DEAD MAN VOTING: Shocking Video From New Hampshire...

Want to talk about the florida central file that kept thousands of legal American voters from voting in a presidential election?

COURT DOCUMENTED PROOF!
 
Florida Central Voter File - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


In February 2000, in a phone conversation with the BBC's London studios, ChoicePoint vice-president James Lee said that the state "wanted there to be more names than were actually verified as being a convicted felon".[5][6]

[edit] James Lee's testimony

On 17 April 2001, James Lee testified, before the McKinney panel, that the state had given DBT the directive to add to the purge list people who matched at least 90% of a last name. DBT objected, knowing that this would produce a huge number of false positives (non-felons).[7]

Lee went on saying that the state then ordered DBT to shift to an even lower threshold of 80% match, allowing also names to be reversed (thus a person named Thomas Clarence could be taken to be the same as Clarence Thomas). Besides this, middle initials were skipped, Jr. and Sr. suffixes dropped, and some nicknames and aliases were added to puff up the list.

"DBT told state officials", testified Lee, "that the rules for creating the [purge] list would mean a significant number of people who were not deceased, not registered in more than one county, or not a felon, would be included on the list. DBT made suggestions to reduce the numbers of eligible voters included on the list". According to Lee, to this suggestion the state told the company, "Forget about it".
"The people who worked on this (for DBT) are very adamant... they told them what would happen", said Lee. "The state expected the county supervisors to be the failsafe." Lee said his company will never again get involved in cleansing voting rolls. "We are not confident any of the methods used today can guarantee legal voters will not be wrongfully denied the right to vote", Lee told a group of Atlanta-area black lawmakers in March 2001.[8]
 
Last edited:
and there they go.

they think that these stupid peersonal insults will erase the court documented proof of decades of republican party cheating they had no idea exsisted until they met this poster.


Your party is the biggest election cheats in American history.

You pretend its not truth.

And you jump all over tape created by a KNOWN liar as your big proof that the republicans should be allowed to cheat yet again.

And you can't admit that the dems do the same damn thing.

congrats, you have become what you hate.

The circle is complete
bla bla bla bla bla bla bla.

I have admitted any provable case Ive been shown.

When have you dont so?

I have yet to see you admit or even acknowledge the multiple times I mentioned that 3 dems were 'convicted' last year of voter fraud.

The case against them was so strong they confessed.


there was a thread on it, and on that thread all you tried to do was change the subject and make yourself into a victim, again.

or should I say; still?
 
Florida Central Voter File - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


In February 2000, in a phone conversation with the BBC's London studios, ChoicePoint vice-president James Lee said that the state "wanted there to be more names than were actually verified as being a convicted felon".[5][6]

[edit] James Lee's testimony

On 17 April 2001, James Lee testified, before the McKinney panel, that the state had given DBT the directive to add to the purge list people who matched at least 90% of a last name. DBT objected, knowing that this would produce a huge number of false positives (non-felons).[7]

Lee went on saying that the state then ordered DBT to shift to an even lower threshold of 80% match, allowing also names to be reversed (thus a person named Thomas Clarence could be taken to be the same as Clarence Thomas). Besides this, middle initials were skipped, Jr. and Sr. suffixes dropped, and some nicknames and aliases were added to puff up the list.

"DBT told state officials", testified Lee, "that the rules for creating the [purge] list would mean a significant number of people who were not deceased, not registered in more than one county, or not a felon, would be included on the list. DBT made suggestions to reduce the numbers of eligible voters included on the list". According to Lee, to this suggestion the state told the company, "Forget about it".
"The people who worked on this (for DBT) are very adamant... they told them what would happen", said Lee. "The state expected the county supervisors to be the failsafe." Lee said his company will never again get involved in cleansing voting rolls. "We are not confident any of the methods used today can guarantee legal voters will not be wrongfully denied the right to vote", Lee told a group of Atlanta-area black lawmakers in March 2001.[8]

any convictions?
 
These casses are not some nutter saying "hey freds dead so Im going to vote for him".


These are cases of right from the top of the party the Republicans designed to keep legal Americans from voting.

They are trying to do it again and what do you peopl do?

You DEFEND THE TRAITORS!
 
COURT DOCUMENTED PROOF!

why do you pretend these cases dont exsist.

then you hump to death the tape of a known liar who has had trouble with the law.

TruthMatters said:
If you cared about election integrity you would care about the massive fraud that is completely court documented that the republicans have performed for decades.
massive fraud?
but YOU said there WAS not massive voter fraud, and that since there WAS not massive voter fraud, we do not need voter ID laws.

were you lying when you claimed there was no massive voter fraud?
 
These casses are not some nutter saying "hey freds dead so Im going to vote for him".


These are cases of right from the top of the party the Republicans designed to keep legal Americans from voting.

They are trying to do it again and what do you peopl do?

You DEFEND THE TRAITORS!

I'll take that as a no.

court documents w/o some kind of conviction are just reports put in by someone, nothing more.
 
These casses are not some nutter saying "hey freds dead so Im going to vote for him".


These are cases of right from the top of the party the Republicans designed to keep legal Americans from voting.

They are trying to do it again and what do you peopl do?

You DEFEND THE TRAITORS!

Bolded & black - need the dictionary definitions, please.

Bolded & blue - need to know why you hate apostrophes.

Bolded & purple - need translated into English.

TIA..
 
USATODAY.com - Fla. scraps flawed felon voting list


The purge of felons from voter rolls has been a thorny issue since the 2000 presidential election. A private company hired to identify ineligible voters before the election produced a list with scores of errors, and elections supervisors used it to remove voters without verifying its accuracy. A federal lawsuit led to an agreement to restore rights to thousands of voters.
 
Last edited:
Thousand of voters most of whom were black lost their right to vote in florida in 2000 because the republican party wanted it that way.
 
and there they go.

they think that these stupid peersonal insults will erase the court documented proof of decades of republican party cheating they had no idea exsisted until they met this poster.


Your party is the biggest election cheats in American history.

You pretend its not truth.

And you jump all over tape created by a KNOWN liar as your big proof that the republicans should be allowed to cheat yet again.

Please provide dictionary definitions for these words too.

And again, why do you hate apostrophes?

And also, why do you hate capital letters?

You can't fix stupid
Ron White
:cool:
 
Thousand of voters most of whom were black lost their right to vote in florida in 2000 because the republican party wanted it that way.

Thousand of voters, most of whom were black, lost their right to vote in Florida in 2000 because the Republican party wanted it that way.



Fixed that for you.

You know, there are free spell checkers available on the Internet. You should download one.
 
Thousand of voters most of whom were black lost their right to vote in florida in 2000 because the republican party wanted it that way.

TruthMatters said:
If you cared about election integrity you would care about the massive fraud that is completely court documented that the republicans have performed for decades.
massive fraud?
but YOU said there WAS not massive voter fraud, and that since there WAS not massive voter fraud, we do not need voter ID laws.

were you lying when you claimed there was no massive voter fraud?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top