative judges, and then you'll be happy.
Oh, so now Mr. "Stack the deck" wants to wait unit there is a Democrat President do expand the Supreme Court? How utterly fair of you.
Well I'll tell you what: let Congress pass it now, and our President will allow the expansion. Oh......you can't do that...right? Because it has nothing to do with having more justices, it has to do with having more commie justices.
And again, you support Republicans stacking that bench but bitch & moan when Democrats want to even the score. TFB.
You must be mentally retarded or something. I said it's fine to stack the bench, but not change the number of justices to do so. Republicans play by the rules. Democrats want to change the rules when they lose.