Democrats are now party of the rich

Just for you, the top donors for the 2022 mid-terms: Who are the Biggest Donors?


The top 10 donors contributed $537,918,512 to Republicans, and $301,808,165 to Democrats.

No matter what year you look at, Dude, the Republican donors smoke the Democrats.

It's time to stop making an ass of yourself. You've been gaslighted. Time to wake up.
And he was brainwashed to only complain about soros.

Just like he cared about pelosi insider trading but not trump.

Or he cares Hillary uses private emails but not Pete hegseth

Or he cared about hunter but not Don and Eric.

He’s a typical Republican idiot or liar
 
You're being troll food. He/She/It/WTF? is not here to discuss politics, He/She/It/WTF? is just here to troll and get on your nerves.
You added nothing to the discussion and you’re trying to save him. I’m rationally giving examples of how you republicans are the party of the rich.

Elon, first trillionaire is maga no? Tax cuts to him, cuts to social programs. Firing workers who organize into unions? Yea, that’s why you’re the troll.

Unless you got something to add?
 
You added nothing to the discussion and you’re trying to save him. I’m rationally giving examples of how you republicans are the party of the rich.

Elon, first trillionaire is maga no? Tax cuts to him, cuts to social programs. Firing workers who organize into unions? Yea, that’s why you’re the troll.

Unless you got something to add?

fishing.gif
 
Fair exchange is no robbery.
It seems I've stumped the two of you. Go ahead and just ignore all the obvious evidence that the GOP is the party of the rich. Like when the jobs numbers suck you go right to "have you checked your 401K lately?" Or inflation is killing the masses, have you checked your 401K? Yes I have. Thank you. But it'll go down eventually too you know. Will you blame Trump then? Nope? Well then. And will you give Biden credit when he does stuff that's pro middle class and the stock market goes up? The trade off is the middle class does a little better under Democrats. That's the point.

And what you and this other fool are doing is paramount to asking me what a woman is. You're not proving anything with your comments. It's as if you've given up on trying. But then you will just circle back around and make the same bad arguments all over again eventually. See you then stupid.
 
You must not understand. You are one of those MAGA low information Republican voters. I'll explain it to you

It is not that $250K is rich, but rather that they stop paying social security tax once their earnings hit a specific legal limit, known as the contribution and benefit base or "taxable maximum".

  • A person earning $250,000 will pay the 6.2% Social Security payroll tax on their first $184,500 of income (amounting to $11,439).
  • The "exemption" point: Any earnings above that $184,500 cap escape the Social Security tax entirely.
  • The outcome: Someone making $250,000 OR MORE pays the exact same amount into the system as someone making $184,500, meaning they pay a lower effective payroll tax rate on their overall income.

Under the Social Security Expansion Act proposed by Senator Bernie Sanders, the rule that high earners stop paying into Social Security at an income cap would be eliminated. His plan requires people who make over $250,000 to pay Social Security taxes on all of their income above that threshold

Now, ONLY the party for the rich would argue against this.

I understand it completely. What Bernie saying is that SOME people pay more into SD on money they will never get back, unless they are raising the benefit as well, which they aren't. This would affect me and my family.

You are one of those that isn't affected so doesn't bother themselves with the details.
 
Analyses from the Congressional Budget Office and various nonpartisan think tanks indicate that the "Big Beautiful Bill" (BBB) significantly favors wealthy households and corporations. Critics argue this structure creates the largest upward transfer of wealth in U.S. history by combining tax breaks for the ultrarich with deep cuts to social safety nets.

More poor people vote Democratic than vote Republican. If that's true, are we supposed to believe that elections aren't rigged in red states?

Let me explain wealthy Democrats like Taylor Swift. She's not a corporation. Corporations don't care. She's self made. She feels lucky not entitled like Baron Trump. She can always make more. People who are self made tend to be more liberal. They don't forget where they came from. The Trump's don't forget where they came from either. Started playing baseball on 3rd base.

All the actors are liberal and rich. They didn't become asshole greedy Republicans. Some do. Like Kanye West. Bruce Jenner has always been a conservative but clearly it's about money for him. Why else would Bruce Jenner vote GOP?

You are SO duped. Rich Democrats in blue states went nuts when Trump capped the SALT deduction at 10k. Why do you think that was? They like to talk a big game, but when the rubber meets the road, they protect themselves. They are social justices warriors who rarely put their money where their mouth is.
 
Then I'd have to reside thete though when that's not my place I want to live. No thanks.

That's on you. I live in a red state/area with lower taxes(still too high) and a lower cost of living all with lower crime rates. You couldn't pay me twice that to live in and around a big blue city or state.
 
An average people who go to college earn 2.5x in a lifetime more than people who don't.

Also, the more education the higher likelihood they will vote Democratic. Lower educated people tend to vote more republican.

And yet the poorest the poor vote Democrat and as income rises as does the tendency to vote Republican. Weird huh?
 
And yet the poorest the poor vote Democrat and as income rises as does the tendency to vote Republican. Weird huh?
I do not have any idea what the **** you’re posting about.

Can you present some facts or something?

Your orange deer leader loves the lower educated. Why is that?
 
Depending on where you are 250k might just be subsistence level.

True. Democrats prefer to limp them all into one basic and use income levels as a reference to success wothout taking into account cost of living. To them, a Republican engineer making 200k in a rural area of a red state is the same as a Democrat garbage collector in NYC making the same with a much higher cost of living, thus a much lower standard of living. This phenomenon boosts the average Democrat's income, but doesn't speak to their level of success relative to many Republicans.
 
15th post
I do not have any idea what the **** you’re posting about.

Can you present some facts or something?

Your orange deer leader loves the lower educated. Why is that?

You didn't know that the poorest people in the country vote heavily democratic? Wow.
 
True. Democrats prefer to limp them all into one basic and use income levels as a reference to success wothout taking into account cost of living. To them, a Republican engineer making 200k in a rural area of a red state is the same as a Democrat garbage collector in NYC making the same with a much higher cost of living, thus a much lower standard of living. This phenomenon boosts the average Democrat's income, but doesn't speak to their level of success relative to many Republicans.
Hilarious sue.

Where is the nations GDP produced?
 
You didn't know that the poorest people in the country vote heavily democratic? Wow.
OK Sue, post the evidence that would convince anyone that that is true.

I’ll wait for your desperate Google search and then leaving the thread.
 
Back
Top Bottom