Yep. Spokane is one of the Early Test Sites. And I hear it hasn't gone well.I don't know where all they've rolled out Cerner. I have been forced to use it at the Mann Grandstaff VA Medical Center in Spokane for more than two years and it is still more cumbersome than before the roll out. I don't understand why they need four different systems to log in either. I mean MyHealtheVet worked fine for me. Now they have IDme, Login.gov, and DS Logon as well. The more of this crap they add, the less intuitive it is.
I am guessing it is because they took a good off-the-shelf package and then tried to over-customize it to behave more like the VA's old one.
I hear that the DoD's edition of Cerner is 75-80% complete in its rollout.
If that's true about the DoD edition... perhaps the VA should just take the DoD version of the thing and abandon its own customizing efforts.
If the VA needs functionality over-and-above what the DoD edition offers, then the VA can work with Cerner-Oracle to build bolt-on bridged subsystems.
Thereby leaving the core-system exactly the same as what the DoD is using.
And that would allow the VA to flush its own deployment project team and let the DoD take over on the VA side as well.
And your right about simplification and intuitiveness... Less Is More...
Last edited: