Debunking the rightwing "class warfare" retard rhetoric

[editec]

Unless one lives in a classless society, pretty much every policy and law of the nation will have different outcomes for people in different socio-economic classes, folks.

There's just no way of avoiding that reality.

Of course recognizing that this is the case is not class warfare, either.

 

[rightwinger]

The rightwingers like to make the bogus claim that higher taxes on the rich constitutes "class warfare," but conveniently ignore the fact that their efforts to cut funding for the poor and disadvantaged, unemployment assistance, funding to schools, funding to improve inner city decay, etc, are all examples of the worst kind of class warfare in themselves.

Of course they like to make their own form of class warfare under the mask of calling it "fiscal conservatism," but we all know the deal about Republican "fiscal conservatism. As I posted in another thread, Republitards are the party of big government and deficits, in the past 30 years not one Republitard president has presided over a surplus while and office and each year the size of government grew while the rich got richer and the poor got poorer, so can the real party of class warfare please stand up?

Well said..

We have been engaged in class warfare against the working class for thirty years. They work more hours, two income families....yet home ownership, healthcare, education are becoming harder to obtain

Meanwhile, the wealthiest class has ensured that they obtain a larger percentage of wealth and income

 

[bripat9643]

So now you want me to give to charity, which I do, and to give the government more, but you are going to take a pass on giving the government more since you donate to charity? Please.

You're the one whining about the poor. If you want to give them your money, have at it. Why you think anyone else is obligated to fund libtard pet causes is what I can't fathom.

 

[bripat9643]

Unfortunately the opportunity for this passed some 20 years ago, it will also require investment in education and training programs to ensure a workforce capable of producing high-quality goods.

One more reason to abolish our atrocious system of government miseducation.

 

[rightwinger]

So now you want me to give to charity, which I do, and to give the government more, but you are going to take a pass on giving the government more since you donate to charity? Please.

You're the one whining about the poor. If you want to give them your money, have at it. Why you think anyone else is obligated to fund libtard pet causes is what I can't fathom.

It warms my heart to see that Dickensonian America is alive and well

 

[bripat9643]

So now you want me to give to charity, which I do, and to give the government more, but you are going to take a pass on giving the government more since you donate to charity? Please.

You're the one whining about the poor. If you want to give them your money, have at it. Why you think anyone else is obligated to fund libtard pet causes is what I can't fathom.

It warms my heart to see that Dickensonian America is alive and well

what the **** is "Dickensonian America?" Turds like you have been coveting other people's money since time immemorial.

The only thing new in this world is that some people have come to realize that they are entitled to keep what they earn.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

That's why the data I posted proves Clinton did preside over a surplus and you keep believing lies.

No Clinton did not have a surplus
In 2001 we had a National Debt of $5.807463 trillion and a deficit of $133.29 billion
In 2000 National Debt was $5.674178 trillion and a deficit of $17.91 billion
In 1999 National Debt was $5.656270 trillion and a deficit of $130.08 billion
So go ahead tell another lie.

So you think clinton had a surplus?

Damn those pesky facts!!

Q: During the Clinton administration was the federal budget balanced? Was the federal deficit erased?

A: Yes to both questions, whether you count Social Security or not.

The Budget and Deficit Under Clinton | FactCheck.org

.

FACT CHECK IS ANNEBERG remember the board obama was a member of.

Damn those pesky facts.

In 2001 we had a National Debt of $5.807463 trillion and a deficit of $133.29 billion
In 2000 National Debt was $5.674178 trillion and a deficit of $17.91 billion
In 1999 National Debt was $5.656270 trillion and a deficit of $130.08 billion

Consider the following:
The sum of all Carter's claimed deficits was $252.709 billion but the national debt went up by $299.015 billion.

The sum of all Reagan's claimed deficits was $1.412228 trillion but the national debt went up by $1.859576 trillion.

The sum of Bush Sr.'s claimed deficits was $1.035646 trillion but the national debt went up by $1.554057 trillion.

The sum of Clinton's claimed deficits and surpluses actually resulted in a net surplus of $62.904 billion but the national debt went up by $1.395974 trillion--only 30% less than the increase during the Reagan administration.

The sum of George W. Bush's claimed deficits (through fiscal year 2008) was $2.131405 trillion but the national debt went up $4.217262 trillion

The sum of all the reported deficits of these five presidents is $4.769084 trillion but the national debt has gone up $9.325885 trillion!

The True Federal Deficit

 

[DaGoose]

Posted by bigrebnc1775.... "The sum of Clinton's claimed deficits and surpluses actually resulted in a net surplus of $62.904 billion"...........

Thanks for finally acknowledging that Clinton actually DID run a SURPLUS.

.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

No Clinton did not have a surplus
In 2001 we had a National Debt of $5.807463 trillion and a deficit of $133.29 billion
In 2000 National Debt was $5.674178 trillion and a deficit of $17.91 billion
In 1999 National Debt was $5.656270 trillion and a deficit of $130.08 billion
So go ahead tell another lie.

Damn those pesky facts!!

Q: During the Clinton administration was the federal budget balanced? Was the federal deficit erased?

A: Yes to both questions, whether you count Social Security or not.

The Budget and Deficit Under Clinton | FactCheck.org

.

FACT CHECK IS ANNEBERG remember the board obama was a member of.

Damn those pesky facts.

In 2001 we had a National Debt of $5.807463 trillion and a deficit of $133.29 billion
In 2000 National Debt was $5.674178 trillion and a deficit of $17.91 billion
In 1999 National Debt was $5.656270 trillion and a deficit of $130.08 billion

Consider the following:
The sum of all Carter's claimed deficits was $252.709 billion but the national debt went up by $299.015 billion.

The sum of all Reagan's claimed deficits was $1.412228 trillion but the national debt went up by $1.859576 trillion.

The sum of Bush Sr.'s claimed deficits was $1.035646 trillion but the national debt went up by $1.554057 trillion.

The sum of Clinton's claimed deficits and surpluses actually resulted in a net surplus of $62.904 billion but the national debt went up by $1.395974 trillion--only 30% less than the increase during the Reagan administration.

The sum of George W. Bush's claimed deficits (through fiscal year 2008) was $2.131405 trillion but the national debt went up $4.217262 trillion

The sum of all the reported deficits of these five presidents is $4.769084 trillion but the national debt has gone up $9.325885 trillion!

The True Federal Deficit

These damn rightwingers quote rightwing blogs because they can't access official data to support their claims. Moron, Clinton did run surpluses during his two terms which decreased national debt. He most certainly didn't spend more than the government took in.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

"Coveting other people's money and "class warfare," these rightwingers sure know how to come up with the most dishonest and divisive rhetoric in absence of actual facts.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

"Coveting other people's money and "class warfare," these rightwingers sure know how to come up with the most dishonest and divisive rhetoric in absence of actual facts.

You do want to take earned money from people after all that is what you are doing when you raise a tax on a certain group of people. You're takng away from them.

 

[Full-Auto]

That's why the data I posted proves Clinton did preside over a surplus and you keep believing lies.

Yet the national debt went up. But thanks for the LOL facts.

The deficit was reduced gradually under Clinton until he ran a surplus.

The national debt went up.

So show me the dollars!!!!!!!!

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Posted by bigrebnc1775.... "The sum of Clinton's claimed deficits and surpluses actually resulted in a net surplus of $62.904 billion but the national debt went up by $1.395974 trillion--only 30% less than the increase during the Reagan administration.

Thanks for finally acknowledging that Clinton actually DID run a SURPLUS.

.

Much better 62 billion does not cover a 1.3 trillion dollar debt. So again there was no surplus

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yet the national debt went up. But thanks for the LOL facts.

The deficit was reduced gradually under Clinton until he ran a surplus.

The national debt went up.

So show me the dollars!!!!!!!!

net surplus of $62.904 billion national debt went up by $1.395974 trillion

 

[Liability]

Figures lie and liberal Democratics figure,

so it figures that liberal Democratics lie.

 

[mudwhistle]

How about forming two countries out of what the USA is today, one capitalist based the other socialist based, and we see who does better. Everyones happy cause they get what they want.

Deal?

I've got a better solution.

Democrat want higher taxes.....let them pay them. Leave the rest of us alone.

 

[Full-Auto]

The deficit was reduced gradually under Clinton until he ran a surplus.

The national debt went up.

So show me the dollars!!!!!!!!

net surplus of $62.904 billion national debt went up by $1.395974 trillion

Where???????


Government - Historical Debt Outstanding – Annual

I can take any of my bills off budget and talk an extreme amount of smack.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The national debt went up.

So show me the dollars!!!!!!!!

net surplus of $62.904 billion national debt went up by $1.395974 trillion

Where???????


Government - Historical Debt Outstanding – Annual

I can take any of my bills off budget and talk an extreme amount of smack.

The debt went up 1.3 trillion dollars not it went up to 1.3 trillion dollars

 

[shintao]

We drop a ton of money on education and the little pukes can't even read and write on par with their grade level.Yet children of similar age in other countries are geniuses compared to our little brats....
Our kids aren't learning for a variety of reasons and it's not that we don't spend enough.

The way to fix this if you ask a Lib is we need to spend more money on education.....
Enough already...It's a joke only it's not fukin funny.

But,...but Bush said a "C" grade for American school children "IS GOOD ENOUGH!!!"

And you are talking out you ass (spending enough). Is this a Cocaine moment?

 

[shintao]

How about forming two countries out of what the USA is today, one capitalist based the other socialist based, and we see who does better. Everyones happy cause they get what they want.

Deal?

I've got a better solution.

Democrat want higher taxes.....let them pay them. Leave the rest of us alone.

I agree, by the time you get through paying the 14 Trillion accumulated by your retard presidents, you will need a break. I think we should confiscate Retard property & bank accounts to pay your fair share of the debt. That way we won't have to tax you at the point of a gun. LMAO!