Democrats and Ghetto's, They own them

[S.J.]

The only way to heal these places is jobs. Someone has to risk capital to open up and employ these citizens at more than Welfare rate. Industry? Factories? You have to teach them to clean up, show up, respect, not steal, not backtalk, no violence...........day by day for years. It is clear they are not learning well at home or school. They have to want it. The Politicans have to not screw things up. is it too late?

As long as Democrats are in charge of those cities nothing will change. If it did, they would be out of power.

 

[francoHFW]

Where is Jack Kemp, the last GOPer who did anything for the poor, discriminated against blacks? Of course blacks elect Dems- they know where the racists are duh...The OP is total bs.

They know where the handouts are.

Way to blame the victims of Pub policy. Crap jobs, pay, college loans, training, tax cuts for the rich and giant corps, a corrupt depression/bust, infrastructure falling apart, the stupidest wars EVER, etc. And 7 years of total obstruction. You think cutting affirmative action helps? Jeeesh.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

I live in a Red controlled area. It's gotten so bad that I bought a gun for protection of my home. It's not Blacks or Browns that are running rampant, it's whites. Any place that is ecomonically hurting will end up like this. And whatever the majority of the population for race will be doing the crime. Outside of my Military time, I have never before now to have the need of a handgun. So don't give me this crap that it's all about the Democrats and blue areas.

 

[Lumpy 1]

The only way to heal these places is jobs. Someone has to risk capital to open up and employ these citizens at more than Welfare rate. Industry? Factories? You have to teach them to clean up, show up, respect, not steal, not backtalk, no violence...........day by day for years. It is clear they are not learning well at home or school. They have to want it. The Politicans have to not screw things up. is it too late?

It's generational and Democrats have zero interest in improvement, they're getting the votes, getting away with their racist lies and they only hope the trend will continue.

They prefer to forget about all Americans screwed over and unaccounted for in the unemployment lie, bring up the Labor Participation rate and close to 100 million Americans not represented and it simply doesn't matter to them, they love the unemployment figure lie.

 

[HenryBHough]

Anybody notice how pogo avoids the topic in most threads, and instead goes after spelling, grammar, punctuation? One would almost think he's trying to change the subject. Hmm.

"He"?

 

[browsing deer]

What we have is multi ethic areas, not walled in, and the residents are free to leave. Ghettos of paris and frankfurt and Vienna had some wealthy residents who were not permitted to be out after dark.

Ghettos are a different thing than slums

 

[S.J.]

Anybody notice how pogo avoids the topic in most threads, and instead goes after spelling, grammar, punctuation? One would almost think he's trying to change the subject. Hmm.

"He"?

Okay, IT.

 

[Lumpy 1]

I live in a Red controlled area. It's gotten so bad that I bought a gun for protection of my home. It's not Blacks or Browns that are running rampant, it's whites. Any place that is ecomonically hurting will end up like this. And whatever the majority of the population for race will be doing the crime. Outside of my Military time, I have never before now to have the need of a handgun. So don't give me this crap that it's all about the Democrats and blue areas.

Well, at least you've noticed there's a problem..granted, you don't understand why just yet.

 

[leftwinger]

I live in a Red controlled area. It's gotten so bad that I bought a gun for protection of my home. It's not Blacks or Browns that are running rampant, it's whites. Any place that is ecomonically hurting will end up like this. And whatever the majority of the population for race will be doing the crime. Outside of my Military time, I have never before now to have the need of a handgun. So don't give me this crap that it's all about the Democrats and blue areas.

I believe you. I understand. Wide open borders and drug flow for 24 years can bring down any nation. We are living it. I don't doubt Meth and Heroin has seeped into your area and made criminals out of druggies. Or we could say on a National scale that you not need gun 8 years ago now you do? But we all know that not true. The RINO did nothing about the southern border either as prior to him.

 

[asaratis]

The article leaves out the sixth way that entitlement programs create inner-city ghettos. The welfare whores that keep having babies to increase their stipend will lose the money if there's a man in the household. This encourages fatherless homes...and gangs.

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

 

[francoHFW]

I live in a Red controlled area. It's gotten so bad that I bought a gun for protection of my home. It's not Blacks or Browns that are running rampant, it's whites. Any place that is ecomonically hurting will end up like this. And whatever the majority of the population for race will be doing the crime. Outside of my Military time, I have never before now to have the need of a handgun. So don't give me this crap that it's all about the Democrats and blue areas.

Well, at least you've noticed there's a problem..granted, you don't understand why just yet.

GREAT, you noticed!
The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 30 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 30 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – Congratulations to Emmanuel Saez
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb...able=58&Freq=Qtr&FirstYear=2008&LastYear=2010
4 = http://www.prudentbear.com/index.php/household-sector-debt-of-gdp
4 = http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/current/
5/6 = http://www.businessinsider.com/15-c...lity-in-america-2010-4?slop=1#slideshow-start

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

 

[Eaglewings]

Eeekkkkk Wrong!

Red States Are Welfare Queens
Red States Are Welfare Queens

As it turns out, it is red states that are overwhelmingly the Welfare Queen States. Yes, that's right. Red States — the ones governed by folks who think government is too big and spending needs to be cut — are a net drain on the economy, taking in more federal spending than they pay out in federal taxes. They talk a good game, but stick Blue States with the bill.

.. Democrats created, control and maintain every ghetto in America and their voters support it...bottom line.

So you do not want to provide true documented link to back yourself up.

So in my opinion ( which I am sure you will ignore ) this thread Fails....0 facts just

BTW: the city where I live is mainly democrats, and it is richest city in the United States...

Notice I have a link?
This Is the Richest City in America





.
.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Ghetto's form because there isn't enough funding for education, isn't enough high paying jobs and the infrastructure is turning to shit.

Also not enough police. Op, do you believe in Police?

Socialism only creates despair, poverty controlled by huge government...

70% of all r&d investment in the 40's through 70's was funded by the government
Science spending was higher
We built and paved the highways
We cleaned up the air
The middle class was as strong as it ever was in history
The rich paid their taxes

Funny how this did the opposite of what you say....Ever since reagan this country has been going backwards.
Rustic. Take a economics class.

 

[francoHFW]

The article leaves out the sixth way that entitlement programs create inner-city ghettos. The welfare whores that keep having babies to increase their stipend will lose the money if there's a man in the household. This encourages fatherless homes...and gangs.

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

So do crap jobs, pay, college loans, training, tax cuts for the rich and giant corps, a corrupt depression/bust, infrastructure falling apart, the stupidest wars EVER, etc. And 7 years of total obstruction. Now they have health care (w/o going on welfare) and free birth control anyway...

 

[ScienceRocks]

I live in a Red controlled area. It's gotten so bad that I bought a gun for protection of my home. It's not Blacks or Browns that are running rampant, it's whites. Any place that is ecomonically hurting will end up like this. And whatever the majority of the population for race will be doing the crime. Outside of my Military time, I have never before now to have the need of a handgun. So don't give me this crap that it's all about the Democrats and blue areas.

Well, at least you've noticed there's a problem..granted, you don't understand why just yet.

GREAT, you noticed!
The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 30 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 30 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – Congratulations to Emmanuel Saez
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
4 = Federated Prudent Bear Fund (A): Overview
4 = FRB: Z.1 Release--Financial Accounts of the United States--December 10, 2015
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

Between Nixon trade and Reagans small government at all cost = cluster ****.

 

[Lumpy 1]

I live in a Red controlled area. It's gotten so bad that I bought a gun for protection of my home. It's not Blacks or Browns that are running rampant, it's whites. Any place that is ecomonically hurting will end up like this. And whatever the majority of the population for race will be doing the crime. Outside of my Military time, I have never before now to have the need of a handgun. So don't give me this crap that it's all about the Democrats and blue areas.

Well, at least you've noticed there's a problem..granted, you don't understand why just yet.

GREAT, you noticed!
The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 30 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 30 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – Congratulations to Emmanuel Saez
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
4 = Federated Prudent Bear Fund (A): Overview
4 = FRB: Z.1 Release--Financial Accounts of the United States--December 10, 2015
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

The Democrat Party war on American capitalism and higher tax rates have made America non-competitive in the world economy. Blame the rich, the entrepreneurs willing to take the big chances and corporations but poor people don't produce jobs and opportunities.

 

[Eaglewings]

Blacks elect Dems because they are uneducated--especially when it comes to politics.

Ask a black man how he votes, and he will tell you Democrat. Ask him why, and he will tell you because the Republican party is for the rich. Ask him who told him that, and he will tell you the Democrats.

Why do Democrat run cities turn into ghettos? Because they are mini socialist entities. Imagine if they are able to turn our entire country that way. Bernie Sanders would be so proud.

 

[francoHFW]

I live in a Red controlled area. It's gotten so bad that I bought a gun for protection of my home. It's not Blacks or Browns that are running rampant, it's whites. Any place that is ecomonically hurting will end up like this. And whatever the majority of the population for race will be doing the crime. Outside of my Military time, I have never before now to have the need of a handgun. So don't give me this crap that it's all about the Democrats and blue areas.

Well, at least you've noticed there's a problem..granted, you don't understand why just yet.

GREAT, you noticed!
The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 30 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 30 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – Congratulations to Emmanuel Saez
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
4 = Federated Prudent Bear Fund (A): Overview
4 = FRB: Z.1 Release--Financial Accounts of the United States--December 10, 2015
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

The Democrat Party war on American capitalism and higher tax rates have made America non-competitive in the world economy. Blame the rich, the entrepreneurs willing to take the big chances and corporations but poor people don't produce jobs and opportunities.

It's gone to hell under Reaganism, dupe. duh. WE NEED DEMAND- look at the savings rates. The rich and giant corps don't pay their fair share while screwing the nonrich. That's YOU too.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Tell China, india or any other sane country on earth to stop investing and do full blown austerity!!! They will laugh in your ******* face!

 

[Eaglewings]

Liberal strategy 101: When you have no argument, attack the punctuation.

..and suddenly they get lazy and incapable of searching the internet to make their case.

You said it you find a link.until then you fail....haaaaa so laughable....cracking me up