Dem congressman Swalwell wants VOTE BY PHONE. Calls it "max out democracy"

:auiqs.jpg:One time he looks off and you make a big deal about it, but Bannon looks homeless all the time and gets a pass!
What are you talking about? That's how he always looks anymore...greasy hair and unkempt beard. 🙄
 
Those on welfare who are us citizens are us citizens so your suggestion that they not be allowed to vote is stupid .
You are the stupid one . Many states ban felons from voting even though are citizens. THINK
 
Actually, couldn't phone voting or online voting be programmed to allow only one vote per Social Security number?

That way, no Social Security number could be used more than once in a vote tally.

Sure, if somebody has stolen a Social Security number, only the vote of the original owner or the identify thief would be counted depending on who voted first.

But that would be the only fraud committed in voting. You wouldn't have multiple votes by the same person or identifying factor.

Other online voting systems, including polls such as the one on this site, don't allow you to vote more than once using your username, unless of course you have sock accounts.

But Social Security numbers are not sock accounts. Any fraud could only be committed once using a Social Security number.
 
He’s clearly owned by the CCP. Dembots are puppets for Xi
 

Dem congressman Swalwell wants VOTE BY PHONE.​


I used to do some telecom design work and know the phone system well. I'd have to think about it, but offhand, I'd say the idea has some feasibility to it but a system would have to be set up first with parity that could recognize the number, run the account, then have the number of people there eligible to vote that it could take each name out of the database as their vote is registered.

And being wholly machine-oriented, the system would be dependent on key presses and voice-recognition to take all of the related info over the phone. Maybe a person would register to vote by phone, and they could leave the system a sampling of their voice for the computer to voice-match against when voting for better security.

Then there is the problem of the phone system only being designed to handle traffic flows based on average usage patterns. If everybody had to call in all on the same day from 8AM to 8PM to phone in their votes, there would undoubtedly be overflow of resources with a lot of calls kicked out to intercept to call back later and try again. I can see a lot of angry people ending up trying for hours and not getting through or time running out before they registered their vote. Then that would lead to all kinds of lawsuits, no doubt.

Naturally, this would take years to set up and billions to implement with probably more years to get all the bugs out of it. And to think, all it used to take to vote was a simple machine which punched holes in a card.

It would only have go go through innumerable trunk lines to pair-gain, back through the central office mainframes where anybody can access the lines, then through the switches out to the CLECS with about a thousand opportunities per voter to corrupt that database with fraud and cheating.

Yep, another Democrat idea.
 
How about in person with a photo ID and fingerprints.

Verified in a National Database that once a vote is cast, no other votes from that person in the USA.

Seems secure.
 
People vote twice all the time.

Register in more than one state and mail in.

You now voted twice, including federal elections.

Michael Moore bragged about voting in 2 states.
 
The idea of voting by phone can be explored. Regardless of the medium by which we vote, the process should always be multi-factor authentication to prove and validate your identity and eligibility. We do bank by phone and do healthcare by phone.

As for Swalwell, given his lack of judgment and recklessness in getting involved with a Chinese spy, I wouldn’t trust any vote by mail system he designed.
 
" Mentally Retarded Ideas "

* Your Mamma Is Stupid *

You are the stupid one . Many states ban felons from voting even though are citizens. THINK
So are those on welfare are equivalent with felons ?

Unless the citizens are dead or incarcerated , the presumption that they are not allowed to vote is stupid .
 
Last edited:
" In Person With Valid ID Ensures Independence Of The Vote BY Stopping Intimidation Impersonation And Vote Buying "

* Loony Tunes Want Finger Prints DNA A Stool Sample And An Ass Print *

How about in person with a photo ID and fingerprints.
Verified in a National Database that once a vote is cast, no other votes from that person in the USA.
Seems secure.
id.me provides identity authentication services for social security agency and now they require a video conference with identification credentials in hand , after which mfa code is accepted with a paired device , or email , but even that can be compromised if someone has access to the device , or email .

The closet homosexual religious zealots want everyone to register with the department of public safety for an online digital id , to verify that one is an adult and for tracking private activities , without valid proof that viewing adult content online constitutes a significant risk to public safety or security .
 
Back
Top Bottom