mga138
This is why I MUST repeatedly post the data on I.Q.
You repeat IQ stuff because that's you run out of knowledge But you don't want to prove you just want to keep repeating the same over and over again.
If you are trying to ground IQ as a genetic product of race the very first thing you NEED to do is
offer up a genetic or biological definition of race, something no one has not done nor has any
study.
.
No-one has shown that human variation is great enough to account for differences of IQ, nor has
anyone established the veracity of IQ as a legitimate measurement.
No one has provided an inextricable link between genetics, race, and IQ outside of methodologically flawed correlations.
Which are those “races” then, purely scientically speaking and in clear text ?
What are the precise genetic criteria for making this classiffication ?
However you twist it, you will run in circles and eventually spiral back into concepts based on human perception alone.
Do you even know what a scientific fact is ?
A scientific fact is that rain water freezes at 0°C at a pressure of 1 bar.
There’s no human choice involved. It’s observable and reproducible anywhere by anybody in the exact same way
Not just that but intelligence, as many people here have pointed out is not something quantifiable(not sure if that is a word) you can’t measure how intelligent someone is, because to begin with you would have to be able to define intelligence very specifically and that can’t be done because intelligence, like many words that define brain functions is an umbrella term that describes several properties of thought(communication, reasoning, understanding) working in tandem.
But can you define intelligence ?
But you ignore all this. You ignore all the question people ask then you just go back to repeating youurself again.