Democrat "Slavers Party"

[Lumpy 1]

If the Democrats are the party of Slavery, then the Republicans are the party that burned down The South and subverted the Constitutional process with the 14th Amendment's ratification.

Here's a link to study up on the Fourteenth Amendment...

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Luissa]

Eh yeah whiners, Southerners had slaves and they ended up voting Democratic Party .... and there's a substantiation history of Democratic racism..Democrats are the party of racists.



If the best you can do is whine about a few years while the Democratic Party was developing and you can rationalize away your racist history, well, so what's new...

^^^^ ignores history and facts.

Yes, democrats owned slaves. No they were not the original slavers. Yes, slavery ended 150+ years ago. Bryd is also dead, and democrats don't control most southern states today. Can we move on now?


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Eh yeah whiners, Southerners had slaves and they ended up voting Democratic Party .... and there's a substantiation history of Democratic racism..Democrats are the party of racists.



If the best you can do is whine about a few years while the Democratic Party was developing and you can rationalize away your racist history, well, so what's new...

^^^^ ignores history and facts.

Yes, democrats owned slaves. No they were not the original slavers. Yes, slavery ended 150+ years ago. Bryd is also dead, and democrats don't control most southern states today. Can we move on now?


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

You are welcome to move-on or put your head in the sand or who knows what..

..as long as the Democrats push this racist nonsense with their party backed race baiting professionals the country will never heal..

 

[S.J.]

Eh yeah whiners, Southerners had slaves and they ended up voting Democratic Party .... and there's a substantiation history of Democratic racism..Democrats are the party of racists.



If the best you can do is whine about a few years while the Democratic Party was developing and you can rationalize away your racist history, well, so what's new...

^^^^ ignores history and facts.

Yes, democrats owned slaves. No they were not the original slavers. Yes, slavery ended 150+ years ago. Bryd is also dead, and democrats don't control most southern states today. Can we move on now?


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

Yes, he's dead, but the Democrats embraced him and had nothing but praise for him until he died.

 

[Luissa]

Eh yeah whiners, Southerners had slaves and they ended up voting Democratic Party .... and there's a substantiation history of Democratic racism..Democrats are the party of racists.







If the best you can do is whine about a few years while the Democratic Party was developing and you can rationalize away your racist history, well, so what's new...

^^^^ ignores history and facts.



Yes, democrats owned slaves. No they were not the original slavers. Yes, slavery ended 150+ years ago. Bryd is also dead, and democrats don't control most southern states today. Can we move on now?





Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

Yes, he's dead, but the Democrats embraced him and had nothing but praise for him until he died.

Yes, Dems like him praised him, then later praised him for denouncing the KKK and racial intolerance. Good thing we get wiser with age.
I condemn his past, and I think it is great he reformed his views. Your point?
Good thing the democrats changed their views on segregation and slavery. Of course we could keep bringing up the past, and also make up history as we go, that is fun too.


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

 

[S.J.]

^^^^ ignores history and facts.



Yes, democrats owned slaves. No they were not the original slavers. Yes, slavery ended 150+ years ago. Bryd is also dead, and democrats don't control most southern states today. Can we move on now?





Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

Yes, he's dead, but the Democrats embraced him and had nothing but praise for him until he died.

Yes, Dems like him praised him, then later praised him for denouncing the KKK and racial intolerance. Good thing we get wiser with age.
I condemn his past, and I think it is great he reformed his views. Your point?
Good thing the democrats changed their views on segregation and slavery. Of course we could keep bringing up the past, and also make up history as we go, that is fun too.


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

He didn't reform his views, he received the KKK newsletter the whole time he was denouncing them (not that it would matter to you).

 

[Luissa]

Yes, he's dead, but the Democrats embraced him and had nothing but praise for him until he died.

Yes, Dems like him praised him, then later praised him for denouncing the KKK and racial intolerance. Good thing we get wiser with age.

I condemn his past, and I think it is great he reformed his views. Your point?

Good thing the democrats changed their views on segregation and slavery. Of course we could keep bringing up the past, and also make up history as we go, that is fun too.





Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

He didn't reform his views, he received the KKK newsletter the whole time he was denouncing them (not that it would matter to you).

It really doesn't. I didn't follow him too much when he was alive, and I especially don't care now that he is dead.


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

 

[Luissa]

Do you have proof of your statement?


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

 

[Pogo]

If the Democrats are the party of Slavery, then the Republicans are the party that burned down The South and subverted the Constitutional process with the 14th Amendment's ratification.

Here's a link to study up on the Fourteenth Amendment...

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A link -- from the anti-historians who places the Democratic party in control of building the Pyramids

Can't make this stuff up.

Hey Lumpy -- The Republic Party [sic] invented the bubonic plague. Deal with it.

 

[S.J.]

Yes, Dems like him praised him, then later praised him for denouncing the KKK and racial intolerance. Good thing we get wiser with age.

I condemn his past, and I think it is great he reformed his views. Your point?

Good thing the democrats changed their views on segregation and slavery. Of course we could keep bringing up the past, and also make up history as we go, that is fun too.





Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

He didn't reform his views, he received the KKK newsletter the whole time he was denouncing them (not that it would matter to you).

It really doesn't. I didn't follow him too much when he was alive, and I especially don't care now that he is dead.


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

Just like I predicted. Nothing matters to you except that he had a "D" after his name. He could be a child murderer and you wouldn't care as long as he's a Democrat. Thank you for confirming.

 

[Luissa]

He didn't reform his views, he received the KKK newsletter the whole time he was denouncing them (not that it would matter to you).

It really doesn't. I didn't follow him too much when he was alive, and I especially don't care now that he is dead.





Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

Just like I predicted. Nothing matters to you except that he had a "D" after his name. He could be a child murderer and you wouldn't care as long as he's a Democrat. Thank you for confirming.

Actually that has nothing to do with it. I just don't care. Which is why I don't care too much about what dead republicans did.


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

 

[S.J.]

It really doesn't. I didn't follow him too much when he was alive, and I especially don't care now that he is dead.





Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

Just like I predicted. Nothing matters to you except that he had a "D" after his name. He could be a child murderer and you wouldn't care as long as he's a Democrat. Thank you for confirming.

Actually that has nothing to do with it. I just don't care. Which is why I don't care too much about what dead republicans did.


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

You represent the ignorance of most Democrats. Thank you, once again, and please keep posting.

 

[jon_berzerk]

nothing like making millions of once self supporting individuals

dependent on government subsidies to afford health care

where will it end

when the whole of the country is one big reservation

where the government promises to take of your every need

and delivers on little if any

Pine Ridge Indian Reservation Picture | South Dakota Native American Reservation is One of Nation's Poorest - ABC News

 

[Pogo]

He didn't reform his views, he received the KKK newsletter the whole time he was denouncing them (not that it would matter to you).

It really doesn't. I didn't follow him too much when he was alive, and I especially don't care now that he is dead.


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

Just like I predicted. Nothing matters to you except that he had a "D" after his name. He could be a child murderer and you wouldn't care as long as he's a Democrat. Thank you for confirming.

Apparently you're the one(s) counting letters -- it's the only pseudo-point you simpletons seem capable of articulating.

The fact is, racists exist and have existed, in sufficient numbers to make them targets for political exploitation by any political movement that could make hay out of them -- whether that was in the old daze when the "solid South" meant a Democratic stronghold where Republican influence was all but nonexistent, or in our modern era when the "Southern Strategy" where the exact opposite is the case.

Does that make either of those parties "racist" by nature, even within their own time?

Actually no, it doesn't. It makes both of them opportunists in those times. The racists aren't the knights in that dynamic; they're the pawns.

As for how and why these events got started, in the middle of the 19th Century the Whigs were dead; the Republican Party had only been formed in 1854, and six years later the war erupted with the first Republican President, who vanquished the South in a deeply traumatic national wound. Now think about it -- with what party would you expect the vanquished to go with in that situation -- the Greens?

Racism/opportunism: know the difference.

 

[Luissa]

Just like I predicted. Nothing matters to you except that he had a "D" after his name. He could be a child murderer and you wouldn't care as long as he's a Democrat. Thank you for confirming.

Actually that has nothing to do with it. I just don't care. Which is why I don't care too much about what dead republicans did.





Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

You represent the ignorance of most Democrats. Thank you, once again, and please keep posting.

I am not a democrat.
What ignorance? Because I am not stuck in the past.


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

 

[S.J.]

It really doesn't. I didn't follow him too much when he was alive, and I especially don't care now that he is dead.


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

Just like I predicted. Nothing matters to you except that he had a "D" after his name. He could be a child murderer and you wouldn't care as long as he's a Democrat. Thank you for confirming.

Apparently you're the one(s) counting letters -- it's the only pseudo-point you simpletons seem capable of articulating.

The fact is, racists exist and have existed, in sufficient numbers to make them targets for political exploitation by any political movement that could make hay out of them -- whether that was in the old daze when the "solid South" meant a Democratic stronghold where Republican influence was all but nonexistent, or in our modern era when the "Southern Strategy" where the exact opposite is the case.

Does that make either of those parties "racist" by nature, even within their own time?

Actually no, it doesn't. It makes both of them opportunists in those times. The racists aren't the knights in that dynamic; they're the pawns.

As for how and why these events got started, in the middle of the 19th Century the Whigs were dead; the Republican Party had only been formed in 1854, and six years later the war erupted with the first Republican President, who vanquished the South in a deeply traumatic national wound. Now think about it -- with what party would you expect the vanquished to go with in that situation -- the Greens?

Racism/opportunism: know the difference.

Look who's defending racists.

 

[Luissa]

Just like I predicted. Nothing matters to you except that he had a "D" after his name. He could be a child murderer and you wouldn't care as long as he's a Democrat. Thank you for confirming.

Apparently you're the one(s) counting letters -- it's the only pseudo-point you simpletons seem capable of articulating.



The fact is, racists exist and have existed, in sufficient numbers to make them targets for political exploitation by any political movement that could make hay out of them -- whether that was in the old daze when the "solid South" meant a Democratic stronghold where Republican influence was all but nonexistent, or in our modern era when the "Southern Strategy" where the exact opposite is the case.



Does that make either of those parties "racist" by nature, even within their own time?



Actually no, it doesn't. It makes both of them opportunists in those times. The racists aren't the knights in that dynamic; they're the pawns.



As for how and why these events got started, in the middle of the 19th Century the Whigs were dead; the Republican Party had only been formed in 1854, and six years later the war erupted with the first Republican President, who vanquished the South in a deeply traumatic national wound. Now think about it -- with what party would you expect the vanquished to go with in that situation -- the Greens?



Racism/opportunism: know the difference.

Look who's defending racists.

Such an idiot.


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

 

[Lumpy 1]

If the Democrats are the party of Slavery, then the Republicans are the party that burned down The South and subverted the Constitutional process with the 14th Amendment's ratification.

Here's a link to study up on the Fourteenth Amendment...

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A link -- from the anti-historians who places the Democratic party in control of building the Pyramids

Can't make this stuff up.

Hey Lumpy -- The Republic Party [sic] invented the bubonic plague. Deal with it.

I find your little tantrum humorous...The visual includes you stamping your tiny feet and sniveling like a 3 year old girl...Thanks

 

[Lumpy 1]

Actually that has nothing to do with it. I just don't care. Which is why I don't care too much about what dead republicans did.





Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

You represent the ignorance of most Democrats. Thank you, once again, and please keep posting.

I am not a democrat.
What ignorance? Because I am not stuck in the past.


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

Embrace your Democrat-ism..I do understand your embarrassment though...

 

[Pogo]

Here's a link to study up on the Fourteenth Amendment...

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A link -- from the anti-historians who places the Democratic party in control of building the Pyramids

Can't make this stuff up.

Hey Lumpy -- The Republic Party [sic] invented the bubonic plague. Deal with it.

I find your little tantrum humorous...The visual includes you stamping your tiny feet and sniveling like a 3 year old girl...Thanks

And I envy your power of imagination, if not your inability to channel it. More than that I envy your charmingly flippant disregard of factual history. I'm sure that saves a ton of work.

But no worries, the rest of us will continue to fix your fables and fill in context. Somebody's gotta do it; obviously it's over your head.

"Mo-om! They're throwing facts again!!"
What a whiner.