Democrat judges are destroying the Democratic Party


Doesn’t change the fact that the MAGA movement is fascist. :dunno:
You all throw that word around a lot. Never occured to you that it is the democratic party that is most correlated to fascism.

Why don't YOU just admit that you support a fascist political party ?(Democrats) who, have everything in common with fascist regimes.
1. Support BIG, powerful government.
2. Engage in excessive regulation of businesses and people.
3. Support gun control/confiscation, (call for repeal of 2nd amendment)
4. Lock people up without bail, trial, or any due process of law for over a year.
5. Support suppression of free speech (Twitter, Facebook, Microsoft)
6. Label ordinary citizens (parents) as "domestic terrorists"
7. Try to lock political opponents (Trump) up in jail, with laughingstock bogus "charges". Actually Do lock some of them up (Bannon, Manafort, Navarro, Jan 6 protesters)
8. Try to assassinate POTUS of rival party (Ford, Reagan, Trump-twice)
 
Last edited:
You all throw that word around a lot. Never occured to you that it is the democratic party that is most correlated to fascism.

Why don't YOU just admit that you support a fascist political party ?(Democrats) who, have everything in common with fascist regimes.
1. Support BIG, powerful government.
2. Engage in excessive regulation of businesses and people.
3. Support gun control/confiscation, (call for repeal of 2nd amendment)
4. Lock people up without bail, trial, or any due process of law for over a year.
5. Support suppression of free speech (Twitter, Facebook, Microsoft)
6. Label ordinary citizens (parents) as "domestic terrorists"
I go by actions, not yer buk larnin! If it smells like a dead possum; it ain’t a rose.
 
I go by actions, not yer buk larnin! If it smells like a dead possum; it ain’t a rose.
You smell like a seditious useful idiot who wants child sex trafficking and fentanyl distribution brought to our country in order to destroy us from within.
 
THIS IS AWESOME *****

Democrat JUDGE-SHOPPING lawfare is about to come to a screeching HALT. Sorry Dems, you got too big for your britches,, Forgot that Republicans control all 3 branches of the govt huh ?

New bill threatens to cripple 'judicial tyranny' from derailing Trump's agenda at every turn​

Story by Andrew Miller

3 min read

FIRST ON FOX: GOP Rep. Darrell Issa has introduced a bill aimed at preventing federal judges from issuing nationwide injunctions with the sole purpose of derailing a president’s political agenda, which Issa says has been the case since President Donald Trump was sworn in.

The legislation, known as the No Rogue Rulings Act (NORRA), amends Chapter 85 of title 28, United 5 States Code by adding a "Limitation on authority to provide injunctive relief."'

"Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no United States district court shall issue any order providing for injunctive relief, except in the case of such an order that is applicable only to limit the actions of a party to the case before such district court with respect to the party seeking injunctive relief from such district court," the legislation states.

Dozens of activist and legal groups, elected officials, local jurisdictions and individuals have launched more than 50 lawsuits against the Trump administration since Jan. 20 in response to his more than 60 executive orders, as well as executive proclamations and memos, Fox News Digital reported earlier this month.

Issa says NORRA would limit the scope of nationwide injunctions by preventing federal judges from issuing injunctions that extend beyond parties directly involved in a case, while also ensuring that any injunction restricts only the specific parties requesting relief, regardless of whether the injunction involves outright enforcement of actions or policy actions.

"The founders could never have envisioned judges and part of the legislative branch teaming up to tie down the executive and disempower the people," Issa told Fox News Digital, adding that the current judge-shopping climate in the United States amounts to "judicial tyranny" and a "weaponization of courts."

Issa's office told Fox News Digital they are optimistic that this is a bill that will pass through Congress with Republican support and be signed by President Trump, adding that the bill has "maximum momentum."

"Nowhere in our Constitution is a single federal judge given absolute power over the President or the people of the United States," Issa posted on X last week.

Issa's bill comes as the Trump administration has publicly pushed back against the flurry of injunctions from courts across the country.

"Many outlets in this room have been fear mongering the American people into believing there is a constitutional crisis taking place here at the White House," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said during a press briefing last week. "I've been hearing those words a lot lately, but in fact, the real constitutional crisis is taking place within our judicial branch, where district court judges in liberal districts across the country are abusing their power to unilaterally block President Trump's basic executive authority."

"We believe these judges are acting as judicial activists rather than honest arbiters of the law and they have issued at least 12 injunctions against this administration in the past 14 days, often without citing any evidence or grounds for their lawsuits," she continued. "This is part of a larger concerted effort by Democrat activists, and nothing more than the continuation of the weaponization of justice against President Trump."

1742609637310.webp
 
Last edited:
It's OVER Democrats. Nice try (except that you sunk your party's approval rating).

All the things Democrats thought they would stop, with activist judges, are now going to proceed FULL SPEED AHEAD.
 
15th post
The worst nightmare of the Democratic Party has arrived. It is Democrat judges appointed by Barrack Obama and Joe Biden.
These judges have been issuing court orders to block President Trump's executive orders (89 since Jan. 20, 2025). There have been more blockages of EOs by these Democrat judges against Trump in just 2 months, than there were against Joe Biden over the course of 4 entire years.
That assertion lacks context. It reminds me of K. Leavitt saying there have been more injunctions against the trump admin than in all of US history.
The context that's lacking is the reason for all the injunctions is the illegal actions trumples are pursuing. It's like saying trump is being persecuted because he's the only criminally indicted prez. Leaving out the context that it's because he committed crimes.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom