Democrat Prosecutor: Trump Should Not Be Allowed to Defend Himself

[Weatherman2020]

Democrats go full fascist part 380 in a continuing series.

Trump should be barred from blaming others for Jan. 6 riot at trial: Special counsel​

If a defendant chooses to blame space aliens, that is for the defendant to choose and the jury to decide if it really was space aliens. But Democrats know he can defend himself, so are now taking actions to ensure the kangaroo court finds a guilty verdict.

MSN

www.msn.com

 

[hjmick]

Blaming another party for a crime is a common tactic for a defendant. The idea, obviously, is to hopefully instill reasonable doubt. Sometimes the claim is even true, most times it isn't. It's up to the prosecutor to convince a jury otherwise. I'm not a lawyer, but I can think of no reason why a judge would deny this defense tactic. And this is coming from a guy who does not like the defendant.

Now, as far as irrelevant statements about drooling Joe, I can understand the desire to prevent campaigning from the courtroom.

 

[rampart]

Democrats go full fascist part 380 in a continuing series.

Trump should be barred from blaming others for Jan. 6 riot at trial: Special counsel​

If a defendant chooses to blame space aliens, that is for the defendant to choose and the jury to decide if it really was space aliens. But Democrats know he can defend himself, so are now taking actions to ensure the kangaroo court finds a guilty verdict.

MSN

www.msn.com

the courts have been pretty tough on "defamation" lately. trump can blame me if he wants.

trump has blamed others for his deficiencies for 70 odd years. why stop now?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

SCOTUS will likely overturn Colorado's collosal blunder and the Dems will look stupid... again

 

[luiza]

The Donald continues to run rings about a bunch of very seriously panicked individuals .

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Typical of the orange liar, blame everyone but himself.
Trump has done that his entire life.

 

[rampart]

SCOTUS will likely overturn Colorado's collosal blunder and the Dems will look stupid... again

the suit was brought by a "group eligible to vote in the republican party." no democrats were plaintiffs.

edit : primary of course, not party.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

the suit was brought by a "group eligible to vote in the republican party." no democrats were plaintiffs.

I don't give two shits, Rump. It'll be overturned and you'll cry... again

Get out of fantasy and into reality. You won't be continuously disappointed

 

[j-mac]

Typical of the orange liar, blame everyone but himself.
Trump has done that his entire life.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Democrats go full fascist part 380 in a continuing series.

Trump should be barred from blaming others for Jan. 6 riot at trial: Special counsel​

If a defendant chooses to blame space aliens, that is for the defendant to choose and the jury to decide if it really was space aliens. But Democrats know he can defend himself, so are now taking actions to ensure the kangaroo court finds a guilty verdict.

MSN

www.msn.com

I would let Trump say whatever he wants.
When he can't prove shit, as usual, he gets a perjury charge for each statement.

Nothing But the Truth: What Happens When You Lie Under ...​

FindLaw
https://www.findlaw.com › ... › Criminal Charges
Sep 8, 2023 — The penalty for a federal perjury crime includes fines and imprisonment for up to five years. Judges have the discretion to use leniency ...

 

[irosie91]

I don't give two shits, Rump. It'll be overturned and you'll cry... again

Get out of fantasy and into reality. You won't be continuously disappointed

it's kinda funny---I never heard of an accused person NOT BEING ALLOWED to defend himself------sheeeeeeesh

 

[SassyIrishLass]

it's kinda funny---I never heard of an accused person NOT BEING ALLOWED to defend himself------sheeeeeeesh

Welcome to demoquack clown world

They're insane

 

[Weatherman2020]

Blaming another party for a crime is a common tactic for a defendant. The idea, obviously, is to hopefully instill reasonable doubt. Sometimes the claim is even true, most times it isn't. It's up to the prosecutor to convince a jury otherwise. I'm not a lawyer, but I can think of no reason why a judge would deny this defense tactic. And this is coming from a guy who does not like the defendant.

Now, as far as irrelevant statements about drooling Joe, I can understand the desire to prevent campaigning from the courtroom.

Only fascists deny people their Constitutional Rights.
Congrats.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Only fascists deny people their Constitutional Rights.
Congrats.

If it wasn't so comical and sad it'd be ridiculous

 

[hjmick]

Only fascists deny people their Constitutional Rights.
Congrats.

Feel free to point out the part that you think is fascist. At no point in my post to I suggest anyone's Constitutional rights should be denied.

 

[Vrenn]

I don't give two shits, Rump. It'll be overturned and you'll cry... again

Get out of fantasy and into reality. You won't be continuously disappointed

Yes, it should be overturned for now since Rump has not been convicted of insurrection yet. But it's the first shot by the Republicans. Rumps days are numbered and sooner or later, he's going to be treated just like Charles Manson who did not participate in the murders.

 

[JoeB131]

Democrats go full fascist part 380 in a continuing series.

Trump should be barred from blaming others for Jan. 6 riot at trial: Special counsel​

If a defendant chooses to blame space aliens, that is for the defendant to choose and the jury to decide if it really was space aliens. But Democrats know he can defend himself, so are now taking actions to ensure the kangaroo court finds a guilty verdict.

None of those people would have stormed the Capitol had Trump not spent months riling them up.

They are all going to jail, so should he.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Yes, it should be overturned for now since Rump has not been convicted of insurrection yet. But it's the first shot by the Republicans. Rumps days are numbered and sooner or later, he's going to be treated just like Charles Manson who did not participate in the murders.

Whatever Vera

 

[Seymour Flops]

This is a common police and prosecutorial mindset and tactic. The ridicule what they call "the SODI defense," meaning Some Other Dude Did It. But really, there are only two defenses to an accusation of a crime: 1) There was no crime, and 2) I didn't commit the crime. If the defendant didn't commit the crime, then "some other dude" did. So, the majority of defendants employ the SODI defense, and prosecutors don't like it. Eats into their winning record, and besides, so they think, most defendants are scumbags anyway, so if they didn't do this one, the did plenty of others.

I suppose the prosecutors would ask, "if Trump didn't do it, who did?" The answer is obvious: The rioters did the riot. They have been punished far out of proportion for their crimes, but they did it. If anyone else is to blame, I'd look to the FBI plants, that the FBI still refuses to say were not there, or what they were doing if they were. I'd blame them before I blame the guy who told the demonstrators to go peacefully to the Capitol and protest.

We see how unfair it is to try to deprive the defendant of his most obvious defense when it is a famous person like Trump. But it happens every day in every country. Police, prosecutors, and their puppets on Grand Juries bring people to trial. By the time the trial jury sees the case, it has been packages like a Hollywood production, and the defendant stands little chance.

Unless - like Donald Trump - they have the resources to fight back.

 

[Seymour Flops]

None of those people would have stormed the Capitol had Trump not spent months riling them up.

Free speech is supposed to rile people up, sometimes. You thinki all those pro-Hamas protesters are trying to keep everyone calm? Are you calling for them to go to jail, also?

If Democrats don't like Trump or anyone else saying that they stole an election, they should stop cheating to win electons.