David Duke to racists: Voting against Donald Trump is 'treason to your heritage'

[bendog]

Party Splinters As Nightmare Scenario Inches Toward Reality.
.. Dems Ready To Pounce... GOP Senator: I Won't Vote For Him... Scarborough: Trump KKK Talk 'Disqualifying'... Romney: 'Disgusting'... Trump Blames His Earpiece!... CLOWN TOWN: Senior Rubio Adviser Rationalizes 'Being A Part Of The Circus'... Rubio Lobs Penis Joke: 'You Know What They Say About Men With Small Hands'... Nate Silver: GOP Could Be 'On Brink Of Failure,' Unable To Stop 'Existential Threat'...

Those bustards hate their own race heritage. Go DRUMPF

 

[Correll]

Correll, yet many of our so called far right Republicans embrace racism. We see some of them here on the Board. I am glad that you have given up your nonsense the voters in LA in 1991 did not know about Duke's past. We all knew it.

This is the real definition of racism.

Full Definition of racism

1. 1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
   
   
2. 2 : racial prejudice or discrimination

David Duke is a racist, by the above definition. Not the made up crap you lefties use.

When he ran for the Presidential GOP nomination he got less than 1%.

That gives you an idea of how many on the "Right" embrace racism.

Those of you who lie about it should be ashamed of yourselves.

His defeat is not a reflection of the weakness of racism. That is a false criteria created by you that meanings nothing. We see racism on the Right and Left on this board every day.

YOu see what you want to see. It makes it easy for you to dismiss ideas that you cannot defeat based on their merits.


And you posted his "good" showing in the governor's race to support your claim of strong racism.

YOU posted words from the Republican President of the United States attacking the supposed "republican" running to be governor of a state and disowning him.

Was there ANY outcry from anyone on the Right for his actions? Calling him a Rhino, for example?

Did Jesse Helms speak out in favor of David Duke? Did Strom Thurmond?

I recall NO debate or disagreement of the issue from the Right that Duke had to lose.

Because he was an ACTUAL REAL LIFE racist and as such had no place in the Republican Party.

 

[sealybobo]

Good grief...but the Black Panthers supporting Obama wasn't racist...nope not at all.

They don't Lynch people.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Correll, yet many of our so called far right Republicans embrace racism. We see some of them here on the Board. I am glad that you have given up your nonsense the voters in LA in 1991 did not know about Duke's past. We all knew it.

This is the real definition of racism.

Full Definition of racism

1. 1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
   
   
2. 2 : racial prejudice or discrimination

David Duke is a racist, by the above definition. Not the made up crap you lefties use.

When he ran for the Presidential GOP nomination he got less than 1%.

That gives you an idea of how many on the "Right" embrace racism.

Those of you who lie about it should be ashamed of yourselves.

His defeat is not a reflection of the weakness of racism. That is a false criteria created by you that meanings nothing. We see racism on the Right and Left on this board every day.

YOu see what you want to see. It makes it easy for you to dismiss ideas that you cannot defeat based on their merits.


And you posted his "good" showing in the governor's race to support your claim of strong racism.

YOU posted words from the Republican President of the United States attacking the supposed "republican" running to be governor of a state and disowning him.

Was there ANY outcry from anyone on the Right for his actions? Calling him a Rhino, for example?

Did Jesse Helms speak out in favor of David Duke? Did Strom Thurmond?

I recall NO debate or disagreement of the issue from the Right that Duke had to lose.

Because he was an ACTUAL REAL LIFE racist and as such had no place in the Republican Party.

No racist should have a place in either party is the point, and you continue to foolishly say our right wing does not have racists.

 

[Correll]

Correll, yet many of our so called far right Republicans embrace racism. We see some of them here on the Board. I am glad that you have given up your nonsense the voters in LA in 1991 did not know about Duke's past. We all knew it.

This is the real definition of racism.

Full Definition of racism

1. 1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
   
   
2. 2 : racial prejudice or discrimination

David Duke is a racist, by the above definition. Not the made up crap you lefties use.

When he ran for the Presidential GOP nomination he got less than 1%.

That gives you an idea of how many on the "Right" embrace racism.

Those of you who lie about it should be ashamed of yourselves.

His defeat is not a reflection of the weakness of racism. That is a false criteria created by you that meanings nothing. We see racism on the Right and Left on this board every day.

YOu see what you want to see. It makes it easy for you to dismiss ideas that you cannot defeat based on their merits.


And you posted his "good" showing in the governor's race to support your claim of strong racism.

YOU posted words from the Republican President of the United States attacking the supposed "republican" running to be governor of a state and disowning him.

Was there ANY outcry from anyone on the Right for his actions? Calling him a Rhino, for example?

Did Jesse Helms speak out in favor of David Duke? Did Strom Thurmond?

I recall NO debate or disagreement of the issue from the Right that Duke had to lose.

Because he was an ACTUAL REAL LIFE racist and as such had no place in the Republican Party.

No racist should have a place in either party is the point, and you continue to foolishly say our right wing does not have racists.

Nothing you said there in anyway challenged any of my points.

YOu are mindless holding to your belief, in the face of all reason.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Correll, yet many of our so called far right Republicans embrace racism. We see some of them here on the Board. I am glad that you have given up your nonsense the voters in LA in 1991 did not know about Duke's past. We all knew it.

This is the real definition of racism.

Full Definition of racism

1. 1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
   
   
2. 2 : racial prejudice or discrimination

David Duke is a racist, by the above definition. Not the made up crap you lefties use.

When he ran for the Presidential GOP nomination he got less than 1%.

That gives you an idea of how many on the "Right" embrace racism.

Those of you who lie about it should be ashamed of yourselves.

His defeat is not a reflection of the weakness of racism. That is a false criteria created by you that meanings nothing. We see racism on the Right and Left on this board every day.

YOu see what you want to see. It makes it easy for you to dismiss ideas that you cannot defeat based on their merits.


And you posted his "good" showing in the governor's race to support your claim of strong racism.

YOU posted words from the Republican President of the United States attacking the supposed "republican" running to be governor of a state and disowning him.

Was there ANY outcry from anyone on the Right for his actions? Calling him a Rhino, for example?

Did Jesse Helms speak out in favor of David Duke? Did Strom Thurmond?

I recall NO debate or disagreement of the issue from the Right that Duke had to lose.

Because he was an ACTUAL REAL LIFE racist and as such had no place in the Republican Party.

No racist should have a place in either party is the point, and you continue to foolishly say our right wing does not have racists.

Nothing you said there in anyway challenged any of my points.

YOu are mindless holding to your belief, in the face of all reason.

Fact: there is racism in both parties.

Fact: we have far too many racists on the right of our party.

Fact: you are demonstrably wrong.

 

[Correll]

This is the real definition of racism.

Full Definition of racism

1. 1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
   
   
2. 2 : racial prejudice or discrimination

David Duke is a racist, by the above definition. Not the made up crap you lefties use.

When he ran for the Presidential GOP nomination he got less than 1%.

That gives you an idea of how many on the "Right" embrace racism.

Those of you who lie about it should be ashamed of yourselves.

His defeat is not a reflection of the weakness of racism. That is a false criteria created by you that meanings nothing. We see racism on the Right and Left on this board every day.

YOu see what you want to see. It makes it easy for you to dismiss ideas that you cannot defeat based on their merits.


And you posted his "good" showing in the governor's race to support your claim of strong racism.

YOU posted words from the Republican President of the United States attacking the supposed "republican" running to be governor of a state and disowning him.

Was there ANY outcry from anyone on the Right for his actions? Calling him a Rhino, for example?

Did Jesse Helms speak out in favor of David Duke? Did Strom Thurmond?

I recall NO debate or disagreement of the issue from the Right that Duke had to lose.

Because he was an ACTUAL REAL LIFE racist and as such had no place in the Republican Party.

No racist should have a place in either party is the point, and you continue to foolishly say our right wing does not have racists.

Nothing you said there in anyway challenged any of my points.

YOu are mindless holding to your belief, in the face of all reason.

Fact: there is racism in both parties.

Fact: we have far too many racists on the right of our party.

Fact: you are demonstrably wrong.

Saying it doesn't make it so.

YOu say I am demonstrably wrong.

Then demonstrate it.

Before you even start.

Full Definition of racism

1. 1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
   
   
2. 2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
   

 

[JakeStarkey]

Correll, you have always been and proven demonstrably wrong, so, no, you don't get "just once more." Our far right is infected with racism.

Do you deny that?

 

[Correll]

Correll, you have always been and proven demonstrably wrong, so, no, you don't get "just once more." Our far right is infected with racism.

Do you deny that?

Empty words.


YOu stated I am demonstrably wrong.

Then demonstrate it.

Before you even start.

Full Definition of racism

1. 1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
   
   
2. 2 : racial prejudice or discrimination

Demonstrate it or admit that you are wrong.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You don't get "just once more," for you have always been proven wrong on the issue of racism in our right wing, where you reside.

Yet you deny it? You must support Trump.

 

[Correll]

You don't get "just once more," for you have always been proven wrong on the issue of racism in our right wing, where you reside.

Yet you deny it? You must support Trump.

You claimed I was "demonstrably wrong" and when I call you on it, you dodge.

You are not fooling anyone here but yourself.

Here is the definition of racism again.

Full Definition of racism

1. 1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
   
   
2. 2 : racial prejudice or discrimination

Trump is winning with an issue heavy campaign, and none of those issues fit the above definition of racism.


That's the Far Right of the GOP today.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You don't get just once more when you have been proven wrong.

Fact: we have too many racists in our far right wing.

Fact: when Trump does not immediately rebuke and disavow any racist comments or endorsements, he puts himself in hot water.

It's boiling now.

 

[Correll]

You don't get just once more when you have been proven wrong.

Fact: we have too many racists in our far right wing.

Fact: when Trump does not immediately rebuke and disavow any racist comments or endorsements, he puts himself in hot water.

It's boiling now.

Calling your opinions facts, doesn't actually make them facts.

No matter how often or how confidently you do it.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You don't get just once more when you have been proven wrong.

Fact: we have too many racists in our far right wing.

Fact: when Trump does not immediately rebuke and disavow any racist comments or endorsements, he puts himself in hot water.

It's boiling now.

Calling your opinions facts, doesn't actually make them facts.

No matter how often or how confidently you do it.

Calling my facts opinions shows you have lost the discussion, Correll, so no more from you.

 

[RollingThunder]

You poor ******* rightwingnut imbeciles....just how far up your asses do you have your heads jammed anyway?

David Duke, ex-Grand Wizard of the KKK, endorsed T'Rump because he loves T'Rump's blatent racism....the same reason a great many of T'Rump's supporters love him as well. White supremist groups all over the country have been supporting T'Rump for months....even doing Robo-calls for him.

Donald Trumps Message Resonates With White Supremacists
By JONATHAN MAHLER
FEB. 29, 2016
Until recently, Jared Taylor, long one of the country’s most prominent white supremacists, had never supported a presidential candidate.

“There’s been no one worth endorsing,” he said in an interview. “I mean, for heaven’s sake, was John McCain ever going to do anything useful as far as the legitimate interests of whites are concerned?”

But Mr. Taylor believes he has finally found someone who will: Donald J. Trump.

This year, Mr. Taylor’s voice could be heard on robocalls to voters across Iowa and New Hampshire, urging them to support Mr. Trump. “We don’t need Muslims,” he said on the call. “We need smart, educated, white people who will assimilate to our culture.”

Then came Sunday — a banner day for Mr. Trump in the eyes of white-power advocates.

In an early-morning social media post, Mr. Trump approvingly reposted on Twitter a quotation from Benito Mussolini (“It is better to live one day as a lion than 100 years as a sheep”). Then, in an interview on CNN, he refused to condemn the Ku Klux Klan or David Duke, its onetime grand wizard, after Mr. Duke declared his support for Mr. Trump.

“God bless this man,” exulted the Daily Stormer, a white supremacist website.

After the CNN interview, Mr. Trump pointed to his disavowal of Mr. Duke’s support two days earlier. In an appearance on NBC’s “Today” show on Monday, he blamed a “very bad earpiece” for his equivocation. And a spokeswoman for Mr. Trump, Hope Hicks, said he broadly disavowed all white supremacist groups.

Mr. Duke took no umbrage. “I’ll laugh it off — that’s fine,” he said in an interview on Fox News Radio on Monday evening. “Donald Trump: Do whatever you need to get elected.”

Intentionally or not, Mr. Trump’s remarks are resonating with — and mobilizing — white supremacists, many of whom have traditionally refrained from participating in the political process.

He has their support, whether he wants it or not.

“I’ve never met him, and I cannot read his mind any better than you can,” said Mr. Taylor, 64, the Virginia-based founder of the New Century Foundation and editor of its website, American Renaissance. “But someone who wants to send home all illegal immigrants and at least temporarily ban Muslim immigration is acting in the interest of whites, whether consciously or not.”

It is difficult to quantify the reach of the various white-supremacist websites that are championing Mr. Trump’s cause. Mr. Taylor says American Renaissance attracts about 300,000 unique visitors a month. Another white-power site, Stormfront.org, claims to have the same number of registered users.

But however limited the practical implications of their support may be, the symbolic implications seem clear.

“You can’t help who admires you, but when white supremacists start endorsing you for president, you ought to start asking why,” said Richard Cohen, the president of the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks white-power groups.

Mr. Trump is not the first presidential candidate whose efforts to exploit a mood of mistrust and resentment across much of the electorate wound up energizing those in its most racialist corners. In the 1968 presidential race, Gov. George C. Wallace of Alabama, a champion of segregation, won five Southern states in part by appealing to racial fears in a campaign waged against the backdrop of urban riots across America. He was beaten by Richard M. Nixon, who made a subtler appeal to disaffected white voters.

More recently, in 1996, Patrick J. Buchanan assailed illegal immigration as an “invasion,” referred to Mexicans as a group as “Jose,” and elongated Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s name in a way that many critics took as anti-Semitic — saying he was using coded language to excite bigots without alienating mainstream voters.

Now, Mr. Trump is embarked on his own resentment-based campaign, and it is not limited to a single region: His commanding victories in the last three contests came in the Northeast, the South and the West.

Mr. Trump’s support among white supremacists has been building from the day he announced his candidacy, when he characterized Mexican immigrants as “rapists.”

Since then, Mr. Trump — or “the glorious leader,” as one white-power writer is calling him — has only grown more popular with that constituency, which cheered his proposal to ban all Muslim immigration and his since-debunked claim to have seen “thousands and thousands of Muslims” celebrating the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, in New Jersey.

Mr. Trump has amplified the messages of some white-power proponents himself: In January, he re-sent a Twitter message from a site called @WhiteGenocideTm. And he has done the same with statistics on black-on-white crime that were later shown to be false.

Nor was Mr. Trump’s CNN interview on Sunday the first time he had been pressed to repudiate his white supremacist supporters.

In January, when Mr. Trump was questioned about the robocalls made on his behalf in Iowa by white supremacists, including Mr. Taylor, he said that he disapproved of the calls, but that his supporters were animated by a legitimate anger over the violent crimes being committed by “illegal immigrants.”

Mr. Trump’s failure to distance himself more sharply from white-power adherents has been minutely observed in online discussion forums.

The American Freedom Party, a white power group, has a daily hourlong podcast devoted to him. And Mr. Trump will be a frequent topic at American Renaissance’s annual conference in May.

For people on the fringes of the American political right, Mr. Trump’s campaign has held out the promise of a white-power resurgence.

“The march to victory will not be won by Donald Trump in 2016, but this could be the steppingstone we need to then radicalize millions of White working and middle class families to the call to truly begin a struggle for Faith, family and folk,” Matthew Heimbach, co-founder of the Traditionalist Youth Network, wrote on the group’s website in October.