Democrats Don't Support Impeachment - Pelosi Backs Down - No Vote

[IM2]

So what great dangers did he pose to the public simply by getting elected, because he wasn't one of them? Them is who we need to get rid of in Washington. You just can't admit it's all about politics and nothing else. The funny thing is that everything they've tried hasn't worked, and all they're really doing is pissing off voters.

He is a overall danger to our republic. And you have missed the consistent examples he shows of why. You claim everything that has been tried has not worked. You are wrong. Trump has obstructed justice by using the courts to litigate anything or any legal process against him because he knows courts do not work fast.

Impeachment is for violations of high crime and misdemeanors, not because you don't like the guy. That's a dictatorship which apparently, the communists are now turning to.

Trump has committed high crimes and misdemeanors. The dictator thinks he is above the law so he obstructs the law. And that is what Trump is doing.

Yes, you lie under oath to a judge, that's a felony called perjury.

And when you refuse and have others refuse subpoenas from the congress that's called an impeachable offense.

 

[NoVote]

Trump has committed high crimes and misdemeanors. The dictator thinks he is above the law so he obstructs the law. And that is what Trump is doing.

 

[Claudette]

Nancy says NO VOTE! For impeachment

Cnn is pissed!

Lol so Is faun haha

Pelosi strategy questioned after refusing authorization vote on impeachment inquiry

Of course there is no vote.

Politicians take care of number one. They know there will be no impeachment and none of them want their names associated with a vote.

So. No vote.

 

[jknowgood]

Where are the lefties ?

JoeB131
rightwinger
Penelope
g5000

Wonder what they have to say on this one ?

Laughing at the rw circle jerk

Awe you we got him know rant was blown out of the water last night. No circle jerk, we are just laughing at how stupid you people are!

 

[jknowgood]

So what great dangers did he pose to the public simply by getting elected, because he wasn't one of them? Them is who we need to get rid of in Washington. You just can't admit it's all about politics and nothing else. The funny thing is that everything they've tried hasn't worked, and all they're really doing is pissing off voters.

He is a overall danger to our republic. And you have missed the consistent examples he shows of why. You claim everything that has been tried has not worked. You are wrong. Trump has obstructed justice by using the courts to litigate anything or any legal process against him because he knows courts do not work fast.

Impeachment is for violations of high crime and misdemeanors, not because you don't like the guy. That's a dictatorship which apparently, the communists are now turning to.

Trump has committed high crimes and misdemeanors. The dictator thinks he is above the law so he obstructs the law. And that is what Trump is doing.

Yes, you lie under oath to a judge, that's a felony called perjury.

And when you refuse and have others refuse subpoenas from the congress that's called an impeachable offense.

Yeah that's the reason they didn't vote to impeach him. Mueller had unlimited resources and unlimited funding to find one thing they could prosecute him for. Guess what, they found nothing.

 

[jknowgood]

Pelosi holds off on vote to authorize impeachment inquiry

Pelosi has called off any official vote on Impeachment...the only reason to do so is she doesn't have the support to successfully do it!

Hogwash.

She merely needs to shut-out un-American a$$wipes who defend a corrupt, arrogant, ignorant, dangerous Presidency.

Until all the evidence has been gathered for presentation to the Congress at-large and the American People, anyway.

Then the hammer comes down.

Whatcha going to do, hire Mueller back?

 

[jknowgood]

Where are the lefties ?

JoeB131
rightwinger
Penelope
g5000

Wonder what they have to say on this one ?

Laughing at the rw circle jerk

BTW: We got two SCOTUS appointments. You've lost the court for years.

Suck on it.

Maybe. Maybe not if when Demorats win the Executive branch and the Congress if they decide to add a couple of seats and fill them with Liberals.

At this point in time liberals proved they will do nothing for the American public. Unless they get their way. Democrats don't have a chance in 2020.

 

[BluesLegend]

Where are the lefties ?

JoeB131
rightwinger
Penelope
g5000

Wonder what they have to say on this one ?

Laughing at the rw circle jerk

BTW: We got two SCOTUS appointments. You've lost the court for years.

Suck on it.

Maybe. Maybe not if when Demorats win the Executive branch and the Congress if they decide to add a couple of seats and fill them with Liberals.

^^^ lawless rigging Dem's reveal their plans.

LOLOL

Imbecile.

There's nothing lawless about it.

You refuse to accept the will of the people and scheme to RIG the SCOTUS there's a shocker.

 

[MAGAman]

Pelosi holds off on vote to authorize impeachment inquiry

Pelosi has called off any official vote on Impeachment...the only reason to do so is she doesn't have the support to successfully do it!

Why don’t they just have a vote to see if they need a vote

Republicans called for a vote.

Chickenshit Democrats wouldn't allow it.

 

[the other mike]

Once there is a vote for impeachment Trump is entitled to the identities of all witnesses. He can cross examine witnesses. He is entitled to see and examine all evidence collected both inculpatory and exculpatory.

The democrats could not survive that.

Still confused by the terms Impeachment and Impeachment Inquiry?

Seems like the Democrats have been inquiring about impeachment for over 2 years.

 

[Faun]

Laughing at the rw circle jerk

BTW: We got two SCOTUS appointments. You've lost the court for years.

Suck on it.

Maybe. Maybe not if when Demorats win the Executive branch and the Congress if they decide to add a couple of seats and fill them with Liberals.

^^^ lawless rigging Dem's reveal their plans.

LOLOL

Imbecile.

There's nothing lawless about it.

You refuse to accept the will of the people and scheme to RIG the SCOTUS there's a shocker.

LOLOL

Your hypocrisy is noted and laughed at. Where was this concern of yours when Republicans denied the will of the people their right to have their duly elected president carry out his Constitutional privilege of appointing s replacement to the U.S. Supreme Court during his final year in office?

 

[Faun]

Pelosi holds off on vote to authorize impeachment inquiry

Pelosi has called off any official vote on Impeachment...the only reason to do so is she doesn't have the support to successfully do it!

Why don’t they just have a vote to see if they need a vote

Republicans called for a vote.

Chickenshit Democrats wouldn't allow it.

Why should they vote on authorizing an impeachment inquiry when Nancy Pelosi already authorized an impeachment inquiry?

 

[BluesLegend]

BTW: We got two SCOTUS appointments. You've lost the court for years.

Suck on it.

Maybe. Maybe not if when Demorats win the Executive branch and the Congress if they decide to add a couple of seats and fill them with Liberals.

^^^ lawless rigging Dem's reveal their plans.

LOLOL

Imbecile.

There's nothing lawless about it.

You refuse to accept the will of the people and scheme to RIG the SCOTUS there's a shocker.

LOLOL

Your hypocrisy is noted and laughed at. Where was this concern of yours when Republicans denied the will of the people their right to have their duly elected president carry out his Constitutional privilege of appointing s replacement to the U.S. Supreme Court during his final year in office?

LMAO Joe Biden invented the idea of delaying SCOTUS nominations until after the upcoming elections then you people bitch when we follow your lead. RIGGING the SCOTUS is entirely another matter. Its not our fault you idiots ran Hillary and lost. So you suffer the consequences. If you are committed to RIG the SCOTUS then Trump should go ahead and nominate another 10 SCOTUS justices now and confirm 10 hard core conservatives to the court. After all you are okay with RIGGING the SCOTUS right? Or are only Dem's allowed to RIG it.

 

[Faun]

Maybe. Maybe not if when Demorats win the Executive branch and the Congress if they decide to add a couple of seats and fill them with Liberals.

^^^ lawless rigging Dem's reveal their plans.

LOLOL

Imbecile.

There's nothing lawless about it.

You refuse to accept the will of the people and scheme to RIG the SCOTUS there's a shocker.

LOLOL

Your hypocrisy is noted and laughed at. Where was this concern of yours when Republicans denied the will of the people their right to have their duly elected president carry out his Constitutional privilege of appointing s replacement to the U.S. Supreme Court during his final year in office?

LMAO Joe Biden invented the idea of delaying SCOTUS nominations until after the upcoming elections then you people bitch when we follow your lead. RIGGING the SCOTUS is entirely another matter. Its not our fault you idiots ran Hillary and lost. So you suffer the consequences. If you are committed to RIG the SCOTUS then Trump should go ahead and nominate another 10 SCOTUS justices now and confirm 10 hard core conservatives to the court. After all you are okay with RIGGING the SCOTUS right? Or are only Dem's allowed to RIG it.

Imecile, you didn't follow Biden's lead. You didn't support holding off on confirmation hearing for s few months until after the election.... you supported cancelling the president's Constitutional obligation of appointing a replacement for nearly the entire last year of his term. That denied the will of the voters, who you only care about now, for their choice of president to appoint a replacement for up to four years of his term, not three. And for no rational reason.

So now that the right has stopped to that level to stack that court, the left can too.

 

[Coyote]

Laughing at the rw circle jerk

BTW: We got two SCOTUS appointments. You've lost the court for years.

Suck on it.

Maybe. Maybe not if when Demorats win the Executive branch and the Congress if they decide to add a couple of seats and fill them with Liberals.

^^^ lawless rigging Dem's reveal their plans.

LOLOL

Imbecile.

There's nothing lawless about it.

You refuse to accept the will of the people and scheme to RIG the SCOTUS there's a shocker.

Rig the Scotus? Merrick Garland come to mind?

 

[BluesLegend]

^^^ lawless rigging Dem's reveal their plans.

LOLOL

Imbecile.

There's nothing lawless about it.

You refuse to accept the will of the people and scheme to RIG the SCOTUS there's a shocker.

LOLOL

Your hypocrisy is noted and laughed at. Where was this concern of yours when Republicans denied the will of the people their right to have their duly elected president carry out his Constitutional privilege of appointing s replacement to the U.S. Supreme Court during his final year in office?

LMAO Joe Biden invented the idea of delaying SCOTUS nominations until after the upcoming elections then you people bitch when we follow your lead. RIGGING the SCOTUS is entirely another matter. Its not our fault you idiots ran Hillary and lost. So you suffer the consequences. If you are committed to RIG the SCOTUS then Trump should go ahead and nominate another 10 SCOTUS justices now and confirm 10 hard core conservatives to the court. After all you are okay with RIGGING the SCOTUS right? Or are only Dem's allowed to RIG it.

Imecile, you didn't follow Biden's lead. You didn't support holding off on confirmation hearing for s few months until after the election.... you supported cancelling the president's Constitutional obligation of appointing a replacement for nearly the entire last year of his term. That denied the will of the voters, who you only care about now, for their choice of president to appoint a replacement for up to four years of his term, not three. And for no rational reason.

So now that the right has stopped to that level to stack that court, the left can too.

Fine we cheated Dems out of a SCOTUS nomination, sucks to be you. lol

 

[BluesLegend]

BTW: We got two SCOTUS appointments. You've lost the court for years.

Suck on it.

Maybe. Maybe not if when Demorats win the Executive branch and the Congress if they decide to add a couple of seats and fill them with Liberals.

^^^ lawless rigging Dem's reveal their plans.

LOLOL

Imbecile.

There's nothing lawless about it.

You refuse to accept the will of the people and scheme to RIG the SCOTUS there's a shocker.

Rig the Scotus? Merrick Garland come to mind?

Both were confirmed by the senate. Your side is proposing to RIG the SCOTUS by expanding the court not for any logical reason other than RIGGING it in favor of Democrats.

Let me put it to you this way. Would you be in favor of President Trump expanding the court next week and choosing 2-4 additional justices? Your answer is no, you are not in favor of this until there's a Dem president and Dem majority in the Senate. Hence you want to RIG the SCOTUS.

 

[The Original Tree]

BTW: We got two SCOTUS appointments. You've lost the court for years.

Suck on it.

Maybe. Maybe not if when Demorats win the Executive branch and the Congress if they decide to add a couple of seats and fill them with Liberals.

^^^ lawless rigging Dem's reveal their plans.

LOLOL

Imbecile.

There's nothing lawless about it.

You refuse to accept the will of the people and scheme to RIG the SCOTUS there's a shocker.

LOLOL

Your hypocrisy is noted and laughed at. Where was this concern of yours when Republicans denied the will of the people their right to have their duly elected president carry out his Constitutional privilege of appointing s replacement to the U.S. Supreme Court during his final year in office?

Where is The Mueller Report when you need one?

Is it up your ass?

or is that Putin Bobblehead Doll you purchased wedge up there?

 

[Coyote]

Maybe. Maybe not if when Demorats win the Executive branch and the Congress if they decide to add a couple of seats and fill them with Liberals.

^^^ lawless rigging Dem's reveal their plans.

LOLOL

Imbecile.

There's nothing lawless about it.

You refuse to accept the will of the people and scheme to RIG the SCOTUS there's a shocker.

Rig the Scotus? Merrick Garland come to mind?

Both were confirmed by the senate. Your side is proposing to RIG the SCOTUS by expanding the court not for any logical reason other than RIGGING it in favor of Democrats.

Let me put it to you this way. Would you be in favor of President Trump expanding the court next week and choosing 2-4 additional justices? Your answer is no, you are not in favor of this until there's a Dem president and Dem majority in the Senate. Hence you want to RIG the SCOTUS.

No different than rigging it by actively preventing a president from nominating a candidate but you know that in your hypocritical little minds.

 

[Coyote]

Maybe. Maybe not if when Demorats win the Executive branch and the Congress if they decide to add a couple of seats and fill them with Liberals.

^^^ lawless rigging Dem's reveal their plans.

LOLOL

Imbecile.

There's nothing lawless about it.

You refuse to accept the will of the people and scheme to RIG the SCOTUS there's a shocker.

Rig the Scotus? Merrick Garland come to mind?

Both were confirmed by the senate. Your side is proposing to RIG the SCOTUS by expanding the court not for any logical reason other than RIGGING it in favor of Democrats.

Let me put it to you this way. Would you be in favor of President Trump expanding the court next week and choosing 2-4 additional justices? Your answer is no, you are not in favor of this until there's a Dem president and Dem majority in the Senate. Hence you want to RIG the SCOTUS.

Forgot to add that I am not in favor of expanding the Court anyway. It is big enough.

Unlike you guys I don't support rigging the courts.