Democrats and reparations....the truth about slavery....

Obviously they werent as a conservative as the democrats. They were for freeing the enslaved. What kind of dumbass are you? :laugh:



Since you are obviously stupid...I will forgive your stupidity......racism is the heart and soul of the democrat party.....every single core group of the democrats is openly and proudly racist.......please...try to deny that....
if you mean the conservative democrats during slavery I agree.


And conservative Republicans freed the slaves.....

The civil war and john brown freed the slaves. Lincoln, a republican (before the dixiecrats took over the republican party during the civil rights movement upon leaving the democratic party in a snit for siding with the civil rights movement,)
was president and issued the proclamation. Hardly "conservative".


But if you're more comfortable with revisionism no one can help you. And would be kinda silly for trying. So I'll stop Stay "safe" in your illusion pard.


So genius....the rabid racists joined the actual party that actually passed the Civil Rights acts, fought along side blacks against the democrats, forced open the democrat schools in the south using federal troops......

And you really believe the racists left the democrat party to join the party that did all that.......wow.....you really need help....
Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond, etc, look it up or remain in your bubble, your choice. Bubble heads on "both" sides are too dilusional to help. I don't really mind if you choose ignorance.
 
Do you deny that the democrat party was the party of the slave owners...who fought to keep slaves, fought to bring slaves into the new states, and fought to re open the slave trade with Africa.....

We all know the history and when the dixiecrats switched over to the republican party. The rest of it is moral relativism. Ain't ya'll agin that?


No...actually they didn't....the racists stayed in the democrat party.....the democrats, especially the young ones, who didn't want to obsess with race in every aspect of life became republicans.....

I can't discuss anything with someone who won't accept reality, take care.

Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond. Nevermind, enjoy your illusion.


Robert Byrd, Al gores father, j. william fulbright....bill clintons good friend and political mentor....bull conner....all the actual racists stayed in the democrat party...they did not switch sides...

Lyndon Johnson...another racist....was a smart racist...he realized that the democrats could not murder enough blacks to keep them from voting...you know he voted against the anti lynching laws pushed by repubicans...right? So what johnson did.....he bought black votes with government welfare....and stated that that was his plan......

The racist party was, is and always will be the democrat party...

obama is racist, the clintons are racists....every core group of the democrat party is openly and proudly racist....

I'll take a racist like LBJ any day. Go look at the legislation he signed off on bubby.


Yes......all meant to enslave blacks but they no longer needed whips, chains and nooses to do it....and look at how well blacks have done under this democrat benevolence......
 
Since you are obviously stupid...I will forgive your stupidity......racism is the heart and soul of the democrat party.....every single core group of the democrats is openly and proudly racist.......please...try to deny that....
if you mean the conservative democrats during slavery I agree.


And conservative Republicans freed the slaves.....

The civil war and john brown freed the slaves. Lincoln, a republican (before the dixiecrats took over the republican party during the civil rights movement upon leaving the democratic party in a snit for siding with the civil rights movement,)
was president and issued the proclamation. Hardly "conservative".


But if you're more comfortable with revisionism no one can help you. And would be kinda silly for trying. So I'll stop Stay "safe" in your illusion pard.


So genius....the rabid racists joined the actual party that actually passed the Civil Rights acts, fought along side blacks against the democrats, forced open the democrat schools in the south using federal troops......

And you really believe the racists left the democrat party to join the party that did all that.......wow.....you really need help....
Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond, etc, look it up or remain in your bubble, your choice. Bubble heads on "both" sides are too dilusional to help. I don't really mind if you choose ignorance.


Thurmond gave up his racism to join the Republicans.....al gore sr., j. william fulbright, robert byrd...all racists...all stayed in the democrat party.....

you guys will buy any horse shit the democrats tell you....
 
if you mean the conservative democrats during slavery I agree.


And conservative Republicans freed the slaves.....

The civil war and john brown freed the slaves. Lincoln, a republican (before the dixiecrats took over the republican party during the civil rights movement upon leaving the democratic party in a snit for siding with the civil rights movement,)
was president and issued the proclamation. Hardly "conservative".


But if you're more comfortable with revisionism no one can help you. And would be kinda silly for trying. So I'll stop Stay "safe" in your illusion pard.


So genius....the rabid racists joined the actual party that actually passed the Civil Rights acts, fought along side blacks against the democrats, forced open the democrat schools in the south using federal troops......

And you really believe the racists left the democrat party to join the party that did all that.......wow.....you really need help....
Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond, etc, look it up or remain in your bubble, your choice. Bubble heads on "both" sides are too dilusional to help. I don't really mind if you choose ignorance.


Thurmond gave up his racism to join the Republicans.....al gore sr., j. william fulbright, robert byrd...all racists...all stayed in the democrat party.....

you guys will buy any horse shit the democrats tell you....


I read it all and came to my own conclusiom rejecting "both" sides. You might want to try reaching your own conclusion someday.
 
We all know the history and when the dixiecrats switched over to the republican party. The rest of it is moral relativism. Ain't ya'll agin that?


No...actually they didn't....the racists stayed in the democrat party.....the democrats, especially the young ones, who didn't want to obsess with race in every aspect of life became republicans.....

I can't discuss anything with someone who won't accept reality, take care.

Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond. Nevermind, enjoy your illusion.


Robert Byrd, Al gores father, j. william fulbright....bill clintons good friend and political mentor....bull conner....all the actual racists stayed in the democrat party...they did not switch sides...

Lyndon Johnson...another racist....was a smart racist...he realized that the democrats could not murder enough blacks to keep them from voting...you know he voted against the anti lynching laws pushed by repubicans...right? So what johnson did.....he bought black votes with government welfare....and stated that that was his plan......

The racist party was, is and always will be the democrat party...

obama is racist, the clintons are racists....every core group of the democrat party is openly and proudly racist....

I'll take a racist like LBJ any day. Go look at the legislation he signed off on bubby.


Yes......all meant to enslave blacks but they no longer needed whips, chains and nooses to do it....and look at how well blacks have done under this democrat benevolence......

What black folk have suffered in America is American. Has nothing to do with political parties at all.
 
No...actually they didn't....the racists stayed in the democrat party.....the democrats, especially the young ones, who didn't want to obsess with race in every aspect of life became republicans.....

I can't discuss anything with someone who won't accept reality, take care.

Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond. Nevermind, enjoy your illusion.


Robert Byrd, Al gores father, j. william fulbright....bill clintons good friend and political mentor....bull conner....all the actual racists stayed in the democrat party...they did not switch sides...

Lyndon Johnson...another racist....was a smart racist...he realized that the democrats could not murder enough blacks to keep them from voting...you know he voted against the anti lynching laws pushed by repubicans...right? So what johnson did.....he bought black votes with government welfare....and stated that that was his plan......

The racist party was, is and always will be the democrat party...

obama is racist, the clintons are racists....every core group of the democrat party is openly and proudly racist....

I'll take a racist like LBJ any day. Go look at the legislation he signed off on bubby.


Yes......all meant to enslave blacks but they no longer needed whips, chains and nooses to do it....and look at how well blacks have done under this democrat benevolence......

What black folk have suffered in America is American. Has nothing to do with political parties at all.


Except the Republicans freed the slaves from their democrat owners and then fought with the newly freed blacks to get them all of their rights.........as the democrats murdered both blacks and Republicans to stop it.....
 
No...actually they didn't....the racists stayed in the democrat party.....the democrats, especially the young ones, who didn't want to obsess with race in every aspect of life became republicans.....

I can't discuss anything with someone who won't accept reality, take care.

Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond. Nevermind, enjoy your illusion.


Robert Byrd, Al gores father, j. william fulbright....bill clintons good friend and political mentor....bull conner....all the actual racists stayed in the democrat party...they did not switch sides...

Lyndon Johnson...another racist....was a smart racist...he realized that the democrats could not murder enough blacks to keep them from voting...you know he voted against the anti lynching laws pushed by repubicans...right? So what johnson did.....he bought black votes with government welfare....and stated that that was his plan......

The racist party was, is and always will be the democrat party...

obama is racist, the clintons are racists....every core group of the democrat party is openly and proudly racist....

I'll take a racist like LBJ any day. Go look at the legislation he signed off on bubby.


Yes......all meant to enslave blacks but they no longer needed whips, chains and nooses to do it....and look at how well blacks have done under this democrat benevolence......

What black folk have suffered in America is American. Has nothing to do with political parties at all.


Even wikipedia can't keep the lie going....

Dixiecrat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The States' Rights Democratic Party opposed racial integration and wanted to retain Jim Crow laws and white supremacy in the face of possible federal intervention. Members were called Dixiecrats. (The term Dixiecrat is aportmanteau of Dixie, referring to the Southern United States, and Democrat.)

The party did not run local or state candidates, and after the 1948 election its leaders generally returned to the Democratic Party.[
 
I can't discuss anything with someone who won't accept reality, take care.

Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond. Nevermind, enjoy your illusion.


Robert Byrd, Al gores father, j. william fulbright....bill clintons good friend and political mentor....bull conner....all the actual racists stayed in the democrat party...they did not switch sides...

Lyndon Johnson...another racist....was a smart racist...he realized that the democrats could not murder enough blacks to keep them from voting...you know he voted against the anti lynching laws pushed by repubicans...right? So what johnson did.....he bought black votes with government welfare....and stated that that was his plan......

The racist party was, is and always will be the democrat party...

obama is racist, the clintons are racists....every core group of the democrat party is openly and proudly racist....

I'll take a racist like LBJ any day. Go look at the legislation he signed off on bubby.


Yes......all meant to enslave blacks but they no longer needed whips, chains and nooses to do it....and look at how well blacks have done under this democrat benevolence......

What black folk have suffered in America is American. Has nothing to do with political parties at all.


Except the Republicans freed the slaves from their democrat owners and then fought with the newly freed blacks to get them all of their rights.........as the democrats murdered both blacks and Republicans to stop it.....

Yes, yes, of course, you're sooooooooooooooooooooo right.
 
Since you are obviously stupid...I will forgive your stupidity......racism is the heart and soul of the democrat party.....every single core group of the democrats is openly and proudly racist.......please...try to deny that....
if you mean the conservative democrats during slavery I agree.


And conservative Republicans freed the slaves.....

The civil war and john brown freed the slaves. Lincoln, a republican (before the dixiecrats took over the republican party during the civil rights movement upon leaving the democratic party in a snit for siding with the civil rights movement,)
was president and issued the proclamation. Hardly "conservative".


But if you're more comfortable with revisionism no one can help you. And would be kinda silly for trying. So I'll stop Stay "safe" in your illusion pard.


So genius....the rabid racists joined the actual party that actually passed the Civil Rights acts, fought along side blacks against the democrats, forced open the democrat schools in the south using federal troops......

And you really believe the racists left the democrat party to join the party that did all that.......wow.....you really need help....
Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond, etc, look it up or remain in your bubble, your choice. Bubble heads on "both" sides are too dilusional to help. I don't really mind if you choose ignorance.


And of course...you are wrong.....being a lefty you are used to that though.......

The Myth of Republican Racism, by Mona Charen, National Review

Okay, but didn’t all the old segregationist senators leave the Democratic party and become Republicans after 1964? No, just one did: Strom Thurmond. The rest remained in the Democratic party — including former Klansman Robert Byrd, who became president pro tempore of the Senate.





Former racists of both parties renounced their old views (as Kevin D. Williamson points out, Lyndon Johnson himself voted against anti-lynching laws and poll-tax repeals), and neither party has a perfect record on racial matters by any stretch.

But it is a libel to suggest that the Republican party, the anti-slavery party, the party of Lincoln, and the party that traditionally supported civil rights, anti-lynching laws, and integration, became the racist party after 1964.

The “solid south” Democratic voting pattern began to break down not in the 1960s in response to civil rights but in the 1950s in response to economic development and the Cold War.

(Black voters in the north, who had been reliable Republicans, began to abandon the GOP in response to the New Deal, encouraged by activists like Robert Vann to “turn Lincoln’s picture to the wall. That debt has been paid in full.”)

In the 1940s, the GOP garnered only about 25 percent of southern votes.

The big break came with Eisenhower’s victories. Significant percentages of white southerners voted for Ike even though the Democratic party remained firmly segregationist and even though Eisenhower backed two civil-rights bills and enforced the Brown decision by federalizing the National Guard.

They also began to send GOP representatives to the House. These Republican gains came not from the most rural and “deep south” regions, but rather from the newer cities and suburbs. If the new southern Republican voters were white racists, one would have expected Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia to be the first to turn.


Instead, as Gerard Alexander notes in “The Myth of the Racist Republicans,” the turn toward the GOP began in Virginia, North Carolina, Texas, Tennessee, and Florida. Eisenhower did best in the peripheral states.

Alexander concludes: “The GOP’s southern electorate was not rural, nativist, less educated, afraid of change, or concentrated in the . . . Deep South. It was disproportionately suburban, middle-class, educated, young, non-native southern, and concentrated in the growth points that were the least ‘Southern’ parts of the south.”

Read more at: The Myth of Republican Racism, by Mona Charen, National Review
 
I can't discuss anything with someone who won't accept reality, take care.

Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond. Nevermind, enjoy your illusion.


Robert Byrd, Al gores father, j. william fulbright....bill clintons good friend and political mentor....bull conner....all the actual racists stayed in the democrat party...they did not switch sides...

Lyndon Johnson...another racist....was a smart racist...he realized that the democrats could not murder enough blacks to keep them from voting...you know he voted against the anti lynching laws pushed by repubicans...right? So what johnson did.....he bought black votes with government welfare....and stated that that was his plan......

The racist party was, is and always will be the democrat party...

obama is racist, the clintons are racists....every core group of the democrat party is openly and proudly racist....

I'll take a racist like LBJ any day. Go look at the legislation he signed off on bubby.


Yes......all meant to enslave blacks but they no longer needed whips, chains and nooses to do it....and look at how well blacks have done under this democrat benevolence......

What black folk have suffered in America is American. Has nothing to do with political parties at all.


Even wikipedia can't keep the lie going....

Dixiecrat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The States' Rights Democratic Party opposed racial integration and wanted to retain Jim Crow laws and white supremacy in the face of possible federal intervention. Members were called Dixiecrats. (The term Dixiecrat is aportmanteau of Dixie, referring to the Southern United States, and Democrat.)

The party did not run local or state candidates, and after the 1948 election its leaders generally returned to the Democratic Party.[


Really?

In the decades that followed Reconstruction the Democratic Party experienced change and evolution regarding its official views on a number of issues including Civil Rights and Integration. Southern Democrats had begun to feel extremely uncomfortable in the party that they viewed as having become far too liberal. In 1947 President Harry S. Truman gave a speech to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) that called for the federal government to be the vigilant protector of the civil rights of all Americans. Truman repeated the phrase "all Americans" leaving no doubt that he meant African Americans should be among those who were guaranteed equality of opportunity. This speech was anathema to the southern Democrats who were staunch supporters of Segregation and the preservation of "white power". In 1948 the Republicans, for the second time, chose New York governor thomas e. dewey to be their presidential candidate. In July 1948 the Democrats held a convention in which they nominated Harry S. Truman, the former vice-president who had succeeded franklin d. roosevelt when the latter died on April 12, 1945. The linchpin of the 1948 Democratic Party platform became its support for civil rights legislation. Many Democrats were wary of supporting the platform because they feared that the party would splinter over the opposing views of civil rights. The delegates from the southern states were vocal in their opposition, and other delegates began to waver. Then hubert h. humphrey, the delegate from Minnesota and mayor of Minneapolis, gave a speech in which he urged his fellow delegates to "get out of the shadow of states' rights and walk forth-rightly into the bright sunshine of human rights!" Humphrey's passionate words were the catalyst for the majority of the Democratic Party delegates to vote for the platform planks that called for a federal anti-lynching law, the Abolition of poll taxes in federal elections, desegregation of the armed forces, and creation of a permanent Fair Employment Practices Committee that would prevent racial discrimination in federal jobs.
As many had feared, a majority of southern delegates, including all 22 members of the Mississippi delegation and 13 from Alabama, walked out of the convention and formed their own party—the States' Rights Democratic Party. The Dixiecrats, as they were also known, held a one-day convention on July 17, 1948, in Birmingham, Alabama, in which they nominated South Carolina governor strom thurmond for president and chose Mississippi governor Fielding L. Wright as their vice-presidential candidate.
The States' Rights Party sought to take votes from both the Democratic and Republican parties by emphasizing the sovereignty of the states and by denouncing Truman and the Democratic Party's proposed civil rights legislation as an immense threat to the states. In Alabama the Dixiecrats succeeded in preventing President Truman's name from being placed on the election ballot.
The Democratic Party was greatly weakened by the defection of the conservative Dixiecrats and also by the liberals who had left to join the Progressive Party that nominated former vice president and secretary of agriculture Henry A. Wallace to be its presidential candidate. Nevertheless, President Harry S. Truman won reelection. Although Truman was reelected over Dewey by a very narrow margin, that vote resulted in the biggest upset in the history of United States presidential campaigns.
The States' Rights Party carried South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama. Thurmond and Wright received approximately 1.2 million votes and 39 electoral votes. In 1954 Thurmond was elected as a Democratic senator. Thurmond joined with other conservative Democrats and used the filibuster and other political strategies to oppose civil rights legislation. Thurmond was reelected in 1956 and 1960. In 1964 Thurmond led a number of conservative southern national and state elected officials who switched from the Democratic to the Republican Party. Thurmond was reelected in 1966, 1972, 1978, 1984, 1990, and 1996. After being reelected in 1996 the 94-year-old Thurmond, announced that he would finish out his term but would no longer run for reelection.

Dixiecrat
 
if you mean the conservative democrats during slavery I agree.


And conservative Republicans freed the slaves.....

The civil war and john brown freed the slaves. Lincoln, a republican (before the dixiecrats took over the republican party during the civil rights movement upon leaving the democratic party in a snit for siding with the civil rights movement,)
was president and issued the proclamation. Hardly "conservative".


But if you're more comfortable with revisionism no one can help you. And would be kinda silly for trying. So I'll stop Stay "safe" in your illusion pard.


So genius....the rabid racists joined the actual party that actually passed the Civil Rights acts, fought along side blacks against the democrats, forced open the democrat schools in the south using federal troops......

And you really believe the racists left the democrat party to join the party that did all that.......wow.....you really need help....
Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond, etc, look it up or remain in your bubble, your choice. Bubble heads on "both" sides are too dilusional to help. I don't really mind if you choose ignorance.


And of course...you are wrong.....being a lefty you are used to that though.......

The Myth of Republican Racism, by Mona Charen, National Review

Okay, but didn’t all the old segregationist senators leave the Democratic party and become Republicans after 1964? No, just one did: Strom Thurmond. The rest remained in the Democratic party — including former Klansman Robert Byrd, who became president pro tempore of the Senate.





Former racists of both parties renounced their old views (as Kevin D. Williamson points out, Lyndon Johnson himself voted against anti-lynching laws and poll-tax repeals), and neither party has a perfect record on racial matters by any stretch.

But it is a libel to suggest that the Republican party, the anti-slavery party, the party of Lincoln, and the party that traditionally supported civil rights, anti-lynching laws, and integration, became the racist party after 1964.

The “solid south” Democratic voting pattern began to break down not in the 1960s in response to civil rights but in the 1950s in response to economic development and the Cold War.

(Black voters in the north, who had been reliable Republicans, began to abandon the GOP in response to the New Deal, encouraged by activists like Robert Vann to “turn Lincoln’s picture to the wall. That debt has been paid in full.”)

In the 1940s, the GOP garnered only about 25 percent of southern votes.

The big break came with Eisenhower’s victories. Significant percentages of white southerners voted for Ike even though the Democratic party remained firmly segregationist and even though Eisenhower backed two civil-rights bills and enforced the Brown decision by federalizing the National Guard.

They also began to send GOP representatives to the House. These Republican gains came not from the most rural and “deep south” regions, but rather from the newer cities and suburbs. If the new southern Republican voters were white racists, one would have expected Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia to be the first to turn.


Instead, as Gerard Alexander notes in “The Myth of the Racist Republicans,” the turn toward the GOP began in Virginia, North Carolina, Texas, Tennessee, and Florida. Eisenhower did best in the peripheral states.

Alexander concludes: “The GOP’s southern electorate was not rural, nativist, less educated, afraid of change, or concentrated in the . . . Deep South. It was disproportionately suburban, middle-class, educated, young, non-native southern, and concentrated in the growth points that were the least ‘Southern’ parts of the south.”

Read more at: The Myth of Republican Racism, by Mona Charen, National Review

No one doubts that you can find a link and stay in your illusion, that's exactly what the National Review is all about. I'll leave my fellow citizens to make up their own minds about your party. All it takes to be a "libera leftist" is to disagree with you, that's all it means. lSome rubes still think that America's founding was all about freedom too.
 
Robert Byrd, Al gores father, j. william fulbright....bill clintons good friend and political mentor....bull conner....all the actual racists stayed in the democrat party...they did not switch sides...

Lyndon Johnson...another racist....was a smart racist...he realized that the democrats could not murder enough blacks to keep them from voting...you know he voted against the anti lynching laws pushed by repubicans...right? So what johnson did.....he bought black votes with government welfare....and stated that that was his plan......

The racist party was, is and always will be the democrat party...

obama is racist, the clintons are racists....every core group of the democrat party is openly and proudly racist....

I'll take a racist like LBJ any day. Go look at the legislation he signed off on bubby.


Yes......all meant to enslave blacks but they no longer needed whips, chains and nooses to do it....and look at how well blacks have done under this democrat benevolence......

What black folk have suffered in America is American. Has nothing to do with political parties at all.


Even wikipedia can't keep the lie going....

Dixiecrat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The States' Rights Democratic Party opposed racial integration and wanted to retain Jim Crow laws and white supremacy in the face of possible federal intervention. Members were called Dixiecrats. (The term Dixiecrat is aportmanteau of Dixie, referring to the Southern United States, and Democrat.)

The party did not run local or state candidates, and after the 1948 election its leaders generally returned to the Democratic Party.[


Really?

In the decades that followed Reconstruction the Democratic Party experienced change and evolution regarding its official views on a number of issues including Civil Rights and Integration. Southern Democrats had begun to feel extremely uncomfortable in the party that they viewed as having become far too liberal. In 1947 President Harry S. Truman gave a speech to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) that called for the federal government to be the vigilant protector of the civil rights of all Americans. Truman repeated the phrase "all Americans" leaving no doubt that he meant African Americans should be among those who were guaranteed equality of opportunity. This speech was anathema to the southern Democrats who were staunch supporters of Segregation and the preservation of "white power". In 1948 the Republicans, for the second time, chose New York governor thomas e. dewey to be their presidential candidate. In July 1948 the Democrats held a convention in which they nominated Harry S. Truman, the former vice-president who had succeeded franklin d. roosevelt when the latter died on April 12, 1945. The linchpin of the 1948 Democratic Party platform became its support for civil rights legislation. Many Democrats were wary of supporting the platform because they feared that the party would splinter over the opposing views of civil rights. The delegates from the southern states were vocal in their opposition, and other delegates began to waver. Then hubert h. humphrey, the delegate from Minnesota and mayor of Minneapolis, gave a speech in which he urged his fellow delegates to "get out of the shadow of states' rights and walk forth-rightly into the bright sunshine of human rights!" Humphrey's passionate words were the catalyst for the majority of the Democratic Party delegates to vote for the platform planks that called for a federal anti-lynching law, the Abolition of poll taxes in federal elections, desegregation of the armed forces, and creation of a permanent Fair Employment Practices Committee that would prevent racial discrimination in federal jobs.
As many had feared, a majority of southern delegates, including all 22 members of the Mississippi delegation and 13 from Alabama, walked out of the convention and formed their own party—the States' Rights Democratic Party. The Dixiecrats, as they were also known, held a one-day convention on July 17, 1948, in Birmingham, Alabama, in which they nominated South Carolina governor strom thurmond for president and chose Mississippi governor Fielding L. Wright as their vice-presidential candidate.
The States' Rights Party sought to take votes from both the Democratic and Republican parties by emphasizing the sovereignty of the states and by denouncing Truman and the Democratic Party's proposed civil rights legislation as an immense threat to the states. In Alabama the Dixiecrats succeeded in preventing President Truman's name from being placed on the election ballot.
The Democratic Party was greatly weakened by the defection of the conservative Dixiecrats and also by the liberals who had left to join the Progressive Party that nominated former vice president and secretary of agriculture Henry A. Wallace to be its presidential candidate. Nevertheless, President Harry S. Truman won reelection. Although Truman was reelected over Dewey by a very narrow margin, that vote resulted in the biggest upset in the history of United States presidential campaigns.
The States' Rights Party carried South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama. Thurmond and Wright received approximately 1.2 million votes and 39 electoral votes. In 1954 Thurmond was elected as a Democratic senator. Thurmond joined with other conservative Democrats and used the filibuster and other political strategies to oppose civil rights legislation. Thurmond was reelected in 1956 and 1960. In 1964 Thurmond led a number of conservative southern national and state elected officials who switched from the Democratic to the Republican Party. Thurmond was reelected in 1966, 1972, 1978, 1984, 1990, and 1996. After being reelected in 1996 the 94-year-old Thurmond, announced that he would finish out his term but would no longer run for reelection.

Dixiecrat


And again...


Dixiecrat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The States' Rights Democratic Party opposed racial integration and wanted to retain Jim Crow laws and white supremacy in the face of possible federal intervention. Members were called Dixiecrats. (The term Dixiecrat is aportmanteau of Dixie, referring to the Southern United States, and Democrat.)

The party did not run local or state candidates, and after the 1948 election its leaders generally returned to the Democratic Party.[


You listed one guy....who stopped being a racist...off the top of my head I gave you 3....and all three of them robert byrd, al gore sr. and j. william fulbright, not only stayed in the democrat party, they were leaders in the party.........all racists...and all democrats....and LBJ was the biggest racist of all......he voted against the anti lynching laws...do you realize that?

Again.....you believe that the democrats...who supported slavery, jim crow, segregtion, lynching, poll taxes and literacy tests., using troops to keep black kids out of white schools....all of a sudden decided to switch sides and join the political party responsible for stopping all of that stuff.....you really are dumb.
 
And conservative Republicans freed the slaves.....

The civil war and john brown freed the slaves. Lincoln, a republican (before the dixiecrats took over the republican party during the civil rights movement upon leaving the democratic party in a snit for siding with the civil rights movement,)
was president and issued the proclamation. Hardly "conservative".


But if you're more comfortable with revisionism no one can help you. And would be kinda silly for trying. So I'll stop Stay "safe" in your illusion pard.


So genius....the rabid racists joined the actual party that actually passed the Civil Rights acts, fought along side blacks against the democrats, forced open the democrat schools in the south using federal troops......

And you really believe the racists left the democrat party to join the party that did all that.......wow.....you really need help....
Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond, etc, look it up or remain in your bubble, your choice. Bubble heads on "both" sides are too dilusional to help. I don't really mind if you choose ignorance.


And of course...you are wrong.....being a lefty you are used to that though.......

The Myth of Republican Racism, by Mona Charen, National Review

Okay, but didn’t all the old segregationist senators leave the Democratic party and become Republicans after 1964? No, just one did: Strom Thurmond. The rest remained in the Democratic party — including former Klansman Robert Byrd, who became president pro tempore of the Senate.





Former racists of both parties renounced their old views (as Kevin D. Williamson points out, Lyndon Johnson himself voted against anti-lynching laws and poll-tax repeals), and neither party has a perfect record on racial matters by any stretch.

But it is a libel to suggest that the Republican party, the anti-slavery party, the party of Lincoln, and the party that traditionally supported civil rights, anti-lynching laws, and integration, became the racist party after 1964.

The “solid south” Democratic voting pattern began to break down not in the 1960s in response to civil rights but in the 1950s in response to economic development and the Cold War.

(Black voters in the north, who had been reliable Republicans, began to abandon the GOP in response to the New Deal, encouraged by activists like Robert Vann to “turn Lincoln’s picture to the wall. That debt has been paid in full.”)

In the 1940s, the GOP garnered only about 25 percent of southern votes.

The big break came with Eisenhower’s victories. Significant percentages of white southerners voted for Ike even though the Democratic party remained firmly segregationist and even though Eisenhower backed two civil-rights bills and enforced the Brown decision by federalizing the National Guard.

They also began to send GOP representatives to the House. These Republican gains came not from the most rural and “deep south” regions, but rather from the newer cities and suburbs. If the new southern Republican voters were white racists, one would have expected Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia to be the first to turn.


Instead, as Gerard Alexander notes in “The Myth of the Racist Republicans,” the turn toward the GOP began in Virginia, North Carolina, Texas, Tennessee, and Florida. Eisenhower did best in the peripheral states.

Alexander concludes: “The GOP’s southern electorate was not rural, nativist, less educated, afraid of change, or concentrated in the . . . Deep South. It was disproportionately suburban, middle-class, educated, young, non-native southern, and concentrated in the growth points that were the least ‘Southern’ parts of the south.”

Read more at: The Myth of Republican Racism, by Mona Charen, National Review

No one doubts that you can find a link and stay in your illusion, that's exactly what the National Review is all about. I'll leave my fellow citizens to make up their own minds about your party. All it takes to be a "libera leftist" is to disagree with you, that's all it means. lSome rubes still think that America's founding was all about freedom too.


Yes....the Founding of the United States was all about freedom....you have that right........that is why democrats and the left hate the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.....all they want is power...and those two things limit their ability to amass power....
 
I'll take a racist like LBJ any day. Go look at the legislation he signed off on bubby.


Yes......all meant to enslave blacks but they no longer needed whips, chains and nooses to do it....and look at how well blacks have done under this democrat benevolence......

What black folk have suffered in America is American. Has nothing to do with political parties at all.


Even wikipedia can't keep the lie going....

Dixiecrat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The States' Rights Democratic Party opposed racial integration and wanted to retain Jim Crow laws and white supremacy in the face of possible federal intervention. Members were called Dixiecrats. (The term Dixiecrat is aportmanteau of Dixie, referring to the Southern United States, and Democrat.)

The party did not run local or state candidates, and after the 1948 election its leaders generally returned to the Democratic Party.[


Really?

In the decades that followed Reconstruction the Democratic Party experienced change and evolution regarding its official views on a number of issues including Civil Rights and Integration. Southern Democrats had begun to feel extremely uncomfortable in the party that they viewed as having become far too liberal. In 1947 President Harry S. Truman gave a speech to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) that called for the federal government to be the vigilant protector of the civil rights of all Americans. Truman repeated the phrase "all Americans" leaving no doubt that he meant African Americans should be among those who were guaranteed equality of opportunity. This speech was anathema to the southern Democrats who were staunch supporters of Segregation and the preservation of "white power". In 1948 the Republicans, for the second time, chose New York governor thomas e. dewey to be their presidential candidate. In July 1948 the Democrats held a convention in which they nominated Harry S. Truman, the former vice-president who had succeeded franklin d. roosevelt when the latter died on April 12, 1945. The linchpin of the 1948 Democratic Party platform became its support for civil rights legislation. Many Democrats were wary of supporting the platform because they feared that the party would splinter over the opposing views of civil rights. The delegates from the southern states were vocal in their opposition, and other delegates began to waver. Then hubert h. humphrey, the delegate from Minnesota and mayor of Minneapolis, gave a speech in which he urged his fellow delegates to "get out of the shadow of states' rights and walk forth-rightly into the bright sunshine of human rights!" Humphrey's passionate words were the catalyst for the majority of the Democratic Party delegates to vote for the platform planks that called for a federal anti-lynching law, the Abolition of poll taxes in federal elections, desegregation of the armed forces, and creation of a permanent Fair Employment Practices Committee that would prevent racial discrimination in federal jobs.
As many had feared, a majority of southern delegates, including all 22 members of the Mississippi delegation and 13 from Alabama, walked out of the convention and formed their own party—the States' Rights Democratic Party. The Dixiecrats, as they were also known, held a one-day convention on July 17, 1948, in Birmingham, Alabama, in which they nominated South Carolina governor strom thurmond for president and chose Mississippi governor Fielding L. Wright as their vice-presidential candidate.
The States' Rights Party sought to take votes from both the Democratic and Republican parties by emphasizing the sovereignty of the states and by denouncing Truman and the Democratic Party's proposed civil rights legislation as an immense threat to the states. In Alabama the Dixiecrats succeeded in preventing President Truman's name from being placed on the election ballot.
The Democratic Party was greatly weakened by the defection of the conservative Dixiecrats and also by the liberals who had left to join the Progressive Party that nominated former vice president and secretary of agriculture Henry A. Wallace to be its presidential candidate. Nevertheless, President Harry S. Truman won reelection. Although Truman was reelected over Dewey by a very narrow margin, that vote resulted in the biggest upset in the history of United States presidential campaigns.
The States' Rights Party carried South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama. Thurmond and Wright received approximately 1.2 million votes and 39 electoral votes. In 1954 Thurmond was elected as a Democratic senator. Thurmond joined with other conservative Democrats and used the filibuster and other political strategies to oppose civil rights legislation. Thurmond was reelected in 1956 and 1960. In 1964 Thurmond led a number of conservative southern national and state elected officials who switched from the Democratic to the Republican Party. Thurmond was reelected in 1966, 1972, 1978, 1984, 1990, and 1996. After being reelected in 1996 the 94-year-old Thurmond, announced that he would finish out his term but would no longer run for reelection.

Dixiecrat


And again...


Dixiecrat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The States' Rights Democratic Party opposed racial integration and wanted to retain Jim Crow laws and white supremacy in the face of possible federal intervention. Members were called Dixiecrats. (The term Dixiecrat is aportmanteau of Dixie, referring to the Southern United States, and Democrat.)

The party did not run local or state candidates, and after the 1948 election its leaders generally returned to the Democratic Party.[


You listed one guy....who stopped being a racist...off the top of my head I gave you 3....and all three of them robert byrd, al gore sr. and j. william fulbright, not only stayed in the democrat party, they were leaders in the party.........all racists...and all democrats....and LBJ was the biggest racist of all......he voted against the anti lynching laws...do you realize that?

Again.....you believe that the democrats...who supported slavery, jim crow, segregtion, lynching, poll taxes and literacy tests., using troops to keep black kids out of white schools....all of a sudden decided to switch sides and join the political party responsible for stopping all of that stuff.....you really are dumb.

You're the one arguing "my party's less racist than your party". What I'm arguing is that it's the entire system. It's America.
 
The civil war and john brown freed the slaves. Lincoln, a republican (before the dixiecrats took over the republican party during the civil rights movement upon leaving the democratic party in a snit for siding with the civil rights movement,)
was president and issued the proclamation. Hardly "conservative".


But if you're more comfortable with revisionism no one can help you. And would be kinda silly for trying. So I'll stop Stay "safe" in your illusion pard.


So genius....the rabid racists joined the actual party that actually passed the Civil Rights acts, fought along side blacks against the democrats, forced open the democrat schools in the south using federal troops......

And you really believe the racists left the democrat party to join the party that did all that.......wow.....you really need help....
Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond, etc, look it up or remain in your bubble, your choice. Bubble heads on "both" sides are too dilusional to help. I don't really mind if you choose ignorance.


And of course...you are wrong.....being a lefty you are used to that though.......

The Myth of Republican Racism, by Mona Charen, National Review

Okay, but didn’t all the old segregationist senators leave the Democratic party and become Republicans after 1964? No, just one did: Strom Thurmond. The rest remained in the Democratic party — including former Klansman Robert Byrd, who became president pro tempore of the Senate.





Former racists of both parties renounced their old views (as Kevin D. Williamson points out, Lyndon Johnson himself voted against anti-lynching laws and poll-tax repeals), and neither party has a perfect record on racial matters by any stretch.

But it is a libel to suggest that the Republican party, the anti-slavery party, the party of Lincoln, and the party that traditionally supported civil rights, anti-lynching laws, and integration, became the racist party after 1964.

The “solid south” Democratic voting pattern began to break down not in the 1960s in response to civil rights but in the 1950s in response to economic development and the Cold War.

(Black voters in the north, who had been reliable Republicans, began to abandon the GOP in response to the New Deal, encouraged by activists like Robert Vann to “turn Lincoln’s picture to the wall. That debt has been paid in full.”)

In the 1940s, the GOP garnered only about 25 percent of southern votes.

The big break came with Eisenhower’s victories. Significant percentages of white southerners voted for Ike even though the Democratic party remained firmly segregationist and even though Eisenhower backed two civil-rights bills and enforced the Brown decision by federalizing the National Guard.

They also began to send GOP representatives to the House. These Republican gains came not from the most rural and “deep south” regions, but rather from the newer cities and suburbs. If the new southern Republican voters were white racists, one would have expected Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia to be the first to turn.


Instead, as Gerard Alexander notes in “The Myth of the Racist Republicans,” the turn toward the GOP began in Virginia, North Carolina, Texas, Tennessee, and Florida. Eisenhower did best in the peripheral states.

Alexander concludes: “The GOP’s southern electorate was not rural, nativist, less educated, afraid of change, or concentrated in the . . . Deep South. It was disproportionately suburban, middle-class, educated, young, non-native southern, and concentrated in the growth points that were the least ‘Southern’ parts of the south.”

Read more at: The Myth of Republican Racism, by Mona Charen, National Review

No one doubts that you can find a link and stay in your illusion, that's exactly what the National Review is all about. I'll leave my fellow citizens to make up their own minds about your party. All it takes to be a "libera leftist" is to disagree with you, that's all it means. lSome rubes still think that America's founding was all about freedom too.


Yes....the Founding of the United States was all about freedom....you have that right........that is why democrats and the left hate the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.....all they want is power...and those two things limit their ability to amass power....

The founders were about liberty and equality for land holding affluent white males only. Look into it.
 
Yes......all meant to enslave blacks but they no longer needed whips, chains and nooses to do it....and look at how well blacks have done under this democrat benevolence......

What black folk have suffered in America is American. Has nothing to do with political parties at all.


Even wikipedia can't keep the lie going....

Dixiecrat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The States' Rights Democratic Party opposed racial integration and wanted to retain Jim Crow laws and white supremacy in the face of possible federal intervention. Members were called Dixiecrats. (The term Dixiecrat is aportmanteau of Dixie, referring to the Southern United States, and Democrat.)

The party did not run local or state candidates, and after the 1948 election its leaders generally returned to the Democratic Party.[


Really?

In the decades that followed Reconstruction the Democratic Party experienced change and evolution regarding its official views on a number of issues including Civil Rights and Integration. Southern Democrats had begun to feel extremely uncomfortable in the party that they viewed as having become far too liberal. In 1947 President Harry S. Truman gave a speech to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) that called for the federal government to be the vigilant protector of the civil rights of all Americans. Truman repeated the phrase "all Americans" leaving no doubt that he meant African Americans should be among those who were guaranteed equality of opportunity. This speech was anathema to the southern Democrats who were staunch supporters of Segregation and the preservation of "white power". In 1948 the Republicans, for the second time, chose New York governor thomas e. dewey to be their presidential candidate. In July 1948 the Democrats held a convention in which they nominated Harry S. Truman, the former vice-president who had succeeded franklin d. roosevelt when the latter died on April 12, 1945. The linchpin of the 1948 Democratic Party platform became its support for civil rights legislation. Many Democrats were wary of supporting the platform because they feared that the party would splinter over the opposing views of civil rights. The delegates from the southern states were vocal in their opposition, and other delegates began to waver. Then hubert h. humphrey, the delegate from Minnesota and mayor of Minneapolis, gave a speech in which he urged his fellow delegates to "get out of the shadow of states' rights and walk forth-rightly into the bright sunshine of human rights!" Humphrey's passionate words were the catalyst for the majority of the Democratic Party delegates to vote for the platform planks that called for a federal anti-lynching law, the Abolition of poll taxes in federal elections, desegregation of the armed forces, and creation of a permanent Fair Employment Practices Committee that would prevent racial discrimination in federal jobs.
As many had feared, a majority of southern delegates, including all 22 members of the Mississippi delegation and 13 from Alabama, walked out of the convention and formed their own party—the States' Rights Democratic Party. The Dixiecrats, as they were also known, held a one-day convention on July 17, 1948, in Birmingham, Alabama, in which they nominated South Carolina governor strom thurmond for president and chose Mississippi governor Fielding L. Wright as their vice-presidential candidate.
The States' Rights Party sought to take votes from both the Democratic and Republican parties by emphasizing the sovereignty of the states and by denouncing Truman and the Democratic Party's proposed civil rights legislation as an immense threat to the states. In Alabama the Dixiecrats succeeded in preventing President Truman's name from being placed on the election ballot.
The Democratic Party was greatly weakened by the defection of the conservative Dixiecrats and also by the liberals who had left to join the Progressive Party that nominated former vice president and secretary of agriculture Henry A. Wallace to be its presidential candidate. Nevertheless, President Harry S. Truman won reelection. Although Truman was reelected over Dewey by a very narrow margin, that vote resulted in the biggest upset in the history of United States presidential campaigns.
The States' Rights Party carried South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama. Thurmond and Wright received approximately 1.2 million votes and 39 electoral votes. In 1954 Thurmond was elected as a Democratic senator. Thurmond joined with other conservative Democrats and used the filibuster and other political strategies to oppose civil rights legislation. Thurmond was reelected in 1956 and 1960. In 1964 Thurmond led a number of conservative southern national and state elected officials who switched from the Democratic to the Republican Party. Thurmond was reelected in 1966, 1972, 1978, 1984, 1990, and 1996. After being reelected in 1996 the 94-year-old Thurmond, announced that he would finish out his term but would no longer run for reelection.

Dixiecrat


And again...


Dixiecrat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The States' Rights Democratic Party opposed racial integration and wanted to retain Jim Crow laws and white supremacy in the face of possible federal intervention. Members were called Dixiecrats. (The term Dixiecrat is aportmanteau of Dixie, referring to the Southern United States, and Democrat.)

The party did not run local or state candidates, and after the 1948 election its leaders generally returned to the Democratic Party.[


You listed one guy....who stopped being a racist...off the top of my head I gave you 3....and all three of them robert byrd, al gore sr. and j. william fulbright, not only stayed in the democrat party, they were leaders in the party.........all racists...and all democrats....and LBJ was the biggest racist of all......he voted against the anti lynching laws...do you realize that?

Again.....you believe that the democrats...who supported slavery, jim crow, segregtion, lynching, poll taxes and literacy tests., using troops to keep black kids out of white schools....all of a sudden decided to switch sides and join the political party responsible for stopping all of that stuff.....you really are dumb.

You're the one arguing "my party's less racist than your party". What I'm arguing is that it's the entire system. It's America.


No...I am arguing that the Republican party doesn't care about race...that is why we don't offer handouts based on the color of people's skin...notice which party actually does that.......
 
So genius....the rabid racists joined the actual party that actually passed the Civil Rights acts, fought along side blacks against the democrats, forced open the democrat schools in the south using federal troops......

And you really believe the racists left the democrat party to join the party that did all that.......wow.....you really need help....
Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond, etc, look it up or remain in your bubble, your choice. Bubble heads on "both" sides are too dilusional to help. I don't really mind if you choose ignorance.


And of course...you are wrong.....being a lefty you are used to that though.......

The Myth of Republican Racism, by Mona Charen, National Review

Okay, but didn’t all the old segregationist senators leave the Democratic party and become Republicans after 1964? No, just one did: Strom Thurmond. The rest remained in the Democratic party — including former Klansman Robert Byrd, who became president pro tempore of the Senate.





Former racists of both parties renounced their old views (as Kevin D. Williamson points out, Lyndon Johnson himself voted against anti-lynching laws and poll-tax repeals), and neither party has a perfect record on racial matters by any stretch.

But it is a libel to suggest that the Republican party, the anti-slavery party, the party of Lincoln, and the party that traditionally supported civil rights, anti-lynching laws, and integration, became the racist party after 1964.

The “solid south” Democratic voting pattern began to break down not in the 1960s in response to civil rights but in the 1950s in response to economic development and the Cold War.

(Black voters in the north, who had been reliable Republicans, began to abandon the GOP in response to the New Deal, encouraged by activists like Robert Vann to “turn Lincoln’s picture to the wall. That debt has been paid in full.”)

In the 1940s, the GOP garnered only about 25 percent of southern votes.

The big break came with Eisenhower’s victories. Significant percentages of white southerners voted for Ike even though the Democratic party remained firmly segregationist and even though Eisenhower backed two civil-rights bills and enforced the Brown decision by federalizing the National Guard.

They also began to send GOP representatives to the House. These Republican gains came not from the most rural and “deep south” regions, but rather from the newer cities and suburbs. If the new southern Republican voters were white racists, one would have expected Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia to be the first to turn.


Instead, as Gerard Alexander notes in “The Myth of the Racist Republicans,” the turn toward the GOP began in Virginia, North Carolina, Texas, Tennessee, and Florida. Eisenhower did best in the peripheral states.

Alexander concludes: “The GOP’s southern electorate was not rural, nativist, less educated, afraid of change, or concentrated in the . . . Deep South. It was disproportionately suburban, middle-class, educated, young, non-native southern, and concentrated in the growth points that were the least ‘Southern’ parts of the south.”

Read more at: The Myth of Republican Racism, by Mona Charen, National Review

No one doubts that you can find a link and stay in your illusion, that's exactly what the National Review is all about. I'll leave my fellow citizens to make up their own minds about your party. All it takes to be a "libera leftist" is to disagree with you, that's all it means. lSome rubes still think that America's founding was all about freedom too.


Yes....the Founding of the United States was all about freedom....you have that right........that is why democrats and the left hate the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.....all they want is power...and those two things limit their ability to amass power....

The founders were about liberty and equality for land holding affluent white males only. Look into it.


Wrong...if they were only for the affluent they would not have created the form of government we have....look it up........our system does not easily give power to the powerful....it restricts power as much as possible...no other country ever had that, and our Founders built that into the constitution......
 
What black folk have suffered in America is American. Has nothing to do with political parties at all.


Even wikipedia can't keep the lie going....

Dixiecrat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The States' Rights Democratic Party opposed racial integration and wanted to retain Jim Crow laws and white supremacy in the face of possible federal intervention. Members were called Dixiecrats. (The term Dixiecrat is aportmanteau of Dixie, referring to the Southern United States, and Democrat.)

The party did not run local or state candidates, and after the 1948 election its leaders generally returned to the Democratic Party.[


Really?

In the decades that followed Reconstruction the Democratic Party experienced change and evolution regarding its official views on a number of issues including Civil Rights and Integration. Southern Democrats had begun to feel extremely uncomfortable in the party that they viewed as having become far too liberal. In 1947 President Harry S. Truman gave a speech to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) that called for the federal government to be the vigilant protector of the civil rights of all Americans. Truman repeated the phrase "all Americans" leaving no doubt that he meant African Americans should be among those who were guaranteed equality of opportunity. This speech was anathema to the southern Democrats who were staunch supporters of Segregation and the preservation of "white power". In 1948 the Republicans, for the second time, chose New York governor thomas e. dewey to be their presidential candidate. In July 1948 the Democrats held a convention in which they nominated Harry S. Truman, the former vice-president who had succeeded franklin d. roosevelt when the latter died on April 12, 1945. The linchpin of the 1948 Democratic Party platform became its support for civil rights legislation. Many Democrats were wary of supporting the platform because they feared that the party would splinter over the opposing views of civil rights. The delegates from the southern states were vocal in their opposition, and other delegates began to waver. Then hubert h. humphrey, the delegate from Minnesota and mayor of Minneapolis, gave a speech in which he urged his fellow delegates to "get out of the shadow of states' rights and walk forth-rightly into the bright sunshine of human rights!" Humphrey's passionate words were the catalyst for the majority of the Democratic Party delegates to vote for the platform planks that called for a federal anti-lynching law, the Abolition of poll taxes in federal elections, desegregation of the armed forces, and creation of a permanent Fair Employment Practices Committee that would prevent racial discrimination in federal jobs.
As many had feared, a majority of southern delegates, including all 22 members of the Mississippi delegation and 13 from Alabama, walked out of the convention and formed their own party—the States' Rights Democratic Party. The Dixiecrats, as they were also known, held a one-day convention on July 17, 1948, in Birmingham, Alabama, in which they nominated South Carolina governor strom thurmond for president and chose Mississippi governor Fielding L. Wright as their vice-presidential candidate.
The States' Rights Party sought to take votes from both the Democratic and Republican parties by emphasizing the sovereignty of the states and by denouncing Truman and the Democratic Party's proposed civil rights legislation as an immense threat to the states. In Alabama the Dixiecrats succeeded in preventing President Truman's name from being placed on the election ballot.
The Democratic Party was greatly weakened by the defection of the conservative Dixiecrats and also by the liberals who had left to join the Progressive Party that nominated former vice president and secretary of agriculture Henry A. Wallace to be its presidential candidate. Nevertheless, President Harry S. Truman won reelection. Although Truman was reelected over Dewey by a very narrow margin, that vote resulted in the biggest upset in the history of United States presidential campaigns.
The States' Rights Party carried South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama. Thurmond and Wright received approximately 1.2 million votes and 39 electoral votes. In 1954 Thurmond was elected as a Democratic senator. Thurmond joined with other conservative Democrats and used the filibuster and other political strategies to oppose civil rights legislation. Thurmond was reelected in 1956 and 1960. In 1964 Thurmond led a number of conservative southern national and state elected officials who switched from the Democratic to the Republican Party. Thurmond was reelected in 1966, 1972, 1978, 1984, 1990, and 1996. After being reelected in 1996 the 94-year-old Thurmond, announced that he would finish out his term but would no longer run for reelection.

Dixiecrat


And again...


Dixiecrat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The States' Rights Democratic Party opposed racial integration and wanted to retain Jim Crow laws and white supremacy in the face of possible federal intervention. Members were called Dixiecrats. (The term Dixiecrat is aportmanteau of Dixie, referring to the Southern United States, and Democrat.)

The party did not run local or state candidates, and after the 1948 election its leaders generally returned to the Democratic Party.[


You listed one guy....who stopped being a racist...off the top of my head I gave you 3....and all three of them robert byrd, al gore sr. and j. william fulbright, not only stayed in the democrat party, they were leaders in the party.........all racists...and all democrats....and LBJ was the biggest racist of all......he voted against the anti lynching laws...do you realize that?

Again.....you believe that the democrats...who supported slavery, jim crow, segregtion, lynching, poll taxes and literacy tests., using troops to keep black kids out of white schools....all of a sudden decided to switch sides and join the political party responsible for stopping all of that stuff.....you really are dumb.

You're the one arguing "my party's less racist than your party". What I'm arguing is that it's the entire system. It's America.


No...I am arguing that the Republican party doesn't care about race...that is why we don't offer handouts based on the color of people's skin...notice which party actually does that.......

Jesus fuck, you're even more lost than I thought. Enjoy your partisanshit, G'day.
 
What black folk have suffered in America is American. Has nothing to do with political parties at all.


Even wikipedia can't keep the lie going....

Dixiecrat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The States' Rights Democratic Party opposed racial integration and wanted to retain Jim Crow laws and white supremacy in the face of possible federal intervention. Members were called Dixiecrats. (The term Dixiecrat is aportmanteau of Dixie, referring to the Southern United States, and Democrat.)

The party did not run local or state candidates, and after the 1948 election its leaders generally returned to the Democratic Party.[


Really?

In the decades that followed Reconstruction the Democratic Party experienced change and evolution regarding its official views on a number of issues including Civil Rights and Integration. Southern Democrats had begun to feel extremely uncomfortable in the party that they viewed as having become far too liberal. In 1947 President Harry S. Truman gave a speech to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) that called for the federal government to be the vigilant protector of the civil rights of all Americans. Truman repeated the phrase "all Americans" leaving no doubt that he meant African Americans should be among those who were guaranteed equality of opportunity. This speech was anathema to the southern Democrats who were staunch supporters of Segregation and the preservation of "white power". In 1948 the Republicans, for the second time, chose New York governor thomas e. dewey to be their presidential candidate. In July 1948 the Democrats held a convention in which they nominated Harry S. Truman, the former vice-president who had succeeded franklin d. roosevelt when the latter died on April 12, 1945. The linchpin of the 1948 Democratic Party platform became its support for civil rights legislation. Many Democrats were wary of supporting the platform because they feared that the party would splinter over the opposing views of civil rights. The delegates from the southern states were vocal in their opposition, and other delegates began to waver. Then hubert h. humphrey, the delegate from Minnesota and mayor of Minneapolis, gave a speech in which he urged his fellow delegates to "get out of the shadow of states' rights and walk forth-rightly into the bright sunshine of human rights!" Humphrey's passionate words were the catalyst for the majority of the Democratic Party delegates to vote for the platform planks that called for a federal anti-lynching law, the Abolition of poll taxes in federal elections, desegregation of the armed forces, and creation of a permanent Fair Employment Practices Committee that would prevent racial discrimination in federal jobs.
As many had feared, a majority of southern delegates, including all 22 members of the Mississippi delegation and 13 from Alabama, walked out of the convention and formed their own party—the States' Rights Democratic Party. The Dixiecrats, as they were also known, held a one-day convention on July 17, 1948, in Birmingham, Alabama, in which they nominated South Carolina governor strom thurmond for president and chose Mississippi governor Fielding L. Wright as their vice-presidential candidate.
The States' Rights Party sought to take votes from both the Democratic and Republican parties by emphasizing the sovereignty of the states and by denouncing Truman and the Democratic Party's proposed civil rights legislation as an immense threat to the states. In Alabama the Dixiecrats succeeded in preventing President Truman's name from being placed on the election ballot.
The Democratic Party was greatly weakened by the defection of the conservative Dixiecrats and also by the liberals who had left to join the Progressive Party that nominated former vice president and secretary of agriculture Henry A. Wallace to be its presidential candidate. Nevertheless, President Harry S. Truman won reelection. Although Truman was reelected over Dewey by a very narrow margin, that vote resulted in the biggest upset in the history of United States presidential campaigns.
The States' Rights Party carried South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama. Thurmond and Wright received approximately 1.2 million votes and 39 electoral votes. In 1954 Thurmond was elected as a Democratic senator. Thurmond joined with other conservative Democrats and used the filibuster and other political strategies to oppose civil rights legislation. Thurmond was reelected in 1956 and 1960. In 1964 Thurmond led a number of conservative southern national and state elected officials who switched from the Democratic to the Republican Party. Thurmond was reelected in 1966, 1972, 1978, 1984, 1990, and 1996. After being reelected in 1996 the 94-year-old Thurmond, announced that he would finish out his term but would no longer run for reelection.

Dixiecrat


And again...


Dixiecrat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The States' Rights Democratic Party opposed racial integration and wanted to retain Jim Crow laws and white supremacy in the face of possible federal intervention. Members were called Dixiecrats. (The term Dixiecrat is aportmanteau of Dixie, referring to the Southern United States, and Democrat.)

The party did not run local or state candidates, and after the 1948 election its leaders generally returned to the Democratic Party.[


You listed one guy....who stopped being a racist...off the top of my head I gave you 3....and all three of them robert byrd, al gore sr. and j. william fulbright, not only stayed in the democrat party, they were leaders in the party.........all racists...and all democrats....and LBJ was the biggest racist of all......he voted against the anti lynching laws...do you realize that?

Again.....you believe that the democrats...who supported slavery, jim crow, segregtion, lynching, poll taxes and literacy tests., using troops to keep black kids out of white schools....all of a sudden decided to switch sides and join the political party responsible for stopping all of that stuff.....you really are dumb.

You're the one arguing "my party's less racist than your party". What I'm arguing is that it's the entire system. It's America.


No...I am arguing that the Republican party doesn't care about race...that is why we don't offer handouts based on the color of people's skin...notice which party actually does that.......


You have been sold lies by the democrat party......they control the teachers unions..the ones spreading the lies......and you suffer for it...
 
Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond, etc, look it up or remain in your bubble, your choice. Bubble heads on "both" sides are too dilusional to help. I don't really mind if you choose ignorance.


And of course...you are wrong.....being a lefty you are used to that though.......

The Myth of Republican Racism, by Mona Charen, National Review

Okay, but didn’t all the old segregationist senators leave the Democratic party and become Republicans after 1964? No, just one did: Strom Thurmond. The rest remained in the Democratic party — including former Klansman Robert Byrd, who became president pro tempore of the Senate.





Former racists of both parties renounced their old views (as Kevin D. Williamson points out, Lyndon Johnson himself voted against anti-lynching laws and poll-tax repeals), and neither party has a perfect record on racial matters by any stretch.

But it is a libel to suggest that the Republican party, the anti-slavery party, the party of Lincoln, and the party that traditionally supported civil rights, anti-lynching laws, and integration, became the racist party after 1964.

The “solid south” Democratic voting pattern began to break down not in the 1960s in response to civil rights but in the 1950s in response to economic development and the Cold War.

(Black voters in the north, who had been reliable Republicans, began to abandon the GOP in response to the New Deal, encouraged by activists like Robert Vann to “turn Lincoln’s picture to the wall. That debt has been paid in full.”)

In the 1940s, the GOP garnered only about 25 percent of southern votes.

The big break came with Eisenhower’s victories. Significant percentages of white southerners voted for Ike even though the Democratic party remained firmly segregationist and even though Eisenhower backed two civil-rights bills and enforced the Brown decision by federalizing the National Guard.

They also began to send GOP representatives to the House. These Republican gains came not from the most rural and “deep south” regions, but rather from the newer cities and suburbs. If the new southern Republican voters were white racists, one would have expected Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia to be the first to turn.


Instead, as Gerard Alexander notes in “The Myth of the Racist Republicans,” the turn toward the GOP began in Virginia, North Carolina, Texas, Tennessee, and Florida. Eisenhower did best in the peripheral states.

Alexander concludes: “The GOP’s southern electorate was not rural, nativist, less educated, afraid of change, or concentrated in the . . . Deep South. It was disproportionately suburban, middle-class, educated, young, non-native southern, and concentrated in the growth points that were the least ‘Southern’ parts of the south.”

Read more at: The Myth of Republican Racism, by Mona Charen, National Review

No one doubts that you can find a link and stay in your illusion, that's exactly what the National Review is all about. I'll leave my fellow citizens to make up their own minds about your party. All it takes to be a "libera leftist" is to disagree with you, that's all it means. lSome rubes still think that America's founding was all about freedom too.


Yes....the Founding of the United States was all about freedom....you have that right........that is why democrats and the left hate the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.....all they want is power...and those two things limit their ability to amass power....

The founders were about liberty and equality for land holding affluent white males only. Look into it.


Wrong...if they were only for the affluent they would not have created the form of government we have....look it up........our system does not easily give power to the powerful....it restricts power as much as possible...no other country ever had that, and our Founders built that into the constitution......


and our Founders built that into the constitution...... totally leaving out women, black folk, poor whites, native peoples, amd on and on, but hey, nevermind.
 
Back
Top Bottom