Democrats Brace for War over Supreme Court

[Hellokitty]

Democrats already know this will be a win win for TRUMP a new appointment before election will be a huge accomplishment for TRUMP and democrats forcing it until after the election will only help TRUMP grow his base.

 

[OldLady]

If you think the Kavanaugh hearings were an evil circus, just wait for the chance of another Trump nominee in the event of another vacancy.

The Left is already manning the barricades. The resulting hearing will make the Brett Kavanaugh fiasco, a dark moment in U.S. history, look like a charming affair. In the event that President Donald Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett, as many conservatives hope, this hearing will be a preview of the Apocalypse.

Will they do anything to keep her from the bench? After all, she’s young and could be on the bench for decades to come.

Dianne Feinstein has already previewed a primary argument to be wielded against Barrett if she is nominated with Feinstein's "dogma lives loudly within you" comments in 2017. Democrats will argue that, as a believing Catholic, Barrett is somehow not qualified to be on the Supreme Court, that real believing Christians, vice the Nancy Pelosi variety, are biased and can't interpret the Constitution.

The hearing should make entertaining television. One has to hope it will come BEFORE the election so Dimocrap antics will be fresh in the minds of the voters.

More @ https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/08/democrats_brace_for_war_over_supreme_court.html

Won’t really matter

Trump only has two months before the Nov election, then we will be in an election year

Everyone knows Republicans do not fill SCOTUS vacancies in an election year

That isn't the way it works. Obama was a retiring President and Trump will be running for and winning reelection. There's no way you can compare the two. That's why Trump will do the right thing and nominate a qualified judge to fill Ruth's spot. In the end, it will be up to Democrats to decide exactly how unhinged they want to act before the next P. election.

Nice try. Let the voters decide. It's our right. LOL

 

[rightwinger]

If you think the Kavanaugh hearings were an evil circus, just wait for the chance of another Trump nominee in the event of another vacancy.

The Left is already manning the barricades. The resulting hearing will make the Brett Kavanaugh fiasco, a dark moment in U.S. history, look like a charming affair. In the event that President Donald Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett, as many conservatives hope, this hearing will be a preview of the Apocalypse.

Will they do anything to keep her from the bench? After all, she’s young and could be on the bench for decades to come.

Dianne Feinstein has already previewed a primary argument to be wielded against Barrett if she is nominated with Feinstein's "dogma lives loudly within you" comments in 2017. Democrats will argue that, as a believing Catholic, Barrett is somehow not qualified to be on the Supreme Court, that real believing Christians, vice the Nancy Pelosi variety, are biased and can't interpret the Constitution.

The hearing should make entertaining television. One has to hope it will come BEFORE the election so Dimocrap antics will be fresh in the minds of the voters.

More @ https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/08/democrats_brace_for_war_over_supreme_court.html

Won’t really matter

Trump only has two months before the Nov election, then we will be in an election year

Everyone knows Republicans do not fill SCOTUS vacancies in an election year

That isn't the way it works. Obama was a retiring President and Trump will be running for and winning reelection. There's no way you can compare the two. That's why Trump will do the right thing and nominate a qualified judge to fill Ruth's spot. In the end, it will be up to Democrats to decide exactly how unhinged they want to act before the next P. election.

I’m cool with that
If the American people want Trump as their President in 2021, he can fill the seat then

If the people say they want a Democrat in 2021, then let a Democrat fill the seat.

That is the way Republicans said it should be in 2016.......hold off and let the people decide

 

[Crixus]

If you think the Kavanaugh hearings were an evil circus, just wait for the chance of another Trump nominee in the event of another vacancy.

The Left is already manning the barricades. The resulting hearing will make the Brett Kavanaugh fiasco, a dark moment in U.S. history, look like a charming affair. In the event that President Donald Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett, as many conservatives hope, this hearing will be a preview of the Apocalypse.

Will they do anything to keep her from the bench? After all, she’s young and could be on the bench for decades to come.

Dianne Feinstein has already previewed a primary argument to be wielded against Barrett if she is nominated with Feinstein's "dogma lives loudly within you" comments in 2017. Democrats will argue that, as a believing Catholic, Barrett is somehow not qualified to be on the Supreme Court, that real believing Christians, vice the Nancy Pelosi variety, are biased and can't interpret the Constitution.

The hearing should make entertaining television. One has to hope it will come BEFORE the election so Dimocrap antics will be fresh in the minds of the voters.

More @ https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/08/democrats_brace_for_war_over_supreme_court.html

Oh it will be awesome. Still, unless John Roberts dies to the libtards still got plenty of influence on the court. One more justice needs to die or retire besides buzzy.

 

[bendog]

McConnell will not hold anything off is she passes.

If you think the Kavanaugh hearings were an evil circus, just wait for the chance of another Trump nominee in the event of another vacancy.

The Left is already manning the barricades. The resulting hearing will make the Brett Kavanaugh fiasco, a dark moment in U.S. history, look like a charming affair. In the event that President Donald Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett, as many conservatives hope, this hearing will be a preview of the Apocalypse.

Will they do anything to keep her from the bench? After all, she’s young and could be on the bench for decades to come.

Dianne Feinstein has already previewed a primary argument to be wielded against Barrett if she is nominated with Feinstein's "dogma lives loudly within you" comments in 2017. Democrats will argue that, as a believing Catholic, Barrett is somehow not qualified to be on the Supreme Court, that real believing Christians, vice the Nancy Pelosi variety, are biased and can't interpret the Constitution.

The hearing should make entertaining television. One has to hope it will come BEFORE the election so Dimocrap antics will be fresh in the minds of the voters.

More @ https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/08/democrats_brace_for_war_over_supreme_court.html

Won’t really matter

Trump only has two months before the Nov election, then we will be in an election year

Everyone knows Republicans do not fill SCOTUS vacancies in an election year

That isn't the way it works. Obama was a retiring President and Trump will be running for and winning reelection. There's no way you can compare the two. That's why Trump will do the right thing and nominate a qualified judge to fill Ruth's spot. In the end, it will be up to Democrats to decide exactly how unhinged they want to act before the next P. election.

I’m cool with that
If the American people want Trump as their President in 2021, he can fill the seat then

If the people say they want a Democrat in 2021, then let a Democrat fill the seat.

That is the way Republicans said it should be in 2016.......hold off and let the people decide

IF RBG passes, McConnell will fill the seat before the 20 election, and if circumstances make it necessary, he'd fill it with a lame duck senate even with an elected dem potus and senate on deck.

 

[FJO]

Trump should nominate a Conservative Black Female Judge it will be hilarious to see the left try and spin something out of that.

Would help if she was also a Lesbian and in a wheelchair, but not really.

Being CONSERVATIVE would "trump" everything else.

They savaged a CONSERVATIVE black man, (Clarence Thomas) no reason to believe they would show more restraint and decency towards a CONSERVATIVE woman.

 

[FJO]

Democrats already know this will be a win win for TRUMP a new appointment before election will be a huge accomplishment for TRUMP and democrats forcing it until after the election will only help TRUMP grow his base.

The next CONSERVATIVE nomination is really urgent, because by now it is obvious that John Roberts can not be relied upon to vote CONSERVATIVE.

 

[wamose]

If Ruth hangs on 3 more years and Barr had all those DOJ coupsters behind bars by then, he would make a great SC judge. But if that happened there would be a greater uproar than when that dude called sissy boy Cris Cuomo, Fredo. It would definitely be fun to see.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

If you think the Kavanaugh hearings were an evil circus, just wait for the chance of another Trump nominee in the event of another vacancy.

The Left is already manning the barricades. The resulting hearing will make the Brett Kavanaugh fiasco, a dark moment in U.S. history, look like a charming affair. In the event that President Donald Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett, as many conservatives hope, this hearing will be a preview of the Apocalypse.

Will they do anything to keep her from the bench? After all, she’s young and could be on the bench for decades to come.

Dianne Feinstein has already previewed a primary argument to be wielded against Barrett if she is nominated with Feinstein's "dogma lives loudly within you" comments in 2017. Democrats will argue that, as a believing Catholic, Barrett is somehow not qualified to be on the Supreme Court, that real believing Christians, vice the Nancy Pelosi variety, are biased and can't interpret the Constitution.

The hearing should make entertaining television. One has to hope it will come BEFORE the election so Dimocrap antics will be fresh in the minds of the voters.

More @ https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/08/democrats_brace_for_war_over_supreme_court.html

For years and longer the Democrats have used the Court system to control the laws of this Nation and they are losing grip on it. They ones who are left after the 2020 elections will throw every listed liar they have on the list. Most will be from the Higher Education list for this is the group they have brain washed the most. They would be willing to die "for the cause" . They have shown in the past how low they can and will go to stop anyone they see as a threat. This war was started with Clarence Thomas ran the mine field and was opposed by A Hill, with some of the most false statements I have ever heard. This same tactic was followed with Kavenaugh hearings. It was a farce. The Senate is controlled by the Republicans at this time and this is the only road block we have against the Commie Liberals. Be prepared for a blood fight. You like the old USSR then move there we don't want any part of it here.

 

[wamose]

And maybe if we can get Sotomayor to retire with Ginsburg we could replace them with Diamond and Silk. Of course Jesse Watters would clerk for them.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

If you think the Kavanaugh hearings were an evil circus, just wait for the chance of another Trump nominee in the event of another vacancy.

The Left is already manning the barricades. The resulting hearing will make the Brett Kavanaugh fiasco, a dark moment in U.S. history, look like a charming affair. In the event that President Donald Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett, as many conservatives hope, this hearing will be a preview of the Apocalypse.

Will they do anything to keep her from the bench? After all, she’s young and could be on the bench for decades to come.

Dianne Feinstein has already previewed a primary argument to be wielded against Barrett if she is nominated with Feinstein's "dogma lives loudly within you" comments in 2017. Democrats will argue that, as a believing Catholic, Barrett is somehow not qualified to be on the Supreme Court, that real believing Christians, vice the Nancy Pelosi variety, are biased and can't interpret the Constitution.

The hearing should make entertaining television. One has to hope it will come BEFORE the election so Dimocrap antics will be fresh in the minds of the voters.

More @ https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/08/democrats_brace_for_war_over_supreme_court.html

Won’t really matter

Trump only has two months before the Nov election, then we will be in an election year

Everyone knows Republicans do not fill SCOTUS vacancies in an election year

Mitch has stated "We will leave no vacancy unfilled."

Suck it up buttercup.

52 Republican Senators

Not one has the integrity to stand by the position they had in 2016?

A different situation, though you choose not to recognize it.

An election year is an election year
Either you wait for the vote to come in or you don’t

Allow me to rephrase - "Tough titty."

 

[rightwinger]

Won’t really matter

Trump only has two months before the Nov election, then we will be in an election year

Everyone knows Republicans do not fill SCOTUS vacancies in an election year

Mitch has stated "We will leave no vacancy unfilled."

Suck it up buttercup.

52 Republican Senators

Not one has the integrity to stand by the position they had in 2016?

A different situation, though you choose not to recognize it.

An election year is an election year
Either you wait for the vote to come in or you don’t

Allow me to rephrase - "Tough titty."

I have great faith in the integrity of the Republican Party

They are above petty partisan politics. Like they said in 2016, they care about the PEOPLE getting to decide who fills an empty Supreme Court seat during an election year

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Mitch has stated "We will leave no vacancy unfilled."

Suck it up buttercup.

52 Republican Senators

Not one has the integrity to stand by the position they had in 2016?

A different situation, though you choose not to recognize it.

An election year is an election year
Either you wait for the vote to come in or you don’t

Allow me to rephrase - "Tough titty."

I have great faith in the integrity of the Republican Party

They are above petty partisan politics. Like they said in 2016, they care about the PEOPLE getting to decide who fills an empty Supreme Court seat during an election year

No, they care about AMERICANS getting to decide who fills the seat.

 

[bendog]

Mitch has stated "We will leave no vacancy unfilled."

Suck it up buttercup.

52 Republican Senators

Not one has the integrity to stand by the position they had in 2016?

A different situation, though you choose not to recognize it.

An election year is an election year
Either you wait for the vote to come in or you don’t

Allow me to rephrase - "Tough titty."

I have great faith in the integrity of the Republican Party

They are above petty partisan politics. Like they said in 2016, they care about the PEOPLE getting to decide who fills an empty Supreme Court seat during an election year

You're killing me. LOL

If the seat is filled, the SC future will hang on Roberts. If he can convince the dems that he is applying the same analysis and rules to EO by dems as gopers, it may be ok. But I gotta say, it doesn't appear to me that Obama got the same deference that Trump is getting. Roberts can say Obama's were overturned because the const didn't explicitly give the potus the power do to what the EO did (like Daca), but conversely with Trump the congress explicitly gave the potus powers to declare emergencies. But, no one really, and not even the Trump admin, argues with a straight face that the emergency defense or economic powers were about immigration or trade disputes.

It will be a bad day if this happens.

 

[hadit]

If you think the Kavanaugh hearings were an evil circus, just wait for the chance of another Trump nominee in the event of another vacancy.

The Left is already manning the barricades. The resulting hearing will make the Brett Kavanaugh fiasco, a dark moment in U.S. history, look like a charming affair. In the event that President Donald Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett, as many conservatives hope, this hearing will be a preview of the Apocalypse.

Will they do anything to keep her from the bench? After all, she’s young and could be on the bench for decades to come.

Dianne Feinstein has already previewed a primary argument to be wielded against Barrett if she is nominated with Feinstein's "dogma lives loudly within you" comments in 2017. Democrats will argue that, as a believing Catholic, Barrett is somehow not qualified to be on the Supreme Court, that real believing Christians, vice the Nancy Pelosi variety, are biased and can't interpret the Constitution.

The hearing should make entertaining television. One has to hope it will come BEFORE the election so Dimocrap antics will be fresh in the minds of the voters.

More @ https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/08/democrats_brace_for_war_over_supreme_court.html

Won’t really matter

Trump only has two months before the Nov election, then we will be in an election year

Everyone knows Republicans do not fill SCOTUS vacancies in an election year

Mitch has stated "We will leave no vacancy unfilled."

Suck it up buttercup.

52 Republican Senators

Not one has the integrity to stand by the position they had in 2016?

Why would you expect different? Neither party has had that kind of integrity for decades. Face it, they're in power and will do exactly what the democrats would do.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Fairness in war makes for a poor strategy.

 

[rightwinger]

52 Republican Senators

Not one has the integrity to stand by the position they had in 2016?

A different situation, though you choose not to recognize it.

An election year is an election year
Either you wait for the vote to come in or you don’t

Allow me to rephrase - "Tough titty."

I have great faith in the integrity of the Republican Party

They are above petty partisan politics. Like they said in 2016, they care about the PEOPLE getting to decide who fills an empty Supreme Court seat during an election year

No, they care about AMERICANS getting to decide who fills the seat.

Damn Skippy
AMERICANS should decide who gets to fill a vacancy during an election year

Being true Americans, Republicans would NEVER allow such an important vacancy to be filled in an election year

 

[rightwinger]

If you think the Kavanaugh hearings were an evil circus, just wait for the chance of another Trump nominee in the event of another vacancy.

The Left is already manning the barricades. The resulting hearing will make the Brett Kavanaugh fiasco, a dark moment in U.S. history, look like a charming affair. In the event that President Donald Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett, as many conservatives hope, this hearing will be a preview of the Apocalypse.

Will they do anything to keep her from the bench? After all, she’s young and could be on the bench for decades to come.

Dianne Feinstein has already previewed a primary argument to be wielded against Barrett if she is nominated with Feinstein's "dogma lives loudly within you" comments in 2017. Democrats will argue that, as a believing Catholic, Barrett is somehow not qualified to be on the Supreme Court, that real believing Christians, vice the Nancy Pelosi variety, are biased and can't interpret the Constitution.

The hearing should make entertaining television. One has to hope it will come BEFORE the election so Dimocrap antics will be fresh in the minds of the voters.

More @ https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/08/democrats_brace_for_war_over_supreme_court.html

Won’t really matter

Trump only has two months before the Nov election, then we will be in an election year

Everyone knows Republicans do not fill SCOTUS vacancies in an election year

Mitch has stated "We will leave no vacancy unfilled."

Suck it up buttercup.

52 Republican Senators

Not one has the integrity to stand by the position they had in 2016?

Why would you expect different? Neither party has had that kind of integrity for decades. Face it, they're in power and will do exactly what the democrats would do.

When have Democrat’s ever done that?

It was REPUBLICANS who made it clear that it is inappropriate to fill a Supreme Court vacancy in an election year

 

[rightwinger]

52 Republican Senators

Not one has the integrity to stand by the position they had in 2016?

A different situation, though you choose not to recognize it.

An election year is an election year
Either you wait for the vote to come in or you don’t

Allow me to rephrase - "Tough titty."

I have great faith in the integrity of the Republican Party

They are above petty partisan politics. Like they said in 2016, they care about the PEOPLE getting to decide who fills an empty Supreme Court seat during an election year

You're killing me. LOL

If the seat is filled, the SC future will hang on Roberts. If he can convince the dems that he is applying the same analysis and rules to EO by dems as gopers, it may be ok. But I gotta say, it doesn't appear to me that Obama got the same deference that Trump is getting. Roberts can say Obama's were overturned because the const didn't explicitly give the potus the power do to what the EO did (like Daca), but conversely with Trump the congress explicitly gave the potus powers to declare emergencies. But, no one really, and not even the Trump admin, argues with a straight face that the emergency defense or economic powers were about immigration or trade disputes.

It will be a bad day if this happens.

This is Roberts Court
His legacy will be judged on how consistently and fairly his court rules

If it devolves into a partisan court intent on protecting one parties position....that will be the Roberts Court

 

[francoHFW]

If you think the Kavanaugh hearings were an evil circus, just wait for the chance of another Trump nominee in the event of another vacancy.

The Left is already manning the barricades. The resulting hearing will make the Brett Kavanaugh fiasco, a dark moment in U.S. history, look like a charming affair. In the event that President Donald Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett, as many conservatives hope, this hearing will be a preview of the Apocalypse.

Will they do anything to keep her from the bench? After all, she’s young and could be on the bench for decades to come.

Dianne Feinstein has already previewed a primary argument to be wielded against Barrett if she is nominated with Feinstein's "dogma lives loudly within you" comments in 2017. Democrats will argue that, as a believing Catholic, Barrett is somehow not qualified to be on the Supreme Court, that real believing Christians, vice the Nancy Pelosi variety, are biased and can't interpret the Constitution.

The hearing should make entertaining television. One has to hope it will come BEFORE the election so Dimocrap antics will be fresh in the minds of the voters.

More @ https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/08/democrats_brace_for_war_over_supreme_court.html

Life is so exciting in your imaginary GOP dupe universe. Luckily Supreme Court nominees are educated judges and not brainwashed idiots like you. So as bad as GOP Supremes are, they are far from GOP dupes, dumbass.