Dear NRA, There Is A Scientific Consensus On Guns And Safety. And You Won't Like It.

the country with the lowest crime rate is Switzerland

they require all their citizens to be armed.

They require all male citizens to belong to the military but typical dullard gun fetishist response.


That doesn't really deny his point.

Being in the military doesn't make you a better person.

If guns are the problem, then Switzerland should have nearly the same crime and shooting problem(s) as the US.

But they don't.
every house has at least 1 AR in it and the ammo to go batshit on a lot of people.

An armed society is a polite society


Well, maybe.

It certainly is strong evidence that guns aren't the problem.
its the real world v scientific polls (opinions)

see, leftist love to quote scientist, feeling that they would never lie, for money or be wrong. And they ignore the real world results that don't confirm what the scientist told them.

the most armed society has the lowest crime rate and they have had it for a long time, but scientist tell them to get rid of guns, so they deny reality and go with theory.

like socialism. in theory it's a great idea, in reality it brings misery and pain, but leftist deny the reality and go with theory b/c a scientist said so.

Ironic given that you just used the example of a social democracy to prove that it actually works.
 
the country with the lowest crime rate is Switzerland

they require all their citizens to be armed.

They require all male citizens to belong to the military but typical dullard gun fetishist response.


That doesn't really deny his point.

Being in the military doesn't make you a better person.

If guns are the problem, then Switzerland should have nearly the same crime and shooting problem(s) as the US.

But they don't.

Switzerland has a "well regulated militia" that has trained all of their gun owners on what it means to be a responsible gun owner.

Gun fetishists in this nation lack the same discipline.

There is a another significant difference between Switzerland and the USA. They are a social democracy with safety nets and universal healthcare plus they have a well regulated economy.

None of the above applies to the USA.

Those factors all play into crime and gun violence.

Which is what the majority of the scientists in the OP know and gun fetishists like you and your ignorant ilk don't.


Being in a militia doesn't change the social factors that make people criminals. It could be responsible for any lower rate of accidents, but not lower crime rates.

Yes. Other factors play into "crime and gun violence".

And Switzerland is strong evidence that guns is not a big part of that.

I would be happy to speculate on the other causes.

But this thread is about you lib attempts to blame guns.
 
the country with the lowest crime rate is Switzerland

they require all their citizens to be armed.

They require all male citizens to belong to the military but typical dullard gun fetishist response.


That doesn't really deny his point.

Being in the military doesn't make you a better person.

If guns are the problem, then Switzerland should have nearly the same crime and shooting problem(s) as the US.

But they don't.

Switzerland has a "well regulated militia" that has trained all of their gun owners on what it means to be a responsible gun owner.

Gun fetishists in this nation lack the same discipline.

There is a another significant difference between Switzerland and the USA. They are a social democracy with safety nets and universal healthcare plus they have a well regulated economy.

None of the above applies to the USA.

Those factors all play into crime and gun violence.

Which is what the majority of the scientists in the OP know and gun fetishists like you and your ignorant ilk don't.


Being in a militia doesn't change the social factors that make people criminals. It could be responsible for any lower rate of accidents, but not lower crime rates.

Yes. Other factors play into "crime and gun violence".

And Switzerland is strong evidence that guns is not a big part of that.

I would be happy to speculate on the other causes.

But this thread is about you lib attempts to blame guns.

Lying about the OP topic isn't going to change it.

Using Switzerland as an example exposes the fact that liberal social policies work to eliminate crime and gun violence.

Compare those to the insane "more guns, less regulations" mantra of the gun fetishists in this nation and it is patently obvious that what you advocate has been, and still is, a complete and utter failure in every respect.
 
the country with the lowest crime rate is Switzerland

they require all their citizens to be armed.

They require all male citizens to belong to the military but typical dullard gun fetishist response.


That doesn't really deny his point.

Being in the military doesn't make you a better person.

If guns are the problem, then Switzerland should have nearly the same crime and shooting problem(s) as the US.

But they don't.

Switzerland has a "well regulated militia" that has trained all of their gun owners on what it means to be a responsible gun owner.

Gun fetishists in this nation lack the same discipline.

There is a another significant difference between Switzerland and the USA. They are a social democracy with safety nets and universal healthcare plus they have a well regulated economy.

None of the above applies to the USA.

Those factors all play into crime and gun violence.

Which is what the majority of the scientists in the OP know and gun fetishists like you and your ignorant ilk don't.
:rofl:

gotta bring non-sense in to defend your theory v reality.
 
the country with the lowest crime rate is Switzerland

they require all their citizens to be armed.

They require all male citizens to belong to the military but typical dullard gun fetishist response.
they are required to keep and maintain their weapons for life.

most guns and lowest crime rate plus military discipline


but lets not think about copying them, lets take away our rights b/c the government will protect us.

Non sequitur response that has nothing to do with the OP topic.

If this nation emulated the highly regulated social democracy that is Switzerland you would be screaming about "losing your freedoms" in every other area of your life.
gibberish

leftist demand we be like the eu, constantly.

but I show you success and you cry about something else.

theory v reality, you hate reality
 
the country with the lowest crime rate is Switzerland

they require all their citizens to be armed.

They require all male citizens to belong to the military but typical dullard gun fetishist response.


That doesn't really deny his point.

Being in the military doesn't make you a better person.

If guns are the problem, then Switzerland should have nearly the same crime and shooting problem(s) as the US.

But they don't.

Switzerland has a "well regulated militia" that has trained all of their gun owners on what it means to be a responsible gun owner.

Gun fetishists in this nation lack the same discipline.

There is a another significant difference between Switzerland and the USA. They are a social democracy with safety nets and universal healthcare plus they have a well regulated economy.

None of the above applies to the USA.

Those factors all play into crime and gun violence.

Which is what the majority of the scientists in the OP know and gun fetishists like you and your ignorant ilk don't.
:rofl:

gotta bring non-sense in to defend your theory v reality.

Your failure to comprehend is your problem.
 
They require all male citizens to belong to the military but typical dullard gun fetishist response.


That doesn't really deny his point.

Being in the military doesn't make you a better person.

If guns are the problem, then Switzerland should have nearly the same crime and shooting problem(s) as the US.

But they don't.
every house has at least 1 AR in it and the ammo to go batshit on a lot of people.

An armed society is a polite society


Well, maybe.

It certainly is strong evidence that guns aren't the problem.
its the real world v scientific polls (opinions)

see, leftist love to quote scientist, feeling that they would never lie, for money or be wrong. And they ignore the real world results that don't confirm what the scientist told them.

the most armed society has the lowest crime rate and they have had it for a long time, but scientist tell them to get rid of guns, so they deny reality and go with theory.

like socialism. in theory it's a great idea, in reality it brings misery and pain, but leftist deny the reality and go with theory b/c a scientist said so.

Ironic given that you just used the example of a social democracy to prove that it actually works.
Not really, since we both know it's just a matter of time before they to run out of opm
 
the country with the lowest crime rate is Switzerland

they require all their citizens to be armed.

They require all male citizens to belong to the military but typical dullard gun fetishist response.
they are required to keep and maintain their weapons for life.

most guns and lowest crime rate plus military discipline


but lets not think about copying them, lets take away our rights b/c the government will protect us.

Non sequitur response that has nothing to do with the OP topic.

If this nation emulated the highly regulated social democracy that is Switzerland you would be screaming about "losing your freedoms" in every other area of your life.
gibberish

leftist demand we be like the eu, constantly.

but I show you success and you cry about something else.

theory v reality, you hate reality

Gun fetishists like you live in a Hollywood fantasy.
 
the country with the lowest crime rate is Switzerland

they require all their citizens to be armed.

They require all male citizens to belong to the military but typical dullard gun fetishist response.


That doesn't really deny his point.

Being in the military doesn't make you a better person.

If guns are the problem, then Switzerland should have nearly the same crime and shooting problem(s) as the US.

But they don't.

Switzerland has a "well regulated militia" that has trained all of their gun owners on what it means to be a responsible gun owner.

Gun fetishists in this nation lack the same discipline.

There is a another significant difference between Switzerland and the USA. They are a social democracy with safety nets and universal healthcare plus they have a well regulated economy.

None of the above applies to the USA.

Those factors all play into crime and gun violence.

Which is what the majority of the scientists in the OP know and gun fetishists like you and your ignorant ilk don't.
:rofl:

gotta bring non-sense in to defend your theory v reality.

Your failure to comprehend is your problem.
wrong

I see reality and think if that happens here reality can repeat.
You hear theories of failed ideas and think it will still work, this time.
 
the country with the lowest crime rate is Switzerland

they require all their citizens to be armed.

They require all male citizens to belong to the military but typical dullard gun fetishist response.
they are required to keep and maintain their weapons for life.

most guns and lowest crime rate plus military discipline


but lets not think about copying them, lets take away our rights b/c the government will protect us.

Non sequitur response that has nothing to do with the OP topic.

If this nation emulated the highly regulated social democracy that is Switzerland you would be screaming about "losing your freedoms" in every other area of your life.
gibberish

leftist demand we be like the eu, constantly.

but I show you success and you cry about something else.

theory v reality, you hate reality

Gun fetishists like you live in a Hollywood fantasy.
so supporting our rights is a fetish now


fyi; I don't own a single gun and never have.

yet I support our Constitution. Why don't you?
 
They require all male citizens to belong to the military but typical dullard gun fetishist response.
they are required to keep and maintain their weapons for life.

most guns and lowest crime rate plus military discipline


but lets not think about copying them, lets take away our rights b/c the government will protect us.

Non sequitur response that has nothing to do with the OP topic.

If this nation emulated the highly regulated social democracy that is Switzerland you would be screaming about "losing your freedoms" in every other area of your life.
gibberish

leftist demand we be like the eu, constantly.

but I show you success and you cry about something else.

theory v reality, you hate reality

Gun fetishists like you live in a Hollywood fantasy.
so supporting our rights is a fetish now


fyi; I don't own a single gun and never have.

yet I support our Constitution. Why don't you?

Lying only hurts your own credibility.
 
they are required to keep and maintain their weapons for life.

most guns and lowest crime rate plus military discipline


but lets not think about copying them, lets take away our rights b/c the government will protect us.

Non sequitur response that has nothing to do with the OP topic.

If this nation emulated the highly regulated social democracy that is Switzerland you would be screaming about "losing your freedoms" in every other area of your life.
gibberish

leftist demand we be like the eu, constantly.

but I show you success and you cry about something else.

theory v reality, you hate reality

Gun fetishists like you live in a Hollywood fantasy.
so supporting our rights is a fetish now


fyi; I don't own a single gun and never have.

yet I support our Constitution. Why don't you?

Lying only hurts your own credibility.
For most on the right it really doesn't matter, having lost all credibility long ago.
 
There's scientific consensus on guns -- and the NRA won't like it

Just one more thing that may pit many conservatives against scientific inquiry. There are lots of liberals who own guns, but conservatives have a special place in their hearts for the NRA and lately a special place in their hearts for despising scientific inquiry



So I decided to determine objectively, through polling, whether there was scientific consensus on firearms. What I found won't please the National Rifle Assn.


My first step was to put together a list of relevant scientists. I decided that to qualify for the survey the researcher should have published on firearms in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and that he or she should be an active scientist — someone who had published an article in the last four years. I was interested in social science and policy issues, so I wanted the articles to be directly relevant. I was not interested in scientists doing research in forensics, history, medical treatment, psychiatric issues, engineering or non-firearms (for example, nail guns, electron guns).

Scientific consensus isn't always right, but it's our best guide to understanding the world. Can reporters please stop pretending that scientists, like politicians, are evenly divided on guns? We're not.

Let the denial begin...
So you ADMIT opinion is now substituted for facts by scientists. Thanks for the admission.
 
There's scientific consensus on guns -- and the NRA won't like it

Just one more thing that may pit many conservatives against scientific inquiry. There are lots of liberals who own guns, but conservatives have a special place in their hearts for the NRA and lately a special place in their hearts for despising scientific inquiry



So I decided to determine objectively, through polling, whether there was scientific consensus on firearms. What I found won't please the National Rifle Assn.


My first step was to put together a list of relevant scientists. I decided that to qualify for the survey the researcher should have published on firearms in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and that he or she should be an active scientist — someone who had published an article in the last four years. I was interested in social science and policy issues, so I wanted the articles to be directly relevant. I was not interested in scientists doing research in forensics, history, medical treatment, psychiatric issues, engineering or non-firearms (for example, nail guns, electron guns).

Scientific consensus isn't always right, but it's our best guide to understanding the world. Can reporters please stop pretending that scientists, like politicians, are evenly divided on guns? We're not.

Let the denial begin...
So you ADMIT opinion is now substituted for facts by scientists. Thanks for the admission.
Substituted for facts?

How in the world does somebody with more than 3 brain cells come to that conclusion RetiredGySgt No wonder I used to read you screen names as Retarded Gay Slug
 
they are required to keep and maintain their weapons for life.

most guns and lowest crime rate plus military discipline


but lets not think about copying them, lets take away our rights b/c the government will protect us.

Non sequitur response that has nothing to do with the OP topic.

If this nation emulated the highly regulated social democracy that is Switzerland you would be screaming about "losing your freedoms" in every other area of your life.
gibberish

leftist demand we be like the eu, constantly.

but I show you success and you cry about something else.

theory v reality, you hate reality

Gun fetishists like you live in a Hollywood fantasy.
so supporting our rights is a fetish now


fyi; I don't own a single gun and never have.

yet I support our Constitution. Why don't you?

Lying only hurts your own credibility.
you make a false accusation the claim I'm lying.

what a poser
 
15th post
Non sequitur response that has nothing to do with the OP topic.

If this nation emulated the highly regulated social democracy that is Switzerland you would be screaming about "losing your freedoms" in every other area of your life.
gibberish

leftist demand we be like the eu, constantly.

but I show you success and you cry about something else.

theory v reality, you hate reality

Gun fetishists like you live in a Hollywood fantasy.
so supporting our rights is a fetish now


fyi; I don't own a single gun and never have.

yet I support our Constitution. Why don't you?

Lying only hurts your own credibility.
For most on the right it really doesn't matter, having lost all credibility long ago.
You hate the Constitution, you're opposition, constant opposition, to it is our proof.

but you lie and say you support it, when your actions prove the opposite.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom