You know, if you were mature, you could have just admitted you missed it because you are lazy.
Lol. A douche like you trying to discuss maturity is quite funny. And you’re wrong anyway.
Right, these guys went to school for 8 years to be able to diagnose a disease, but you know more, never having met the man.
Hey, retard: I am
not the one who offers his own diagnosis. That was you. And, of course, despite your slavish devotion to the infallibility of medical or psychiatric diagnoses, it happens to be the case that there is a reason for the concept known as “misdiagnosed.”
By the way, to clarify things for your ignorant shallow mind, I don’t either accept or deny that his mental illness was “schizophrenia.” He don’t know that it’s true. Neither do you.
This is as close as you got to making a salient point, so let's discuss.
Your assessment of my number of salient points is rendered meaningless because you aren’t equipped to judge such things.
The Courts have ruled that you can't institutionalize someone unless they are an IMMEDIATE threat. The other half of this problem is that we don't fund mental health programs adequately. So all they can do is medicate guys like this, and if they are somewhat cogent, release them back, when they stop taking their meds.
I personally think this is a bad policy. We should be able to institutionalize people, and mandate that they take their meds. But we also need to fund the programs adequately, which might mean more taxes.
One can (even a dope like you can) maintain that there is no validity to requiring “immediacy” of a threat to one’s self or to others. But there
are countervailing arguments. For example, I am guessing that even
you wouldn’t appreciate being locked inside an Arkham type “hospital” without at least some rational finding that you posed an immediate threat to yourself or to others.
We won't do these things, of course.
For plenty of good reasons.
Um, okay, let's look at that. First, the Chinese haven't killed nearly as many Muslims in their own country as we've killed in the last 40 years travelling to the other side of the planet.
Link?
Also, the topic was incarceration, not killing. Try to force yourself to stick to the topic actually being discussed.
Second, Xianjiang is an autonomous region within China. They actually have privileges as a region.
Irrelevant to this conversation. Also, not supported by you. I certainly don’t accept any claim made by you without credible support.
Third, it wasn't just "Treasury". The State Department designated ETIM as a terrorist organization. We captured Uyghurs on the battlefield in Afghanistan and held them at Gitmo.
Your link specifically cited Treasury. And it still doesn’t make any difference to your argument.
Yet still dancing circles around you.
More proof that you’re quite delusional.
Wow, you don't know how this is done at all, do you?
In other words you disagree with kickback’s observation; and you thus imagine that he can’t be right. That’s just your overblown and unjustified ego babbling away. .